Recommended Posts

No, they aren't :(

hmm , also i don't understand why are they purposely making the nav bar taller? I mean first they landed taller tabs w.r.t the nav bar , then instead of making the tabs lil shorter , they make the nav bar even more taller :|

Lol, it's like Mozilla just can't deliver anymore. They're doing well on a few things, and many under the hood changes, but ultimately they've slipped up on the big things that the average user can really notice for the past, what, 3 versions? The home tab, new download manager, incontent UI, separate tab processes, tab animations, and even small things like moving the window controls to the right place, having a normally sized window border, or just implementing the drop marker they've had in their mockups since version 4, all take forever to implement.

I thought they had different teams working on different things, so why is it that something like a drop marker takes 9 versions to arrive?

Those versions are 6 weeks apart, not 6 months.

Expect smaller changes, more often. Even without the new process you quite probably would not have seen those things yet, and the idea for the new process is not about making obvious UI changes with every release - it's about getting whatever changes there are out the user, more quickly.

I thought they had different teams working on different things, so why is it that something like a drop marker takes 9 versions to arrive?

Keeping UX team aside , MemShrink and Snappy projects have indeed boosted like jets! Firefox 13 is the version to see such vast changes which really make UI faster. IonMonkey devs have too worked hard and now its close to other engines , few more weeks it might be faster than v8. Its only , ONLY UX team which is so forked up :/

I mean they created this UX branch , which sometimes gets UX changes later than the nightlies , and then numerous bugs of it are still not fixed/properly discussed... Instead of providing all sorts of halfbaked features , they have just added another roadblock every bug has to pass for no obvious reasons. People using UX builds are quite less than say nightly , and then even if we test UX features , they are not addressed properly anywhere (i think only Mozillazine forums have proper UX thread,nowhere else in google groups etc). I have no problem with other teams , its just so-called UX team which is a big let down...

Lol, it's like Mozilla just can't deliver anymore. They're doing well on a few things, and many under the hood changes, but ultimately they've slipped up on the big things that the average user can really notice for the past, what, 3 versions? The home tab, new download manager, incontent UI, separate tab processes, tab animations, and even small things like moving the window controls to the right place, having a normally sized window border, or just implementing the drop marker they've had in their mockups since version 4, all take forever to implement.

I thought they had different teams working on different things, so why is it that something like a drop marker takes 9 versions to arrive?

They didn't even implement the drop markers correctly. :p Not sure if someone filled a bug for it, but they forgot to update the drop marker on Windows for Add-ons Manager, next to the wrench icon.

hmm , also i don't understand why are they purposely making the nav bar taller? I mean first they landed taller tabs w.r.t the nav bar , then instead of making the tabs lil shorter , they make the nav bar even more taller :|

It also seems like they've screwed up the selected tab image seen in Heartripper's screenshot.

Mozilla, y u no use favicon?

why? what for? There this vast image and title of webpage ,or are you referring to their old design where they were going to just show the favicon instead of thumbnail ?

Brace yourself for , the big thing!

The new Download Manager has been pushed to the inbound builds , and will be disabled by default in Aurora 13. Version 13 will be a BIG hit!

post-293012-0-49958800-1331385723_thumb.

New Tab Page iteration 02 ! (Special appearance in UX Builds 9 March 2012)

Do you know by any chance if Mozilla plans to reduce the width on their tabs? I know you can do it via Stylish, but I think it improves the visual appearance of the tabs being shorter in width, similar to the mockups (which looks similar to Chrome's width). having too long of a tab just looks ugly IMO.

The new rounded tabs IMO look great on OSX, but not sure about Windows yet.

Do you know by any chance if Mozilla plans to reduce the width on their tabs? I know you can do it via Stylish, but I think it improves the visual appearance of the tabs being shorter in width, similar to the mockups (which looks similar to Chrome's width). having too long of a tab just looks ugly IMO.

The new rounded tabs IMO look great on OSX, but not sure about Windows yet.

the mockups do reflect shorter tabs (in width) , but even Firefox 4's mockups reflected the same. So we don't really know at the moment...

Yes i think mac is more "curve friendly" and seeing the gradient of new tab page and about home , it seems that firefox developers are making UI which just looks good on OSX , it seems irrelevant in Windows. With Win8 which is even more squarish , i don't know if their desing would be great. But i like it somehow for the timebeing , at least its better than regular ones

The new Download Manager has been pushed to the inbound builds...

Is there a about:config setting for UX 13.0a1 x86 to enable it? Assuming the new DM is that nice drop-down button. Strangely it worked for me yersterday on ux 64...

Is there a about:config setting for UX 13.0a1 x86 to enable it? Assuming the new DM is that nice drop-down button. Strangely it worked for me yersterday on ux 64...

it was removed from 32bit versions (and from 64bit too , but its just that its not yet updated)

will come back after sometime :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!