Recommended Posts

Some goody good bug fixes:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206438 (New Smooth scrolling algorithm - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705877 (Some speedup in CSS - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726396 (WebGL regression - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729878 (New Layout for New Tab Page - in fx-team)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673381 (Some more info in about:support - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735014 (Incremental GC related Snappy - in Inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498998 (Standard - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697006 (Desktop support for WebApps - in inbound)

Same opinion. This one is much better than current one.

Better looking but feels laggy with all the gradient rendering and fade-in-fade-out highlights when you scroll the mouse of the ones of the boxes. But it's a step in the right direction.

Mozilla may try to oust Adobe Flash away from h264 enabled systems; a plug-ing free media experience may await us:

Asa Dotzler

Post reply

More message actions

Mar 13 (3 hours ago)

On 3/13/2012 8:55 PM, Chris Hofmann wrote: > What's really needed from

here forward is a heavy dose of website

> evangelism, and/or some incentives for websites to convert over,

> and some easy and guaranteed path they can deliver the kind of

> experience with either codec.

>

> Do we think all that is in place?

No. And I don't think it can be put in place.

There is no easy or guaranteed path they can deliver the same

experience. They have to first re-encode their library of content -

something that no one we've talked to other than YouTube (and Blizzard

has talked to other large catalogs) is willing to do. It's not easy or

cheap and it's got zero reward when everything just works with H.264

(even for Firefox because they'll have Flash fallback using that same

h.264 encoding for quite a while.) Next they have to re-build their

sites to do the right thing with H.264, WebM, and Flash fallback (and

probably several quality versions of each of those encodings) for all

the different desktop and mobile browsers. That's no easy task, not

cheap, and again with zero reward.

This isn't a "do x, y, and z, and it will work in Firefox" like the old

days. It currently "works" in Firefox as far as they're concerned. This

isn't a "re-encode once and never again" like "re-write for standards"

was in the old days. It's "double the encoding load, the site burden,

and user support issues" for the foreseeable future.

There is no carrot here. A free codec doesn't help when they still have

to pay for the non-free one to reach all of their Microsoft and Apple

users. They don't get better performance or quality from WebM. They get

something slightly less performant and slightly lower quality.

We are not going to win this one evangelizing a more expensive, slightly

lower quality solution that requires a whole lot of effort with no

obvious benefits. No matter how well it fits our values, it doesn't fit

their values.

Had adobe included WebM in Flash and Flash Media Server; had Google

dropped H.264 on Chrome and Android; maybe there'd be some opportunities

to try to get people to move to WebM as a global web solution but I

think that opportunity past us about 8 months ago with the massive rise

in Android and iPad usage and with the further cementing of h.264 as the

<video> element solution - both with more site use and with Adobe's

launch of a streaming h.264 to the <video> tag server product.

- A

Taken from discussion Google thing.

The thumbnails on the new tab page looks terrible.

Yeah they do , they have just used bigger thumbnails but same crappy size of images... I think a new thumbnail service is on its way before NewTabPage lands for beta/stable...

The thumbnails on the new tab page looks terrible.

Yeah they do , they have just used bigger thumbnails but same crappy size of images... I think a new thumbnail service is on its way before NewTabPage lands for beta/stable...

Clear your cache or re-visit the pages. The thumbnail size was changed but you guys are still seeing your old cached copies.

If you remove a site from the about:tabs page it stores your selection and will not show that site again! I accidentally removed a site I wanted to pin and know never can?

If you bookmark the site, you should be able to drag the bookmark from either the bookmark bar or the menu, over to a spot on the new tab page. That will pin your selection.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Microsoft announces the return of Xbox exclusives with Gears of War and Clockwork Revolution by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft had plenty of announcements to make today at the Xbox Games Showcase celebrating 25 years of the gaming brand. Now, under the leadership of the new Xbox CEO Asha Sharma, Xbox games are going back to their original release methods. She appeared in the livestream itself to announce the return of Xbox console exclusives. This means two major upcoming games from first-party studios won't be coming to PlayStation or Nintendo consoles: Gears of War: E-Day from The Coalition and Clockwork Revolution from InExile. Both titles will only be coming out on Xbox Series X|S consoles and Windows PCs, ditching any plans they had for PlayStation. "These are not timed exclusives," confirmed Microsoft. "We’re committed to investing in and growing XBOX both on console and beyond." The company confirmed that any already announced Xbox titles for PlayStation, under previous leadership, will continue to arrive for the rival platform. This means games like the new Halo remake, Forza Horizon 6, Fable, and State of Decay 3 will still be available on PlayStation, either at launch or later. It sounds like any new projects announced by the company will avoid other consoles in the same way. Microsoft first opened the floodgates by bringing titles like Sea of Thieves, Grounded, Hi-Fi Rush, and Pentiment to PlayStation and Nintendo consoles back in 2024. Since then, almost every new game release from Xbox Game Studios has arrived for rival consoles alongside Xbox and PC. This decision follows Sony's plans to ditch its own multiplatform releases too. Outside of multiplatform live service titles, the PlayStation maker is even abandoning its PC porting endeavors that started years ago.
    • I'm missing the beginning part of this equation... but for the sake of the convo, you don't get to take a $250(?) set of normally priced RAM, jack it up to over $500/600/800 just because of a market shift, then lower it back down to more than what it was originally and call that a "sale". Not the author of this post... the manufacturer/seller.
    • SpaceX has secured a significant cloud-services deal with Google, agreeing to a monthly payment of $920 million for computing power.  This agreement, covers approximately 110,000 NVIDIA GPUs and other components.... https://cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/investments/google-to-buy-computing-from-spacex-at-920-million-per-month/131543026    
    • no thanks is overpriced and its not the fastest ram neither.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!