Recommended Posts

Some goody good bug fixes:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206438 (New Smooth scrolling algorithm - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705877 (Some speedup in CSS - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726396 (WebGL regression - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729878 (New Layout for New Tab Page - in fx-team)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673381 (Some more info in about:support - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735014 (Incremental GC related Snappy - in Inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498998 (Standard - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697006 (Desktop support for WebApps - in inbound)

Same opinion. This one is much better than current one.

Better looking but feels laggy with all the gradient rendering and fade-in-fade-out highlights when you scroll the mouse of the ones of the boxes. But it's a step in the right direction.

Mozilla may try to oust Adobe Flash away from h264 enabled systems; a plug-ing free media experience may await us:

Asa Dotzler

Post reply

More message actions

Mar 13 (3 hours ago)

On 3/13/2012 8:55 PM, Chris Hofmann wrote: > What's really needed from

here forward is a heavy dose of website

> evangelism, and/or some incentives for websites to convert over,

> and some easy and guaranteed path they can deliver the kind of

> experience with either codec.

>

> Do we think all that is in place?

No. And I don't think it can be put in place.

There is no easy or guaranteed path they can deliver the same

experience. They have to first re-encode their library of content -

something that no one we've talked to other than YouTube (and Blizzard

has talked to other large catalogs) is willing to do. It's not easy or

cheap and it's got zero reward when everything just works with H.264

(even for Firefox because they'll have Flash fallback using that same

h.264 encoding for quite a while.) Next they have to re-build their

sites to do the right thing with H.264, WebM, and Flash fallback (and

probably several quality versions of each of those encodings) for all

the different desktop and mobile browsers. That's no easy task, not

cheap, and again with zero reward.

This isn't a "do x, y, and z, and it will work in Firefox" like the old

days. It currently "works" in Firefox as far as they're concerned. This

isn't a "re-encode once and never again" like "re-write for standards"

was in the old days. It's "double the encoding load, the site burden,

and user support issues" for the foreseeable future.

There is no carrot here. A free codec doesn't help when they still have

to pay for the non-free one to reach all of their Microsoft and Apple

users. They don't get better performance or quality from WebM. They get

something slightly less performant and slightly lower quality.

We are not going to win this one evangelizing a more expensive, slightly

lower quality solution that requires a whole lot of effort with no

obvious benefits. No matter how well it fits our values, it doesn't fit

their values.

Had adobe included WebM in Flash and Flash Media Server; had Google

dropped H.264 on Chrome and Android; maybe there'd be some opportunities

to try to get people to move to WebM as a global web solution but I

think that opportunity past us about 8 months ago with the massive rise

in Android and iPad usage and with the further cementing of h.264 as the

<video> element solution - both with more site use and with Adobe's

launch of a streaming h.264 to the <video> tag server product.

- A

Taken from discussion Google thing.

The thumbnails on the new tab page looks terrible.

Yeah they do , they have just used bigger thumbnails but same crappy size of images... I think a new thumbnail service is on its way before NewTabPage lands for beta/stable...

The thumbnails on the new tab page looks terrible.

Yeah they do , they have just used bigger thumbnails but same crappy size of images... I think a new thumbnail service is on its way before NewTabPage lands for beta/stable...

Clear your cache or re-visit the pages. The thumbnail size was changed but you guys are still seeing your old cached copies.

If you remove a site from the about:tabs page it stores your selection and will not show that site again! I accidentally removed a site I wanted to pin and know never can?

If you bookmark the site, you should be able to drag the bookmark from either the bookmark bar or the menu, over to a spot on the new tab page. That will pin your selection.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It's nearly time to replace my aging Founders Edition 3080, it doesn't OC as nicely as it used to and it's running around 10c warmer than it did when I first bought it.  I don't have budget for much more than what I spent on the 3080 and locally, that means the best GPU I can manage is a 9070XT. On this basis I have a few questions: 1. At present I don't use ray tracing, if this was to change, would this GPU be an issue? 2. How does it compare on a performance basis? 3. Are the drivers worse or better than those for nVidia? 4. Linux support, is it there? 5. Anything else I should be aware of if I were to make this change? 6. Is it a good idea or shall I try and keep the 3080 a little longer.
    • What OS is that? It looks a bit like Mac OS but the command line suggests it isn't, either way I like it!
    • Outlook classic is inherently better than new outlook, for a number of reasons. That said, if the only reason people need office is to read email, they should just use thunderbird.
    • Windows 11 is a big thumbs down from me. I used for a period of a few days while it was in insider and windows 10 was the main OS, and realised it wasn't for me. I am still waiting for Windows to be tolerable again, a shame as at one point I was very pro Microsoft.  
    • Classic outlook, not only does it have a much fuller feature set, it doesn't include Microsoft attempting to sync my emails from my servers to theirs. If classic outlook is ever removed from office, and the version I paid for in 2021 stops working for some reason, I'll use Thunderbird.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      74
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!