Recommended Posts

Some goody good bug fixes:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206438 (New Smooth scrolling algorithm - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705877 (Some speedup in CSS - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726396 (WebGL regression - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729878 (New Layout for New Tab Page - in fx-team)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673381 (Some more info in about:support - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735014 (Incremental GC related Snappy - in Inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=498998 (Standard - in inbound)

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697006 (Desktop support for WebApps - in inbound)

Same opinion. This one is much better than current one.

Better looking but feels laggy with all the gradient rendering and fade-in-fade-out highlights when you scroll the mouse of the ones of the boxes. But it's a step in the right direction.

Mozilla may try to oust Adobe Flash away from h264 enabled systems; a plug-ing free media experience may await us:

Asa Dotzler

Post reply

More message actions

Mar 13 (3 hours ago)

On 3/13/2012 8:55 PM, Chris Hofmann wrote: > What's really needed from

here forward is a heavy dose of website

> evangelism, and/or some incentives for websites to convert over,

> and some easy and guaranteed path they can deliver the kind of

> experience with either codec.

>

> Do we think all that is in place?

No. And I don't think it can be put in place.

There is no easy or guaranteed path they can deliver the same

experience. They have to first re-encode their library of content -

something that no one we've talked to other than YouTube (and Blizzard

has talked to other large catalogs) is willing to do. It's not easy or

cheap and it's got zero reward when everything just works with H.264

(even for Firefox because they'll have Flash fallback using that same

h.264 encoding for quite a while.) Next they have to re-build their

sites to do the right thing with H.264, WebM, and Flash fallback (and

probably several quality versions of each of those encodings) for all

the different desktop and mobile browsers. That's no easy task, not

cheap, and again with zero reward.

This isn't a "do x, y, and z, and it will work in Firefox" like the old

days. It currently "works" in Firefox as far as they're concerned. This

isn't a "re-encode once and never again" like "re-write for standards"

was in the old days. It's "double the encoding load, the site burden,

and user support issues" for the foreseeable future.

There is no carrot here. A free codec doesn't help when they still have

to pay for the non-free one to reach all of their Microsoft and Apple

users. They don't get better performance or quality from WebM. They get

something slightly less performant and slightly lower quality.

We are not going to win this one evangelizing a more expensive, slightly

lower quality solution that requires a whole lot of effort with no

obvious benefits. No matter how well it fits our values, it doesn't fit

their values.

Had adobe included WebM in Flash and Flash Media Server; had Google

dropped H.264 on Chrome and Android; maybe there'd be some opportunities

to try to get people to move to WebM as a global web solution but I

think that opportunity past us about 8 months ago with the massive rise

in Android and iPad usage and with the further cementing of h.264 as the

<video> element solution - both with more site use and with Adobe's

launch of a streaming h.264 to the <video> tag server product.

- A

Taken from discussion Google thing.

The thumbnails on the new tab page looks terrible.

Yeah they do , they have just used bigger thumbnails but same crappy size of images... I think a new thumbnail service is on its way before NewTabPage lands for beta/stable...

The thumbnails on the new tab page looks terrible.

Yeah they do , they have just used bigger thumbnails but same crappy size of images... I think a new thumbnail service is on its way before NewTabPage lands for beta/stable...

Clear your cache or re-visit the pages. The thumbnail size was changed but you guys are still seeing your old cached copies.

If you remove a site from the about:tabs page it stores your selection and will not show that site again! I accidentally removed a site I wanted to pin and know never can?

If you bookmark the site, you should be able to drag the bookmark from either the bookmark bar or the menu, over to a spot on the new tab page. That will pin your selection.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!