Recommended Posts

True, but x64 browsers ATM, aren't ready for primetime yet. They're kinda like Office x64, nice to have, but not really needed by 99.9% of users.

That said, I hope IE10 x64 has the new JS engine IE9 x86 has.

Obviously, you have NOT run the x64 version of Office 2010.

What keeps the majority of folks using x32 versions of Office (and especially on x64 operating systems) is add-in/plug-in support/issues from third parties.

True, but x64 browsers ATM, aren't ready for primetime yet. They're kinda like Office x64, nice to have, but not really needed by 99.9% of users.

That said, I hope IE10 x64 has the new JS engine IE9 x86 has.

Obviously, you have NOT run the x64 version of Office 2010.

What keeps the majority of folks using x32 versions of Office (and especially on x64 operating systems) is add-in/plug-in support/issues from third parties.

I might be a little off topic, buy why would anyone wants another PDF reader ?

The best behavior IMO is to open PDF files with the default application installed on your OS. Adobe reader is blasing fast to start since a while. This also causes less security issue and Mozilla is wasting a lot of time into such things.

its not another PDF reader , its in built one. Just like why you need HTML5 videos when flash/divx/quicktime etc can play videos? Its a feature not new PDF reader in market

PS : Having pdf opened in one tab and neowin in other is cooler than having PDF in separate window and Neowin in separate :)

I tried clearing my cache, and yes disk cache is enabled (I have all my cache settings at the defaults). This behavior is on two totally different installs too, one is on my windows 7 desktop which has been running aurora for some time, and the other is my laptop running ubuntu 12.04, and its a fresh install of aurora. The new tab page's thumbnails are quite unreliable on both.

Gmail for example consistently never creates a thumbnail.

Firefox doesn't generate thumbnails for HTTPS pages because of the possible information leakage (That's assuming that HTTPS is supposed to be private, most of the time it's just used for encryption)

You couldn't want Firefox to save a thumbnail of your bank details, but saving a thumbnail of a login page for a forum isn't bad, etc. it just errs on the side of caution.

And the thumbnails are stored in the cache as normal, if something resets the cache (like a crash) then they're lost.

Edit: Oh yeah, Lion fullscreen support.

120343646.png

In today's update, a tab opened that asked me if I wanted to allow this pdf viewer from mozilla to install. I allowed it and tried it. Now it's just sitting in my addon list, and there's no button to uninstall it.

alright had to reset firefox (cool feature , see about:support) . Man a reset + sync to get your addons back etc = Super fast way to make firefox faster without thinking of restoring passwords managing passwords etc! If only they make syncing as easy as that of Chrome (just id and pass no key)

Actually its built inside firefox and is not supposed to work as addon , they are working over its settings UI etc...

Coz its BUILT inside firefox , you can't remove it , you can disable it or enable it just like any feature of firefox (ahem)

its not another PDF reader , its in built one. Just like why you need HTML5 videos when flash/divx/quicktime etc can play videos? Its a feature not new PDF reader in market

PS : Having pdf opened in one tab and neowin in other is cooler than having PDF in separate window and Neowin in separate :)

But I don't want to have HTLM5 videos. Not having embedded video player would have stopped the codec war for web browsers since a while.

But I don't want to have HTLM5 videos. Not having embedded video player would have stopped the codec war for web browsers since a while.

No it wouldn't, the war would just have been via plugins instead. Certainly, leaving the decision up to Adobe (which it would have been, given Flash's position), would have just been silly and na?ve.

Why on earth don't you want HTML5 video anyway? You prefer having to install plugins to view something as simple as video in a browser?

With regards PDF, I think this is a bit different. PDF is somewhat more specific and niche, though still widespread. Philosophically it feels a bit like halfway between something obvious like html5 video and something crazy like implementing the ability to read Word documents.

I think, however, the argument for it wins in my eyes because PDF is widely used, and thus is an opportunity to remove another ubiquitous, risky plugin from necessary circulation.

No it wouldn't, the war would just have been via plugins instead. Certainly, leaving the decision up to Adobe (which it would have been, given Flash's position), would have just been silly and na?ve.

Why on earth don't you want HTML5 video anyway? You prefer having to install plugins to view something as simple as video in a browser?

With regards PDF, I think this is a bit different. PDF is somewhat more specific and niche, though still widespread. Philosophically it feels a bit like halfway between something obvious like html5 video and something crazy like implementing the ability to read Word documents.

I think, however, the argument for it wins in my eyes because PDF is widely used, and thus is an opportunity to remove another ubiquitous, risky plugin from necessary circulation.

PDF is a standard, not only Adobe can do a PDF reader. They don't have full control of their format. Also PDF isn't a niche, it's a standard and the best way to share documents. Your philosophy is completly wrong if you think that few people are using PDF.

HTML5 videos are a mess because each web browser supports its own codecs (who can't be brought via plugins). Using the default OS player (hence OS codecs) would have made things a lot more easier. Not all web browser makers want to pay for royalties. Anbody can install its own codecs instead, without paying for royalites.

HTML5 videos are a mess because a few companies (Apple/Microsoft) are pushing a format that can never be a part of the spec. Couple that with Googles failings and you have the "perfect" situation where the only option for open web videos, isn't the one you can realistically use.

We're starting to see the light with in-content preferences! There's a tryserver and soon it'll be in UX. atm it doesn't replace preferences dialog, you can reach it by typing about:preferences in urlbar.

it's still bugged but it's a big step forward!

infos: http://msujaws.wordpress.com/2012/03/23/msu-cse-capstone-update-323/

tryserver: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/try-builds/[email protected]/

main.PNGgeneral.PNGtabs.PNGprivacy.PNG

  • Like 2

HTML5 videos are a mess because a few companies (Apple/Microsoft) are pushing a format that can never be a part of the spec. Couple that with Googles failings and you have the "perfect" situation where the only option for open web videos, isn't the one you can realistically use.

i haz firefox and HTML5 enabled on youtube , most of them work good under WebM. Now if Mozilla decides to bring h.246 to Firefox (desktop) , it would be even better... But still HTML5 videos on youtube work good :) But apparently one format would be decided anyhow

We're starting to see the light with in-content preferences! There's a tryserver and soon it'll be in UX. atm it doesn't replace preferences dialog, you can reach it by typing about:preferences in urlbar.

it's still bugged but it's a big step forward!

infos: http://msujaws.wordp...one-update-323/

tryserver: http://ftp.mozilla.o...m-00c6313989d0/

*Some Sexy Pics*

Yeah! Also the plan is to land them in 4 weeks ie for Firefox 14. Right now polishing and a lil bug with advanced settings is to be fixed and its good to go! However Firefox implementation is idk way too different than from Chrome's. Chrome looks very metro and seeing Windows 8 , i think this UI though looks good , is not native :| Anyways finally something from Firefox 4's mockups is landing after over a year :p

i haz firefox and HTML5 enabled on youtube , most of them work good under WebM. Now if Mozilla decides to bring h.246 to Firefox (desktop) , it would be even better... But still HTML5 videos on youtube work good :) But apparently one format would be decided anyhow

...

According to some numbers, Google have apparently only transcoded about 50% of the videos to WebM, and if there's any ads it uses the Flash player anyway (Which is becoming more common as Google lower the bar, my account can use ads and I've only got like 600 views total)

It's not strange that there's no codec specified (There's no image formats specified either, it's just that everybody supports JPEG/PNG/GIF/BMP), but it is a shame the large companies wouldn't play along.

How is Adobe Reader "bloated"? Be constructive plz, else your post will be considered as fud.

Also, when reading PDF from the file explorer, why would it open Chrome? Yes you need a whole separate application for opening PDF. The Windows 8 reader is almost perfect, it just needs to be opened multiple times at once and per pages printing option (although this one is related to WinRT, not the reader), I don't see why I'd need another PDF reader.

It takes a ridiculously huge amount of space for a pdf reader. It only starts fast because it adds a startup item at boot.

PDF is a standard, not only Adobe can do a PDF reader. They don't have full control of their format. Also PDF isn't a niche, it's a standard and the best way to share documents. Your philosophy is completly wrong if you think that few people are using PDF.

At no point did I say few people are using PDF. I said it's more niche and specific than video, which it is. Almost everyone watches YouTube, relatively far far more often than anyone shares documents.

It takes a ridiculously huge amount of space for a pdf reader. It only starts fast because it adds a startup item at boot.

Who cares about how many MB of RAM it takes? We all have a lot of free memory that needs to be used. And did you check how much MB the Firefox PDF reader takes?

And it's starting fast because Windows is caching it, even if you remove the automated started application.

And finally, Windows 8 reader blows up Adobe Reader, I don't feel like I need Firefox to build a PDF reader. They only did it because Chrome does it too.

At no point did I say few people are using PDF. I said it's more niche and specific than video, which it is. Almost everyone watches YouTube, relatively far far more often than anyone shares documents.

Right.

The grayness of the new start page is very reminiscent of Macness. It feels alien on a Windows system.

HTML5 videos are a mess because a few companies (Apple/Microsoft) are pushing a format that can never be a part of the spec. Couple that with Googles failings and you have the "perfect" situation where the only option for open web videos, isn't the one you can realistically use.

For Microsoft / Apple / Android Users (Microsoft, Apple, and Android provide h264 support for all users),

- h264 is a hardware accelerated, super-high performing, super-high compression, free codec.

For users of legacy OS that have acquired FFDShow / LAV / Adobe Flash Player (no difficult!!),

- h264 is a hardware accelerated (some cases), super-high performing, super-high compression, free codec.

The above details are factual. This leaves essentially no one without the ability play h264.

So now lets compare,

(+) h264 is free, as established above.

(+) h264 is hardware accelerated. Starting from, I think, some minimal support in the NVIDIA 6800 series and 7xxx series (although hard to use, almost no codec supports the pre-8xxx series) and ATi/AMD HD series.

(+) Out of spec 8-bit h264 video are supported by the three major GPU manufacturers - not just AVC / base profile.

(+) With new GPUs, 4K h264 video is supported.

(-) WebM has a very, very, tiny set of hardware that it is supported on.

(-) Support on hardware, doesn't mean the OS supports it.

(-) This is all new hardware as well; no WebM HWA on your NV 8xxx series; enjoy your decreased battery life

(-) WebM doesn't compete with non-base-profile h264; bandwidth limited devices will not benefit from WebM

(+) h264 has a variety of software accelerated codecs, some of which are very optimized

(-) WebM is a joke when it comes to non-GPU playback; it does not compete with h264 codecs (put it in other words, choose between playing HD h264 on a netbook or SD WebM)

(-) It makes more sense in terms of space (2 videos instead of one), time (transcoding), and money (space and time is money) for provide h264 video in HTML5 and provide Flash fallback options for other people.

I could go on, but I am bored. There is a discussion on Mozilla about supporting h264 - it is essentially this (arguments such as how expensive WebM is, etc...), except more biased toward WebM.

Who cares about how many MB of RAM it takes? We all have a lot of free memory that needs to be used. And did you check how much MB the Firefox PDF reader takes?

And it's starting fast because Windows is caching it, even if you remove the automated started application.

And finally, Windows 8 reader blows up Adobe Reader, I don't feel like I need Firefox to build a PDF reader. They only did it because Chrome does it too.

Right.

So? It still makes sense for it to be in the browser, I can't understand why anyone would be against it, and I hate the "omg they copied x" argument :p.

When most users encounter pdf files, its on the Internet. Its convenient and integrated if it opens right in the browser instead of a separate program.

So? It still makes sense for it to be in the browser, I can't understand why anyone would be against it, and I hate the "omg they copied x" argument :p.

When most users encounter pdf files, its on the Internet. Its convenient and integrated if it opens right in the browser instead of a separate program.

Read the conversation again.

Not everyone uses Windows 8.

I was just pointing out that reading PDF with external software will be easier & more common in the near future :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I'm fine with a little reasonable promotion of Edge, but the degree which they do it right now I consider extremely unreasonable. 
    • Microsoft AI boss no longer believes that AI will replace human workers by David Uzondu Mustafa Suleyman, the head of Microsoft AI, recently took back his statements concerning white-collar jobs that he gave to the Financial Times in an interview made back in February, where he claimed that AI would replace office workers within 12 to 18 months. On Monday's episode of The Verge's Decoder, Suleyman recast the technology as more like a helpmate than a tool designed to take over your job. He explained that smaller office duties will "increasingly become digitized, automated" as people generate more digital materials. During the discussion, Suleyman emphasized a "very important distinction" between "tasks" and "jobs" to clarify his previous claims. He argued that his earlier comments only referred to individual actions that people perform at their desks. Suleyman used to work for DeepMind, the research lab he co-founded in 2010 alongside Demis Hassabis and Shane Legg, before he left in 2022 to establish Inflection AI and build an empathetic digital assistant. Microsoft hired him in March 2024 to lead its newly formed "Microsoft AI" division, placing him in charge of consumer products like Copilot, Bing, and Edge. His February comments also detailed plans for Microsoft to achieve self-sufficiency with a $140 billion infrastructure budget to train frontier models, predicting that creating a customized AI will soon feel like creating a podcast or a new blog: The 41-year-old is not the only AI executive who's softened his "AI will replace you" stance. OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, last month used X to push back against employment panic by arguing that his startup builds tools to assist humans rather than build replacements. He had previously garnered backlash by suggesting that many modern office roles that AI might replace did not qualify as "real work" in the first place, at least when you compare desk jobs to physical, historical labor like farming.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader DC 2026.001.21662 by Razvan Serea Adobe Acrobat Reader DC software is the free, trusted standard for viewing, printing, signing, and annotating PDFs. Its the only PDF viewer that can open and interact with all types of PDF content – including forms and multimedia. It’s connected to Adobe Document Cloud – so you can work with PDFs on computers and mobile devices. Adobe Document Cloud is a revolutionary, modern and efficient way to get work done with documents in the office, at home or on-the-go. At the heart of Document Cloud is the all-new Adobe Acrobat DC, which will take e-signatures mainstream by delivering free e-signing with every individual subscription. Document Cloud includes a set of integrated services that use a consistent online profile and personal document hub. With Adobe Document Cloud, people will be able to create, review, approve, sign and track documents whether on a desktop or mobile device. Businesses will be able to take advantage of Document Cloud for enterprise which provides enterprise-class document services that integrate into systems of record such as CRM, HCM, CLM, and CMS, adding speed, efficiency and transparency to getting business done with documents. Adobe Acrobat Reader DC new feature highlights: Work with PDFs from anywhere with the new, free Acrobat DC mobile app for Android or iOS. Select functionality is also available on Windows Phone. Use the new Fill & Sign tool in your desktop software to complete PDF forms fast with smart autofill. Download the free Adobe Fill & Sign mobile app to add the same option to your iPad or Android tablet device. Save money on ink and toner when printing from your Windows PC. Store and access files in Adobe Document Cloud with 5GB of free storage. Get instant access to recent files across desktop, web, and mobile devices with Mobile Link. Sync your Fill & Sign autofill collection across desktop, web, and iPad devices. Adobe PDF Pack premium features includes: Convert documents and images to PDF files. Use your mobile device camera to take a picture of a paper document or form and convert it to PDF. Turn PDFs into editable Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, or RTF files. Combine multiple files into a single PDF (web only). Get signatures from others with a complete e-signature service. Send, track, and confirm delivery of documents electronically instead of using fax or overnight services (tracking not available on mobile). Store and access files online with 20GB of storage. Download: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC 64-bit | 719.0 MB (Freeware) Link: Adobe Acrobat Reader DC Home Page | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Meta will now use data from outside businesses to personalize AI responses by David Uzondu In an update that's rolling out globally (except in a handful of countries), Meta will use your data from outside businesses to personalize your AI responses and your primary feeds. Meta already utilizes your shopping activity to target ads, but the company now plans to expand this tracking to personalize other "parts of your experience" like feed algorithms and AI assistant chats. The company is replacing the two settings ("Your activity off Meta technologies" and "Activity from other businesses") that currently let you disconnect off-platform activity with a single, renamed setting called Activity from other businesses. If you don't want Meta to manipulate your feed and AI responses using your outside history, you can just turn the Activity from other businesses setting off in your account settings. This toggle resides within your Accounts Center, applying your choice to every connected profile. Turning this off will not stop companies from sending your data to Meta. The company will still collect your web interactions, but it only uses them to train products, while still accessing external accounts you connect. When The Verge spoke to Meta spokesperson Emil Vazquez, the representative said that this update will exclude several locations at launch, including the European region, the UK, Brazil, Thailand, South Africa, Turkey, South Korea, Ecuador, Nigeria, and Kenya. The new update comes at a time when the social media giant is recovering from a major PR disaster involving generative AI. Last week, there was a huge security issue on Instagram where attackers figured out a way to trick Meta AI into handing over account ownership (even if the victim had 2FA enabled). Some of the affected accounts include the dormant Obama White House profile, cosmetics brand Sephora, the Chief Master Sergeant of the Space Force, and security researcher Jane Manchun Wong. Internally, the company also had to scale back plans on its Model Capability Initiative (MCI), an employee-monitoring program designed to train corporate AI models by recording worker keystrokes and screen activity, after employees raised privacy concerns and complained about severe battery life drain.
    • JetBrains is working to cut false positives in RustRover 2026.2 by David Uzondu Recently, JetBrains released the fifth EAP build of its dedicated IDE, RustRover 2026.2, bringing improvements like a Run gutter icon for criterion_main! macro benchmarking and a feature that alerts you when there are unused traits in your current scope. Now, the company is out with a blog post addressing one of the "most common" complaints from users: false positives. In RustRover, a false positive occurs when the editor incorrectly highlights something as an error even though the project compiles and runs successfully. This mismatch flags a gap between the IDE's internal intelligence and the actual compiler. When the editor flashes red warnings over perfectly valid code, developers lose trust in the tool, which stalls momentum. Traditionally, RustRover runs cargo check to detect compiler errors and warnings, but it also relies on its own code analysis engine to power real-time features. To provide quick feedback, this engine parses your source code into a syntax tree while inferring types and resolving names as you type. Because this engine must work on broken, half-written code and react instantly, its logic sometimes diverges from the compiler's, producing false positives that do not exist in the compiler's eyes. JetBrains said that it has a "dedicated task force" focused specifically on identifying and fixing false positives by analyzing user reports and examining large-scale open-source projects. To speed up this process, the team built an internal system modeled after Crater, the famous Rust project that compiles and runs tests for every single crate published on crates.io. This automated pipeline compares the diagnostics from RustRover's analysis with actual compiler output to catch discrepancies before they reach users, ensuring smoother workflows. RustRover, for those who're unaware, is a dedicated IDE designed specifically for Rust developers. It's been around for a couple of years now, providing features like built-in debugging via LLDB, seamless cargo integration, advanced macro expansion, and HTML support. JetBrains distributes the app under two licensing models: a paid commercial subscription and a free option for non-commercial use.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Primer1st earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Experienced
      JayZJay went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Reacting Well
      Sir_Timbit earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      rubentuben8 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ARaclen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Edouard
      134
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!