Recommended Posts

True, but x64 browsers ATM, aren't ready for primetime yet. They're kinda like Office x64, nice to have, but not really needed by 99.9% of users.

That said, I hope IE10 x64 has the new JS engine IE9 x86 has.

Obviously, you have NOT run the x64 version of Office 2010.

What keeps the majority of folks using x32 versions of Office (and especially on x64 operating systems) is add-in/plug-in support/issues from third parties.

True, but x64 browsers ATM, aren't ready for primetime yet. They're kinda like Office x64, nice to have, but not really needed by 99.9% of users.

That said, I hope IE10 x64 has the new JS engine IE9 x86 has.

Obviously, you have NOT run the x64 version of Office 2010.

What keeps the majority of folks using x32 versions of Office (and especially on x64 operating systems) is add-in/plug-in support/issues from third parties.

I might be a little off topic, buy why would anyone wants another PDF reader ?

The best behavior IMO is to open PDF files with the default application installed on your OS. Adobe reader is blasing fast to start since a while. This also causes less security issue and Mozilla is wasting a lot of time into such things.

its not another PDF reader , its in built one. Just like why you need HTML5 videos when flash/divx/quicktime etc can play videos? Its a feature not new PDF reader in market

PS : Having pdf opened in one tab and neowin in other is cooler than having PDF in separate window and Neowin in separate :)

I tried clearing my cache, and yes disk cache is enabled (I have all my cache settings at the defaults). This behavior is on two totally different installs too, one is on my windows 7 desktop which has been running aurora for some time, and the other is my laptop running ubuntu 12.04, and its a fresh install of aurora. The new tab page's thumbnails are quite unreliable on both.

Gmail for example consistently never creates a thumbnail.

Firefox doesn't generate thumbnails for HTTPS pages because of the possible information leakage (That's assuming that HTTPS is supposed to be private, most of the time it's just used for encryption)

You couldn't want Firefox to save a thumbnail of your bank details, but saving a thumbnail of a login page for a forum isn't bad, etc. it just errs on the side of caution.

And the thumbnails are stored in the cache as normal, if something resets the cache (like a crash) then they're lost.

Edit: Oh yeah, Lion fullscreen support.

120343646.png

In today's update, a tab opened that asked me if I wanted to allow this pdf viewer from mozilla to install. I allowed it and tried it. Now it's just sitting in my addon list, and there's no button to uninstall it.

alright had to reset firefox (cool feature , see about:support) . Man a reset + sync to get your addons back etc = Super fast way to make firefox faster without thinking of restoring passwords managing passwords etc! If only they make syncing as easy as that of Chrome (just id and pass no key)

Actually its built inside firefox and is not supposed to work as addon , they are working over its settings UI etc...

Coz its BUILT inside firefox , you can't remove it , you can disable it or enable it just like any feature of firefox (ahem)

its not another PDF reader , its in built one. Just like why you need HTML5 videos when flash/divx/quicktime etc can play videos? Its a feature not new PDF reader in market

PS : Having pdf opened in one tab and neowin in other is cooler than having PDF in separate window and Neowin in separate :)

But I don't want to have HTLM5 videos. Not having embedded video player would have stopped the codec war for web browsers since a while.

But I don't want to have HTLM5 videos. Not having embedded video player would have stopped the codec war for web browsers since a while.

No it wouldn't, the war would just have been via plugins instead. Certainly, leaving the decision up to Adobe (which it would have been, given Flash's position), would have just been silly and na?ve.

Why on earth don't you want HTML5 video anyway? You prefer having to install plugins to view something as simple as video in a browser?

With regards PDF, I think this is a bit different. PDF is somewhat more specific and niche, though still widespread. Philosophically it feels a bit like halfway between something obvious like html5 video and something crazy like implementing the ability to read Word documents.

I think, however, the argument for it wins in my eyes because PDF is widely used, and thus is an opportunity to remove another ubiquitous, risky plugin from necessary circulation.

No it wouldn't, the war would just have been via plugins instead. Certainly, leaving the decision up to Adobe (which it would have been, given Flash's position), would have just been silly and na?ve.

Why on earth don't you want HTML5 video anyway? You prefer having to install plugins to view something as simple as video in a browser?

With regards PDF, I think this is a bit different. PDF is somewhat more specific and niche, though still widespread. Philosophically it feels a bit like halfway between something obvious like html5 video and something crazy like implementing the ability to read Word documents.

I think, however, the argument for it wins in my eyes because PDF is widely used, and thus is an opportunity to remove another ubiquitous, risky plugin from necessary circulation.

PDF is a standard, not only Adobe can do a PDF reader. They don't have full control of their format. Also PDF isn't a niche, it's a standard and the best way to share documents. Your philosophy is completly wrong if you think that few people are using PDF.

HTML5 videos are a mess because each web browser supports its own codecs (who can't be brought via plugins). Using the default OS player (hence OS codecs) would have made things a lot more easier. Not all web browser makers want to pay for royalties. Anbody can install its own codecs instead, without paying for royalites.

HTML5 videos are a mess because a few companies (Apple/Microsoft) are pushing a format that can never be a part of the spec. Couple that with Googles failings and you have the "perfect" situation where the only option for open web videos, isn't the one you can realistically use.

We're starting to see the light with in-content preferences! There's a tryserver and soon it'll be in UX. atm it doesn't replace preferences dialog, you can reach it by typing about:preferences in urlbar.

it's still bugged but it's a big step forward!

infos: http://msujaws.wordpress.com/2012/03/23/msu-cse-capstone-update-323/

tryserver: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/try-builds/[email protected]/

main.PNGgeneral.PNGtabs.PNGprivacy.PNG

  • Like 2

HTML5 videos are a mess because a few companies (Apple/Microsoft) are pushing a format that can never be a part of the spec. Couple that with Googles failings and you have the "perfect" situation where the only option for open web videos, isn't the one you can realistically use.

i haz firefox and HTML5 enabled on youtube , most of them work good under WebM. Now if Mozilla decides to bring h.246 to Firefox (desktop) , it would be even better... But still HTML5 videos on youtube work good :) But apparently one format would be decided anyhow

We're starting to see the light with in-content preferences! There's a tryserver and soon it'll be in UX. atm it doesn't replace preferences dialog, you can reach it by typing about:preferences in urlbar.

it's still bugged but it's a big step forward!

infos: http://msujaws.wordp...one-update-323/

tryserver: http://ftp.mozilla.o...m-00c6313989d0/

*Some Sexy Pics*

Yeah! Also the plan is to land them in 4 weeks ie for Firefox 14. Right now polishing and a lil bug with advanced settings is to be fixed and its good to go! However Firefox implementation is idk way too different than from Chrome's. Chrome looks very metro and seeing Windows 8 , i think this UI though looks good , is not native :| Anyways finally something from Firefox 4's mockups is landing after over a year :p

i haz firefox and HTML5 enabled on youtube , most of them work good under WebM. Now if Mozilla decides to bring h.246 to Firefox (desktop) , it would be even better... But still HTML5 videos on youtube work good :) But apparently one format would be decided anyhow

...

According to some numbers, Google have apparently only transcoded about 50% of the videos to WebM, and if there's any ads it uses the Flash player anyway (Which is becoming more common as Google lower the bar, my account can use ads and I've only got like 600 views total)

It's not strange that there's no codec specified (There's no image formats specified either, it's just that everybody supports JPEG/PNG/GIF/BMP), but it is a shame the large companies wouldn't play along.

How is Adobe Reader "bloated"? Be constructive plz, else your post will be considered as fud.

Also, when reading PDF from the file explorer, why would it open Chrome? Yes you need a whole separate application for opening PDF. The Windows 8 reader is almost perfect, it just needs to be opened multiple times at once and per pages printing option (although this one is related to WinRT, not the reader), I don't see why I'd need another PDF reader.

It takes a ridiculously huge amount of space for a pdf reader. It only starts fast because it adds a startup item at boot.

PDF is a standard, not only Adobe can do a PDF reader. They don't have full control of their format. Also PDF isn't a niche, it's a standard and the best way to share documents. Your philosophy is completly wrong if you think that few people are using PDF.

At no point did I say few people are using PDF. I said it's more niche and specific than video, which it is. Almost everyone watches YouTube, relatively far far more often than anyone shares documents.

It takes a ridiculously huge amount of space for a pdf reader. It only starts fast because it adds a startup item at boot.

Who cares about how many MB of RAM it takes? We all have a lot of free memory that needs to be used. And did you check how much MB the Firefox PDF reader takes?

And it's starting fast because Windows is caching it, even if you remove the automated started application.

And finally, Windows 8 reader blows up Adobe Reader, I don't feel like I need Firefox to build a PDF reader. They only did it because Chrome does it too.

At no point did I say few people are using PDF. I said it's more niche and specific than video, which it is. Almost everyone watches YouTube, relatively far far more often than anyone shares documents.

Right.

The grayness of the new start page is very reminiscent of Macness. It feels alien on a Windows system.

HTML5 videos are a mess because a few companies (Apple/Microsoft) are pushing a format that can never be a part of the spec. Couple that with Googles failings and you have the "perfect" situation where the only option for open web videos, isn't the one you can realistically use.

For Microsoft / Apple / Android Users (Microsoft, Apple, and Android provide h264 support for all users),

- h264 is a hardware accelerated, super-high performing, super-high compression, free codec.

For users of legacy OS that have acquired FFDShow / LAV / Adobe Flash Player (no difficult!!),

- h264 is a hardware accelerated (some cases), super-high performing, super-high compression, free codec.

The above details are factual. This leaves essentially no one without the ability play h264.

So now lets compare,

(+) h264 is free, as established above.

(+) h264 is hardware accelerated. Starting from, I think, some minimal support in the NVIDIA 6800 series and 7xxx series (although hard to use, almost no codec supports the pre-8xxx series) and ATi/AMD HD series.

(+) Out of spec 8-bit h264 video are supported by the three major GPU manufacturers - not just AVC / base profile.

(+) With new GPUs, 4K h264 video is supported.

(-) WebM has a very, very, tiny set of hardware that it is supported on.

(-) Support on hardware, doesn't mean the OS supports it.

(-) This is all new hardware as well; no WebM HWA on your NV 8xxx series; enjoy your decreased battery life

(-) WebM doesn't compete with non-base-profile h264; bandwidth limited devices will not benefit from WebM

(+) h264 has a variety of software accelerated codecs, some of which are very optimized

(-) WebM is a joke when it comes to non-GPU playback; it does not compete with h264 codecs (put it in other words, choose between playing HD h264 on a netbook or SD WebM)

(-) It makes more sense in terms of space (2 videos instead of one), time (transcoding), and money (space and time is money) for provide h264 video in HTML5 and provide Flash fallback options for other people.

I could go on, but I am bored. There is a discussion on Mozilla about supporting h264 - it is essentially this (arguments such as how expensive WebM is, etc...), except more biased toward WebM.

Who cares about how many MB of RAM it takes? We all have a lot of free memory that needs to be used. And did you check how much MB the Firefox PDF reader takes?

And it's starting fast because Windows is caching it, even if you remove the automated started application.

And finally, Windows 8 reader blows up Adobe Reader, I don't feel like I need Firefox to build a PDF reader. They only did it because Chrome does it too.

Right.

So? It still makes sense for it to be in the browser, I can't understand why anyone would be against it, and I hate the "omg they copied x" argument :p.

When most users encounter pdf files, its on the Internet. Its convenient and integrated if it opens right in the browser instead of a separate program.

So? It still makes sense for it to be in the browser, I can't understand why anyone would be against it, and I hate the "omg they copied x" argument :p.

When most users encounter pdf files, its on the Internet. Its convenient and integrated if it opens right in the browser instead of a separate program.

Read the conversation again.

Not everyone uses Windows 8.

I was just pointing out that reading PDF with external software will be easier & more common in the near future :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!