Recommended Posts

None right now I know of. Sorry... I don't workup much on this.

 

 

Tab Mix Plus has always been my go-to for anything tab related.  Can customize all sorts of things with them.  No idea how well it works with Nightly.. working fine with 29RC though. Looking briefly at their forums reports that the official build is problematic, but there's talk with the dev builds.  Classic Theme Restorer has an option for the close tab buttons too.

 

Thanks for the replies.  I checked up on the bug again, and someone in the comments posted this:

 

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-close-buttons/

 

Restartless, does what it says on the tin (and only that.)  :)  .

Thanks for the replies.  I checked up on the bug again, and someone in the comments posted this:

 

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-close-buttons/

 

Restartless, does what it says on the tin (and only that.)  :)  .

 

Thanks for sharing it for all people.  :)

Australis addons :)

  • Like 3

My Firefox just updated automatically(Strange because its too early lol) and ForecastFox was not working(2.2.2). After looking a little bit you can install 2.2.4(Not yet from Firefox addons page)and that version its working perfectly

 

https://static.getforecastfox.com/downloads/forecastfox-latest.xpi

I find the lack of an inactive tab graphic just doesn't look right on Windows 8. It's actually kind of distracting. And I am using the normal blue color for the theme.

Yeah, it looks really nice with win7 aero, and with osx...but not so much win win8's solid background color. I've been just using the fxchrome theme on windows 8 ;)

i see 29 is out and i must say for me i think it is very ugly. why does it have to copy chrome? i dont want to upgrade if it wont work or look how i would like.

i have a few questions i hope you can answer

 

tabs - i hate tabs and never use then as i use multiple monitors. can you disable tabs? i use an extension to hide tabs if only 1 tab showing as i dont like wasted space.

bookmarks toolbar - i havent seen it in any screenshots with it so is it still there? the toolbar i use has many folders holding many bookmarks. i want easy access to bookmarks.

personas - i love the custom backgrounds personas give you, ive always used my own so i really want to keep using this.

Chrome all the way :P
 

 

I do like what Mozilla have been doing recently, but once you've used one certain browser for many many many hours - its hard to change.

 

The guy who created the Firefox icon lives next door to me, so theres always some geeky jokes flying around our houses ;)

tabs - i hate tabs and never use then as i use multiple monitors. can you disable tabs? i use an extension to hide tabs if only 1 tab showing as i dont like wasted space.

bookmarks toolbar - i havent seen it in any screenshots with it so is it still there? the toolbar i use has many folders holding many bookmarks. i want easy access to bookmarks.

personas - i love the custom backgrounds personas give you, ive always used my own so i really want to keep using this.

Tabs - Yes, your addon probably still works. Using Tab Mix Plus myself, although even with three displays I personally don't use this option myself. On the display page of its configuration is an option to hide the tab bar when there's only one tab open, or hide it always if you're pining for a retro look.

Bookmarks Toolbar - Yup, still there.

Personas - Still there too.

It's really not hard to get it to look and feel like the pre-Australis versions, still stupidly flexible as always, something Chrome can't touch.

How has it copied chrome?

Probably referring to the minimalistic look, they do kinda sorta resemble each other now out of the box. Fortunately easily changed if you don't care for the Chrome look.

1.  Tabs on bottom no longer an option.

2.  Rounded tabs that looks almost identical to Chrome's

3.  Lack of user customization, like Chrome.

 

FF 29 is a disaster.

1. you can still get that with addons or even css scripts if you prefer

2. the tabs in firefox are fully round where the tabs in chrome are angular like minella envelopes. how is that almost identical? what do you expect them to do? make them triangles?

3. there is still plenty of user customization, especially if you install addons. I refer you to this post if you want addons to make firefox look like it was before

 

firefox 29 works just fine. i've been using it for awhile in beta. and i quite like the new theme. the only change i've made with an addon was add the addons bar back for forecastfox

1. you can still get that with addons or even css scripts if you prefer

2. the tabs in firefox are fully round where the tabs in chrome are angular like minella envelopes. how is that almost identical? what do you expect them to do? make them triangles?

3. there is still plenty of user customization, especially if you install addons. I refer you to this post if you want addons to make firefox look like it was before

 

firefox 29 works just fine. i've been using it for awhile in beta. and i quite like the new theme. the only change i've made with an addon was add the addons bar back for forecastfox

 

I can guarantee you that Mozilla will eventually back off of Firefox 29 the same way Microsoft backed off of Windows 8.

1.  Tabs on bottom no longer an option.

2.  Rounded tabs that looks almost identical to Chrome's

3.  Lack of user customization, like Chrome.

 

FF 29 is a disaster.

There's still plenty of user customization, *especially* compared to chrome. Chrome allows absolutely zero toolbar or menu customization. fx 29 allows you to add/remove items from the toolbar, as well as from the new menu. And as always, extensions and themes give many, many more customization options, far more than whats available from other browsers.

 

And I echo the comment above, the new tab strip does *not* look like chrome's, I can't fathom where people are getting this comparison from. if anything the new tab strip looks less like chrome's than the old one.

 

Chrome's tab strip is designed to look like tabs on a manilla envelope, all tabs have the same look, except inactive tabs are slightly transparent. With australis the curved shape is much more pronounced, and not designed with the manilla envelope look in mind, and the inactive tabs look totally different, almost completely blended into the background. They are not 'chrome-like' tabs...

I can guarantee you that Mozilla will eventually back off of Firefox 29 the same way Microsoft backed off of Windows 8.

and i guarantee you they wont. there's no reason too. the only downside of the new theme is the addon bar was removed. everything else is pretty much the same or improved

 

the new settings button has features that the firefox button lacked plus just like before you can still access the classic file menu by pressing alt

 

sync has been improved greatly as well (but you probably don't care about that because it's not actually part of the theme)

 

there are plenty of other things in the back end as well there are being improved but you still don't care because you just don't like how it looks by default now

 

/end rant

  • Like 3

There's still plenty of user customization, *especially* compared to chrome. Chrome allows absolutely zero toolbar or menu customization. fx 29 allows you to add/remove items from the toolbar, as well as from the new menu. And as always, extensions and themes give many, many more customization options, far more than whats available from other browsers.

 

And I echo the comment above, the new tab strip does *not* look like chrome's, I can't fathom where people are getting this comparison from. if anything the new tab strip looks less like chrome's than the old one.

 

They see a rounded tab, and their mind is set.  That's how it is for almost everything.  :/  .

and i guarantee you they wont. there's no reason too. the only downside of the new theme is the addon bar was removed. everything else is pretty much the same or improved

 

the new settings button has features that the firefox button lacked plus just like before you can still access the classic file menu by pressing alt

 

sync has been improved greatly as well (but you probably don't care about that because it's not actually part of the theme)

 

there are plenty of other things in the back end as well there are being improved but you still don't care because you just don't like how it looks by default now

 

/end rant

 

I just screen capped this post.  So when Mozilla does back off all this nonsense, I can rub it in your arrogant face.  Same way I did to Dot Matrix with his "Start Menu is never coming back to Windows 8" nonsense.

I just screen capped this post.  So when Mozilla does back off all this nonsense, I can rub it in your arrogant face.  Same way I did to Dot Matrix with his "Start Menu is never coming back to Windows 8" nonsense.

with the start screen i can understand. it takes up the entire screen and has a few features from the menu missing. neither is the case with the new theme or settings button.

 

the way it seems to me is you're calling the new theme crap just because you cant have the tabs on the bottom anymore. you're blowing things way out of proportion and refusing to look at everything else

My main concern about copying Chrome was the menu button, as I liked the Firefox button, but they actually did their own thing, and even the placement makes more sense with the way it works now (the menu pretty much just offers more buttons along the ones on the toolbar, so it makes sense it's placed right next to them). Keeps all the extension buttons tidy if you don't like them taking up space on the toolbar.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!