Recommended Posts

None right now I know of. Sorry... I don't workup much on this.

 

 

Tab Mix Plus has always been my go-to for anything tab related.  Can customize all sorts of things with them.  No idea how well it works with Nightly.. working fine with 29RC though. Looking briefly at their forums reports that the official build is problematic, but there's talk with the dev builds.  Classic Theme Restorer has an option for the close tab buttons too.

 

Thanks for the replies.  I checked up on the bug again, and someone in the comments posted this:

 

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-close-buttons/

 

Restartless, does what it says on the tin (and only that.)  :)  .

Thanks for the replies.  I checked up on the bug again, and someone in the comments posted this:

 

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/no-close-buttons/

 

Restartless, does what it says on the tin (and only that.)  :)  .

 

Thanks for sharing it for all people.  :)

Australis addons :)

  • Like 3

My Firefox just updated automatically(Strange because its too early lol) and ForecastFox was not working(2.2.2). After looking a little bit you can install 2.2.4(Not yet from Firefox addons page)and that version its working perfectly

 

https://static.getforecastfox.com/downloads/forecastfox-latest.xpi

I find the lack of an inactive tab graphic just doesn't look right on Windows 8. It's actually kind of distracting. And I am using the normal blue color for the theme.

Yeah, it looks really nice with win7 aero, and with osx...but not so much win win8's solid background color. I've been just using the fxchrome theme on windows 8 ;)

i see 29 is out and i must say for me i think it is very ugly. why does it have to copy chrome? i dont want to upgrade if it wont work or look how i would like.

i have a few questions i hope you can answer

 

tabs - i hate tabs and never use then as i use multiple monitors. can you disable tabs? i use an extension to hide tabs if only 1 tab showing as i dont like wasted space.

bookmarks toolbar - i havent seen it in any screenshots with it so is it still there? the toolbar i use has many folders holding many bookmarks. i want easy access to bookmarks.

personas - i love the custom backgrounds personas give you, ive always used my own so i really want to keep using this.

Chrome all the way :P
 

 

I do like what Mozilla have been doing recently, but once you've used one certain browser for many many many hours - its hard to change.

 

The guy who created the Firefox icon lives next door to me, so theres always some geeky jokes flying around our houses ;)

tabs - i hate tabs and never use then as i use multiple monitors. can you disable tabs? i use an extension to hide tabs if only 1 tab showing as i dont like wasted space.

bookmarks toolbar - i havent seen it in any screenshots with it so is it still there? the toolbar i use has many folders holding many bookmarks. i want easy access to bookmarks.

personas - i love the custom backgrounds personas give you, ive always used my own so i really want to keep using this.

Tabs - Yes, your addon probably still works. Using Tab Mix Plus myself, although even with three displays I personally don't use this option myself. On the display page of its configuration is an option to hide the tab bar when there's only one tab open, or hide it always if you're pining for a retro look.

Bookmarks Toolbar - Yup, still there.

Personas - Still there too.

It's really not hard to get it to look and feel like the pre-Australis versions, still stupidly flexible as always, something Chrome can't touch.

How has it copied chrome?

Probably referring to the minimalistic look, they do kinda sorta resemble each other now out of the box. Fortunately easily changed if you don't care for the Chrome look.

1.  Tabs on bottom no longer an option.

2.  Rounded tabs that looks almost identical to Chrome's

3.  Lack of user customization, like Chrome.

 

FF 29 is a disaster.

1. you can still get that with addons or even css scripts if you prefer

2. the tabs in firefox are fully round where the tabs in chrome are angular like minella envelopes. how is that almost identical? what do you expect them to do? make them triangles?

3. there is still plenty of user customization, especially if you install addons. I refer you to this post if you want addons to make firefox look like it was before

 

firefox 29 works just fine. i've been using it for awhile in beta. and i quite like the new theme. the only change i've made with an addon was add the addons bar back for forecastfox

1. you can still get that with addons or even css scripts if you prefer

2. the tabs in firefox are fully round where the tabs in chrome are angular like minella envelopes. how is that almost identical? what do you expect them to do? make them triangles?

3. there is still plenty of user customization, especially if you install addons. I refer you to this post if you want addons to make firefox look like it was before

 

firefox 29 works just fine. i've been using it for awhile in beta. and i quite like the new theme. the only change i've made with an addon was add the addons bar back for forecastfox

 

I can guarantee you that Mozilla will eventually back off of Firefox 29 the same way Microsoft backed off of Windows 8.

1.  Tabs on bottom no longer an option.

2.  Rounded tabs that looks almost identical to Chrome's

3.  Lack of user customization, like Chrome.

 

FF 29 is a disaster.

There's still plenty of user customization, *especially* compared to chrome. Chrome allows absolutely zero toolbar or menu customization. fx 29 allows you to add/remove items from the toolbar, as well as from the new menu. And as always, extensions and themes give many, many more customization options, far more than whats available from other browsers.

 

And I echo the comment above, the new tab strip does *not* look like chrome's, I can't fathom where people are getting this comparison from. if anything the new tab strip looks less like chrome's than the old one.

 

Chrome's tab strip is designed to look like tabs on a manilla envelope, all tabs have the same look, except inactive tabs are slightly transparent. With australis the curved shape is much more pronounced, and not designed with the manilla envelope look in mind, and the inactive tabs look totally different, almost completely blended into the background. They are not 'chrome-like' tabs...

I can guarantee you that Mozilla will eventually back off of Firefox 29 the same way Microsoft backed off of Windows 8.

and i guarantee you they wont. there's no reason too. the only downside of the new theme is the addon bar was removed. everything else is pretty much the same or improved

 

the new settings button has features that the firefox button lacked plus just like before you can still access the classic file menu by pressing alt

 

sync has been improved greatly as well (but you probably don't care about that because it's not actually part of the theme)

 

there are plenty of other things in the back end as well there are being improved but you still don't care because you just don't like how it looks by default now

 

/end rant

  • Like 3

There's still plenty of user customization, *especially* compared to chrome. Chrome allows absolutely zero toolbar or menu customization. fx 29 allows you to add/remove items from the toolbar, as well as from the new menu. And as always, extensions and themes give many, many more customization options, far more than whats available from other browsers.

 

And I echo the comment above, the new tab strip does *not* look like chrome's, I can't fathom where people are getting this comparison from. if anything the new tab strip looks less like chrome's than the old one.

 

They see a rounded tab, and their mind is set.  That's how it is for almost everything.  :/  .

and i guarantee you they wont. there's no reason too. the only downside of the new theme is the addon bar was removed. everything else is pretty much the same or improved

 

the new settings button has features that the firefox button lacked plus just like before you can still access the classic file menu by pressing alt

 

sync has been improved greatly as well (but you probably don't care about that because it's not actually part of the theme)

 

there are plenty of other things in the back end as well there are being improved but you still don't care because you just don't like how it looks by default now

 

/end rant

 

I just screen capped this post.  So when Mozilla does back off all this nonsense, I can rub it in your arrogant face.  Same way I did to Dot Matrix with his "Start Menu is never coming back to Windows 8" nonsense.

I just screen capped this post.  So when Mozilla does back off all this nonsense, I can rub it in your arrogant face.  Same way I did to Dot Matrix with his "Start Menu is never coming back to Windows 8" nonsense.

with the start screen i can understand. it takes up the entire screen and has a few features from the menu missing. neither is the case with the new theme or settings button.

 

the way it seems to me is you're calling the new theme crap just because you cant have the tabs on the bottom anymore. you're blowing things way out of proportion and refusing to look at everything else

My main concern about copying Chrome was the menu button, as I liked the Firefox button, but they actually did their own thing, and even the placement makes more sense with the way it works now (the menu pretty much just offers more buttons along the ones on the toolbar, so it makes sense it's placed right next to them). Keeps all the extension buttons tidy if you don't like them taking up space on the toolbar.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • "...a low price of just $340..." I don't think it means what you think it means.
    • This Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 32GB RAM with RGB is a great deal for limited time by Sayan Sen Memory prices have been through the roof for a while, though it seems like things might finally be getting better. If you are in the market for one, then grab this Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5 6000 CL36 kit with RGB for a low price of just $340 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The kit is compatible with both AMD and Intel systems as it supports both EXPO and XMP overclocking profiles, respectively. 6000 MT/s is often the sweet spot for many systems as it provides ample data transfer speed while still being on Gear 1 mode. This Vengeance variant has RGB so if you love bright setups with such lighting, this is a win-win for you. The technical specifications of the Corsair Vengeance memory kit are given in the table below: Specification Value Memory Type DDR5 Memory Size (Total) 32GB Kit Configuration 2 × 16GB Form Factor UDIMM (Desktop) Pin Count 288-pin Speed (Data Rate) 6000 MT/s Speed Rating PC5-48000 Tested CAS Latency 38-44-44-96 Voltage (Tested) 1.35V Performance Profile AMD EXPO & Intel XMP Heat Spreader Aluminum heatspreader Cooling Type Passive (Heatsink) Lighting Ten Zone RGB Software Support Corsair iCUE Get it at the link below: CORSAIR Vengeance RGB DDR5 32GB (2 x 16GB) 6000 CL38 – Gray (CMH32GX5M1E6000Z38): $339.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US, Fulfilled by Amazon US) This Woot deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The very fact that a TPM (v2.0 specifically which is part of the issue I suspect) is now a baseline for any supported Windows installation will naturally mean other vendors will start to leverage it as they know it'll be there. It's called progress, and it's always been the way. A TPM isn't a windows thing, it's just a module designed to securely store keys. Secure boot isn't a Windows thing (although MS are the TCA as I recall hence the upheaval this year as the 2011 certs expire), it's just a way to verify a bootloader is signed. Windows simply leverages them.
    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!