Recommended Posts

My main concern about copying Chrome was the menu button, as I liked the Firefox button, but they actually did their own thing, and even the placement makes more sense with the way it works now (the menu pretty much just offers more buttons along the ones on the toolbar, so it makes sense it's placed right next to them). Keeps all the extension buttons tidy if you don't like them taking up space on the toolbar.

Yeah, the placement on the toolbar is simply the sensible place to put it, even IE has it there. I do wish they hadn't used the 'hamburger' icon though.

I guess it's because people see it as the "settings" icon.

Yeah, that's how it's used on mobile, not so much on desktop because we normally have the space for menus and so, but when you throw minimalism into the mix it's certainly a useful idea.

And of course, if not the "hamburger", what would you use to show that it's a drop down palette of random icons? The hamburger isn't a great fit, but it gets the point across.

Australis "Popularity" https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/classicthemerestorer/statistics/?last=30 Mozilla should reconsider this what happen...

Those numbers are a very tiny part of firefox's overall number of users lol. firefox has millions of users.

Meh, as long as they don't remove the ability to customize it to how I want, they can paint it with rainbows and unicorns for all I care. That's what keeps me with Firefox versus something rigid like Chrome or IE.

Meh, as long as they don't remove the ability to customize it to how I want, they can paint it with rainbows and unicorns for all I care.

That's just it though, people customize their browser in different ways and it seems like with each new version there are more and more addons just to replicate removed functionality.

That's just it though, people customize their browser in different ways and it seems like with each new version there are more and more addons just to replicate removed functionality.

that's no different with any other platform though

 

take windows for example. 8 aside there are apps like classic shell to make windows like older versions

 

there are similar things on android, ios, and osx as well

 

heck, just look at all the linux forks

That's just it though, people customize their browser in different ways and it seems like with each new version there are more and more addons just to replicate removed functionality.

Exactly, everybody does it differently.  It's totally impossible to make everybody happy, I know a few people who do like Australis out of the box (mainly Chrome users), but since it's completely possible to get whatever feature set the way you like it and it doesn't take a ton of resources to do it, it's not exactly a big deal either. Nothing unique to Firefox either.  Windows 8 irked me, added features back.  Gnome 3 ###### me off to no end, added features back.  And so on and so forth.  Austrailis aside, they haven't exactly removed a ton of features anyways in previous versions.  Between oh 19 or so and 28 I've had more or less the exact same plugins the whole time.  Austrailis had me add one.  Not worth making a fuss over considering the alternatives in browsers.

that's no different with any other platform though

 

take windows for example. 8 aside there are apps like classic shell to make windows like older versions

You are correct. People weren't happy with Windows 8 when it came out and some are still not happy with it now.

 

Exactly, everybody does it differently.  It's totally impossible to make everybody happy

This is true but I wandering if there was a real need for the change. Were there people who were unhappy with the previous Firefox interface?

 

Not worth making a fuss over considering the alternatives in browsers.

Depends on how much you like Firefox I guess. Some people may be indifferent about browsers and can switch between them with little difference in workflow.

 

 

You are correct. People weren't happy with Windows 8 when it came out and some are still not happy with it now.

 

you misread what i said. what i meant was "leaving 8 out of it" as classic shell has been around since vista or possibly earlier

You are correct. People weren't happy with Windows 8 when it came out and some are still not happy with it now.

You can customize 8 to behave virtualally the same as 7. Even throw 7's shell on it if that floats your boat.

 

This is true but I wandering if there was a real need for the change. Were there people who were unhappy with the previous Firefox interface?

Apparently so. But again one guy's perfection is another guy's eyesore.

 

Depends on how much you like Firefox I guess. Some people may be indifferent about browsers and can switch between them with little difference in workflow.

Well if "some people" aren't happy with the changes and refuse to make it how they want they're going to be sorely disappointed with the much less flexible options in the others. ;)

This is true but I wandering if there was a real need for the change. Were there people who were unhappy with the previous Firefox interface?

 

well there was an addon to be able to move the firefox button so not everyone was happy with it

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/movable-firefox-button/

There are always people who are going to be unhappy about any UI change, I remember people moaning that Firefox was ruined when they removed the original icons.

UIIPzsg.png

There were addons made to restore them, that's the best part about Firefox, if the developers change something then 90% of the time an addon can change it back.

WTF happened to the browser? After updating to 29 and restarting the browser for the install, at the first start I though I got a virus and Chrome was installed.

The redesign took me by complete surprise :/ Any way to return back to the previous one?

https://addons.mozilla.org/pl/firefox/addon/classicthemerestorer/ :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • No, "a great deal" for 32GB of DDR5 is $50, not $350. I mean I see what you mean, that it's a decent price compared to what's currently available, but you really should put a disclaimer in this articles explaining that it's still multiple times more expensive than it used to be.
    • Linux 7.1 stable launch looms as Linus Torvalds releases the final release candidate by Paul Hill Linus Torvalds has just released what’s expected to be the final release candidate of Linux 7.1, rc7. The Linux founder said that this RC is not small, but smaller than recent releases, which is a good sign because he expects the stable version to drop next week if things continue on this trajectory. Linux kernels see a merge window for the first two weeks of their life, where developers add new features, then there are about seven or eight weeks of release candidates before the stable version. Typically, there are seven release candidates, but if more time is needed, then an eighth release candidate is released too. This week’s RC’s biggest area of fixes was for GPUs, with networking just behind. Torvalds said that the rest of the release was “pretty random and spread out” with some architecture fixes, driver fixes, filesystem improvements, and build fixes for more unusual configs. In terms of specific pieces of hardware receiving improvements in this update, we had more AMD Zen6 models supported and fixes for AMD SDMA 7.1 and GFX11. Hardware that got improvements includes Lenovo laptops, HONOR laptops, and MSI laptops. Here are the changelogs for those: ASoC: amd: acp: Add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15ASH11 Input: atkbd - add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Air 14 (83QK) Input: atkbd - skip deactivate for HONOR BCC-N's internal keyboard ASoC: amd: yc: Add MSI Raider A18 HX A9WJG to quirk table ASoC: amd: yc: Enable internal mic on MSI Bravo 17 C7VF When the stable Linux 7.1 is released, it will be up to distribution maintainers, such as Canonical and Red Hat, to release the update to their users via the update manager. Some versions of Linux will get it before others, and some will never get it at all. Fedora and Arch-based distros will be among the first to get it, though. If you don’t get it, the security fixes will be backported to your system’s kernel, so you won’t be at risk, but you won’t get newer hardware support, which is fine if your computer works now.
    • Ideally, the algorithm is smart enough to see the real sender ID and non-spoofed address to block it. Ideally.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      68
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!