Recommended Posts

Context Menu and the loading animation in the tab is kinda ######ed

 

Context Menu changes are experimental and it will change a lot in future, you should read PDF attached in its bug for future prospect of it.

Here its link for PDF direct: https://bug1000513.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8411345 ; Blog post on Context Menu: http://msujaws.wordpress.com/2014/05/27/experimenting-with-context-menus/

As for loading animation in the tab, bug has been filed, I think it will take few days maximum I think. Actually merge day is coming near, so they will now focus on fixing regressions rather than landing big chunk changes.

Context Menu changes are experimental and it will change a lot in future, you should read PDF attached in its bug for future prospect of it.

As for loading animation in the tab, bug has been filed, I think it will take few days maximum I think. Actually merge day is coming near, so they will now focus on fixing regressions rather than landing big chunk changes.

 

I could get used to context menu, just seems weird atm

I could get used to context menu, just seems weird atm

 

Indeed but you will admit that its way much better than IE11 which has awful right click context menu which includes disabled states as well in it and many other stuff as well..

Is this what you are facing with tab loading animation:

http://screencast.com/t/fViRLzExHEh

Indeed but you will admit that its way much better than IE11 which has awful right click context menu which includes disabled states as well in it and many other stuff as well..

Is this what you are facing with tab loading animation:

http://screencast.com/t/fViRLzExHEh

 

Yeah it is, just looks a bit weird

Is there a way for Firefox on the Mac to, for instance, not maximize the images in the Desktop Showcase threads on this site? It goes against how Safari and Google Chrome handles these images - they appear maximised in Firefox but inline images are cut off on the right hand side. I looked in about:config for the automatic image resize setting and that was already set to true. Google'ing turned up nothing with regards to this other a post suggesting to turn off automatic resizing for images.

 

Is this a question that has been asked before and problem solved? 

 

Any idea as to what I'm talking about?

 

I would say to post it on site and forum issues but this has got to be known already.  It probably works this way for a reason.

Toggling image resizing in about:config won't have any effect, that only applies to standalone images.

The proper behaviour here is apparently undefined, Firefox and IE render it one way, Chrome and Safari another. Personally I think WebKit/Blink is wrong here though (The image is being told to fit the parent element, and the parent element is being told to fit the image, Firefox and IE fit it to the image, WebKit/Blink instead fits it to the parent element of the images parent element.)

Indeed but you will admit that its way much better than IE11 which has awful right click context menu which includes disabled states as well in it and many other stuff as well..

Is this what you are facing with tab loading animation:

http://screencast.com/t/fViRLzExHEh

Go home Firefox you're drunk.

This looks interesting, looks like there is some movement on implementing APZC for the mac version, if I understand correctly this could significantly improve scrolling responsiveness: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=944938

 

APZC + Tiled layers is what would be equivalent to OSX's 'responsive scrolling'.

APZC and tiling is what's used in the Android version (And everywhere with Chrome), it'll provide much better responsiveness than what's currently implemented (At the moment every scroll requires a repaint of the newly shown contents, with tiling the browser renders more than what's visible, but then you can scroll anywhere within that visible region without repainting)

It'll work better with multi-process tabs too, instead of the tab processes repainting when the parent scrolls, they can just go to sleep and never do any work.

I've been saying for ages that 64bit wasn't important because all it really offered was extra RAM availability (And I've only ever seen one person who was actually hitting that), but it seems with Windows 8 (or 8.1) Microsoft added a new, more secure form of ASLR that both requires a 64bit app, and requires the app to try to take advantage of the 64bit address space. I think that's a good enough reason honestly, actually adds a benefit for end users.

The overwhelming majority of Internet users could neither tell you what 64 bit means, nor will they have seen Google's announcement.

He's right about the first part, probably not the second. Most people have no idea what 64bit is (Or offers), but I think a bunch are going to see Google's announcement, have no idea what it means, but get the idea that Chrome is better because of it (Ignoring that even IE6 was available as a 64bit release)

Although I do find it funny how in the span of a few years we've gone from "Firefox uses 500MB of RAM, what a memory hog!" to "Firefox can only use 4GB of RAM? That's outdated!"

  • Like 2

So with a new OS X theme comes a new revision to Australis, not sure how I feel about it, but it is just a mockup (And it does fit the OS theme, which might be half the problem)

 

One tiny little nitpick I have with this mockup is that in Yosemite titlebars are transparent to the content of the window, and sidebars are transparent to the background. This mockup has a titlebar transparent to the desktop, which would be inconsistent.

 

And I totally approve of everyone going 64-bit. A regular user would not know what memory protection is, but we all know how useful that was over the last decade or so :)

It's an "official" mockup, it's not a prototype or anything so the OS isn't actually involved.

I don't actually have Yosemite, so what does it do with the fullscreen button?

The green 'traffic light' button fullscreens an app rather than use the previous 'zoom' feature.

  • 2 weeks later...

-- In-Content UI is disabled for Firefox 32.

-- YARR (Yet Another Regular Expression) code ported from Webkit has been removed from m-c (mozilla central) code base and Irregexp (from v8) replaced YARR.

-- After shifting to mozilla::pikx certificate validation, devs are planning to rip out NSS based code from M33.

-- Currently UTF-16 and ASCII strings conversion to UTF-8 is happening in mozilla JS side, it will improve performance and memory usage. v8 engine of Chrome already do this. Its Latin1 strings project.

 

Landed on mozilla-inbound

-- MemShrink P1 (Javascript) [Consolidate ScriptSources with the same source] - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020012

-- e10s-addons related chunk landed - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=990729 ; https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1017302 ; https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1019181

-- Cache2 related fixes - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=956801 ; https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=967310

-- Cache2 porting to thunderbird - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1023413

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!