Recommended Posts

one problem is 64-bit firefox doesn't support netflix html5 yet, so without silverlight no netflix.

 

does anything even still support Silverlight anymore? o_0 I thought Microsoft was finally killing that one off

ah there's my answer

 

That is not a reason to not release the 64-bit version to the stable channel... People's 32-bit Firefox installs would not be upgraded to 64-bit and then their Netflix stops working. One would have to go out of their way to install the 64-bit version. A warning that Netflix won't work would suffice.

I'd say that Microsoft killed off Silverlight with the introduction of Edge, problem is all the sites that used it when MS pushed it, now have to re-write all their sites to work properly (Apparently Silverlight was quite popular for media services, so a bunch of TV broadcasters only have Silveright web players, and currently Firefox is the only browser that works with them) 

one problem is 64-bit firefox doesn't support netflix html5 yet, so without silverlight no netflix.

Yeah, Mozilla have been waiting on Adobe for a 64bit CDM (And unless there's any unforeseen delays, it should be released alongside 42), and Netflix devs have been working with the Mozilla media team to make sure it works (42 also has the re-write of the MSE implementation that fixed nearly all the playback issues, it's now dumb stuff like people breaking WMF on their computers, so Firefox takes longer than usual for an API call, so Netflix times it out, etc.)

Adobe are also working on a CDM for OS X, so soon enough OS X users will be able to watch Netflix too. Isn't DRM great?

I know this is off-topic, but it's still hard for me to believe this one topic has been going on for 4 years straight! Is there any other thread on here that has gone on the same amount of time or longer?

I'd say that Microsoft killed off Silverlight with the introduction of Edge, problem is all the sites that used it when MS pushed it, now have to re-write all their sites to work properly (Apparently Silverlight was quite popular for media services, so a bunch of TV broadcasters only have Silveright web players, and currently Firefox is the only browser that works with them) 

Yeah, Mozilla have been waiting on Adobe for a 64bit CDM (And unless there's any unforeseen delays, it should be released alongside 42), and Netflix devs have been working with the Mozilla media team to make sure it works (42 also has the re-write of the MSE implementation that fixed nearly all the playback issues, it's now dumb stuff like people breaking WMF on their computers, so Firefox takes longer than usual for an API call, so Netflix times it out, etc.)

Adobe are also working on a CDM for OS X, so soon enough OS X users will be able to watch Netflix too. Isn't DRM great?

Yeah, it appears as though we traded a poorly supported microsoft plugin, for a poorly supported adobe plugin xD

at least a cdm is much smaller in scope then silverlight or flash and leaves everything but the drm part to the browser's native capabilities.

Sad, I had to use Modernizr.inputtypes['date'] for IE and Firefox and use JS date picker.

Also, Firefox needs to implement swipe left and right for back and forward - keep forgetting that it doesn't.

could someone fix these links up? there all broken

Edited by Demz
  • 2 weeks later...

Looks like something has slipped with a Mozilla Partner, so while 42 will have a official 64bit release, it doesn't look like Mozilla is going to make it publicly available on the website, it'll only be available from their FTP server.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1181014#c24

Looks like something has slipped with a Mozilla Partner, so while 42 will have a official 64bit release, it doesn't look like Mozilla is going to make it publicly available on the website, it'll only be available from their FTP server.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1181014#c24

Looking forward to an official 64-bit release even if it isn't advertised as such. I would guess the "partner" is Adobe/Flash which I don't have installed anyway so I don't care :D

not having an official 64bit firefox build out is only gonna hurt Mozilla in the short term an possibly ther long term also, as people will just go over to Pale Moon or Google Chromes 64bit , personally though i dont care as i dont use Windows

Ehhh, I don't think the majority of people really care, actually.

The majority of people don't even know what it means. They just use whatever the default download is. For Chrome that is still 32-bit as far as I can tell. You have to manually select the 64-bit download if you want it when I just checked.

Looking forward to an official 64-bit release even if it isn't advertised as such. I would guess the "partner" is Adobe/Flash which I don't have installed anyway so I don't care :D

I don't think it's Flash (Originally Flash was an issue since the 64bit plugin was a separate download, Adobe bundled them ages ago though), it's probably something like the CDM. Or maybe Netflix are delaying their native player launch, so Mozilla needs to keep Silverlight around for another release.

Ehhh, I don't think the majority of people really care, actually.

For most people having a 64bit release means not having the "* 32" in the task manager.

  • 2 weeks later...

What ######## idiot thought this was a good idea,

Only available to code blocks in HTML wrapped in a <script type="application/javascript;version=1.7"> block (or higher version). Beware, however, that as this is a non-standard feature, this will most likely break support for other browsers.

from this page https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/let and seems supported by https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/

Great

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I think this will appeal to a lot of enthusiasts. If the thermals are similar to those of a single system in a compact case, many people running multiple systems may choose to combine them into one machine, provided the case footprint remains reasonable.
    • No, "a great deal" for 32GB of DDR5 is $50, not $350. I mean I see what you mean, that it's a decent price compared to what's currently available, but you really should put a disclaimer in this articles explaining that it's still multiple times more expensive than it used to be.
    • Linux 7.1 stable launch looms as Linus Torvalds releases the final release candidate by Paul Hill Linus Torvalds has just released what’s expected to be the final release candidate of Linux 7.1, rc7. The Linux founder said that this RC is not small, but smaller than recent releases, which is a good sign because he expects the stable version to drop next week if things continue on this trajectory. Linux kernels see a merge window for the first two weeks of their life, where developers add new features, then there are about seven or eight weeks of release candidates before the stable version. Typically, there are seven release candidates, but if more time is needed, then an eighth release candidate is released too. This week’s RC’s biggest area of fixes was for GPUs, with networking just behind. Torvalds said that the rest of the release was “pretty random and spread out” with some architecture fixes, driver fixes, filesystem improvements, and build fixes for more unusual configs. In terms of specific pieces of hardware receiving improvements in this update, we had more AMD Zen6 models supported and fixes for AMD SDMA 7.1 and GFX11. Hardware that got improvements includes Lenovo laptops, HONOR laptops, and MSI laptops. Here are the changelogs for those: ASoC: amd: acp: Add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15ASH11 Input: atkbd - add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Air 14 (83QK) Input: atkbd - skip deactivate for HONOR BCC-N's internal keyboard ASoC: amd: yc: Add MSI Raider A18 HX A9WJG to quirk table ASoC: amd: yc: Enable internal mic on MSI Bravo 17 C7VF When the stable Linux 7.1 is released, it will be up to distribution maintainers, such as Canonical and Red Hat, to release the update to their users via the update manager. Some versions of Linux will get it before others, and some will never get it at all. Fedora and Arch-based distros will be among the first to get it, though. If you don’t get it, the security fixes will be backported to your system’s kernel, so you won’t be at risk, but you won’t get newer hardware support, which is fine if your computer works now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      68
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!