Recommended Posts

one problem is 64-bit firefox doesn't support netflix html5 yet, so without silverlight no netflix.

 

does anything even still support Silverlight anymore? o_0 I thought Microsoft was finally killing that one off

ah there's my answer

 

That is not a reason to not release the 64-bit version to the stable channel... People's 32-bit Firefox installs would not be upgraded to 64-bit and then their Netflix stops working. One would have to go out of their way to install the 64-bit version. A warning that Netflix won't work would suffice.

I'd say that Microsoft killed off Silverlight with the introduction of Edge, problem is all the sites that used it when MS pushed it, now have to re-write all their sites to work properly (Apparently Silverlight was quite popular for media services, so a bunch of TV broadcasters only have Silveright web players, and currently Firefox is the only browser that works with them) 

one problem is 64-bit firefox doesn't support netflix html5 yet, so without silverlight no netflix.

Yeah, Mozilla have been waiting on Adobe for a 64bit CDM (And unless there's any unforeseen delays, it should be released alongside 42), and Netflix devs have been working with the Mozilla media team to make sure it works (42 also has the re-write of the MSE implementation that fixed nearly all the playback issues, it's now dumb stuff like people breaking WMF on their computers, so Firefox takes longer than usual for an API call, so Netflix times it out, etc.)

Adobe are also working on a CDM for OS X, so soon enough OS X users will be able to watch Netflix too. Isn't DRM great?

I know this is off-topic, but it's still hard for me to believe this one topic has been going on for 4 years straight! Is there any other thread on here that has gone on the same amount of time or longer?

I'd say that Microsoft killed off Silverlight with the introduction of Edge, problem is all the sites that used it when MS pushed it, now have to re-write all their sites to work properly (Apparently Silverlight was quite popular for media services, so a bunch of TV broadcasters only have Silveright web players, and currently Firefox is the only browser that works with them) 

Yeah, Mozilla have been waiting on Adobe for a 64bit CDM (And unless there's any unforeseen delays, it should be released alongside 42), and Netflix devs have been working with the Mozilla media team to make sure it works (42 also has the re-write of the MSE implementation that fixed nearly all the playback issues, it's now dumb stuff like people breaking WMF on their computers, so Firefox takes longer than usual for an API call, so Netflix times it out, etc.)

Adobe are also working on a CDM for OS X, so soon enough OS X users will be able to watch Netflix too. Isn't DRM great?

Yeah, it appears as though we traded a poorly supported microsoft plugin, for a poorly supported adobe plugin xD

at least a cdm is much smaller in scope then silverlight or flash and leaves everything but the drm part to the browser's native capabilities.

Sad, I had to use Modernizr.inputtypes['date'] for IE and Firefox and use JS date picker.

Also, Firefox needs to implement swipe left and right for back and forward - keep forgetting that it doesn't.

could someone fix these links up? there all broken

Edited by Demz
  • 2 weeks later...

Looks like something has slipped with a Mozilla Partner, so while 42 will have a official 64bit release, it doesn't look like Mozilla is going to make it publicly available on the website, it'll only be available from their FTP server.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1181014#c24

Looks like something has slipped with a Mozilla Partner, so while 42 will have a official 64bit release, it doesn't look like Mozilla is going to make it publicly available on the website, it'll only be available from their FTP server.

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1181014#c24

Looking forward to an official 64-bit release even if it isn't advertised as such. I would guess the "partner" is Adobe/Flash which I don't have installed anyway so I don't care :D

not having an official 64bit firefox build out is only gonna hurt Mozilla in the short term an possibly ther long term also, as people will just go over to Pale Moon or Google Chromes 64bit , personally though i dont care as i dont use Windows

Ehhh, I don't think the majority of people really care, actually.

The majority of people don't even know what it means. They just use whatever the default download is. For Chrome that is still 32-bit as far as I can tell. You have to manually select the 64-bit download if you want it when I just checked.

Looking forward to an official 64-bit release even if it isn't advertised as such. I would guess the "partner" is Adobe/Flash which I don't have installed anyway so I don't care :D

I don't think it's Flash (Originally Flash was an issue since the 64bit plugin was a separate download, Adobe bundled them ages ago though), it's probably something like the CDM. Or maybe Netflix are delaying their native player launch, so Mozilla needs to keep Silverlight around for another release.

Ehhh, I don't think the majority of people really care, actually.

For most people having a 64bit release means not having the "* 32" in the task manager.

  • 2 weeks later...

What ######## idiot thought this was a good idea,

Only available to code blocks in HTML wrapped in a <script type="application/javascript;version=1.7"> block (or higher version). Beware, however, that as this is a non-standard feature, this will most likely break support for other browsers.

from this page https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/let and seems supported by https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/

Great

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • OpenAI is now rolling out Lockdown Mode to more ChatGPT users by Pradeep Viswanathan Back in February, OpenAI first announced Lockdown Mode for users who want the most comprehensive protection from potential attacks. At the time of the announcement, the company mentioned that this feature was available to a small set of highly security-conscious users, including executives or security teams at leading organizations. Today, OpenAI announced that Lockdown Mode is now rolling out to all personal ChatGPT accounts, including Free, Go, Plus, and Pro, and also self-serve ChatGPT Business accounts. Users can enable the feature from ChatGPT Settings > Security when it is available for their account. When Lockdown Mode is enabled, ChatGPT limits or disables several features that connect to the web or external services. These include live web browsing, Deep Research, Agent Mode, and more. Here is the complete list of services that will be disabled in Lockdown Mode: Live web browsing: Web browsing is limited to accessing only cached content. Search results may be limited, unavailable, or stale. Image support: ChatGPT may not display images in regular responses or retrieve images from the web. Users can still upload image files, and image generation remains available where it is otherwise available. Deep research: Deep research is disabled. Agent mode: Agent mode is disabled. Canvas networking: Users cannot approve Canvas-generated code to access the network. File downloads: ChatGPT cannot download files for data analysis. ChatGPT can still operate on your manually uploaded files. It is important to note that Lockdown Mode does not completely block prompt injections from appearing in content that ChatGPT processes. For example, a malicious instruction could still be present in an uploaded file or cached web content. However, the mode is designed to reduce the ways such an attack could send sensitive information outside the conversation. Along with Lockdown Mode, OpenAI today also announced that the Active sessions feature is now available across ChatGPT accounts and workspace types. This feature allows users to review where their account is signed in across devices and end sessions if required. A session will have the following information displayed: Device or browser information. First-party app context, such as ChatGPT, Codex, or API Platform. Approximate location. Sign-in date and time. Whether the device is a trusted device. Whether it is your current session. OpenAI highlighted that the Active sessions feature will not be available for accounts linked to an organization’s single sign-on setup, including SAML or OIDC.
    • with LSTC and ESU, moving to w11 or linux because w10 suddenly will not work when in reality it works and its a better choice, of course there are also developers that only test in 11 or force you to have TPM and Secure boot for the sake of "better security" in games. or most likely people is buying new PC that only ship with 11
    • with LTSC and ESU there are still viable as a stable platform not that they care and let people deal with w11 crashing and burning every month support mean shet if the platform is trash
    • Most boring game ever. Repetitive, empty, predictable, and full of cliches. Total waste of time and money, IMO.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!