Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

http://www.bigelowaerospace.com/index.php

Bigelow Aerospace Expediting BA 330 Development

Due to customer demand and progress in commercial crew transportation, Bigelow Aerospace has moved directly to BA 330 development. As the name indicates, the BA 330 will provide roughly 330 cubic meters of usable volume and can support a crew of up to six. The BA 330 can function as an independent space station, or several BA 330s can be combined to support an even larger orbital complex. "It's extremely exciting to proceed with the actual construction of BA 330s," said Robert T. Bigelow, President and founder of Bigelow Aerospace, "This robust habitat will serve as the backbone for a new, dynamic era of commercial human spaceflight. The BA 330 will support a wide variety of utilization and exploration missions both in Low Earth Orbit and beyond. "

awesome video man, these guys are really talented and the models are incredible. wish i could buy a few to put on my desk. they also helped me realize just how big these habs are, that's really more like it! finally some big stuff in space. it was good to know they were the guys that did the ships in Independence Day, didn't know that!

  • 3 weeks later...

Video of a BA-330 launch, and its deployment & docking with a Boeing CST-100 spacecraft. After separating from the 2nd stage it deploys its solar arrays, then the body of the habitat is inflated (unshown) and becomes rigid. The walls are 16 inches thick, providing better radiation and debris protection than a metal structure like on the ISS. Additional shielding can be added internally if required.

Music and audio of the rocket engine added by yours truly (it was silent so....)

Music was from another project and the audio of the rocket was a Falcon 9 launch. Didn't need to call ISS a tin can - that's self evident by now ;)

Bigelow opens that big factory later this year, and outfitting & module/hub/propulsion bus construction starts soon after. After that's done they've said the station construction starts when the commercial spacecraft are available to transport crews; probably 2014-2016.

can't wait, it'll be good to have their station designs transition into replacing the ISS over the next few years, and working together with the Dragon and Dream Chaser towards creating THE VALKYRIE SHUTTLE! bet you thought i'd fogotten about her!

  • 2 months later...

A reply from Bigelow about their progress. Destructive testing of a BA-330 restraint layer (holds it together) soon after completion later this year - add pressure until failure to see what it can take.

Thanks for your interest in Bigelow Aerospace (BA). You asked about a very broad range of topics that would take many pages to respond to all, but maybe I'll just start with our near term plans. BA is a very hardware oriented company that puts a lot of value in testing as opposed to analysis, so most of the objectives you see below are hardware/test centered.

With a few months left in 2011, we are currently working on several important projects to dramatically increase the maturity of the BA330 design. The first and biggest is beginning the qualification of the BA 330 restraint layer (the strength behind the Bigelow Expandable Pressure Vessels.) Bigelow Aerospace has designed and developed restraint layers for several sizes of Expandable Vehicles including Genesis, Galaxy, and Sundancer, but BA 330 will be the biggest so far. The designs are completed and we are in the process of fabricating the first of the BA 330 size restraint layers now. Our plans have it completed and ready for destructive testing by the end of the year. This will be a big and exciting milestone for us as the largest expandable structure we have designed and fabricated to date (we have built several Sundancer size restraint layers and currently have one in leak test that was started about 3 years ago at 12 psi.) The plan is to pressurize this unit to failure late this year, or early next, to learn about this specific design?s structural margins and evaluate our fabrication methods. Bigelow Aerospace has always had an in internal design philosophy to maintain very large structural margins giving us industry leading factors of safety.

Bigelow is also heavily engaged in working with our full scale BA 330 ECLSS (Environmental Control and Life Support System) chamber. This involves long and short term testing in a sealed volume with either human or human simulators in the loop to produce the ECLSS load. We have performed several tests to date where we have had multiple people occupy the sealed chamber from several hours to days at time to test these systems. Long duration and characterization testing will continue into the new year using this facility.

The last major area we are currently concentrating on is our Avionics ?Flat Sat.? We are constructing what will eventually become a very high fidelity, even up to flight quality, set of hardware that will function everything electronic on the spacecraft (ie: GNC, ECLSS, Power Generation, Communication, etc) but laid out on benches. This makes these complex systems easier to work on and evaluate before integration into a flight structure. We are currently in the first phases of this plan with a basic network of flight representative computers and communication equipment installed and operating. We plan to continually upgrade the fidelity of the hardware and software and test continuously until we have all full flight quality systems for the spacecraft installed and fully tested on the bench. This ?build a little, test a little? philosophy is a standard practice at Bigelow Aerospace.

There are also several outside projects we are working on, including contract work for Boeing on CCDev2, but I can?t get into too much of that because of the proprietary nature of some of these relationships.

Thanks for the interest and hope this sparks some discussion.

heh heh good to see they're replying to your emails in person Doc, you must be a heavyweight in the industry for that to happen. anyway, it's good that they're active, been a while since we had any news from them, no? half of their response goes over my head as i just hum "Valkyrie shuttle", but still, it's good to read this!

  • 4 months later...

From an interview mostly about the Boeing CST-100 with John Mulholland, vice president and program manager for Boeing Commercial Programs -

"[Robert Bigelow] has been a great partner and provided us a lot of value," Mulholland said. "They are about to sign a contract with the International Space Station to put an inflatable module up there. Getting that NASA seal of approval will really help stimulate the market."

This is likely, but not certain, to be the BEAM - Bigelow Expandable Activity Module, a hab used for logistics and as a testbed before their tech is used for other much more interesting projects.

That said, a Sundancer can't be ruled out as it wouldn't need another spacecraft (the Soyuz lifeboat or a crew exchange vehicle) acting as a tug to put it in place for berthing. Time will tell.

Sounds like the "balloon" is literally getting ready to go up.

  • 2 weeks later...

the sooner the better, those pics you posted of their big modules in outer space really had me going. why is it that everything space is always tentative and coming soon? why can't it be next month? and this doesn't even sound like a very expensive project.

  • 8 months later...

Wait may be coming to an end....

http://www.spacenews.com/article/new-nasa-bigelow-deal-puts-inflatable-space-station-module-one-step-closer-to-orbit#.UOs_Ub-9LTo

New NASA, Bigelow Deal Puts Inflatable Space Station Module One Step Closer to Orbit

NASA and Bigelow Aerospace have reached an agreement that could pave the way for attaching a Bigelow-built inflatable space habitat to the international space station.

>

The rest is behind a paywall - more as it emerges....

Link....

Bigelow Aerospace and NASA sign contract

There have been rumors about this for awhile. NASA and Bigelow Aerospace have signed a $17.8 million contract. The details will be released later but apparently it deals with preliminary work on the proposed BEAM (Bigelow Expandable Activity Module) system for the ISS.

Contractor BIGELOW AEROSPACE, LLC

NORTH LAS VEGAS, NEVADA

Contract Number NNH13CH31C

NASA Center HQ - Headquarters Acquisition Division

Place of Performance North Las Vegas, NV (District 01)

Award Date 12/20/2012

Completion Date 12/19/2017

Contractor Type Small Business

Award Type Firm Fixed Price

Current FY Obligations $6,350,000

Total Obligations $6,350,000

Total Award Value $17,865,903

NAICS Code 541712

Description of Work UNDER THIS CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND OPERATE THE BIGELOW EXPANDABLE ACTIVITY MODULE (BEAM) ON-BOARD THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION (ISS). THIS EFFORT IS FOR PHASE 2 OF THE BEAM ISS DEMONSTRATION MODULE PROJECT, AND ESTABLISHES THE REQUIREMENTS, PERFORMANCE METRICS, COSTS, AND MANAGEMENT OF THE EFFORT THAT WILL BE USED TO DESIGN, DELIVER, AND OPERATE THE BEAM.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!