Recommended Posts

Here we go. What they're getting awards for - (spacecraft images bottom)

Boeing: CST-100 crew capsule

SpaceX: Dragon capsule launch escape/landing system

Sierra Nevada: Dream Chaser spaceplane

Blue Origin: New Shepard capsule

RELEASE: 11-102

NASA AWARDS NEXT SET OF COMMERCIAL CREW DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS

WASHINGTON -- NASA has awarded four Space Act Agreements in the second

round of the agency's Commercial Crew Development (CCDev2) effort.

Each company will receive between $22 million and $92.3 million to

advance commercial crew space transportation system concepts and

mature the design and development of elements of their systems, such

as launch vehicles and spacecraft.

The selectees for CCDev2 awards are:

-- Blue Origin, Kent, Wash., $22 million

-- Sierra Nevada Corporation, Louisville, Colo., $80 million

-- Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX), Hawthorne, Calif., $75

million

-- The Boeing Company, Houston, $92.3 million

"We're committed to safely transporting U.S. astronauts on

American-made spacecraft and ending the outsourcing of this work to

foreign governments," NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said. "These

agreements are significant milestones in NASA's plans to take

advantage of American ingenuity to get to low-Earth orbit, so we can

concentrate our resources on deep space exploration."

The goal of CCDev2 is to accelerate the availability of U.S.

commercial crew transportation capabilities and reduce the gap in

American human spaceflight capability. Through this activity, NASA

also may be able to spur economic growth as potential new space

markets are created.

Once developed, crew transportation capabilities could become

available to commercial and government customers.

"The next American-flagged vehicle to carry our astronauts into space

is going to be a U.S. commercial provider," said Ed Mango, NASA's

Commercial Crew Program manager. "The partnerships NASA is forming

with industry will support the development of multiple American

systems capable of providing future access to low-Earth orbit."

These awards are a continuation of NASA's CCDev initiatives, which

began in 2009 to stimulate efforts within U.S. industry to develop

and demonstrate human spaceflight capabilities. For more information

about NASA's Commercial Crew Program, visit:

Boeing CST-100 (partnered with Bigelow Aerospace)

CST-100.jpg

SpaceX Dragon (already flying)

fancy-dragon3_640x480.jpg

Sierra Nevada Dream Chaser (partnered with Northrop Grumman & Virgin Galactic)

Sierra+Nevada+Dream_Chaser.jpg

Blue Origin New Shepard (somewhat black project)

A513.jpg

Details -

Sierra Nevada:

system requirements review

canted airfoil fin selection

cockpit based flight simulator

vehicle avionics integration laboratory

system defniition review

flight control integration laboratory

ETA structure delivery

separation system test

preliminary design review for Dream Chaser

optional milestones: materials testing captive carry and ETA landing gear drop tests, ETA captive carry flight test, wind tunnel testing, dream chaser handling qualities evaluation, main RCS test, two hybrid rocket motor test firing, thrust vector control test, ETA captive carry flight test readiness review, ETA free flight test

Blue Origin:

* Space Vehicle Design: space vehicle system requirements review

* Pusher escape Risk Reduction: pusher escape ground firing, pusher escape pad escape test (optional milestones: pusher escape max-Q sled test calibration run, pusher escape mas-Q sled test egress run)

* RBS (reusable booster system) engine risk reduction: engine thrust chamber assembly test at Stennis (optional: engine pump cold gas drive test, engine pump hot gas drive test) [as an aside, apparently the RBF is a 100klbf restartable hydrolox engine)

Boeing:

launch abort engine fabrication & hot fire test demonstration

landing air bag drop demonstration #1

phase I wind tunnel tests

interim design review - 4

parachute drop tests demonstration

SM propellant tank development test

LV EDS/ASIF interface simulation test

Preliminary design review

SpaceX:

launch abort system propulsion conceptual design review

design status review 1 (for Falcon 9/Dragon crew transportation system)

LAS propulsion components PDR

crew accommodation concept prototype and in situ trial (internally-funded by SpaceX, NASA astronauts invited to try crew accomodations and give feedback)

DSR 2

crew accommodation concept delta-prototype and in-situ trial 2

LAS propulsion component test articles complete

LAS propulsion component initial test cycle

concept baseline review

Sierra Nevada hasn't provided a timeline graphic for Dream Chaser's timeline, but drop tests of the full size test bird, analogous to the Shuttle Enterprise, will perform drop-test flights in 2012 - likely using the Virgin Galactic White Knight Two serving as its mothership. A launch is possible atop an Atlas V in 2014.

Blue Origin is, as usual, cryptic other than the test flight will be on an Atlas V and later flights on their own reusable booster.

  • 2 months later...

CCDev is now starting level 2 (CCDev-2) and is issuing bi-monthly reports. The most recent is here -

http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/563409main_201106_Commercial_60day_Report_508.pdf

Highlights:

Boeing CST-100: Delta Systems Design Review completed, Full-scale landing airbag test this summer.

SpaceX Dragon: abort system design and supporting paper gets sent to NASA this month (July 2011). Cabin hardware (seats, controls, and enhanced life support) development in parallel.

SNC Dream Chaser: system requirements review, preliminary design review, airfoil selection

Blue Origin SV: vehicle design, pusher launch escape, and reusable booster.

No, it's TSTO - two stages.

The only SSTO spacecraft that's been proposed was the Lockheed Martin VentureStar spaceplane and it's X-33 testbed, both of which used the revolutionary Linear Aerospike engine. They were cancelled by NASA & Congress in 2001 during X-33's construction; it was too big a threat to the Space Shuttle establishment.

VentureStar was shown in the opening credits for Star Trek: Enterprise and was also referenced in Avatar.

Left to right: X-33, VentureStar and Space Shuttle

x33_venturestar_shuttle.jpg

oh come on Doc, you know i love the VentureStar, it's basically my Valkyrie shuttle, and yes the name was used in the Avatar ISV...that was a nice touch i thought. is there a chance the VS will be resurrected now the shuttle is retired? will the aeospike engine magically work to spec now? please?

When who is scheduled to do what - subject to change, of course

2011:

Dragon C2 cargo - ISS approach (optional C3 - ISS docking)

2012:

Dragon C3 cargo - ISS docking (if blended C2/C3 isn't done)

Dream Chaser drop tests (from WhiteKnightTwo)

Cygnus C1 cargo first test flight - ISS approach

Falcon Heavy delivered to Vandenberg AFB SLC-4E

Dragon cargo to ISS goes operational - 12 flights

Cygnus cargo to ISS goes operational - 8 flights

2013:

Falcon Heavy first flight

Dream Chaser unmanned flight

2014:

CST100 unmanned flight

Dragon manned flight

Dream Chaser manned flight

2016:

NASA MPCV* unmaned flight (if NASA's SLS** booster is ready)

* Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle

** Space Launch System ultra-heavy lift rocket

MPCV is what's supposed to take us to the moon and Mars, right? So why not just launch it to the moon 2016?

EDIT: i liked your Buck Rogers joke, but i intentionally avoided it...the Venture Star cancellation really saddens me...such a beautiful ship!

Orion/MPCV is what's left of the Constellation lunar program, an exercise in how NOT to do things.

Constellation was finally killed last year but its supporters keep trying to resurrect it, and MPCV is part of that in spite of Dragon being designed to be just as capable for beyond Earth orbit missions. Its launcher, SLS, is late and getting later as Constellation advocates try to resurrect Ares V as the design goal in spite of good reasons not to ($$$$$$)

Stupidity & greed.

The correct way to do heavy lift is to have a competition like COTS for cargo and CCDev for crew; let SpaceX's Falcon X/XX concept etc. take on all comers. The problem is that this puts the old-paradigm high-cost systems like shuttle-derived (SLS/Ares V, Direct etc) at a cost disadvantage, which doesn't sit well with congressmen & senators who have shuttle-based NASA centers and suppliers in their states/districts.

NASA and United Launch Associates (ULA - a Lockheed/Boeing joint venture) have signed a Space Act Agreement for the human-rating of the Atlas V booster. This agreement is unfunded, but it will allow ULA to use NASA's labs to develop, simulate and test towards this end. ULA's dime.

Atlas V is to be the front line launcher for the SNC Dream Chaser, Blue Origin's Space Vehicle, and Boeing's CST-100.

The big question is if the $120M+ cost of Atlas V will be lowered enough to compete with Falcon 9's $59M - $69M price point. The current price is the same as a cross-fed Falcon Heavy, a much more powerful system set to start flying in 2013. Massive overkill for this purpose, but still....

Atlas V and CST-100

atlas402.jpg

Atlas V and Dream Chaser

atlas_dreamchaser.jpg

every time you feel hostile towards spaceplanes, just sing the theme song from Star Blazers to yourself, and picture the Argo/Yamato flying through space with that huge citadel on top. you'll get in the spirit and won't hate spaceplanes any more.

"we're off to outer space, we're leaving mother Earth, to save the human race..."

As I'v said, they have their uses including emergency medical and delicate experiment/materials return, but for now not the routine up/down stuff.

That said, I'm prepping a post that may make you happier. It's not near term but it is commercial and very real.

  • 4 weeks later...

CCDev 60 day update #2

http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/580957main_August%202011_CSD%2060%20Day%20Report_508.pdf

Notables:

The main potential delay for SpaceX's COTS-2/3 flight actually docking at ISS is not them but delays in software updates at ISS itself.

SpaceX will be testing at White Sands, presumably the Super Draco thrusters.

Blue Origin will be testing engines at Stennis.

SNC at Langley, KSC and JSC.

Boeing at Langley.

Aside-

SpaceX is testing the Super Draco's at White Sands because that center is set up to handle engine testing with toxic hypergolic fuels; nitrogen tetroxide and hydrazine - the same as most other spacecraft. The plan is to eventually transition to the NOBFx monopropellant if its ignition speed is fast enough for use in launch abort systems.

NOBFx = Nitrous Oxide Fuel Blend x, a FireStar Technologies propitiatory mix of nitrous oxide with a fuel and blending agents in various proportions (the "x") according to the mission. By storing both oxidizer and fuel in a stabilized mix it simplifies the plumbing considerably and it's not anywhere near as toxic as hypergolics. It gets tested at ISS in 2012,

http://www.firestar-engineering.com/index.html

NOFBx advantages -

  • constituents are widely available from chemical suppliers, inexpensive and safe to handle.
    can be transported and handled without undue precautions or hazards.
    effluents are non-toxic and produces no accumulated deposits or contamination.
    propulsion system has high Isp (320-340 s) ? similar to the most common bi-propellant.
    has far better lift capability than the current workhorse monopropellant, hydrazine.
    is tolerant to a wide thermal range; storable at room temperature on the ground and is Space-storable.
    [is projected to] lower cost compared to existing propulsion systems of comparable performance.
    is monopropellant, which significantly reduces the need for auxiliary hardware, saving cost, volume, and mass for launch systems.
    utilizes cool running thrusters that dramatically reduce thermal design challenges.
    burns in liquid, gas, and two-phase flow.
    does not have the materials compatibility constraints of traditional hypergolic systems.

  • 2 months later...

Boeing will be using one of the old Shuttle processing facilities to prep & refurbish their CST-100 CCDev entry -

Link....

Boeing signs lease for NASA's space shuttle hangar

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. ? The Boeing Co. plans to build space taxis at a mothballed space shuttle processing hangar at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in central Florida.

On Monday, NASA officials and company executives confirmed that Boeing has reached an agreement with Space Florida, a state-backed agency working to expand space-related businesses in Florida, to lease Orbiter Processing Facility 3 at the center.

Boeing will also place the headquarters of its commercial crew operation in Florida, said John Mulholland, vice president and program manager for the company's effort.

"We will launch from right here, on Florida's Space Coast," Mullholland said.

The agreement was hailed by state and federal officials during a news conference inside the Orbiter Processing Facility. "Ladies and gentlemen, the dream is alive," said Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla.

NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver said the agreement would give a "major boost" to the space agency's commercialization efforts. She noted that Boeing and Space Florida were already sprucing up the shuttle's old hangar.

"I love what you've done to the place so far," she joked.

Kennedy Space Center is drafting a master plan for a revamped spaceport that, in addition to supporting future NASA spacecraft, will host commercial, military and international customers.

Boeing is one of four companies NASA is sponsoring to develop spaceships that can ferry astronauts to the International Space Station, a $100 billion project of 16 nations orbiting 240 miles (385 kilometers) above Earth.

With the retirement of NASA's space shuttles this summer, the United States is currently dependent on Russia to fly crews to the orbital outpost, at a cost of about $350 million per year.

NASA hopes to be able to buy rides from U.S. firms before the end of 2016.

Boeing's proposed space taxi is a seven-seat capsule called the CST-100, which would launch on an Atlas 5 rocket.

The company also has an agreement to provide rides for clients of Bigelow Aerospace, which is developing privately-owned inflatable space habitats for commercial and government lease.

NASA has spent $388 million to bolster the development of passenger spaceships. Boeing won $18 million in the program's first round of financing and $92.3 million in the second phase, which is currently under way.

The U.S. space agency this year added $20.6 million in options to Boeing's agreement if the company can complete additional milestones in the CST-100 development.

The Obama administration is requesting $850 million for the program for the fiscal year that began Oct. 1. Bills pending in the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate would cut that to $312 million and $500 million, respectively.

OPF-3

5936079070_d2590e369e.jpg

  • 1 month later...

Q1 2012 Commercial Crew Development milestones -

Sierra Nevada Corp. (SNC) Dream Chaser

- Engineering Test Article (ETA) Structure Delivery

- Captive Carry Interface & ETA Landing Gear Drop Tests (read: attachment for the Virgin WhiteKnightTwo mothership)

- Separation System Test

- ETA Captive Carry Flight Test Readiness Review

Boeing CST-100

- Launch Vehicle Emergency Detection System/Avionics System Integration Facility Interface Simulation Test Phase 2

- Launch Abort Engine (LAE) Fabrication and Hot Fire Test Demo

SpaceX Dragon

- Crew Accommodation Concept Prototype and In-Situ Trial 1 (read: seats, control panel layouts & controls)

- Crew Accommodation Concept Delta-Prototype and In-Situ Trial 2

(launch abort/DragonRider test fire in Q2)

Blue Origin SV

- Pusher Escape Ground Firing (read: launch abort system)

- Pusher Escape Test Vehicle #1 Shipment

United Launch Alliance (ULA) human-rated Atlas V launcher

- No milestone in Q1

Alliant Techsystems Inc. (ATK) Liberty launcher (unfunded)

- Launch System Initial System Design (ISD)

- Technical Interchange Meeting 2

- Program Status Review (PSR)

Excalibur Almaz Incorporated (EAI) (unfunded)

- System Requirements Review

- Launch Vehicle Compatibility Review

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!