What does x4 bandwidth mean on a PCIe 2.0 x16 slot?


Recommended Posts

Hey guys. I'm building my first ever PC, and as I was looking through the motherboards, I've noticed quite a lot of them state they have a PCIe 2.0 x16 slot, and then they have a PCIe 2.0 x16 slot, but with x4 bandwidth. The problem is, I don't know what they mean by x4 bandwidth. Here's the mobo in question:

http://www.scan.co.uk/products/gigabyte-ga-ph67a-ud3-b3-intel-h67-s-1155-pci-e-20-%28x16%29-ddr3-1333-sata-6gb-s-raid-atx

Basically, I'd like to use it for Crossfire support. I'm not looking into getting a second card straight away, but would like to get a mobo with Crossfire support so I can future proof myself when I want to get some extra graphics horsepower. It does say on the spec sheet it supports Crossfire, but I was worried that the x4 bandwith would limit the Crossfire capabilities in someway. I've tried googling for an explanation but haven't gotten very far. So, if someone could explain to me what that means, I'd be real appreciative.

Pretty much, its a 16x slot that runs at 4x electrically which means its going to have 1/4 the bandwidth. You are going to lose a lot of performance its not going to be much faster than a single card.

(I think) Its similar to my motherboard in that with 1 graphics card in it is x16 but with two in crossfire, the second card will only be 4x while the other is 16x. Making x8 overall for both in crossfire.

It doesnt work like that, the 4x slot is going to severely cripple one card which is going to affect the performance of the 16x slot card trying to keep in sync at the very least you are going to get massive microstutter.

So PCIe x16 only has 6.4GBPS bandwith? Surely that means there's a severe bottleneck with graphics cards like the 5870, a la the graphics card I'm probably going to get? Seen as the 5870 has a memory bandwith of 153GBPS? Or am I missing something completely?

(Why do I get the feeling that the more I learn the less I actually know? :laugh:)

So PCIe x16 only has 6.4GBPS bandwidth? Surely that means there's a severe bottleneck with graphics cards like the 5870, a la the graphics card I'm probably going to get? Seen as the 5870 has a memory bandwidth of 153GBPS? Or am I missing something completely?

(Why do I get the feeling that the more I learn the less I actually know? :laugh:)

Those two bandwidth numbers are entirely different things.

That 153GB/s memory bandwidth on your video card is the internal bandwidth of the card. Meaning from the GPU to the ram on the card itself and vice versa. Where as The PCI-E bandwidth is the rate at which the card can communicate with other devices in the system(such as the CPU, or the 2nd card in sli/xfire).

Those two bandwidth numbers are entirely different things.

That 153GB/s memory bandwidth on your video card is the internal bandwidth of the card. Meaning from the GPU to the ram on the card itself and vice versa. Where as The PCI-E bandwidth is the rate at which the card can communicate with other devices in the system(such as the CPU, or the 2nd card in sli/xfire).

Oh, right, yeah, that makes sense. I guess I was having a blonde moment :blush:

If you really want to crossfire then pay the extra money for a motherboard which supports x16/x16 crossfire (something i wish I'd known before I bought my crappy x16/x4 motherboard :p)

Testing has shown that x16, x8 and x4 only makes a 1% difference in performance.

Even putting a HD 6990 in x16 or x4 resulted in a 1% performance loss. And that is the fastest card on the market. That 1% was within testing error range as the x4 link in testing was connected to the South Bridge and not the CPU's built in PCIe controller, this added latency.

What people need to realise is that there is not enough data going over the PCIe link to make a difference. The graphics cards want low latency to the CPU and system memory they don't need high bandwidth as all that graphics data is being stored on the GPU itself in its memory and processed by the on-card GPU. Very little PCIe activity. An x4 link still has 16Gb/ps (2GB/ps) of bandwidth. Do you seriously think the GPU is transferring 16Gb of data per second with the CPU and System Memory? - No.

I don't know where this misinformation started but it has been debunked over and over and over again.

Do you have a source on that? I would be pretty intrested to read through.

Just one source. I've however done the testing myself and saw a 0.5-1% difference between all 3 configurations. In short it makes no difference and again 16Gb/ps people that is the full x4 bandwidth. :laugh:

So if I stick another Radeon HD 5850 in my system (16x/4x), it will be not much less performance than in 16x/16x?

Could I put a 5830 in? Or does it have to be the exact same card?

For ATi's Crossfire the cards do not have to be identical but they do need to be close to each other. Here is AMD's Crossfire compatibility chart to help you understand which cards will work together in crossfire and yes x16 and x4 will work fine and you wont be able to discern any performance difference between x16 and x4.

http://i.imgur.com/Db0uz.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!