What does x4 bandwidth mean on a PCIe 2.0 x16 slot?

By The Teej
in Hardware Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

The Teej

Posted
Posted

Hey guys. I'm building my first ever PC, and as I was looking through the motherboards, I've noticed quite a lot of them state they have a PCIe 2.0 x16 slot, and then they have a PCIe 2.0 x16 slot, but with x4 bandwidth. The problem is, I don't know what they mean by x4 bandwidth. Here's the mobo in question:

http://www.scan.co.uk/products/gigabyte-ga-ph67a-ud3-b3-intel-h67-s-1155-pci-e-20-%28x16%29-ddr3-1333-sata-6gb-s-raid-atx

Basically, I'd like to use it for Crossfire support. I'm not looking into getting a second card straight away, but would like to get a mobo with Crossfire support so I can future proof myself when I want to get some extra graphics horsepower. It does say on the spec sheet it supports Crossfire, but I was worried that the x4 bandwith would limit the Crossfire capabilities in someway. I've tried googling for an explanation but haven't gotten very far. So, if someone could explain to me what that means, I'd be real appreciative.

Grand Master

TheLegendOfMart

Posted
Posted

Pretty much, its a 16x slot that runs at 4x electrically which means its going to have 1/4 the bandwidth. You are going to lose a lot of performance its not going to be much faster than a single card.

(I think) Its similar to my motherboard in that with 1 graphics card in it is x16 but with two in crossfire, the second card will only be 4x while the other is 16x. Making x8 overall for both in crossfire.

It doesnt work like that, the 4x slot is going to severely cripple one card which is going to affect the performance of the 16x slot card trying to keep in sync at the very least you are going to get massive microstutter.

Grand Master

The Teej

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So PCIe x16 only has 6.4GBPS bandwith? Surely that means there's a severe bottleneck with graphics cards like the 5870, a la the graphics card I'm probably going to get? Seen as the 5870 has a memory bandwith of 153GBPS? Or am I missing something completely?

(Why do I get the feeling that the more I learn the less I actually know? :laugh:)

Grand Master

Blackhearted

Posted
Posted

So PCIe x16 only has 6.4GBPS bandwidth? Surely that means there's a severe bottleneck with graphics cards like the 5870, a la the graphics card I'm probably going to get? Seen as the 5870 has a memory bandwidth of 153GBPS? Or am I missing something completely?

(Why do I get the feeling that the more I learn the less I actually know? :laugh:)

Those two bandwidth numbers are entirely different things.

That 153GB/s memory bandwidth on your video card is the internal bandwidth of the card. Meaning from the GPU to the ram on the card itself and vice versa. Where as The PCI-E bandwidth is the rate at which the card can communicate with other devices in the system(such as the CPU, or the 2nd card in sli/xfire).

Grand Master

The Teej

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Those two bandwidth numbers are entirely different things.

That 153GB/s memory bandwidth on your video card is the internal bandwidth of the card. Meaning from the GPU to the ram on the card itself and vice versa. Where as The PCI-E bandwidth is the rate at which the card can communicate with other devices in the system(such as the CPU, or the 2nd card in sli/xfire).

Oh, right, yeah, that makes sense. I guess I was having a blonde moment :blush:

Grand Master

Vice

Posted
Posted

If you really want to crossfire then pay the extra money for a motherboard which supports x16/x16 crossfire (something i wish I'd known before I bought my crappy x16/x4 motherboard :p)

Testing has shown that x16, x8 and x4 only makes a 1% difference in performance.

Even putting a HD 6990 in x16 or x4 resulted in a 1% performance loss. And that is the fastest card on the market. That 1% was within testing error range as the x4 link in testing was connected to the South Bridge and not the CPU's built in PCIe controller, this added latency.

What people need to realise is that there is not enough data going over the PCIe link to make a difference. The graphics cards want low latency to the CPU and system memory they don't need high bandwidth as all that graphics data is being stored on the GPU itself in its memory and processed by the on-card GPU. Very little PCIe activity. An x4 link still has 16Gb/ps (2GB/ps) of bandwidth. Do you seriously think the GPU is transferring 16Gb of data per second with the CPU and System Memory? - No.

I don't know where this misinformation started but it has been debunked over and over and over again.

Grand Master

Vice

Posted
Posted

Do you have a source on that? I would be pretty intrested to read through.

Just one source. I've however done the testing myself and saw a 0.5-1% difference between all 3 configurations. In short it makes no difference and again 16Gb/ps people that is the full x4 bandwidth. :laugh:

Grand Master

Vice

Posted
Posted

So if I stick another Radeon HD 5850 in my system (16x/4x), it will be not much less performance than in 16x/16x?

Could I put a 5830 in? Or does it have to be the exact same card?

For ATi's Crossfire the cards do not have to be identical but they do need to be close to each other. Here is AMD's Crossfire compatibility chart to help you understand which cards will work together in crossfire and yes x16 and x4 will work fine and you wont be able to discern any performance difference between x16 and x4.

http://i.imgur.com/Db0uz.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG

      By Nas · Posted

      So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval

      By excalpius · Posted

      For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval

      By ad47uk · Posted

      Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices

      By Fiza Ali · Posted

      4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried

      By Nas · Posted

      Yeah... The root of my comment, ostensibly, is how to spin the story via the actual technical merits of the solution! * Decentralized (aka federated) solution with built-in encrypted ephemeral message transport, * Transport via Relays (intermediary servers) with no message archival, * Second configurable pathway are actual email servers (if DNS records are programmed accordingly) via IMAP protocols carriage, * "Chat-over-Email" is the design pattern adopted; it can either leverage full-blown Email Server (must use the INBOX folder) to exchange all received messages/edits/reactions (so be weary of notifications overloads) [best practice is creating a separate email acct used explicitly for federated chat purposes!] or leverage its built-in Relay Server mechanism which actually resides on-device (by default but can be configured otherwise), * By virtue of be a decentralized/federated model, all other intermediary servers who may pass-along messages (while the recipient's final relay/device is inaccessible) cannot snoop on the messages due to the encrypted nature of contents. The intermediaries may, however, analyze the metadata due to the simple fact that routing mechanisms require hints for relay destinations. Unfortunately, whomever is posting about DeltaChat across socials are misleading with "zero metadata" claims -- especially when the Relays (according to their own technical documents) mandate the addition of chat-version metadata and other decorations in order to actually transport any message. -- Based on this summary, I'd prefer if they'd better dual-path message transport (email server add-in, federated relay engine) rather than patch-on email protocols to existing federated social media frameworks. They're frankensteining something rather than extending widely-deployed technology stacks.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!