San Francisco may vote on banning male circumcision


Recommended Posts

:rofl: :woot:

Why wouldn't "god" take it off himself if "he" didn't like it? :rofl:

Ask him.

Yeah, but doesn't his god also command him to stone adulterers to death?

What's this? Take what you like and ignore the rest?

Does he ? So bring it on, I wouldn't mind reading about adulteres getting stoned to death, throw in animal abusers and mass murderes in the mix and it'll be a party.

Yeah, religion is like that, you take the good stuff and forget about the bad stuff, you don't see them talking about another Crusade or burning people at the stake and so on, it's funny that way.

But still, isn't it a good thing that they don't take EVERYTHING from the bible and apply it IRL ? Shouldn't you be happy about it ? It's not like stoning and circumcising is the same, why should both be treated the same by the law ?

Yeah, but doesn't his god also command him to stone adulterers to death?

What's this? Take what you like and ignore the rest?

That's religious folk for you.

Ask him.

Does he ? So bring it on, I wouldn't mind reading about adulteres getting stoned to death, throw in animal abusers and mass murderes in the mix and it'll be a party.

Yeah, religion is like that, you take the good stuff and forget about the bad stuff, you don't see them talking about another Crusade or burning people at the stake and so on, it's funny that way.

But still, isn't it a good thing that they don't take EVERYTHING from the bible and apply it IRL ? Shouldn't you be happy about it ? It's not like stoning and circumcising is the same, why should both be treated the same by the law ?

But you can't take the bible HALF literally, and HALF not.

That makes the book fiction. And if its fiction, then it can't be true.

So you admit that it isn't actually needed when the kid is a baby?

Thank you for proving my point.

Actually, I never admitted that. Please don't put words in my mouth.

Yeah, but doesn't his god also command him to stone adulterers to death?

What's this? Take what you like and ignore the rest?

We also have a law in the Torah that states the laws of your land are your laws as well. :)

Guess the Rabbis decided that this law takes precedence over stoning.

That's religious folk for you.

But you can't take the bible HALF literally, and HALF not.

That makes the book fiction. And if its fiction, then it can't be true.

It's not the issue here, though, I would be the last person on Earth to say that the Holy Bible holds any truth, or that I believe in God and whatever else you might argue against. I'm a bloody Atheist after all.

It's not like I personally believe their God commanded them to do so, I know that THEY believe it, and you must respect their religion as much as you respect yours (or in case you're an Atheist, well, the void or whatever it is that we believe in).

But I'm curious, why should you take the Bible as 100% literal or 100%, err - "metaphorical" ? (Bah.. no idea what word to use in such context). Why can't you pick and choose each sentence as you see fit ? It wasn't "written" by God, after all, was it ? So that alone is a good enough reason to NOT take everything literally, but there are parts in it where God supposedly speaks, directly or otherwise, so its their choice how to interpret it, or rather, their Rabbis or whoever.

It's not the issue here, though, I would be the last person on Earth to say that the Holy Bible holds any truth, or that I believe in God and whatever else you might argue against. I'm a bloody Atheist after all.

It's not like I personally believe their God commanded them to do so, I know that THEY believe it, and you must respect their religion as much as you respect yours (or in case you're an Atheist, well, the void or whatever it is that we believe in).

But I'm curious, why should you take the Bible as 100% literal or 100%, err - "metaphorical" ? (Bah.. no idea what word to use in such context). Why can't you pick and choose each sentence as you see fit ? It wasn't "written" by God, after all, was it ? So that alone is a good enough reason to NOT take everything literally, but there are parts in it where God supposedly speaks, directly or otherwise, so its their choice how to interpret it, or rather, their Rabbis or whoever.

But if you take some parts literal, you have to take it all literal, or else it doesn't make sense to take any part literal.

For a non-religious person, you sure do stick up for them ;)

I don't believe that you must take everything literally. But hell, what do I know, I lost interest after 1 page of the Hebrew Bible.

I'm sure that there are secular examples I could use to show that no one always takes a book, document, speech and whatever 100% literal or 100% [opposite-of-literal], they too pick and choose. But.. I'm too tired and I wouldn't know where to begin to find such an example.

But if you take some parts literal, you have to take it all literal, or else it doesn't make sense to take any part literal.

Why are you making up bull****? Where does that come from? You're just pulling stuff out of your ass now.

And he's sticking up for them because he believes that just because he doesn't believe in something himself, doesn't mean he can't defend it. That's a very noble concept, and not one that he came up with himself, but of course, I wouldn't expect you to understand that.

Why are you making up bull****? Where does that come from? You're just pulling stuff out of your ass now.

And he's sticking up for them because he believes that just because he doesn't believe in something himself, doesn't mean he can't defend it. That's a very noble concept, and not one that he came up with himself, but of course, I wouldn't expect you to understand that.

What exactly am I making up?

But if you take some parts literal, you have to take it all literal, or else it doesn't make sense to take any part literal.

No you don't. That's like saying you have to take all parts of a The Lord of the Rings literal or all metaphorical.

:rofl: :woot:

Why wouldn't "god" take it off himself if "he" didn't like it? :rofl:

To test those who are devoted to him?

Yeah, but doesn't his god also command him to stone adulterers to death?

What's this? Take what you like and ignore the rest?

Let he without sin cast the first stone.

But still, isn't it a good thing that they don't take EVERYTHING from the bible and apply it IRL ? Shouldn't you be happy about it ? It's not like stoning and circumcising is the same, why should both be treated the same by the law ?

What a weird perspective to have. Between stoning people who willfully committed criminal acts and dismembering newborns who've done nothing wrong nor developed any ability to consent to any behavior whatsoever, circumcision is considered the less barbaric act?

Weeeeird.

To test those who are devoted to him?

The whole 'testing' nonsense is one of the most absurd copouts of religious argument. It's always there to back up anybody in any situation that doesn't quite feel right.

If a horrible disaster happens in a blue state, Pat Robertson can say God is punishing adulterers, pro-choicers, feminists, and gays. A record sweep of distructive tornados in the red states of the American south, on the other hand? Must be a test of faith! God has a plan.

Back and forth, back and forth, punishment or test, say it's whichever one best applies to which side of an argument you agree with at the time. Never question your own beliefs. Ever.

Naturally fit ? Take a look at yours and tell me if it looks natural to you.

I'm guessing that a haircut is also "mutilation" because hair is a part of your body, is it not ? You cut it, as in, you "dismember" it.

Go google mutilation and see the images, maybe you'll get the idea of what it actually is.

some facts about the foreskin: 1. its genetically fit for its purpose (protecting penis head etc)

2. its a natural part of the body - why must be removed? how is it redundant on a genetic level? And yes, having it is different from not having it, since if there was no difference, the debate wouldn't revolve around this subject.

yes mine is uncircumcised, its natural, as intended. If yours is circumcised, than that is not natural. Circumcision atleast in my opinion is mutilation, there is no logical or rational reason to remove it, unless medically threatening to your survival/well-being.

And who are you to decide what is and isn't absurd about religion?

I think a large portion of the people in this topic have a gross misunderstand of what faith actually means(inb4 all the sarcastic, obnoxious joke answers)

I never said it was absurd about religion. I said it was absurd about religious argument, and any argument for that matter. It's a logical copout, because using it makes it literally impossible to ever be wrong. Anything bad that ever happens to your allies is a test, but the exact same bad events happening to an enemy are a punishment. It creates a comfortable little bubble of delusion where you never have to question your own upbringing.

You can defend it all you want, but it just makes you incapable of developing any real perspective on religious conflict. Anyone could look at the drama between the Jewish and Arab worlds in the middle east and see two groups of people that both think their faith is 100% true and righteous. Anyone on either side will see their victories as God-given and their failures as either tests of faith or part of a larger sequence of events that will ultimately lead to a God-given victory.

That is why it's a copout. Because it's illogical. It can never be conclusive, and encourages endless arguments where both sides either engage in it and believe themselves to be right, or one side recognizes the absurdity OF THE METHOD OF ARGUMENT and just gives up.

some facts about the foreskin: 1. its genetically fit for its purpose (protecting penis head etc)

2. its a natural part of the body - why must be removed? how is it redundant on a genetic level? And yes, having it is different from not having it, since if there was no difference, the debate wouldn't revolve around this subject.

yes mine is uncircumcised, its natural, as intended. If yours is circumcised, than that is not natural. Circumcision atleast in my opinion is mutilation, there is no logical or rational reason to remove it, unless medically threatening to your survival/well-being.

Yours may be natural, but mine's cleaner which I'm sure you'll disclaim as also being "not natural."

What a weird perspective to have. Between stoning people who willfully committed criminal acts and dismembering newborns who've done nothing wrong nor developed any ability to consent to any behavior whatsoever, circumcision is considered the less barbaric act?

Weeeeird.

The whole 'testing' nonsense is one of the most absurd copouts of religious argument. It's always there to back up anybody in any situation that doesn't quite feel right.

If a horrible disaster happens in a blue state, Pat Robertson can say God is punishing adulterers, pro-choicers, feminists, and gays. A record sweep of distructive tornados in the red states of the American south, on the other hand? Must be a test of faith! God has a plan.

Back and forth, back and forth, punishment or test, say it's whichever one best applies to which side of an argument you agree with at the time. Never question your own beliefs. Ever.

From my understanding God doesn't discriminate; he punishes bad behavior from anyone and he loves everyone. Don't see the blue state red state nonsense.

Let's not also forget that circumcision is an irreversible process that removes sensitivity from the area.

Then brush up on your layman medical knowledge and read about the role of the frenulum (or frenum). That's where the sensitivity comes from.

From my understanding God doesn't discriminate; he punishes bad behavior from anyone and he loves everyone. Don't see the blue state red state nonsense.

Horrible disasters are not punishments for anyone's specific sins, unless a prophecy has been given.

They happen because Adam sinned. We each chose to live in a world without God's love and protection by forsaking God as our rightful authority, so please, blame ourselves. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware by Ivan Jenic Image: Meta The global hardware shortage isn’t exactly news, as the entire world has been struggling with rising component prices for quite some time now. And while big companies certainly aren’t as affected as the average consumer, even they aren’t opposed to the idea of saving a few (million) bucks. Meta appears to have found a way to spend less on new hardware while also putting its outdated infrastructure to use, essentially killing two birds with one stone. The company has built a custom chip that lets it reuse memory from retired servers rather than buying new hardware. The chip is called Vistara and allows for connecting old DDR4 RAM from obsolete servers into new servers that rely on DDR5. The problem Vistara solves goes back to a basic mismatch in how long hardware lasts. Meta replaces its servers every three to five years, but the memory modules inside them are good for seven to ten. When a server gets decommissioned, perfectly usable DDR4 RAM goes with it. Meta is presenting the new method at today’s ISCA symposium, but The Register has got hold of a paper that explains how Vistara works. It's a custom ASIC that bridges DDR4 memory to newer processors via aCXL 2.0/1.1 interface over PCIe Gen5 x16. Meta pulls DDR4 sticks from old machines and installs them in dedicated units it calls MemServers, each of which pairs 768GB of DDR5 with 256GB of recovered DDR4. The operating system sees the DDR4 as an additional memory node and draws from it when the primary DDR5 is running low. Off-the-shelf CXL hardware couldn't do this, so Meta built its own. Existing interfaces bundle their own memory with the controller, which makes reusing old RAM sticks impossible. But Vistara separates the controller from the memory entirely, so Meta can plug in whatever DDR4 sticks it has on hand. Meta plans to deploy the new architecture in hyperscale infrastructure with millions of servers, which should mean that Meta’s AI datacenters will now be more efficient. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure, especially with its new AI model, Muse Spark, now widely available. All of this doesn't mean that Meta will exclusively rely on "recycled" RAM, but the company is still looking at considerable savings at scale.
    • Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time, you can save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI: lifetime subscriptions. ChatPlayground AI puts the world’s top AI models in one powerful interface, letting you enter a single prompt and instantly compare outputs from multiple models to choose the perfect response for your needs. Boost productivity and creativity with access to the latest AI giants like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, and dozens more — all in one window. Whether you’re chatting, coding, generating images, or refining prompts, ChatPlayground AI equips you with advanced tools like prompt engineering, image/PDF chat, saved conversations, and AI image creation, plus priority support to keep your workflow seamless. Access the world’s best AI models Side-by-Side Comparisons: Enter one prompt & instantly view results from multiple AI models to find the best output for your needs 40+ AI Models: Includes GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Llama, Perplexity, and many more Multi-Function Platform: Access AI for chat, image generation & coding all within a single interface Web Browser Extension: Offers a Chrome extension to seamlessly integrate the platform into your browsing workflow Boost productivity with powerful features ChatPlayground Interface: Designed for seamless AI model comparison in one window Prompt Engineering: Refine & optimize your prompts for better, more accurate responses Chat with Images & PDFs: Upload visuals and documents to get context-aware answers Saved Chat History: Keep track of past conversations for reference & ongoing projects AI Image Generation: Create high-quality visuals powered by top AI image models Priority Customer Support: Get faster assistance whenever you need it What you'll get with the Unlimited Plan Includes unlimited messages/month Built for prompt engineers, startups, and teams who run experiments nonstop Includes priority access to new features and future models Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop Max number of device(s): Unlimited Available to both NEW & Existing users Updates included A lifetime subscription to ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited Plan) normally costs $619, but you can pick it up for just $79 for a limited time - that represents a saving of $530 (87% off). Click the link below for more details, always check terms and specifications before making a purchase. Get this ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited) for $79 (was $619) There are also two other discounted plans to choose from. Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!