San Francisco may vote on banning male circumcision


Recommended Posts

When did I say I would ban entire genres? (edit: oh, right, i said "metal". K, sorry about that, but as iamawesome said "Oh please, you know what I mean" :rolleyes:. Anyways, here's the clarification) I merely said I would control what he listened to. What are you even arguing against?

My point is that I have a right to circumcise my child, and make that decision for him, just as I have the right to tell him he can't watch Harold and Kumar.

As a parent of two, I'm WAY more qualified to speak on raising kids than you lot, so here's some info for you.

A parents job is NOT to control every aspect of their child's life. A parents job is to help and guide their children into becoming considerate and productive members of society. To teach them right from wrong and to help them be the best person they can be. A parent does not OWN their children, and IMO, has no right to force beliefs on them. Religion is a massively personal thing and to give them zero choice on something as major as removing part of their penis shows zero consideration for their future.

My little girl, for example, is currently 8 years old. Most girls her age already have their ears pierced, and I've even seen one or two with a nose piercing. My little girl is un-pierced with will remain that way until I consider her mature enough to decide for HERSELF if that's what she wants to do. Then, if that's what she wants, she can have whatever she wants, pierced. Same goes for my son.

Another example. I am an atheist, I've even been called a militant atheist at times; yet my kids attend Sunday school at our local Methodist church. I do this because I feel it's VERY important that they learn about religion, and the Sunday school are more qualified to teach them the intricicies of it than I am. I balance this relgious teaching with counterpoints of my own, and answer any questions they have to the best of my ability. Above all else, I do not and will not lie to them. The end result of that? My son doesn't believe in god, but does enjoy the social aspect of the church and has joined the Boys Brigade (similar to Scouts). My daughter, on the other hand, has decided that she believes in god AND enjoys the social aspect of church. She's joined the Girls Brigade AND the church choir, and has asked if she can have her confirmation when she's older.

Both my kids are intelligent, respectful, polite, and never get themselve in serious trouble; just the usual kid misbehaviour you expect for an 11 and 8 year old, despite my son having ADHD & Aspergers and my daughter Dispraxia. I consider myself to have done a great job of parenting so far, and I feel this is mainly because I not only teach them, but I also respect them as people.

I would NEVER, EVER consider doing anything like having my son circumcised. It's NOT my body and I absolutely NO right to change it according to MY beliefs. If HE decides in the future that he wants to be cut, that's HIS choice, not mine.

the Sunday school are more qualified to teach them the intricacies of it than I am.
All was fine until I read this. Like all was fine when I went to Sunday school until I queried on Jesus pwning the merchants at the Temple, slavery, mauling bears, homosexuals' salvation and women's perspective and all that ****.

Pastafarianism is more qualified to teach them the intricacies of religion.

All was fine until I read this. Like all was fine when I went to Sunday school until I queried on Jesus pwning the merchants at the Temple, slavery, mauling bears, homosexuals' salvation and women's perspective and all that ****.

Pastafarianism is more qualified to teach them the intricacies of religion.

Depends on the Sunday school. This one is run by my kids grandma.

As a parent of two, I'm WAY more qualified to speak on raising kids than you lot, so here's some info for you.

A parents job is NOT to control every aspect of their child's life. A parents job is to help and guide their children into becoming considerate and productive members of society. To teach them right from wrong and to help them be the best person they can be. A parent does not OWN their children, and IMO, has no right to force beliefs on them. Religion is a massively personal thing and to give them zero choice on something as major as removing part of their penis shows zero consideration for their future.

My little girl, for example, is currently 8 years old. Most girls her age already have their ears pierced, and I've even seen one or two with a nose piercing. My little girl is un-pierced with will remain that way until I consider her mature enough to decide for HERSELF if that's what she wants to do. Then, if that's what she wants, she can have whatever she wants, pierced. Same goes for my son.

Another example. I am an atheist, I've even been called a militant atheist at times; yet my kids attend Sunday school at our local Methodist church. I do this because I feel it's VERY important that they learn about religion, and the Sunday school are more qualified to teach them the intricicies of it than I am. I balance this relgious teaching with counterpoints of my own, and answer any questions they have to the best of my ability. Above all else, I do not and will not lie to them. The end result of that? My son doesn't believe in god, but does enjoy the social aspect of the church and has joined the Boys Brigade (similar to Scouts). My daughter, on the other hand, has decided that she believes in god AND enjoys the social aspect of church. She's joined the Girls Brigade AND the church choir, and has asked if she can have her confirmation when she's older.

Both my kids are intelligent, respectful, polite, and never get themselve in serious trouble; just the usual kid misbehaviour you expect for an 11 and 8 year old, despite my son having ADHD & Aspergers and my daughter Dispraxia. I consider myself to have done a great job of parenting so far, and I feel this is mainly because I not only teach them, but I also respect them as people.

I would NEVER, EVER consider doing anything like having my son circumcised. It's NOT my body and I absolutely NO right to change it according to MY beliefs. If HE decides in the future that he wants to be cut, that's HIS choice, not mine.

That's a heart-warming anecdote, and I'm happy for you.

However, there are other parents here who've taken the opposite stance as you, so try not to be too obnoxious about it, and secondly, you're one person/one family. Your way isn't necessarily the "right way", just "your way". =]

PS: If my child decided he was atheist, what would I do about it anyways? There really isn't much I can do, is there? It's his choice, and not something I would control, even if I could.

Also, once again, your point seems to be missing the fact that circumcision doesn't force him into a religious position. It's still his choice.

PPS: For those who ARE religious, instilling religious values go right along with your guidance for becoming a well-adjusted person, productive person.

So hand on, the place is running a deficit running into the millions and they waste time on this stuff?

Actually, this is going to save people some time and suffering once this is passed. It's a traumatic procedure for anybody and, if it can be banned, I am all for it.

All human body part serve a purpose.

Depends on the Sunday school. This one is run by my kids grandma.
And she lectures about all religions or just about hers? The whole point of you letting them learn about religion (which I consider as something irrelevant for a child) is for them to learn about a bit of everything. Theology 101 if it pleases you. You say that your children are found of the whole Christian social structure thing. I say that it's normal, since they were exposed to just it. I also enjoyed that, until I started asking the wrong questions.

And she lectures about all religions or just about hers? The whole point of you letting them learn about religion (which I consider as something irrelevant for a child) is for them to learn about a bit of everything. Theology 101 if it pleases you. You say that your children are found of the whole Christian social structure thing. I say that it's normal, since they were exposed to just it. I also enjoyed that, until I started asking the wrong questions.

Before she retired, she taught religious education in a high school. She tries to keep her Sunday school class as evenly balanced as that was, and covers at least the main ones as best she can.

Questions are encouraged, or I wouldn't let my kids go.

lol, no.

LOL Empty post. I forgot. Your brain doesn't serve any purpose. Let's cut it out; make you a vegetable. LMAO!

As for those who think there are health benefits to getting circumcised, answer me this: How the **** did we survive these past millions of years without circumcision? Oh wait ... I forgot. God created us all just 2,000-3,000 years ago. :rolleyes:

LOL Empty post. I forgot. Your brain doesn't serve any purpose. Let's cut it out; make you a vegetable. LMAO!

As for those who think there are health benefits to getting circumcised, answer me this: How the **** did we survive these past millions of years without circumcision? Oh wait ... I forgot. God created us all just 2,000-3,000 years ago. :rolleyes:

It's only empty because no one should ever answer/argue against such stupid statements, if it had been a question, I would gladly answer you, but seeing as you demonstrated your ignorance by STATING a lie, I will just sit, point and laugh at you.

Health benefits != survival.

The human race survived through a lot tough ****.

Out of curiosity, why aren't we allowed to chop off the little fingers of our children if we feel like it? They don't need their little fingers, just like they don't need their foreskins, so surely that should be allowed? If you people are allowed to harm children by chopping off one body part they don't need because of *your* beliefs, people who wish to remove their children's little fingers due to their beliefs should be able to, right? :)

Because a finger/appendage is different then a wrapper around your dick. It still helps you. That's a bad comparison. Try thinking about the removal of the appendix, and then pretend that it's an external organ, not internal. THAT would be equivalent.

Because a finger/appendage is different then a wrapper around your dick. It still helps you. That's a bad comparison. Try thinking about the removal of the appendix, and then pretend that it's an external organ, not internal. THAT would be equivalent.

I suppose you're right. I use my little finger when typing sometimes. However, nothing anyone says will convince me that it's okay to remove someone's body part without their permission, whether that body part is useless or not.

I haven't been able to reply to all people's posts here due to all of the work I have to do, but someone sent me a private message for more information on why I believe what I do in regard to this subject, so I replied and will post my response here. This is the best way I believe I can articulate my views on this matter:

In regard to my views on this, it all comes down to the fact that no one can be sure which religion a baby will choose to follow when they can make that concious choice, or whether they will follow a religion at all. Due to that, I think it's highly immoral to commit this irreversible act when it's likely the child won't even wish to follow that religion.

My mother had me christened when I was young; it's not something I could control or consent to, and it's now something I find quite disgusting. Luckily, I was not physically harmed when christened; however, if Christianity is actually "the real" religion and if there is a God that wishes us to follow Christianity, I have actually been tainted and forced to join that religion without consenting to it. I doubt I would support Christianity if it turned out to be "the true" religion because I don't agree with a lot of what the Bible promotes. So that is what it all boils down to with me: Tainting people and performing irreversible actions when the child has not consented.

I realise the rules of Judaism state the child must be circumcised at 8 days old, but I think the rights and freedoms of the child should come first. The child may grow up to wish to follow Judaism, and if they do, they may be gutted or devastated that they weren't circumcised; that is a point I recognise. However, as I have pointed out, there is absolutely no indication the child may wish to follow Judaism. My mother is Christian, but I refuse the follow the Christian religion, so people trying to assert that circumcising unconsenting babies is okay simply because their parents are religious just doesn't sit well with me. Due to the fact we are able to exercise free will and freethought, it's still likely the child will decide not to be religious.

The child may end up being devastated if they haven't been circumcised (if they decide to follow Judaism), but they may be devastated if they have been circumcised (if they decide not to follow Judaism). As circumcision is irreversible and there is no inclination whatsoever that the child may wish to follow Judaism, it makes sense to not carry out this act on unconsenting babies.

I respect the right of religious people to practice their religion, but only when those practices will not harm others; in the case of infant circumcision, we cannot be sure it won't cause harm.

I think that is the best way I can articulate my views :) I know I'd be devastated if my mother had me circumcised because I'm already not too happy she had me christened when I could not consent to it.

I suppose you're right. I use my little finger when typing sometimes. However, nothing anyone says will convince me that it's okay to remove someone's body part without their permission, whether that body part is useless or not.

Well there's your problem, stop thinking of the foreskin as a body part, think of it as foreskin. Oh wait..

"In regard to my views on this, it all comes down to the fact that no one can be sure which religion a baby will choose to follow when they can make that concious choice, or whether they will follow a religion at all. Due to that, I think it's highly immoral to commit this irreversible act when it's likely the child won't even wish to follow that religion"

Here's the thing, circumcision doesn't mean that you HAVE to practice Judaism, but if you are practicing Judaism, you HAVE to be circumcised. So if he chooses to be a Buddhist, or an Atheist, him being circumcised will mean absolutely NOTHING to him OR his religion.

There are many people who circumcise themselves and their kids for non-religious reasons, so going by that fact alone it proves that circumcision doesn't force you to follow a particular religion, nor does it prevent you from following any religion.

I'm not sure why you feel that you're tainted in any way, if you believe in God and follow Christianity, you shouldn't feel that way, if you're an Atheist, you shouldn't care, considering you don't believe in it.

They're trying to create a law to criminalize something that is totally optional? Absolute smacktardery.

But its the same rationalization that applies to homophobia, so why can it not apply everywhere?! I hereby ban everyone from ice cream because my upbringing showed me that its bad for me so its bad for everyone. Wait I have a better one. I ban everyone from haircuts because some children are deathly afraid of people cutting their hair and some even cry. I also ban clowns because some small children are afraid of them as well.

Well there's your problem, stop thinking of the foreskin as a body part, think of it as foreskin. Oh wait..

But it is a body part, so that suggestion is stupid.

"In regard to my views on this, it all comes down to the fact that no one can be sure which religion a baby will choose to follow when they can make that concious choice, or whether they will follow a religion at all. Due to that, I think it's highly immoral to commit this irreversible act when it's likely the child won't even wish to follow that religion"

Here's the thing, circumcision doesn't mean that you HAVE to practice Judaism, but if you are practicing Judaism, you HAVE to be circumcised. So if he chooses to be a Buddhist, or an Atheist, him being circumcised will mean absolutely NOTHING to him OR his religion.

Actually, you're wrong. It may mean something to his religion because if he is circumcised he is tainted with the fact it was done in the name of Judaism. Even if it doesn't affect him in a religious way, it could affect him in a mental way. I've already stated I would despise it if someone had cut off my foreskin without my permission, and I know I'm not alone in that sentiment. Stating that cutting off a piece of his body will mean nothing to him is ignorant; you don't know everyone, so you don't know what will affect different people. Yes, being circumcised doesn't mean you have to follow Judaism, but it does mean you no longer have a part of your body some people enjoy and cherish. Not getting into too much detail, I imagine (from experience) masturbation and sex are both a bit more enjoyable when one has a foreskin due to how the foreskin is involved; even if they're not, some people simply prefer to have ther foreskins. Yes, being circumcised at that age is a condition of being Jewish, but as I have pointed out many times, there is absolutely no inclination that the child is going to want to be Jewish. Your arguments could be used by people trying to make it law that everybody is circumcised at that age. Would you agree with that? Would you agree with them passing a law ensuring every single baby is circumcised at the age of 8 just in case they decide to follow a religion that requires that at some point in the future? If you don't agree with that, I don't see how you can agree with this. As I have pointed out, the parents being religious has absolutely no affect on the child's free will or their choice of religion.

There are many people who circumcise themselves and their kids for non-religious reasons, so going by that fact alone it proves that circumcision doesn't force you to follow a particular religion, nor does it prevent you from following any religion.

I've never stated or suggested that. I've just pointed out that it is not right to harm a child in the name of religion. Some people who have been circumcised in the past admit that it has harmed them and they'd prefer to have foreskins, which is why I believe this is something that should be the choice of the person. Innocent children should not be punished just because a religion they may not follow requires something to be done to them.

I'm not sure why you feel that you're tainted in any way, if you believe in God and follow Christianity, you shouldn't feel that way, if you're an Atheist, you shouldn't care, considering you don't believe in it.

What I tried to communicate is that if God exists and if he does in fact wish us all to follow Christianity, then I have been tainted by my mother joining me into the Christian faith without my permission. Even if God exists and wishes us to follow Christianity, I don't think I would because I believe it promotes a lot of immoral values. I'm not atheist, I'm agnostic. I believe it's very possible God exists, but I reckon he wouldn't advocate what any of the holy books suggest.

How about this then:

We only need one testicle; there is no need for both, which is why it's okay to remove one when a person has testicular cancer. So, I ask:

Those who support removing the foreskin of unconsenting babies, simply due to the fact a holy book states it should be done, would you support removing one testicle of an 8 day old baby if a holy book stated that should be done, even if it's very possible the baby will not follow that religion?

They're trying to create a law to criminalize something that is totally optional? Absolute smacktardery.

No, they're not. They're trying to criminalise something which can be harmful. It is not optional because the babies who are circumcised have no option; it is done to them without their consent.

That's even less comparable then cutting off a finger as you stated earlier (and then retracted) and if you don't stop making ludicrous comparisons, there's no sense in further discussion with you. You are clearly blowing this out of proportion.

Do you think we should ban christenings and baptisms too? Based on your reasoning, you should.

That's even less comparable then cutting off a finger as you stated earlier (and then retracted) and if you don't stop making ludicrous comparisons, there's no sense in further discussion with you. You are clearly blowing this out of proportion.

Why is it? I've pointed out that we only need one testicle, and that is one of the reasons a lot of you are using as to why it's fine to remove someone's foreskin without their permission (it's fine because Judaism requires it and we don't need foreskins). It is not a ludicrous suggestion. If you believe it is you must state why (and that idea must be reasonable) otherwise I will maintain the comparison

Do you think we should ban christenings and baptisms too? Based on your reasoning, you should.

Baptisms and christenings of unconsenting children, yes, due to their meaning. As I have pointed out, if Christianity is the true religion that God (if he exists) wishes us to follow, I have been tainted by being christened without my consent. There is absolutely nothing wrong with people getting a christening or baptism when they can consent, but due to the meaning of those acts, they shouldn't be committed on unconsenting children.

Donald Trump has already sent private investigators to the white house to spy on him in the bathroom to find out... and he's shocked at what they are finding, or not finding

Regardless of their find, they'll still need a certificate from Obama for absolute proof in any direction. :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you have entire racks of servers and that minor module cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to, your access layer switches. This should be a 10g switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports and should be a fully managed switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. if your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!