Ed Bott : Adobe and Skype top my Foistware Hall of Shame


Recommended Posts

Fox it reader is one of the worst

capturertb.jpg

Not only do you have to uncheck the pre selected check mark boxes but you also have to click decline. They make it you think its just like any other software install were you have to click allow to continue. Not the case. ********!

While I hate that they take longer to update it, Ccleaner has a slim build with no toolbar.

I also disagree with the autor on the Apple stuff. Only 3rd party bloat is bad? crap is crap no matter who makes it.

This annoying recent trend of including toolbars with the setup has made people wary and mindful of the installation process.

Before it just used to be: double-click setup.exe -> Next ->Next ......... -> Next -> Finish. Done.

Atleast now a good percentage of users actually pay attention lol

Either way, I'm against the whole "install software" mindset, I'm a staunch believer in portable apps: Extract -> Finish. Done.

Beauty in simplicity.

It's wishful thinking but I do hope the big corporations change their software so that they become truly portable.

Summary

I am sick and tired of software companies that try to make a quick buck by tricking their customers into installing programs they don?t need. It?s time to name and shame the worst purveyors of foistware out there. Adobe and Skype are at the top of my list. Can you add more nominees?

Dear Mr. Ed Bott , here's are my two nominees:

- http://downloads.zdnet.com/

- http://download.cnet.com/

One-third of the software listed on your company websites (CBS interactive) is bundled with toolbars, adware, spyware and other crap. Clean your house first!

Dear Mr. Ed Bott , here's are my two nominees:

- http://downloads.zdnet.com/

- http://download.cnet.com/

One-third of the software listed on your company websites (CBS interactive) is bundled with toolbars, adware, spyware and other crap. Clean your house first!

Best post. +1

What the hell kind of term is "Foistware"? Sounds like a product Tampax would release. Anyway, Foxit is pretty bad for trying to scam people into installing toolbars and similar crapware, but Copernic is bang on the mark, ZDNet and CNet are the biggest peddlers of this crap on the web.

What the hell kind of term is "Foistware"? Sounds like a product Tampax would release. Anyway, Foxit is pretty bad for trying to scam people into installing toolbars and similar crapware, but Copernic is bang on the mark, ZDNet and CNet are the biggest peddlers of this crap on the web.

I don't know that ZDNet and CNet are responsible for coding the software they make available. I don't know that this is a case of hypocrisy on the part of Ed Bott. He seems rather to be complaining about a general software problem.

Scratch that! Just saw warwagon's post above.

I'm not trying to start any problems here, but I am curious if anyone knows of Linux programs that do this. I haven't seen any, but surely there might be at least one.

I don't know that ZDNet and CNet are responsible for coding the software they make available. I don't know that this is a case of hypocrisy on the part of Ed Bott. He seems rather to be complaining about a general software problem.

I'm not trying to start any problems here, but I am curious if anyone knows of Linux programs that do this. I haven't seen any, but surely there might be at least one.

This is true, they don't force anything into the installers, but the website is full of big buttons that say "CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD" which I must admit I've clicked more times than I should have, when instead I should have clicked the tiny hyperlink half way down the page.

As for the Linux thing, I can't speak for all Linux freeware, but I've never seen any bundling going on. Linux installers aren't traditionally as interactive as Windows installers, since it's usually just a shell script to install, and even then, most distros use a package manager which avoids the whole thing in the first place.

As for the Linux thing, I can't speak for all Linux freeware, but I've never seen any bundling going on. Linux installers aren't traditionally as interactive as Windows installers, since it's usually just a shell script to install, and even then, most distros use a package manager which avoids the whole thing in the first place.

Yes, that is my impression as well. I just haven't seen any 'trickery' or 'pushing' on Linux, and it's been nearly four years. I'm sure it could happen, but, as you note, it is less likely to happen given the way installing software tends to work.

I think with the ascension of the Windows Marketplace v2 with Windows 8, "Foistware" (god I hate that word :p) will die on its own since there will probably be some unified installation method. One can hope :p

The latest in this string of nonsense that comes along is download manager. If they are really trying to be helpful they would provide two options one with download manager and one without. Otherwise they are just trying to shove stuff down people's throat.

The latest in this string of nonsense that comes along is download manager. If they are really trying to be helpful they would provide two options one with download manager and one without. Otherwise they are just trying to shove stuff down people's throat.

You mean Adobe ? : you are downloading it wrong. Example : to download flash for IE, download it with Firefox/opera. To download Firefox/opera plug-in download it with IE, than Adobe won't force the download of download manager (but still suggest ask toolbar).

Never update online.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!