Friend getting me mad about cars..


Recommended Posts

all you guys say civics are rice. There are civics that aren't, and can easily beat a viper. You say it costs $20,000 + $50,000 to mod a civic? Try $5000 + $15,000 to beat most cars on the road. If you tune it right, they can be very good race cars, drag or track. And it would be much cheaper than buying a stock performance car. The only reason to get a car like a viper or an M3 would be for more comfort, style, and exclusiveness. If you want pure performance, a civic can give you that for much less. You guys need to learn to stop saying every civic or Japanese car is rice.

585486040[/snapback]

so if i wanted to get "pure performance" i'd buy a civic and mod it, but if i wanted style and comfort i'd get a Viper or an M3?

seriously, look at what ur saying. Even if i had a civic that could beat any Viper or M3, you'd still be driving a friggin civic. Big whoop, every 2nd car on the road is a civic, and even then a $5000 turbo (which my cousin has in a Protege 3) wont beat a lot of the cars on the road.

so if i wanted to get "pure performance" i'd buy a civic and mod it, but if i wanted style and comfort i'd get a Viper or an M3?

seriously, look at what ur saying.  Even if i had a civic that could beat any Viper or M3, you'd still be driving a friggin civic. Big whoop, every 2nd car on the road is a civic, and even then a $5000 turbo (which my cousin has in a Protege 3) wont beat a lot of the cars on the road.

585487436[/snapback]

No, if you wanted to get "pure performance for a lot less" you'd get a Civic over a Viper or an M3. Learn to read the whole post instead of jumping instantly to Quick Reply when you've only read half.

No, if you wanted to get "pure performance for a lot less" you'd get a Civic over a Viper or an M3. Learn to read the whole post instead of jumping instantly to Quick Reply when you've only read half.

585487480[/snapback]

HAHA!!!

NO.... you would get a mustang GT and mod it. You got to start on a good platform. Civics are great cars but not for going fast.

:sleep:

Fast civics fine... I really don't have a problem with those, but this kids way into him self by thinking he can beat a viper with only a CAI and ECU mod.

Ones I DO have a problem with are the lowered huge rim ones... they are a traffic hazard. Every pot hole or snow bank they slam on the breaks to make sure they don't scrape or bend a rim.... don't even get me started on when they go over train tracks. Sometimes I think they do it just to be cool.

But performance related... there has to be a better way to get some horse power out of your exhaust then getting one of those annoying fart cans. ugh.

About the post that says you can mod a civic pretty cheap.. under 15,000.

What would some of those mods be???

dodge viper lol

if u want a fast car, look into the Mercedes Mclaren 2005 SLR 5.4L V8 supercharged twin-intercooler.

;)

0-62 in 3 seconds, 313mph max

600 horsepower

it's made to be a 'street' car too, so u can go and do ur shopping without having **** steering becasue your only going at 50mph

dodge viper lol

if  u  want a fast car, look into the Mercedes Mclaren 2005 SLR 5.4L V8 supercharged twin-intercooler.

;)

0-62 in 3 seconds, 313mph max

600 horsepower

it's made to be a 'street' car too, so u can go and do ur shopping without having **** steering becasue your only going at 50mph

585487736[/snapback]

lol i dont think u mean 313mph maybe 213mph lol

About the only Civic that could even come close to a Viper on a drag strip is one with an engine swap. They are not fast cars, and boosting them is gonna lead to a blown engine a lot quicker than a stock Viper.

There are some Japanese cars that can easily give a Viper a run for it's money well tuned. RX-7s, Supras, Evo, WRXs, Skylines, some of the old Zs well tuned could hold with it on the strip or on the track.

A better comparison would be a SRT-4 with about $10k worth of mods and a Viper, that at least has a turbo engine from the factory, and a well built engine.

Fast civics fine... I really don't have a problem with those, but this kids way into him self  But performance related... there has to be a better way to get some horse power out of your exhaust then getting one of those annoying fart cans. ugh.

585487719[/snapback]

the annoying fart can does nothing for performace, just the dumbasses don't know how to tune their exhaust by getting a resonator to cut of the nasty sounding raspyness. plus its a honda so no matter what its going to sound like ****.

I've done extensive mods to my Chevy cavalier and I still have not done an exhaust but yet my car sounds deep, so its not that all 4 bangers sound like that, just civics are far far worse.

I personally own an srt-10 and I can preatty much guarantee no civic would own this - the 04/05 viper rivals ferrari and lambo...how can a rice-rocket be even compared to this... :blink:

btw the gs that the viper pulls...for those of you who have been in a 737 jet as its about to take off...its kinda like that but more *umph* :pinch:  :ninja:

585485749[/snapback]

Im not sure about ferrari lambo and viper. ferrari and lambo are more of exotic cars. stock they only pack around 375HP. they are more for the look then speed. viper is a modern muscle car. I keep telling my friend that civics suck but he just keeps saying how he would put a Honda CRV motor with vtec into his crx shell and whip any car just because every other car weighs more...i cant stand his talking. i got to find a really good thing to tell him so that he can finally shut his mouth.

Im not sure about ferrari lambo and viper. ferrari and lambo are more of exotic cars. stock they only pack around 375HP. they are more for the look then speed. viper is a modern muscle car. I keep telling my friend that civics suck but he just keeps saying how he would put a Honda CRV motor with vtec into his crx shell and whip any car just because every other car weighs more...i cant stand his talking. i got to find a really good thing to tell him so that he can finally shut his mouth.

This guy really needs to understand that it's not going to be that easy. You can't just stick a CRV motor in a civic and beat everything on the road. Some people will never understand what it really takes to build a car, and these are people I generally don't argue with because they don't have the intelligence to relize their mistake.

Sure, hondas are fun, and built right there are a few 12, and 10 second hondas that would take down exotics, but these people have poured money into these things to make them that fast. I also hate the talk of "it's a muscle car, it beats anything." Many of people have told me that because it has a V8 in it, it owns everything, no matter what year V8. That's also a bunch of crap.

And no, I don't mean to bash honda's, I love the cars, they are just plain fun, but they are meant more for things like autocross and such, not drag racing because of their weight advantage and suspension options.

Either way I'll still take my skyline because of it's suspension options and power, stupid U.S. :p

Best answer for dumb car people: don't argue with your mouth, show them with your car ;)

Fast civics fine... I really don't have a problem with those, but this kids way into him self  by thinking he can beat a viper with only a CAI and ECU mod.

Ones I DO have a problem with are the lowered huge rim ones... they are a traffic hazard. Every pot hole or snow bank they slam on the breaks to make sure they don't scrape or bend a rim.... don't even get me started on when they go over train tracks. Sometimes I think they do it just to be cool.

But performance related... there has to be a better way to get some horse power out of your exhaust then getting one of those annoying fart cans. ugh.

About the post that says you can mod a civic pretty cheap.. under 15,000.

What would some of those mods be???

585487719[/snapback]

FART CANS!!!! rofl :rofl: wow dude sorry but i fell out of my chair here at work reading that thanks (Y)

woot i was able to find some pics on my server of his civic

here they are friends

<Civic Pictures>

585487858[/snapback]

Are you sure that's your friend's? Because you said all he has is CAI and some ECU mods, but I see exhaust and an intercooler. Still though, he can't beat a Viper with that. There's no way.

the annoying fart can does nothing for performace, just the dumbasses don't know how to tune their exhaust by getting a resonator to cut of the nasty sounding raspyness. plus its a honda so no matter what its going to sound like ****.

I've done extensive mods to my Chevy cavalier and I still have not done an exhaust but yet my car sounds deep, so its not that all 4 bangers sound like that, just civics are far far worse.

585487780[/snapback]

It all depends on what they get. A muffler of course wouldn't do a damned thing, but if you get a cat-back exhaust, high-flow catalytic converter, and headers, then it would definitely give you some better performance.

BTW, I too hate the high-pitched exhaust. I like a nice, deep sound. And it's not just Civics; anybody can put a high-pitched muffler or exhaust on his/her car, no matter what kind it is. It just happens to be that Civics are the most tuned import car so therefore you associate them with it the most.

Im not sure about ferrari lambo and viper. ferrari and lambo are more of exotic cars. stock they only pack around 375HP. they are more for the look then speed. viper is a modern muscle car. I keep telling my friend that civics suck but he just keeps saying how he would put a Honda CRV motor with vtec into his crx shell and whip any car just because every other car weighs more...i cant stand his talking. i got to find a really good thing to tell him so that he can finally shut his mouth.

585487816[/snapback]

wrong

the gallardo itself packs

Max. output 499.9 PS (493.0 bhp) (367.6 kW)

@7800 rpm

Max. torque 510.0 Nm (376 lbft) (52 kgm)

@4500 rpm

source: http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/id/?id=107712

the murcielago packs

Max. output 580 PS (572.0 bhp) (426.5 kW)

@7500 rpm

Max. torque 650.0 Nm (479 lbft) (66.3 kgm)

@5400 rpm

source: http://www.carfolio.com/specifications/models/id/?id=87791

infact, the countache is the last model to actually get only 375 horsepower. The differences though between a civic with 375 horses and a countache, are the powerbands, and the fact the countache will have a LOT more torque at lower RPMs. It will STILL decimate a civic with the same horsepower or even till probably 500+ horsepower, even then it will rely a lot on tranny, clutch, etc.

I used to toy with the idea of building up an import, but after driving heavily modified imports and some high end cars, I VERY quickly ditched that idea. The handling is far superior, acceleration is much better, as is top speed. Don't get me wrong, I still wanna buy a supra, but I'll never expect it to be a supercar, because it can never be one...and it's still got LOADS more going for it than a civic.

dodge viper lol

if  u  want a fast car, look into the Mercedes Mclaren 2005 SLR 5.4L V8 supercharged twin-intercooler.

;)

0-62 in 3 seconds, 313mph max

600 horsepower

it's made to be a 'street' car too, so u can go and do ur shopping without having **** steering becasue your only going at 50mph

585487736[/snapback]

313 might be a theoretical limit based on gearing. But I doubt that also.

Anyway those cars are what? 300,000 - 400,000. A viper is still under 100 grand or close to it.

I realy like the mercedes too though. I wouldn't mind having a SL55 AMG. :)

Viper is a "street" car too. I doubt either of these are cushy though. :p

Oh and that 'intercooler' is probably his cold air induction. The civic is the ultimate posermobile. He just needs a blow off valve speaker and one of those fake purge valves that shoot mist out the grill. lol.

Edited by randy_tho
watch the races, the corvette is a lot better than the previous model, but it still loses to the viper in general (of course the occasional win, but in general the viper still kills it).

585488739[/snapback]

IIRC, Chevy has the lead in American LeMans races over Dodge. But, IMO, Porsche has them both beat.

313 might be a theoretical limit based on gearing. But I doubt that also.

Anyway those cars are what? 300,000 - 400,000. A viper is still under 100 grand or close to it.

585488779[/snapback]

No way, over 250mph would take a lot of horsepower just to kill the wind resistance. Like, 1000 hp and some serious downforce. Not to mention, you need some place to actually go straight for that far!

And a McLaren F1 will easily go for $1 million now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!