Maccik2 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 (edited) 6.1.7068.0.winmain.090321-1322 - search for in public torrents. 6.1.7069.0.winmain.090323-1630 6.1.7070.0.winmain.090324-1853 - potentially RC Escrow build. screenshots 6.1.7071.0.winmain.090326-1750 - potentially RC Escrow build 6.1.7072.0.winmain.090327-1845 - potentially RC Escrow build 6.1.7073.0.winmain.090330-1830 - potentially RC Escrow build 6.1.7074.0.winmain.090331-1850 - potentially RC Escrow build 6.1.7075.0.winmain.090401-1840 - potentially RC Escrow build -not fake! 6.1.7076.0.winmain.090402-1838 - potentially RC Escrow build actual build: 6.1.7105.0.winmain.090404-1235 -new milestone I have a question This is true or false ??? Message to all members, Please behave in this thread. Most of are reports for the day coming from this thread. Shape up or I'll close it down. Edited April 6, 2009 by warwagon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Gary7 Subscriber² Posted April 5, 2009 Subscriber² Share Posted April 5, 2009 From what I hear it is real. The 7105 build anyway. I am running 7068 and I know that 7075 has been released to some testers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winlonghorn Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 6.1.7068.0.winmain.090321-1322 - search for in public torrents.6.1.7069.0.winmain.090323-1630 6.1.7070.0.winmain.090324-1853 - potentially RC Escrow build. screenshots 6.1.7071.0.winmain.090326-1750 - potentially RC Escrow build 6.1.7072.0.winmain.090327-1845 - potentially RC Escrow build 6.1.7073.0.winmain.090330-1830 - potentially RC Escrow build 6.1.7074.0.winmain.090331-1850 - potentially RC Escrow build 6.1.7075.0.winmain.090401-1840 - potentially RC Escrow build -not fake! 6.1.7076.0.winmain.090402-1838 - potentially RC Escrow build actual build: 6.1.7105.0.winmain.090404-1235 -new milestone I have a question This is true or false ??? It is a fake! They don't compile builds on the weekends! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToneKnee Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Umm, quite possibly fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maccik2 Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 ok ..thanks for the quick reply ..but anyway is posible what would you think?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrysaor Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 It is a fake! They don't compile builds on the weekends! :) 7068 was compiled on 03/21 which is saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Gary7 Subscriber² Posted April 5, 2009 Subscriber² Share Posted April 5, 2009 It is a fake! They don't compile builds on the weekends! I am running 6.1.7068.0.winmain.090321-1322 and it was built on a Saturday. That is a weekend day. I am sure that MS works 7x24. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToneKnee Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 ok ..thanks for the quick reply ..but anyway is posible what would you think?? If it's true that they've reached a new milestone (the reason for the big build number increase) then it's quite possible it exists, though saying that, no source of information or even any credible source pretty much means fake. There have only been a few actual leaks of builds, but there have so many more fake builds around that people need to stop and think before they post another "zomg!!! another leaked build on the interwebz!!!", because then they look like an idiot when they proved that it is indeed fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maccik2 Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 OH Thank s guy s :D :jump: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crackler Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 IF this build is real, any ideas why they jumped in the build numbers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ci7 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 fake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winlonghorn Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 I am running 6.1.7068.0.winmain.090321-1322 and it was built on a Saturday. That is a weekend day. I am sure that MS works 7x24. :) ok sorry about that. I was told that they don't compile on the weekend. lol. someone lied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maccik2 Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 I have source but i can t post here .....but i think is posible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToneKnee Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 IF this build is real, any ideas why they jumped in the build numbers? Again with what I said before, if they've reached a milestone, they would jump to the next 7x00 area of numbers. Do you really think that Vista was built like nearly 1000 times between the original CTP and RTM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crackler Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 So basically...in a nicer tone :p...a build number skip to indicate reaching the true RC build/trunk/other awkward terminology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hidr0 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 IF this build is real, any ideas why they jumped in the build numbers? Because they CAN!... just like with XP and Vista Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Gary7 Subscriber² Posted April 5, 2009 Subscriber² Share Posted April 5, 2009 IF this build is real, any ideas why they jumped in the build numbers? Because they can, they can do as they please. Vista's build numbers were not in consecutive order. I was a Beta tester for Vista and their builds were not always in order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Tyranade Subscriber² Posted April 5, 2009 Subscriber² Share Posted April 5, 2009 Roll on RC! I hope this leaks out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+kpo6969 Subscriber¹ Posted April 5, 2009 Subscriber¹ Share Posted April 5, 2009 I have source but i can t post here .....but i think is posible I'd believe this one before your's. http://www.sevenforums.com/news/6517-rc-es...ne-reached.html posted before your's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris89 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Hi, something is strange: Why 7105 and not 7100? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crackler Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Hi,something is strange: Why 7105 and not 7100? I already asked something similar. :pinch: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
consume Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Maybe it's a new milestone for new icons :o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vistademon Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Its real, builds are compiled on weekend. Don't be so eager to call it a fake untill the info is out, i'm sure the news will spread over the next few hours. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoLoR1 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 7105 might present 1st build in RTM branch, that would mean RC is "finished" already, just needs last polishing for release and it might get final build number 7100. Like it was with beta, beta it self was built 08/12/12 while you had builds from branch 700x before already. In any case we will probably see RC one way or another very soon (this could be "major" announcment from MS, that they will actualy catch april release). And yes "builds are not built during weekends". They are however built on saturday if there was no friday build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkmanx21 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 So is this one real or fake? I wonder if this build includes the announcements? :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts