Maccik2 Posted April 6, 2009 Author Share Posted April 6, 2009 It is believed that this is a new phase in the development of Windows 7 because the second digit of the build has been incremented. This pattern would closely follow previous events in the incubation of Windows 7: Milestone 2: 6500 series Milestone 3: 6700 series Pre-beta: 6800 series Beta 1: 7000 series Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxieFoxie Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 (edited) This is NOT fake. Build number is like this due to kernel changes, also this IS rc escrow and yes, they most of the time change numbers before those releases. Edited April 6, 2009 by FoxieFoxie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fubar Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 This is NOT fake.Build number is like this due to kernel changes, also this IS rc escrow and yes, they most of the time change numbers before those releases. do you have screen shots to back this claim up about it not being fake ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Freeman Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 As much as I hope this is real, I wont get too excited untill i see at least screens from a reliable source. And also if it turns out to be real i hope it leaks out soon while i still have lots of free time to test it :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atleeit Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 It is real we just wait overnight and you'll see :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkyDX Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 What happened to "not fake unless proved otherwise"? I wonder what the changes have been if it's a new milestone, maybe a completely redesigned Aero style? Many now will say they wouldn't change much on the UI this late but if I remember correctly wasn't the Luna UI from XP only exposed while being near RTM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atleeit Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 What happened to "not fake unless proved otherwise"?I wonder what the changes have been if it's a new milestone, maybe a completely redesigned Aero style? Many now will say they wouldn't change much on the UI this late but if I remember correctly wasn't the Luna UI from XP only exposed while being near RTM? If you read you will know already about the changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solid Knight Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 I love the addition of "not fake" to reassure doubtful downloaders. It's right up there with "not a virus". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panda X Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 What happened to "not fake unless proved otherwise"?I wonder what the changes have been if it's a new milestone, maybe a completely redesigned Aero style? Many now will say they wouldn't change much on the UI this late but if I remember correctly wasn't the Luna UI from XP only exposed while being near RTM? I'm still all for the "fake unless proved otherwise" but not "not fake unless proven otherwise". Aero isn't changing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billibi Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 (edited) Hi,something is strange: Why 7105 and not 7100? because RC1 is ready :) and move forward (7100 will be the rc. this quite possibly has already been compiled but wont be released due to final tweaks )7105 has been compiled but is only an internal release to test the new code microsoft often start new thread before finalizing the last one e.g. build 7005 was started before 7000 had been compiled and released Edited April 6, 2009 by billibi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solid Knight Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Maccik2 you say it is absolutely REAL.... PROOF PLEASE ! Just read this: PROOF! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest xiphi Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Just read this: PROOF! You call that proof? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solid Knight Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 You call that proof? It's irrefutable evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hdood Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Aren't these sites just listing every single build number and putting "RC ESCROW" next to it in the hope that one will stick and they'll get "credit" for it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owen W Veteran Posted April 6, 2009 Veteran Share Posted April 6, 2009 Religion and Windows 7 on a single thread. What else could anyone ask for. :argh: +1 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atleeit Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Wow, as if I haven't heard that line beforeEven if the build is real, and out there somewhere your childish response doesn't exactly elicit confidence in you. If you really want to be taken seriously, provide your proof. Otherwise just accept that people aren't always going to believe you and stop resorting to childish name calling Even if screenshots are provided people still call the word fake so no point wasting time, just wait a few days and see this build surface too the wild and let everyone check it for themselves, this time i will do an upgrade, didn't bother with all the previous builds, waste of time :D Aren't these sites just listing every single build number and putting "RC ESCROW" next to it in the hope that one will stick and they'll get "credit" for it? No they say possibility ! because RC1 is ready :) and move forward (7100 will be the rc. this quite possibly has already been compiled but wont be released due to final tweaks )7105 has been compiled but is only an internal release to test the new code microsoft often start new thread before finalizing the last one e.g. build 7005 was started before 7000 had been compiled and released You talk jibberish here, 7105 will be RC-escrow if any and it will be released to testers as planned for April 2009, 10th if I'm correct. Not positive but pretty sure. 7100 won't be RC if the RC-Escrow is 7105, they still have a month to go regarding this, they won't go backwards in builds. 7005 was internal, 7000 was public...If 7105 is RC-Escrow then RC Public will be higher build. That's my guess, what's everyone else think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mad_onion Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 You talk jibberish here, 7105 will be RC-escrow if any and it will be released to testers as planned for April 2009, 10th if I'm correct. Not positive but pretty sure.7100 won't be RC if the RC-Escrow is 7105, they still have a month to go regarding this, they won't go backwards in builds. 7005 was internal, 7000 was public...If 7105 is RC-Escrow then RC Public will be higher build. That's my guess, what's everyone else think. I think a lot of you might have it wrong. Build 7105 is part of a new branch. I'm guessing the RC will be build 7100 and this new branch could be the RTM branch. that's assuming the RC escrow doesn't have it's build number inflated which i'm guessing it won't as it's just a build for internal testers. but brandon live would actually know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beatmztr Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 Isn?t it fun that we will all know what build the RC is going to be when it will be released, than the half of the people on this thread will be right and the other half will be wrong. Who will be right or who will be wrong? ....only time and MS can tell ;)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paixao Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 I found this as the file name on another site: 6.1.7105.0.090404-1235_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVD I DON'T KNOW if it is fake or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoLoR1 Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 I found this as the file name on another site: 6.1.7105.0.090404-1235_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVDI DON'T KNOW if it is fake or not. same site that "predicted" 7065 and 7070 build leaks and few others, with sizes and pictures and everything.... So guess how real that is. Dont get me wrong im not saying this might not be RC (altho i doubt, for me is more RTM branch), but that site posts a lot of bull s* and even if its real and gets out they will be lucky, nothing more nothing less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subject Delta Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 I found this as the file name on another site: 6.1.7105.0.090404-1235_x86fre_client_en-us_Retail_Ultimate-GB1CULFRER_EN_DVDI DON'T KNOW if it is fake or not. Only one way to find out :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyolc8 Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 These sites says it will come in this week, or something like this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest xiphi Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 It's irrefutable evidence. But it's not. You can't just make up a random build string and expect people to believe it. Seems you're the type to believe anything you see or hear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solid Knight Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 But it's not. You can't just make up a random build string and expect people to believe it. Seems you're the type to believe anything you see or hear. You are aware that it's a joke, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerAusgewanderte Posted April 6, 2009 Share Posted April 6, 2009 a thread with windows 7 and religion, I say quite reasonable (even though I am an atheist) since easter is just around the corner -> Rising of the lost son ;) I think this build is real and we will see this on sites by the end of the week (even though it's Good Friday, hence Crucifixion, maybe we have to wait a few more days... ;) ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts