Windows 7 new milestone 7105 ------6.1.7105.0.winmain.090404-1235

[Maccik2]

6.1.7068.0.winmain.090321-1322 - search for in public torrents.

6.1.7069.0.winmain.090323-1630

6.1.7070.0.winmain.090324-1853 - potentially RC Escrow build. screenshots

6.1.7071.0.winmain.090326-1750 - potentially RC Escrow build

6.1.7072.0.winmain.090327-1845 - potentially RC Escrow build

6.1.7073.0.winmain.090330-1830 - potentially RC Escrow build

6.1.7074.0.winmain.090331-1850 - potentially RC Escrow build

6.1.7075.0.winmain.090401-1840 - potentially RC Escrow build -not fake!

6.1.7076.0.winmain.090402-1838 - potentially RC Escrow build

actual build:

6.1.7105.0.winmain.090404-1235 -new milestone

I have a question This is true or false ???

Message to all members, Please behave in this thread. Most of are reports for the day coming from this thread. Shape up or I'll close it down.

Edited April 6, 2009 by warwagon

[+Gary7 Subscriber²]

From what I hear it is real. The 7105 build anyway. I am running 7068 and I know that 7075 has been released to some testers.

[winlonghorn]

6.1.7068.0.winmain.090321-1322 - search for in public torrents.

6.1.7069.0.winmain.090323-1630

6.1.7070.0.winmain.090324-1853 - potentially RC Escrow build. screenshots

6.1.7071.0.winmain.090326-1750 - potentially RC Escrow build

6.1.7072.0.winmain.090327-1845 - potentially RC Escrow build

6.1.7073.0.winmain.090330-1830 - potentially RC Escrow build

6.1.7074.0.winmain.090331-1850 - potentially RC Escrow build

6.1.7075.0.winmain.090401-1840 - potentially RC Escrow build -not fake!

6.1.7076.0.winmain.090402-1838 - potentially RC Escrow build

actual build:

6.1.7105.0.winmain.090404-1235 -new milestone

I have a question This is true or false ???

It is a fake! They don't compile builds on the weekends! :)

[ToneKnee]

Umm, quite possibly fake.

[Maccik2]

ok ..thanks for the quick reply ..but anyway is posible what would you think??

[Chrysaor]

It is a fake! They don't compile builds on the weekends! :)

7068 was compiled on 03/21 which is saturday.

[+Gary7 Subscriber²]

It is a fake! They don't compile builds on the weekends!

I am running 6.1.7068.0.winmain.090321-1322 and it was built on a Saturday. That is a weekend day. I am sure that MS works 7x24. :)

[ToneKnee]

ok ..thanks for the quick reply ..but anyway is posible what would you think??

If it's true that they've reached a new milestone (the reason for the big build number increase) then it's quite possible it exists, though saying that, no source of information or even any credible source pretty much means fake.

There have only been a few actual leaks of builds, but there have so many more fake builds around that people need to stop and think before they post another "zomg!!! another leaked build on the interwebz!!!", because then they look like an idiot when they proved that it is indeed fake.

[Maccik2]

OH Thank s guy s :D :jump:

[Crackler]

IF this build is real, any ideas why they jumped in the build numbers?

[Ci7]

fake

[winlonghorn]

I am running 6.1.7068.0.winmain.090321-1322 and it was built on a Saturday. That is a weekend day. I am sure that MS works 7x24. :)

ok sorry about that. I was told that they don't compile on the weekend. lol. someone lied.

[Maccik2]

I have source but i can t post here .....but i think is posible

[ToneKnee]

IF this build is real, any ideas why they jumped in the build numbers?

Again with what I said before, if they've reached a milestone, they would jump to the next 7x00 area of numbers. Do you really think that Vista was built like nearly 1000 times between the original CTP and RTM?

[Crackler]

So basically...in a nicer tone :p...a build number skip to indicate reaching the true RC build/trunk/other awkward terminology.

[Hidr0]

IF this build is real, any ideas why they jumped in the build numbers?

Because they CAN!... just like with XP and Vista

[+Gary7 Subscriber²]

IF this build is real, any ideas why they jumped in the build numbers?

Because they can, they can do as they please. Vista's build numbers were not in consecutive order. I was a Beta tester for Vista and their builds were not always in order.

[+Tyranade Subscriber²]

Roll on RC!

I hope this leaks out.

[+kpo6969 Subscriber¹]

I have source but i can t post here .....but i think is posible

I'd believe this one before your's.

http://www.sevenforums.com/news/6517-rc-es...ne-reached.html

posted before your's

[Chris89]

Hi,

something is strange:

Why 7105 and not 7100?

[Crackler]

Hi,

something is strange:

Why 7105 and not 7100?

I already asked something similar. :pinch:

[consume]

Maybe it's a new milestone for new icons :o

[vistademon]

Its real, builds are compiled on weekend.

Don't be so eager to call it a fake untill the info is out, i'm sure the news will spread over the next few hours. :D

[SoLoR1]

7105 might present 1st build in RTM branch, that would mean RC is "finished" already, just needs last polishing for release and it might get final build number 7100. Like it was with beta, beta it self was built 08/12/12 while you had builds from branch 700x before already. In any case we will probably see RC one way or another very soon (this could be "major" announcment from MS, that they will actualy catch april release).

And yes "builds are not built during weekends". They are however built on saturday if there was no friday build.

[darkmanx21]

So is this one real or fake?

I wonder if this build includes the announcements? :D