Windows 8 RC To Get Flatter Explorer UI, Other Changes

By freak180
in The Fast Ring (Insider Previews)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Jan Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Canouna: Today we've taken some times to check the most recent build of Windows 8,

Compiled two days ago, this build will let us check what's new on the Release Candidate branch.

First of all, we can note a new icons for Setup.exe,

Then a new color picker style during the OOBE & Personalization panel,

A bunch of new Aero cursors are added,

Another new revision of the Aero,

A bunch of new start page background added,

A polished start "button" in the corner,

And more...

The system is fast, and really stable.

Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

So it sounds like they probably added the "button" back in some form but not the "menu", so people shouldn't jump up and down or anything. heh.

Honestly why don't they just let us set the same background as we have on the desktop with the start page? If the images are the same then the transition isn't going to feel as jarring to some/most IMO.

If they don't want to do that because it might mess with the way the tiles look (since they don't have any real border around them so they could "fade" into the wallpaper someone picks), then why not just slap a simple "glass" layer between the tiles and the wallpaper like windows on the desktop do now? That way you have something there to make sure the live tiles don't get lost in the wallpaper as it were.

I really thing that regardless of how many start screen backgrounds they add that it'll never be enough.

Grand Master

freak180

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So it sounds like they probably added the "button" back in some form but not the "menu", so people shouldn't jump up and down or anything. heh.

Honestly why don't they just let us set the same background as we have on the desktop with the start page? If the images are the same then the transition isn't going to feel as jarring to some/most IMO.

If they don't want to do that because it might mess with the way the tiles look (since they don't have any real border around them so they could "fade" into the wallpaper someone picks), then why not just slap a simple "glass" layer between the tiles and the wallpaper like windows on the desktop do now? That way you have something there to make sure the live tiles don't get lost in the wallpaper as it were.

I really thing that regardless of how many start screen backgrounds they add that it'll never be enough.

There is no mention of it being added "back." The one in the CP is just polished.
Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

There is no mention of it being added "back." The one in the CP is just polished.

Well in the CP there is no "button" just a tab preview that shows up when you move the mouse down into the corner. They might have added something now though, cuz he says "button" not "preview" or w/e you want to call the popup in the CP. We'll know when screenshots get posted, just have to wait.

I don't care if there is or isn't a button, I'm more interested in the second part of my post about the wallpaper issue.

Proficient

Anthonyd

Posted
Posted

Well in the CP there is no "button" just a tab preview that shows up when you move the mouse down into the corner. They might have added something now though, cuz he says "button" not "preview" or w/e you want to call the popup in the CP. We'll know when screenshots get posted, just have to wait.

I don't care if there is or isn't a button, I'm more interested in the second part of my post about the wallpaper issue.

The start button is inside the charm bar for the CP, it isn't gone.
Grand Master

bandit_liberty_rumble

Posted
Posted
Honestly why don't they just let us set the same background as we have on the desktop with the start page? If the images are the same then the transition isn't going to feel as jarring to some/most IMO.

If they don't want to do that because it might mess with the way the tiles look (since they don't have any real border around them so they could "fade" into the wallpaper someone picks), then why not just slap a simple "glass" layer between the tiles and the wallpaper like windows on the desktop do now? That way you have something there to make sure the live tiles don't get lost in the wallpaper as it were.

I really thing that regardless of how many start screen backgrounds they add that it'll never be enough.

All they'd have to do is add a simple blur effect to the desktop background. I'm not really down with the aesthetics of the tiles in the first place though. The icons for legacy apps should be the main element of their respective tile, and therefore should be much larger and probably centered in the tile in a similar way that the icons for Metro apps are centered in their tiles. And the Metro tiles and their colors are too much 'in your face' for my taste, so much so that the Start screen can almost start to look like a bunch of ads...

current.jpgblur.jpg

  • neo1911, butilikethecookie and T M H
  • Like 3
Grand Master

McKay

Posted
Posted

right click on desktop -> Personalize -> Window Color Option (Automatic)

right click on desktop -> Personalize (open another window) -> select Windows Basic

Now select again the Window Color on the first window you did open

Nice! Thanks!

Veteran

bogas04

Posted
Posted

All they'd have to do is add a simple blur effect to the desktop background. I'm not really down with the aesthetics of the tiles in the first place though. The icons for legacy apps should be the main element of their respective tile, and therefore should be much larger and probably centered in the tile in a similar way that the icons for Metro apps are centered in their tiles. And the Metro tiles and their colors are too much 'in your face' for my taste, so much so that the Start screen can almost start to look like a bunch of ads...

current.jpgblur.jpg

a weird wallpaper can ruin it easily, hence the weird start screen background by itself.

Grand Master

bandit_liberty_rumble

Posted
Posted

a weird wallpaper can ruin it easily

Maybe - although nobody is forced to use a weird wallpaper - ... but you're right, it might not be appropriate for MS's concept of going with the very stark colors for their tiles.

I think something like the blur effect would alleviate the problem to a certain extent though.

(first Google result I got for 'weird wallpaper' ;) )

weird.jpg vs. weirdblur.jpg

This is terribad, all that blur in fullscreen really kills my eyes :(

You've got to be kidding ?! (although I'm certainly not saying it's perfect the way I did it)

Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

I dunno about blur, that's probably not the right way to go about it. I think added a glass effect like how the taskbar or windows have in the desktop right now is a better way to do it. That way the tiles would look like they're on top of a glass window and your wallpaper is behind the window etc. It'd fit with the "windows" theme still.

As for the desktop app tiles using a small icon I think, as I said in another post months back, that having different tiles look different is by design in the end. Think of it like this, if every type of "object" that you pinned to the start screen had the same live tile look then how would you know what is a metro app, what's a desktop app, or what's a pinned website? Or what's just a shortcut to something on your system for that matter?

Having pinned sites, desktop apps and metro apps with different tiles lets you, as a user, know right away what you're clicking on. But I agree that the icon for desktop apps under the app name could look better if it was a bit bigger. I think the reason it's not is that most apps icons don't support the bigger, i'm guessing 64x64, look and so they're just going with the default 32x32 size icon in the tile?

Veteran

bogas04

Posted
Posted

Maybe - although nobody is forced to use a weird wallpaper - ... but you're right, it might not be appropriate for MS's concept of going with the very stark colors for their tiles.

I think something like the blur effect would alleviate the problem to a certain extent though.

(first Google result I got for 'weird wallpaper' ;) )

Well it would work (as Launchpad does same thing) but then metro apps' tiles are not like apple apps (no boundaries/shadows/<add more differences here>). Anyways , these concepts would just remain here :/

ALSO not to forget how WP is so locked in terms of customization , i think the amount of customization given for Metro Tablets/Desktop Users is more than enough.

Grand Master

bandit_liberty_rumble

Posted
Posted
As for the desktop app tiles using a small icon I think, as I said in another post months back, that having different tiles look different is by design in the end. Think of it like this, if every type of "object" that you pinned to the start screen had the same live tile look then how would you know what is a metro app, what's a desktop app, or what's a pinned website? Or what's just a shortcut to something on your system for that matter?

Having pinned sites, desktop apps and metro apps with different tiles lets you, as a user, know right away what you're clicking on. But I agree that the icon for desktop apps under the app name could look better if it was a bit bigger. I think the reason it's not is that most apps icons don't support the bigger, i'm guessing 64x64, look and so they're just going with the default 32x32 size icon in the tile?

But would you really look for an app based on whether it's Metro style or legacy? Seems kind of backwards to me. In the end, you just care about what the app does, not what framework it's written in, or its visual style.

Maybe I'm too cynical about this. But I suspect Microsoft are making the tiles for legacy apps look deliberately bad so that the Metro tiles stand out more.

Grand Master

bandit_liberty_rumble

Posted
Posted

Well it would work (as Launchpad does same thing) but then metro apps' tiles are not like apple apps (no boundaries/shadows/<add more differences here>).

You're right. And I think that's great. MS is doing something completely original here (even though I don't agree with all of their decisions).

Veteran

bogas04

Posted
Posted

The new cursors and new icon for setup. Apparently we can see the new Aero revision as well :) Thanks to Jim Allchin & Canouna , but i still hate him for keeping us drooling all this while :p :p :p :drool: :

post-293012-0-07776800-1335782415.png

post-293012-0-13843100-1335782418.png

Which reminds me of Canouna's old tweet which had no explanation behind it , now makes sense :p

568825873.jpg?key=25921944

http://twitpic.com/9enwup

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Secure Boot

      By cork1958 · Posted

      Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • Ford execs say they made a mistake when they replaced human engineers with AI

      By TsarNikky · Posted

      How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval

      By TsarNikky · Posted

      Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1

      By Copernic · Posted

      AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried

      By zikalify · Posted

      You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      149
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!