Poll: Windows 8 Experience (How do you like it?)



Recommended Posts

Yes. Its primary function was to create a sense of unity; To provide a common UX across devices.

 

While in the immediate time, I WILL concede and agree that it works either way. it does unify.. I'd only ask that you realize that while it unifies.. the base, the absolute base of the modern UI was meant for touchscreen use and then others of us who use mice.

While in the immediate time, I WILL concede and agree that it works either way. it does unify.. I'd only ask that you realize that while it unifies.. the base, the absolute base of the modern UI was meant for touchscreen use and then others of us who use mice.

That's still not true at all. Metro was first conceived for PC use in Windows Media Center. It then evolved to fit on Microsoft's Zune, and Zune software, Windows Phone, and has since returned to the PC. If you fire up WMC, you'll see it's still there. The Metro Design Language is nothing more than a paradigm that seeks to break the "traditional" UI paradigms. It focuses on simple typography and graphics, rather than complex typographic and graphical UIs. It's an all around paradigm that can be used with a wide range of input methods, yes including touch, as opposed to the "traditional" desktop, which was designed around the mouse. The classic desktop will never satisfyingly accept other forms of input without big change - which is why it's taken a back seat as computers become increasingly mobile, and open to new forms of input. Like it or not, 10-20 years from now, mice interaction will be a silly notion to many.  

 

xp_mce2005_ur2_15.jpg

As a long time Microsoft Windows fan this was the first time I gave up on it and went back to an earlier version (Win7). Still have 9 unused Windows 8/8.1 VL keys from my Action Pack subscription.

That's still not true at all. Metro was first conceived for PC use in Windows Media Center. It then evolved to fit on Microsoft's Zune, and Zune software, Windows Phone, and has since returned to the PC. If you fire up WMC, you'll see it's still there. The Metro Design Language is nothing more than a paradigm that seeks to break the "traditional" UI paradigms. It focuses on simple typography and graphics, rather than complex typographic and graphical UIs. It's an all around paradigm that can be used with a wide range of input methods, yes including touch, as opposed to the "traditional" desktop, which was designed around the mouse. The classic desktop will never satisfyingly accept other forms of input without big change - which is why it's taken a back seat as computers become increasingly mobile, and open to new forms of input. Like it or not, 10-20 years from now, mice interaction will be a silly notion to many.  

 

xp_mce2005_ur2_15.jpg

 

 

 

 

Then I agree to disagree with you. besides.. what purpose does this discussion serve? I don't want my pride getting the better of me. So I'm simply leaving anything unsaid on the table and walking away. I see no further reason to debate a topic such as this. Elvis has left the building!

Then I agree to disagree with you. besides.. what purpose does this discussion serve? I don't want my pride getting the better of me. So I'm simply leaving anything unsaid on the table and walking away. I see no further reason to debate a topic such as this. Elvis has left the building!

I'm simply pointing out that the ill conceived notion that Metro is meant for touch only devices simply isn't true. That's not its sole function. As long as people think this, they'll never truly understand why there's a big push for new and innovative UIs.   

I'm simply pointing out that the ill conceived notion that Metro is meant for touch only devices simply isn't true. That's not its sole function. As long as people think this, they'll never truly understand why there's a big push for new and innovative UIs.   

 

Yes, it works for both, BUT it doesn't work equally well for both, Metro or Modern or whatever it's being called now, was designed to work best with touch screens. Again as I've pointed out earlier Metro was Microsofts attempt to "tablet-atize" the UI and if they would have left it for the tablet/phone nobody would care. Of course, they wouldn't have a vehicle to drive their users to the "store" right?

 

What's their new slogan - one experience across all devices? Do you use you phone, tablet, laptop or computer the same way? I sure don't, so why would I want the same experience? What about the desktop only user that has no desire to have a tablet or a Windows phone? Should they have to learn how to use Windows all over again, because Microsoft wants a piece of the tablet market?

 

Why wouldn't Microsoft simply ask the end user what they wanted at install? I would have been MUCH happier if they would have ask what I wanted, after all, am I not the customer?

 

As for your second sentance, what exactly has Metro brought to the UI, that Apple or Google hasn't already done with their Tablet UIs? I am truly curious, I have used iPads and Android tablets and am running CMMod on my Nook HD+, I also have installed Windows 8 Beta, Windows 8, and Windows 8.1, and have seen NOTHING new or innovative form Microsoft. Please, tell me something other than those annoying "live tiles" that drive me crazy until I turn them off.

Yes, it works for both, BUT it doesn't work equally well for both, Metro or Modern or whatever it's being called now, was designed to work best with touch screens. Again as I've pointed out earlier Metro was Microsofts attempt to "tablet-atize" the UI and if they would have left it for the tablet/phone nobody would care. Of course, they wouldn't have a vehicle to drive their users to the "store" right?

 

What's their new slogan - one experience across all devices? Do you use you phone, tablet, laptop or computer the same way? I sure don't, so why would I want the same experience? What about the desktop only user that has no desire to have a tablet or a Windows phone? Should they have to learn how to use Windows all over again, because Microsoft wants a piece of the tablet market?

 

Why wouldn't Microsoft simply ask the end user what they wanted at install? I would have been MUCH happier if they would have ask what I wanted, after all, am I not the customer?

 

As for your second sentance, what exactly has Metro brought to the UI, that Apple or Google hasn't already done with their Tablet UIs? I am truly curious, I have used iPads and Android tablets and am running CMMod on my Nook HD+, I also have installed Windows 8 Beta, Windows 8, and Windows 8.1, and have seen NOTHING new or innovative form Microsoft. Please, tell me something other than those annoying "live tiles" that drive me crazy until I turn them off.

As I said above, Microsoft did not leverage PCs for tablets. That simply isn't true. They're unifying Windows devices. 

 

You don't have the option to choose because there's so many things wrong in allowing it. First of all, Windows isn't Linux. You've never had the option before to install/uninstall shells at will, so the same applies here. Second, you're the customer, but Microsoft never forced you to purchase the OS. It's not their duty to cater to every single user out there. They offer a product, and you choose to buy it or not. Second, numerous technicalities exist in supporting "options". Microsoft (or any developer, really) just doesn't have the time, energy, or resources available to support whatever bells and whistles you think you need. They have a pre-defined UX that they want to support, and nothing is going to change that. Change is part of the ride. Sooner or later, you know it's going to happen, so why complain about it? Companies can't afford to cater to a crowd looking to cling to a defunct era in computing. 

As I said above, Microsoft did not leverage PCs for tablets. That simply isn't true. They're unifying Windows devices. 

 

You don't have the option to choose because there's so many things wrong in allowing it. First of all, Windows isn't Linux. You've never had the option before to install/uninstall shells at will, so the same applies here. Second, you're the customer, but Microsoft never forced you to purchase the OS. It's not their duty to cater to every single user out there. They offer a product, and you choose to buy it or not. Second, numerous technicalities exist in supporting "options". Microsoft (or any developer, really) just doesn't have the time, energy, or resources available to support whatever bells and whistles you think you need. They have a pre-defined UX that they want to support, and nothing is going to change that. Change is part of the ride. Sooner or later, you know it's going to happen, so why complain about it? Companies can't afford to cater to a crowd looking to cling to a defunct era in computing. 

 

I'm sorry I do NOT believe that if tablets weren't exploding the Metro UI would be touch driven or that Microsoft would have made such a drastic change to the UI. They got into the phone market late and lost millions of dollars, they got into the mp3 player market too late and lost millions, they got into the tablet market late and are still losing millions, they RUSHED Metro and screwed it up. They made some improvements with 8.1, they need to think long and hard about their customer base. Desktop users do NOT want Windows 8, every store the sells computer has a sign saying they still have computers with Windows 7 on them, what does that tell you?

 

Windows RT SHOULD have been the tablet and phone os only, the desktop should have been an improved Windows 7. Honestly, I think Microsoft knew with the way people clung to Windows XP, they figured they could slip Metro onto the desktop at a low desktp buying time and recieve as little backlash as possible while working out the bugs, as their desktop users stuck with Windows 7. It's a gamble that hasn't paid off, and it will hurt them, go to any web site for a store that sells computers and read the reviews, the biggest complaint is about Windows 8 and people hate it. These people aren't techies or power users they are regular users that don't like the UI, and they don't like it enough to post comments about it.

 

Why complain about it? Then how will they know it's NOT what I want or need? How will they know their customers are NOT happy with a "pre-defined UX" that doesn't work for desktop users? How would they realize the have many things to correct for desktop users to adopt their "Vision" of a "single experience across all devices"? How will Microsoft understand you can't have a great UI for many devices that aren't used in the same way? If Microsoft really believed in their "Vision" they would have removed the desktop completely, we desktop users are a "defunct era of computing" holding them back from the greatness of METRO, right?

 

I'm still waitng for the "new and innovative" things Metro brought to use desktop users...

Desktop users do NOT want Windows 8, every store the sells computer has a sign saying they still have computers with Windows 7 on them, what does that tell you?

It tells me you're full of it as: 1) I've never seen signs like that. 2) Users have downgrade rights. Big deal, it's been like that forever. 3) Then how did my local Best Buy sell 3 Windows 8.1 laptops while I was in for a keyboard for my Surface just today?

 

Why complain about it? Then how will they know it's NOT what I want or need? How will they know their customers are NOT happy with a "pre-defined UX" that doesn't work for desktop users? How would they realize the have many things to correct for desktop users to adopt their "Vision" of a "single experience across all devices"? How will Microsoft understand you can't have a great UI for many devices that aren't used in the same way? If Microsoft really believed in their "Vision" they would have removed the desktop completely, we desktop users are a "defunct era of computing" holding them back from the greatness of METRO, right?

Windows has ALWAYS had a predefined UX. Users never asked for the Start Menu either, yet Microsoft forced it in Windows 95, much to the disdain of users. I'm not sure why all of a sudden you think things will change with Windows' development process. Again, it's not Linux. It's not designed to swap shells. This is nothing new. There's no rulebook saying desktop UIs need to have a Windows 95 look and feel to it. In fact, limiting desktops to that kind of UI limits their use. The UI was designed solely for a mouse, a technology which is slowly disappearing in favor of newer technologies. So no matter what, the UI is going to change to use these new input methods. There's no conspiracy here, simply normal evolution of PCs. Companies are finally adapting them to today's user base, the majority of whom want mobility. The majority of whom are ready to try new technologies without reservation. As a technology company Microsoft can only hold on to the old for so long until the strain becomes too much. Eventually, they have to push in a new direction to move forward.

 

Not sure why you think Metro on the desktop works the same as Metro on the phone. The desktop version of Metro allows more expandability in terms of multitasking and features. They look the same, but are quite different (yet similar) to use. If you can use one, you can easily use the other. That's the whole point of unifying the experience between devices. 

 

You're missing out on a fun adventure. Metro on the desktop isn't as bad as you make it out to be, and looks quite nice (and even complementary to modern designed offices and homes) on widescreen monitors.

 

post-420821-0-03812800-1385567190.png 

 

 

It tells me you're full of it as: 1) I've never seen signs like that. 2) Users have downgrade rights. Big deal, it's been like that forever. 3) Then how did my local Best Buy sell 3 Windows 8.1 laptops while I was in for a keyboard for my Surface just today?

 

Windows has ALWAYS had a predefined UX. Users never asked for the Start Menu either, yet Microsoft forced it in Windows 95, much to the disdain of users. I'm not sure why all of a sudden you think things will change with Windows' development process. Again, it's not Linux. It's not designed to swap shells. This is nothing new. There's no rulebook saying desktop UIs need to have a Windows 95 look and feel to it. In fact, limiting desktops to that kind of UI limits their use. The UI was designed solely for a mouse, a technology which is slowly disappearing in favor of newer technologies. So no matter what, the UI is going to change to use these new input methods. There's no conspiracy here, simply normal evolution of PCs. Companies are finally adapting them to today's user base, the majority of whom want mobility. The majority of whom are ready to try new technologies without reservation. As a technology company Microsoft can only hold on to the old for so long until the strain becomes too much. Eventually, they have to push in a new direction to move forward.

 

Not sure why you think Metro on the desktop works the same as Metro on the phone. The desktop version of Metro allows more expandability in terms of multitasking and features. They look the same, but are quite different (yet similar) to use. If you can use one, you can easily use the other. That's the whole point of unifying the experience between devices. 

 

You're missing out on a fun adventure. Metro on the desktop isn't as bad as you make it out to be, and looks quite nice (and even complementary to modern designed offices and homes) on widescreen monitors.

 

attachicon.gifScreenshot (1007).png

 

1) I was at two different Staples and an Office Max and they ALL had a sign posted in their computer display areas, I'll grab a picture the next time I'm in one. There is also a commercial for a computer store here in Tucson that expresly states they have Windows 7 on both desktops and laptops.

2) Yes, but I'm willing to wager the Windows 8 has been the most used, oh wait, they aren't putting Windows 8 Pro on many desktops are they?

3) And? If I needed a laptop/desktop, I'd go buy one and slap Windows 7 on as fast as the USB could load it! You think every buy around the holidays is buying for themselves?

 

Yes, they ALWAYS have, but they were really ever designing for the DESKTOP, something they are NOT doing now.

 

I've traveled that "fun adventure" 3 times and have gone back all three times, W8 RC/Beta, W8 and W8.1, the experience was a mess everytime. The sad thing? The 8.1 was the worst of them all, why? Microsoft has decided that video drivers are now "important" instead of "optional" and it decided to install the latest nVidia drivers, well they are a disaster for the 5/6 series cards. Then after I removed the "important" drivers for ones that work, Windows kept replacing them with the broken drivers until I turned off "auto install important updates" and had to chck for updates and then tell Windows not to install those drivers.. f'ing nice!

 

So I got the drivers sorted, then removed every tile with an ad... well, that left me the desktop and IE and few misc tiles I was never going to use, I don't like IE so that was gone, and I realized I might as well just boot to the desktop. Done. Tried to change the font - NOPE!, use a dark theme and be able to read the window tile - NOPE! Look, you have to give people some options, not everyone wants what Microsoft think is best. Windows 8/8.1 was a backward step for the desktop user who wants or needs a little bit of customization with resorting to reg hacks. The default font look terrible to me, I hate it and it should be trivial to change it, since 8 is built on 7 and they actually REMOVED it. WHY?

 

I'm glad people want mobility, good for them, is a desktop a mobile device? No. Is a non-touch screen laptop used like a mobile device? No. They had the soultion, Windows RT on the tablet and phone, but they wouldn't have been able to convince Office users to buy a device without Office. So, RT died a fast death when they realized Office Apps were going to be a ways off, can't get the enterprise market without - "a real keyboard and Office" to quote their commercials. They have to have the enterprise market to drive people to their store and they probably told the app designers they would be getting "all the desktop users as well" to convince people to take them seriously. You think the app designers would dump Apple or Android, without the promise of the entire Windows userbase? So agian, you gotta cram the store into the desktop, and you gotta have it where they can see it everytime they boot or push the Windows key. You sure as heck couldn't have it buried in the start menu...

 

I have a Nook HD+ running Android (CMMod 10.2) and it's beautiful and works great, but I sure wouldn't want to drive that with a mouse and I sure as heck don't want it on my desktop.

 

Look, we are just going to have to disagree, I only see Windows 8 as a last gasp stab at getting a real piece of the tablet market, and they hoped that the desktop users would be able to handle the crappy choices they made in their UI.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Making US citizens pay is a prominent tool? Joke of the week…
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!