Microsoft Could Launch a Start Menu Option in Windows 8


Recommended Posts

Microsoft Could Launch a Start Menu Option in Windows 8

Windows 8 dumps the traditional Start Menu and instead adopts a ?confusing? Start Screen that relies on live tiles to let users launch apps from a single screen.

Steven Sinofsky, the former Windows boss, is one of the main Microsoft executives who wanted to replace the Start Menu with a Start Screen, claiming that adopting a feature that would better mix the desktop industry with the touch-optimized market would support the company?s long-term plans.

CIO Today writes that Sinofsky even convinced CEO Steve Ballmer to adopt his idea, so all Windows 8 workstations now come with a Start Screen.

Steven Sinofsky is no longer head of the Windows division and more and more voices familiar with matter are hinting that a Start Menu option could, after all, land on Windows 8 platforms.

There are already several third-party apps that could restore the Start Menu on Windows 8 and Stardoc?s Start8 is one of the most popular.

Kris Kwilas, Stardock's technology vice president, says that his software has already sold tens of thousands of copies, while even more consumers take the trial version for a spin.

?Early adopters of Windows 8 feel there's something missing -- a comfort factor for how they want to use their PCs," Kwilas says, hinting that Microsoft may actually develop a Start Menu for Windows 8, just to make sure its new operating system isn?t considered a confusing solution anymore.

But Steve Ballmer said in an interview with the Associated Press in October that Microsoft has absolutely no intention to bring back the Start Menu. You already have ?a whole screen as a Start button,? Ballmer said.

Steven Sinofsky, on the other hand, explained during the Windows 8 launch conference that it?s just a matter of time until people get used to the new Start Screen. The same happened with the Start button too, he explained.

?You know, as familiar and productive as Windows 7 is for customers today, the world that led to Windows 7 began back in the early 1990s when familiar concepts like the Start menu were first conceived. Familiar today, but completely new when it was first released. That technology world was so very different than the world we experience each and every day.?

http://news.softpedi...-8-307447.shtml

------------

I doubt it, sounds like weak rumours to me

EDIT - Apologies, maybe this should be in the news section, mods feel free to move

  • Like 2

As much as I would be infinitely happier if they did bring the start menu back, it's not going to happen. Aside from anything else, the third party options do a good enough job, so why should Microsoft bother?

Guys. **** the damn menu. It doesn't need to be around anymore. The Start screen is more attractive and functional, and it totally destroys the entire purpose of re-imagining Windows. Does nobody think before they write, anymore?

  • Like 2

It sounds to me as if that writer, and the writer of the report it's based off, have no idea what they're talking about. But I could be wrong :)

Why, because their opinion is opposite of yours?

Guys. **** the damn menu. It doesn't need to be around anymore. The Start screen is more attractive and functional.

Just stop, it's getting embarrassing now, we get it you think the start screen is the best thing ever, tens of thousands of people don't, stop telling them how you think they should use their computer and let them have their start menu.

Guys. **** the damn menu. It doesn't need to be around anymore. The Start screen is more attractive and functional, and it totally destroys the entire purpose of re-imagining Windows. Does nobody think before they write, anymore?

Why are you so against giving people what they want, bro?

I really hope they don't bring back the start menu, the start screen is fine, and using metro apps with a start menu would be an even bigger clusterfeck

  • Like 4

Guys. **** the damn menu. It doesn't need to be around anymore. The Start screen is more attractive and functional, and it totally destroys the entire purpose of re-imagining Windows. Does nobody think before they write, anymore?

Personal tastes and preferences aren't something you're comfortable with when they differ from yours, am I right?

I really hope they don't bring back the start menu, the start screen is fine, and using metro apps with a start menu would be an even bigger clusterfeck

Nope, you want to know why? I'm using Start8, and the last time I saw the Start Screen is when I installed Windows for the first time, 3 weeks ago. People must have the choice to use their computer how they want to. If they want to use Metro apps, good for them. If they don't want to use the Start Screen, they should be allowed to.

The only thing the start menu has over the start screen is the built-in search box (i know there is the search off to the side). Other than that I think the start screen is ok - great for a tablet, ok for a mouse.

Edit: @myx - I agree people should have the choice of how to use their computers (hence Start8) however Microsoft doesn't have to provide all those ways, moving 'forward' with the start screen is good I think. With that said I also agree with -T-, for me the start screen is a good way to use apps in a metro/touch environment, the start menu was too small.

Guys. **** the damn menu. It doesn't need to be around anymore. The Start screen is more attractive and functional, and it totally destroys the entire purpose of re-imagining Windows. Does nobody think before they write, anymore?

+1 :D

Nobody likes to change. However, without change, the world would be much more dull and we wouldn't have the variety of technology that we have today.

However, this is a simple choice. If you want to have "what you want", as somebody said in this thread, go Linux, where you have your choice among 100's of distro's.

For all others, if you are tied into the Microsoft or Apple ecosystem, however, you will never get "what you want", without having to hack it on your own.

  • Like 2

I don't know. I am using Start8 the last time I switched over to the start screen was pretty much when I first installed Windows 8 because I wanted to play with everything but after having it for a week or so I have spent 90% of my time on the desktop.

Haters gonna hate. But this article wasn't at all researched or well thought out.

StevenSi's leave isn't going to change anything. Microsoft has a course set, and they're sticking to it. The evidence is there to support it.

- JL-G is heading the division.

- StevenSi's departure had NOTHING to do with Surface or Windows 8.

- Destroys the purpose of Windows 8, and the "re-imagining" of WIndows.

- Destroys the uniformity of platforms.

- Creates a ****ty UX to support.

- Destroys forward platform viability.

- At no point do you see Microsoft demonstrating or even hinting at replacing the Start Screen. Ballmer was all over Windows 8 Start just last month at BUILD.

This article is nothing more than BS.

  • Like 2

Unlikely to happen, it'd basically be Microsoft admitting they got it wrong, and that won't happen. There may be a case to be made however for better visual guidance to the start menu for those having trouble adjusting to "hot spots". This may result in a return of the start button in some shape, but not the menu itself. For those that want the menu itself back, there are third party tools that work just fine.

Having a start menu, you're obviously going to stick with what you know how to use. Its the event that you HAVE to use the start screen that you'll use it, perhaps get used to it, and see if its more productive or not.

I remember when people didn't like the 'new' XP start menu, and reverted back to the WinME one. They stuck with that and took awhile to eventually move to the new one.

Its funny, the people that want the menu back believe that they are in some sort of majority, the people that are happy with the start screen (me included) believe they are in some kind of majority, while back in the real world the actual majority don't voice an opinion on forums for tech topics so these opinions are tarnished by our own bias towards what we see others saying (but we see other saying stuff on the same posts that interest us, so the bias grows).

The thing is, its a big change yes, but so was XP and the hatred was as strong in some circles. It was blasted in the press and many people called it a fisher price OS - look at it now and what it became. People do get used to new systems and in my opinion the start screen isn't as massive of a change as some are making out - I mean we're talking mainly a visual change over function, yes I'm aware certain things aren't possible and some take an extra click, but I'm also aware of the benefits the start screen brings with it and the reason why its a default.

I love the live tiles and will do more so when more apps are released in the store, there is already a pretty good sage app and the new Dynamics app (not released yet but there is plenty of info about it) looks very nice, along with a SAP application and more to come, there will soon be plenty of business related apps available to give you live info.

But that's not the main point, its about unifying things, what I love is being able to buy a cheap app on my laptop and its then available on my other windows 8 devices - if the start menu existed I might not have given the new UI and apps a decent chance, as it is Ive come to love it.

If the start menu existed then the modern UI could be completely bypassed and the modern UI (along with its store count) would take longer to gain mass adoption.

Having a start menu, you're obviously going to stick with what you know how to use. Its the event that you HAVE to use the start screen that you'll use it, perhaps get used to it, and see if its more productive or not.

I remember when people didn't like the 'new' XP start menu, and reverted back to the WinME one. They stuck with that and took awhile to eventually move to the new one.

THIS!!!!

I got so sick of helping XP users out and finding the 'classic' start menu, which was only in use because some idiot techy friend had told them that the new UI made the computer slower and the old one was better (read as I'm comfortable with the old one and dam MS for changing it).

These users never gave it a chance, and stayed with the horrible classic menu until an upgrade or new computer.

MS need to get the new UI upto mass adoption levels to boost the the ecosystem, like it or not but the new ecosystem is life or death for them when you look at the numbers moving to ipads and android tablets - they have to make this work and keeping the start menu would simply be a negative in getting the new UI into the minds of the masses and getting people used to it.

I know I'm not downgrading to Windows 8 till that start screen and the whole full screen crAPP features can be completely removed.

I do understand people wanting the start menu back, but you want the whole modern UI layer gone along with store - something that you can completely ignore other than using as a launcher (for apps you don't have pinned to taskbar)? wow!

I presume Microsoft are getting thousands of complaints/support requests about the missing desktop Start menu daily ("where has it gone?" "how do you re-enable it?"), and people are not adjusting as well as Microsoft (or Sinofsky) hoped to it's removal (it was there since Windows 95). It's a staple feature in Windows - I certainly found it's disappearance awkward and annoying (I am a desktop-only user).

I am more than happy to support Stardock for their efforts, and it's great to hear that tens of thousands of people are buying Start8. Even if the report above is false, I still think think the number would be that high, at least.

Unlikely to happen, it'd basically be Microsoft admitting they got it wrong, and that won't happen. There may be a case to be made however for better visual guidance to the start menu for those having trouble adjusting to "hot spots". This may result in a return of the start button in some shape, but not the menu itself. For those that want the menu itself back, there are third party tools that work just fine.

Hm, but the button is still there in the same place, on hover :/ I do hope they don't place it back everpresent on the Taskbar.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Can you give an example of when you would want to use Rufus over the other or vice versa? Just wondering which is the "best".
    • Oh no...the wallet is already screaming. So many games and so little time. Being old and responsible is awful!
    • LibreWolf 152.0.2-1 by Razvan Serea LibreWolf is an independent “fork” of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy security and user freedom. It is the community run successor to LibreFox. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. LibreWolf features: Latest Firefox — LibreWolf is compiled directly from the latest build of Firefox Stable. You will have the the latest features, and security updates. Independent Build — LibreWolf uses a build independent of Firefox and has its own settings, profile folder and installation path. As a result, it can be installed alongside Firefox or any other browser. No phoning home — Embedded server links and other calling home functions are removed. In other words, minimal background connections by default. User settings updates Extensions firewall: limit internet access for extensions. Multi-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac/and soon Android) Community-Driven Dark theme (classic and advanced) LibreWolf privacy features: Delete cookies and website data on close. Include only privacy respecting search engines like DuckDuckGo and Searx. Include uBlockOrigin with custom default filter lists, and Tracking Protection in strict mode, to block trackers and ads. Strip tracking elements from URLs, both natively and through uBO. Enable dFPI, also known as Total Cookie Protection. Enable RFP which is part of the Tor Uplift project. RFP is considered the best in class anti-fingerprinting solution, and its goal is to make users look the same and cover as many metrics as possible, in an effort to block fingerprinting techniques. Always display user language as en-US to websites, in order to protect the language used in the browser and in the OS. Disable WebGL, as it is a strong fingerprinting vector. Prevent access to the location services of the OS, and use Mozilla's location API instead of Google's API. Limit ICE candidates generation to a single interface when sharing video or audio during a videoconference. Force DNS and WebRTC inside the proxy, when one is being used. Trim cross-origin referrers, so that they don't include the full URI. Disable link prefetching and speculative connections. Disable disk cache and clear temporary files on close. Disable form autofill. Disable search and form history...and more. Download: LibreWolf 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: LibreWolf Home Page | Addons | Screenshot | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hands on with iFlyTek AINote 2 E-Ink tablet: insanely thin and smart by Taras Buria During Amazon Prime Day 2026, iFlyTek is offering its E-Ink tablets with big discounts. The AINOTE 2 is now available at 20% off, allowing you to save quite a lot on one of the thinnest E-Ink tablets out there. I was offered a chance to look at the device, so here are my impressions. The AINOTE 2 is a large 10.65-inch E-Ink tablet that strikes you the moment you take it out of the box. It is extremely thin. At just 4.2 mm, this tablet is at the edge of what is possible for a device with a USB Type-C port. It is also very light, which makes it comfortable and enjoyable during long reading sessions. The tablet has a gold metal chassis with the front and back made of plastic. The back also features four rubber feet that prevent it from sliding around your desk when writing. Besides a USB Type-C port and an LED indicator, there are two buttons mounted on the top edge: a power button with a built-in fingerprint scanner and a dedicated AI button. I would say the fingerprint scanner is quite mid. Given that iFlyTek positions the device as a digital notebook, it makes sense to have a biometric scanner to protect sensitive information. However, it is not the fastest fingerprint reader, and sometimes it fails to recognize my finger. I assume that is due to the tablet's insane thinness. A dedicated AI button is an interesting choice, especially in the middle of the top edge. I can see this button being useful for those who heavily rely on AI and use it frequently, but I cannot help but think its placement is impractical. Having it on one of the longer sides would make so much more sense. The AINOTE 2 is a very pretty device. Gold finish with thin chassis and nearly symmetrical front bezels create a fantastic combination, and iFlyTek cleverly hides the front chin with a section that looks like an extension of the screen, housing two touch-capacitive buttons: one for AI and one for quick notes. This section can also scroll pages when you swipe from the middle to the left or right. It is a cool idea, and very handy when you need to scroll tens of pages at once. AINOTE 2's elegant look extends from its exterior to its software. The user interface is very clean and not cluttered with an abundance of buttons. The tablet prioritizes the note-taking experience, and when you unlock it, it defaults to the list of all notes and folders. Additionally, there is a separate "Schedule" section with your calendar, tasks, memos, and other productivity features. You can connect your Outlook or Google account or use a local calendar. The tablet has quite a lot of AI features powered by OpenAI's GPT-5 and Google's Gemini 3. Besides a standard app with all your chats, you can invoke AI by pressing its dedicated button and dictating your request. It is not limited to just chats. It works with the built-in calendar, and you can tell it to create events, tasks, notes, and more. Additionally, AI features are integrated into the built-in notepad, allowing you to summarize notes, ask questions about your notes, and more. The tablet can OCR handwritten text in different languages (about 120 languages, which is very impressive), and it surprised me with very good accuracy. Voice note transcription is also available, including a "multiplayer" mode where the tablet detects each speaker. Unfortunately, the AINOTE 2 has no built-in speakers (even though it somehow makes a tapping noise when you flip pages using the Quick Bar), so the only way to listen to something is to connect a Bluetooth speaker or headphones. However, there are four front-facing mics for dictation, voice notes, AI chats, and more. Unfortunately, certain features require a Pro subscription that costs $5.99/mo or $59.99/year. Those include offline voice transcription, access to better AI models, the ability to edit notes on a PC or mobile app, and extended service coverage similar to Apple Care. It is a bummer to see yet another app, especially in a device that costs $649, but at least they give a free 90-day trial so that you can see if the benefits justify the price. As for the reader, it supports PDF, EPUB, TXT, MOBI, AZW3, DOC(X), XLS(X), PPT(X), JPEG, JPG, and PNG. The app is quite customizable, with features like text contrast/boldness/size adjustments, margins and spacing customization, and the ability to load custom fonts. Plus, you can annotate books with the stylus, add text notes, and use AI to work with them. Just keep in mind that most AI features require an active internet connection. Like with other E-Ink tablets with Android inside, you can load any other reader you want from the Google Play Store or a third-party source. Despite its hefty price tag of $629 or $519 by the time of publishing this article during Prime Day 2026, the AINOTE 2 has quite modest hardware inside. There is only 4 GB of RAM and about 42GB of storage. It is powered by the RockChip RK3576 processor with 8 cores at 2.2 GHz. Given that the tablet runs Android 14 and has Google Play, you can install Android apps, but do not expect much from this thing performance-wise. As for the battery, there is a 4,000 Li-Ion battery, which, on full charge, lasted me for about one week of active daily use of reading and note-taking. The screen has a resolution of 1920x2560 pixels, which equals 300 PPI, a perfect spot for a sharp, nice-to-read display. It supports EMR styluses that do not require charging, and I have to say that the note-taking experience on this tablet is fantastic. Stylus lag is nearly imperceivable, creating a very natural, paper-like feel. The stylus comes in the box (including two extra nibs), and it features an extra button for various actions and an eraser on top. It magnetically attaches to the tablet and stays safely secured. The stylus has a very nice coarse texture, and thanks to using Wacom tech, you can swap it for any other EMR pen if you wish. The AINOTE 2 has no front light, and because of that, the display sits very close to the screen surface, reducing the distance between the stylus tip/your finger and the display to a minimum. No front light is certainly an inconvenience in certain scenarios, but the screen makes up for that with a seriously impressive paper-like feel and writing experience. In dark conditions, you will have to find a lamp, but the good thing is that the screen has a solid anti-glare surface that diffuses light. The display has two modes: Crisp and Fast. Crisp ensures the image stays, well, crisp and sharp, while Fast speeds up refresh rate and response by toning down display resolution and making everything a bit more jagged. In my testing, I only used Fast mode when browsing the web for a much faster render time. The iFlyTek AINOTE is an impressive device, but it's not flawless. A few things disappointed me during a week of using it. Software localization has a bunch of not necessarily broken, but certainly awkward, machine-translated English. System navigation is not good, as there is no universal "Home" gesture. To go to the main page, you have to swipe up and then press the Home button from the multi-tasking window. There are many gestures for various actions, such as display cleanup, screenshot, undo/redo, but no back/forward or Home gestures. I really hate that the tablet won't let me update its software without creating an iFlyTek account first. Finally, privacy could be a concern for some, as most tablets' features require an active internet connection, an iFlyTek account, and sharing data when using AI. If you can overlook its quirks, some of which could be addressed with software updates (I received two with massive changelogs over a single week), and accept a $519 price tag (with a discount), you will be happy with the AINOTE 2. However, if you do not need that many AI features in an E-Ink reader or you want something a bit more affordable, you'd better look at cheaper competitors from BOOX or Amazon, such as the BOOX Go 10.3 Gen 2 or the Kindle Scribe, which is currently 24% off during Prime Day sales. Buy iFlyTek AINOTE 2 on Amazon - $519 | 20% off with Prime What I liked What I disliked Very impressive hardware Beautiful design Fantastic display with an EMR stylus Supports offline voice transcription Easy-to-use software Clever, useful, and well-made AI features A fingerprint scanner Very expensive Some features require a subscription Poor system navigation Mandates a user account No speakers Privacy could be a concern Note: iFlyTek provided the review unit without any editorial input or review guidance. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Look up "greed". If you are willing to buy that it's only inflation, I've got a bridge to sell you.
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      416
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      132
    4. 4
      Xenon
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!