Recommended Posts

Hostess Brands Inc. got final approval for its wind-down plans in bankruptcy court Thursday, setting the stage for its roster of snack cakes to find a second life with new owners ? even as 18,000 jobs will be wiped out.

The company said in court that it's in talks with 110 potential buyers for its brands, which include CupCakes, Ding Dongs and Ho Hos. The suitors include at least five national retailers such as supermarkets, a financial adviser for the company said. The process has been "so fast and furious" Hostess wasn't able to make its planned calls to potential buyers, said Joshua Scherer of Perella Weinberg Partners.

"Not only are these buyers serious, but they are expecting to spend substantial sums," he said.

The update on the sale process came as Hostess received approval in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York in White Plains, N.Y. to give its top executives bonuses totaling up to $1.8 million for meeting certain liquidation goals. The company says the incentive pay is needed to retain the 19 corporate officers and "high-level managers" during the wind down process, which could take about a year.

more

The glory of uncontrolled capitalism, the workers get shafted, then when they try to defend themselves, they get double shafted and the upper management gets bonuses...

Really? Bonuses for meeting liquidation goals?

Is anyone willing to pay me 1.8 million dollars if I meet my goal to get completely ****-faced tonight?

Heck I'll even take substantially less than that...but helping pay for the booze would be awesome. :p

The bonuses aren't a huge deal. Those top level people need a reason to hang around to close everything out. The IRS is going to want every last dime they can get out of that liquidation which is why that was granted. Seems shady, but in reality it's necessary.

The bonuses aren't a huge deal. Those top level people need a reason to hang around to close everything out. The IRS is going to want every last dime they can get out of that liquidation which is why that was granted. Seems shady, but in reality it's necessary.

But what is wrong with those executives just getting their normal paycheck instead of their paycheck+bonuses? A colleague of mine at work has just been told that his contract will not be renewed next year. Are the company offering him anything extra? Nope, he gets his monthly paycheck and when the time is up, that's it. Does he still have responsibilities while he is with us? Of course. And he will fulfil those responsibilities to the best of his ability so that he gets his paycheck. He doesn't need a bonus to sweeten the deal for him. Does being in a managerial position suddenly change that mentality?

But what is wrong with those executives just getting their normal paycheck instead of their paycheck+bonuses? A colleague of mine at work has just been told that his contract will not be renewed next year. Are the company offering him anything extra? Nope, he gets his monthly paycheck and when the time is up, that's it. Does he still have responsibilities while he is with us? Of course. And he will fulfil those responsibilities to the best of his ability so that he gets his paycheck. He doesn't need a bonus to sweeten the deal for him. Does being in a managerial position suddenly change that mentality?

If you're a lazy ******* that was leeching the company dry without intention of actually doing anything for the pay? Then yes ;)

  • Like 3

There are dozens of Twinkie knockoffs on the market, many of them taste much better than the real thing (which in the last few years was disgusting).

It's the same with cereal; while many of the big brands have ruined their product trying to go healthy or cut costs many of generic versions still taste as good as the old stuff we remember.

The update on the sale process came as Hostess received approval in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York in White Plains, N.Y. to give its top executives bonuses totaling up to $1.8 million for meeting certain liquidation goals.

That's just wrong.

  • Like 1
The update on the sale process came as Hostess received approval in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York in White Plains, N.Y. to give its top executives bonuses totaling up to $1.8 million for meeting certain liquidation goals.

That's just wrong.

Agreed, super messed up. This is after the union had already accepted cuts years ago in order for the business to keep running. In hindsight, it was only a matter of time. People are trying to eat healthier, and these sugary snack foods were the first thing off most people's lists (seriously, the only time I ever bought these was at a gas station in the middle of nowhere during a road trip), and it definitely didn't help that management was terrible either (7 different CEOs in 10 years.. that's very high turnover).

It's times like these that make me want more Elizabeth Warrens in a sense. Clearly the wealthy have had things stacked in their favor for quite some time, I'm hoping the pendulum swings the other way for a change to benefit the middle class for once.

The bonuses aren't a huge deal. Those top level people need a reason to hang around to close everything out. The IRS is going to want every last dime they can get out of that liquidation which is why that was granted. Seems shady, but in reality it's necessary.

Actually they are because they are completely stupid. and why would you want the people who got you in this situation to liquidate it... makes no sense. over here when a company goes bankrupt the assets are handled by third part holding/handler or something I believe, there's a name for the people/company that manages the assets of a bankrupt company, which I don't remember and can't translate

Agreed, super messed up. This is after the union had already accepted cuts years ago in order for the business to keep running. In hindsight, it was only a matter of time. People are trying to eat healthier, and these sugary snack foods were the first thing off most people's lists (seriously, the only time I ever bought these was at a gas station in the middle of nowhere during a road trip), and it definitely didn't help that management was terrible either (7 different CEOs in 10 years.. that's very high turnover).

It's times like these that make me want more Elizabeth Warrens in a sense. Clearly the wealthy have had things stacked in their favor for quite some time, I'm hoping the pendulum swings the other way for a change to benefit the middle class for once.

Well the Teamsters Union agreed to cuts, but the majority Bakers Union wouldn't negotiate.

And Elizabeth warren are you serious, that woman is a complete whack job!

And Elizabeth warren are you serious, that woman is a complete whack job!

Think about it like this.. the banksters and Wall Street have their lobbyists.. who does the middle class have?

I'll take Elizabeth Warren any day over no representation at all. Having her on the Senate banking committee ought to put the banks on thin ice, and it's about time

First off, now I completely understand why a friend of mine has pushed to get their Business degree....so they can turn off their brain and turn on their bank account. Only in business and politics can you **** up beyond all reason and come out not only smelling of roses but richer than you'll ever need for the next seven lifetimes.

About Sen. Elect Warren, I absolutely agree that we need more people of her intelligence and integrity in Washington. She's already doing her best to do what she can and she hasn't been sworn in yet. If Congress has more people like her and Sen. Sanders (I-VT) then the middle class would be a lot stronger, and the rest of the nation along with it, than they are now.

T

  • Like 1

Actually they are because they are completely stupid. and why would you want the people who got you in this situation to liquidate it... makes no sense. over here when a company goes bankrupt the assets are handled by third part holding/handler or something I believe, there's a name for the people/company that manages the assets of a bankrupt company, which I don't remember and can't translate

curators we call them, I think it's the same in English :)

edit: according to google translate it would be called a trustee in English, but that might have a different meaning

Agreed, super messed up. This is after the union had already accepted cuts years ago in order for the business to keep running. In hindsight, it was only a matter of time. People are trying to eat healthier, and these sugary snack foods were the first thing off most people's lists (seriously, the only time I ever bought these was at a gas station in the middle of nowhere during a road trip), and it definitely didn't help that management was terrible either (7 different CEOs in 10 years.. that's very high turnover).

It's times like these that make me want more Elizabeth Warrens in a sense. Clearly the wealthy have had things stacked in their favor for quite some time, I'm hoping the pendulum swings the other way for a change to benefit the middle class for once.

The first bankruptcy run, both unions agreed to cuts, this time around only the teamsters did.

The first bankruptcy run, both unions agreed to cuts, this time around only the teamsters did.

Well if I knew that the new owners and managers had increased their salaries by 400% or more (true) I wouldn't be all that interested in taking a SECOND massive pay cut either...

  • Like 1

Of course the future is assured. They would just be stupid to file bankruptcy and not sell off the rights to their products. That's why I've found the whole selling and buying on ebay to be so funny. There was never a question that someone else would buy the rights to their products and continue to make them.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!