Recommended Posts

Hostess Brands Inc. got final approval for its wind-down plans in bankruptcy court Thursday, setting the stage for its roster of snack cakes to find a second life with new owners ? even as 18,000 jobs will be wiped out.

The company said in court that it's in talks with 110 potential buyers for its brands, which include CupCakes, Ding Dongs and Ho Hos. The suitors include at least five national retailers such as supermarkets, a financial adviser for the company said. The process has been "so fast and furious" Hostess wasn't able to make its planned calls to potential buyers, said Joshua Scherer of Perella Weinberg Partners.

"Not only are these buyers serious, but they are expecting to spend substantial sums," he said.

The update on the sale process came as Hostess received approval in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York in White Plains, N.Y. to give its top executives bonuses totaling up to $1.8 million for meeting certain liquidation goals. The company says the incentive pay is needed to retain the 19 corporate officers and "high-level managers" during the wind down process, which could take about a year.

more

The glory of uncontrolled capitalism, the workers get shafted, then when they try to defend themselves, they get double shafted and the upper management gets bonuses...

Really? Bonuses for meeting liquidation goals?

Is anyone willing to pay me 1.8 million dollars if I meet my goal to get completely ****-faced tonight?

Heck I'll even take substantially less than that...but helping pay for the booze would be awesome. :p

The bonuses aren't a huge deal. Those top level people need a reason to hang around to close everything out. The IRS is going to want every last dime they can get out of that liquidation which is why that was granted. Seems shady, but in reality it's necessary.

The bonuses aren't a huge deal. Those top level people need a reason to hang around to close everything out. The IRS is going to want every last dime they can get out of that liquidation which is why that was granted. Seems shady, but in reality it's necessary.

But what is wrong with those executives just getting their normal paycheck instead of their paycheck+bonuses? A colleague of mine at work has just been told that his contract will not be renewed next year. Are the company offering him anything extra? Nope, he gets his monthly paycheck and when the time is up, that's it. Does he still have responsibilities while he is with us? Of course. And he will fulfil those responsibilities to the best of his ability so that he gets his paycheck. He doesn't need a bonus to sweeten the deal for him. Does being in a managerial position suddenly change that mentality?

But what is wrong with those executives just getting their normal paycheck instead of their paycheck+bonuses? A colleague of mine at work has just been told that his contract will not be renewed next year. Are the company offering him anything extra? Nope, he gets his monthly paycheck and when the time is up, that's it. Does he still have responsibilities while he is with us? Of course. And he will fulfil those responsibilities to the best of his ability so that he gets his paycheck. He doesn't need a bonus to sweeten the deal for him. Does being in a managerial position suddenly change that mentality?

If you're a lazy ******* that was leeching the company dry without intention of actually doing anything for the pay? Then yes ;)

  • Like 3

There are dozens of Twinkie knockoffs on the market, many of them taste much better than the real thing (which in the last few years was disgusting).

It's the same with cereal; while many of the big brands have ruined their product trying to go healthy or cut costs many of generic versions still taste as good as the old stuff we remember.

The update on the sale process came as Hostess received approval in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York in White Plains, N.Y. to give its top executives bonuses totaling up to $1.8 million for meeting certain liquidation goals.

That's just wrong.

  • Like 1
The update on the sale process came as Hostess received approval in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York in White Plains, N.Y. to give its top executives bonuses totaling up to $1.8 million for meeting certain liquidation goals.

That's just wrong.

Agreed, super messed up. This is after the union had already accepted cuts years ago in order for the business to keep running. In hindsight, it was only a matter of time. People are trying to eat healthier, and these sugary snack foods were the first thing off most people's lists (seriously, the only time I ever bought these was at a gas station in the middle of nowhere during a road trip), and it definitely didn't help that management was terrible either (7 different CEOs in 10 years.. that's very high turnover).

It's times like these that make me want more Elizabeth Warrens in a sense. Clearly the wealthy have had things stacked in their favor for quite some time, I'm hoping the pendulum swings the other way for a change to benefit the middle class for once.

The bonuses aren't a huge deal. Those top level people need a reason to hang around to close everything out. The IRS is going to want every last dime they can get out of that liquidation which is why that was granted. Seems shady, but in reality it's necessary.

Actually they are because they are completely stupid. and why would you want the people who got you in this situation to liquidate it... makes no sense. over here when a company goes bankrupt the assets are handled by third part holding/handler or something I believe, there's a name for the people/company that manages the assets of a bankrupt company, which I don't remember and can't translate

Agreed, super messed up. This is after the union had already accepted cuts years ago in order for the business to keep running. In hindsight, it was only a matter of time. People are trying to eat healthier, and these sugary snack foods were the first thing off most people's lists (seriously, the only time I ever bought these was at a gas station in the middle of nowhere during a road trip), and it definitely didn't help that management was terrible either (7 different CEOs in 10 years.. that's very high turnover).

It's times like these that make me want more Elizabeth Warrens in a sense. Clearly the wealthy have had things stacked in their favor for quite some time, I'm hoping the pendulum swings the other way for a change to benefit the middle class for once.

Well the Teamsters Union agreed to cuts, but the majority Bakers Union wouldn't negotiate.

And Elizabeth warren are you serious, that woman is a complete whack job!

And Elizabeth warren are you serious, that woman is a complete whack job!

Think about it like this.. the banksters and Wall Street have their lobbyists.. who does the middle class have?

I'll take Elizabeth Warren any day over no representation at all. Having her on the Senate banking committee ought to put the banks on thin ice, and it's about time

First off, now I completely understand why a friend of mine has pushed to get their Business degree....so they can turn off their brain and turn on their bank account. Only in business and politics can you **** up beyond all reason and come out not only smelling of roses but richer than you'll ever need for the next seven lifetimes.

About Sen. Elect Warren, I absolutely agree that we need more people of her intelligence and integrity in Washington. She's already doing her best to do what she can and she hasn't been sworn in yet. If Congress has more people like her and Sen. Sanders (I-VT) then the middle class would be a lot stronger, and the rest of the nation along with it, than they are now.

T

  • Like 1

Actually they are because they are completely stupid. and why would you want the people who got you in this situation to liquidate it... makes no sense. over here when a company goes bankrupt the assets are handled by third part holding/handler or something I believe, there's a name for the people/company that manages the assets of a bankrupt company, which I don't remember and can't translate

curators we call them, I think it's the same in English :)

edit: according to google translate it would be called a trustee in English, but that might have a different meaning

Agreed, super messed up. This is after the union had already accepted cuts years ago in order for the business to keep running. In hindsight, it was only a matter of time. People are trying to eat healthier, and these sugary snack foods were the first thing off most people's lists (seriously, the only time I ever bought these was at a gas station in the middle of nowhere during a road trip), and it definitely didn't help that management was terrible either (7 different CEOs in 10 years.. that's very high turnover).

It's times like these that make me want more Elizabeth Warrens in a sense. Clearly the wealthy have had things stacked in their favor for quite some time, I'm hoping the pendulum swings the other way for a change to benefit the middle class for once.

The first bankruptcy run, both unions agreed to cuts, this time around only the teamsters did.

The first bankruptcy run, both unions agreed to cuts, this time around only the teamsters did.

Well if I knew that the new owners and managers had increased their salaries by 400% or more (true) I wouldn't be all that interested in taking a SECOND massive pay cut either...

  • Like 1

Of course the future is assured. They would just be stupid to file bankruptcy and not sell off the rights to their products. That's why I've found the whole selling and buying on ebay to be so funny. There was never a question that someone else would buy the rights to their products and continue to make them.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • If I could, I would commemorate it the best way possible: Replacing old machines that are still running Windows XP with something more modern, stable and better.     Noone and nothing should be running Windows XP in 2026.
    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      255
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!