Recommended Posts

^That is what they mean with "Exclusive extras" though. How else would that be exclusive?

I took that to mean that it's exclusive only because you had to pay for it as an extra. Not that it will be exclusive to the premium thing. Because every other "exclusive" thing they've had in the game from pre orders and such you can now buy as an extra.

To be honest, I believe that this time they mean that those items are exclusive to the people who paid for "Battlefield Premium" and won't be available as an extra. That's the way I read it anyway. "Premium" usually means that there's an extra for such users and I believe that in this case it's those extra items.

Though I'd rather know this for sure before buying "Battlefield Premium". If there's an decent price and the items are "Premium" only, I'd buy it. Though if the items aren't "Premium" only I wouldn't buy it and just buy them individually like you.

Who knows. Before BF3 was released they said the only way to get the specact skins and the dog tags was to pre order from that certain retailer, they were exclusive...now you can buy them through Origin.

I'm willing to bet, since it contains all their future dlcs that it will be $50-$60. Individually they will probably be $15. That's just a guess though, and I hope I'm wrong and they are cheaper but I doubt it.

You've got to be kidding me. BC2 is utter garbage when it comes to joining friends, adding friends, browsing servers and joining them. Complete and utter garbage compared to Battlelog. I've moved from BF3 to BC2 lately and I miss Battlelog so much. That and character movement (except vaulting of course).

Well in my experience Battlelog is utter garbage when joining friends and browsing servers and joining them. Me and my mates struggle to connect to EA online and it takes ages to join servers because of the ridiculously long loading times. I don't see what's so bad about BC2- you find your friends username, you can add them easily, joining friends is simple and the maps load so quickly and browsing servers is just as easy, if not moreso, in BC2 than Battlelog.

I find BF3 is all about personal experience- it crashes on me quite a lot and has random freezes which isn't a driver issue as there have been numerous updates since the game released and I've reinstalled a number of times and none of these has helped my issues. That, and when I quit the game it takes at least 10 minutes for my PC to be actually usable again after it's finished doing whatever it's doing.

And don't even mention Origin- it's the buggiest program I've ever been forced to use, with it rejecting the game totally at times throwing random errors and refusing to open at times. Again, this is just my experience with it and it has been other people's too, not just me.

Well in my experience Battlelog is utter garbage when joining friends and browsing servers and joining them. Me and my mates struggle to connect to EA online and it takes ages to join servers because of the ridiculously long loading times. I don't see what's so bad about BC2- you find your friends username, you can add them easily, joining friends is simple and the maps load so quickly and browsing servers is just as easy, if not moreso, in BC2 than Battlelog.

I find BF3 is all about personal experience- it crashes on me quite a lot and has random freezes which isn't a driver issue as there have been numerous updates since the game released and I've reinstalled a number of times and none of these has helped my issues. That, and when I quit the game it takes at least 10 minutes for my PC to be actually usable again after it's finished doing whatever it's doing.

And don't even mention Origin- it's the buggiest program I've ever been forced to use, with it rejecting the game totally at times throwing random errors and refusing to open at times. Again, this is just my experience with it and it has been other people's too, not just me.

Well, if you have that many issues then I can see why you'd dislike it. Personally I pretty much don't have anything you just described (save for the occasional Disconnected from EA bug, but that's less common than used to be and I had long load times before I installed an SSD) so I find Battlelog to be excellent. And no issues with Origin either.

Sigh. Battlefield 3 is not only ditching the massive maps and vehicles that define the franchise in the upcoming Close Quarters map pack, er, sorry, Close Quarters "expansion," it appears Electronic Arts is once again following in Activision's footsteps with a premium, paid, Call of Duty Elite-like Battlefield 3 service.
I can't help but remember the comments DICE Senior Producer Patrick Bach made about charging for Battlefield maps back in 2010 when the $15 CoD map pack became the norm: "We don't ever want to charge for our maps and insisted to EA that this attitude was crucial when it came to keeping our community happy and playing together. We're owned by EA but we're still very much DICE."

Guess this means DICE isn't DICE anymore.

http://uk.pc.gamespy.../1224747p1.html

Straight from the horses mouth. Being GameSpy who use to deals with BF2 accounts.

Use to hate GameSpy, now I love 'em :rofl:

Yep, for example BC2 Vietnam had significantly more content than a COD map pack.

I never played the Vietnam DLC, but couldn't you shoot a Huey down with an AK-47 as well? The gameplay looked so far removed from the core game in that sense that it would be a mini-game on its own, like Battlefield 1943 was.

I never played the Vietnam DLC, but couldn't you shoot a Huey down with an AK-47 as well? The gameplay looked so far removed from the core game in that sense that it would be a mini-game on its own, like Battlefield 1943 was.

No, but the map designs made it really easy to shoot down helicopters with tanks though. The helicopters in Vietnam were op as hell though so it was kind of fair.

I don't remember that happening at all. But it has been a while since I played.

Yeah, They didn't do huge ammounts of damage, but I've taken a heli down with an assault rifle after popping a few RPG's into it and then running out of them.

So apparently Battlefield Premium gives you server queue priority...

0EysX.png

Proof: http://i.imgur.com/0EysX.png

I was going to buy it but now I'm not on principal, no one should get priority queue access just because theyve bought some DLC, EA are getting worse than Activision.

Just to state, I think I remember seeing a Battlefield tweet saying that Close quarters would cost $14.99. Assuming the other will cost the same, $14.99 x 4 = $59.96. So this would be a better deal if you plan to buy the expansions when they come out.

Just to state, I think I remember seeing a Battlefield tweet saying that Close quarters would cost $14.99. Assuming the other will cost the same, $14.99 x 4 = $59.96. So this would be a better deal if you plan to buy the expansions when they come out.

But its no deal if you don't plan on getting all of them. I know I won't get Close Quarters, so that means the other three turn out to ~45.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!