Vista Interim Build To Be Released Monday!


Recommended Posts

Interim Build To Be Released Monday! We are proud to announce that build 5365 is going to be released on Connect this Monday. This build is an Interim build which will include several bug fixes and some UI changes. It will feature as well the updated Internet Explorer UI. Also expected are better driver support and some optimizations to make Aero Glass run more smoothly. Also from what I heard is the Media Center has a better refined look and runs a lot smoother. Also there will be more gadgets and lots of bugs with them will be fixed as well in this build. Also the install may also be faster and optimized as well in this build. We think this is a great preview to see what’s to come of Beta 2 of Windows Vista.

New in build 5365:

*Sidebar Fixes/More Gadgets

*Improved Driver Support

*Welcome Center Changed (Updated)

*Several Bug Fixes

*Improved Install (Faster etc..)

(More info to come soon about improvements.)

For you anxious testers we expect to see this build around 1:00 PM EST Time.

Source:

http://www.hdrive.org/index.php?subaction=...t_from=&ucat=2&

I dont think it would be plubic, the BETA 2 might be, but i'm not sure. I just decided to post this so all of you can be aware of this,

Enjoy! :D

UPDATE: Now can be found on the Front page. Please contune to post coments! on both the front page, and this fourm :D

Edited by Tech_Kid_2006

Gonna get the screenshots hopefully later today for everyone to enjoy :D

And maybe something else :whistle: :rofl: (I get sniped by microsoft if I told you the link lol) :laugh:

Oh forgot Neowin would get there ninjas after me to if I did that lol

Wait till sometime in the (evening?) Monday PST time (@ Redmond). What? You didn't think that Redmond would be nice enough to just stick to good ole' GMT time releases, did you? :laugh:

And yeah, this won't be public, it will be interim, but won't be dubbed a "CTP" either.

But FYI, I don't expect it to be 5365. Why? Oh, just a little someone told us testers that 5361 was "old"...I wouldn't expect 5365 to be released. And besides, the 5365 rumors were instigated by Thurrot. He's usually no on the mark, but he's always close. But not on the mark. So I'm betting we'll see something even higher..

P.S Im the source and got my info from Microsoft so it is true but as you all know who the hell knows they may change it by like one build number you all know Microsoft. :laugh: :p

Oh and sorry about the EST Time guess Im not considerate of other sorry bout that I'll give GMT and PST time on there to but why should I?

The time thing is just a guess cause it seems its the exact time that microsoft released there other builds except for the past interim depends on if they have server problems etc.

P.S Holy just noticed how many answers you guys need lol!

Oh, just a little someone told us testers that 5361 was "old"

All builds they release to testers are "old" but it depends on what you call old.Cause they might of had this build compiled in february with a different build number and brought the stuff from that build into this one etc.

Trust me very confusing!

Edited by hypatech

"Im the source and got my info from Microsoft so it is true"

So tell me why we should believe you. You're proof is simply not there; whereas we (the testers) all do in fact have confirmation from Wendy about certain things.

The time reference wasn't regarding you're site's statement, but I will say that going around and plugging your own site is downright silly (See your posts at JCXP and AeroXp, which you just happened to join quite recently :shifty:). If its really worth anything, then the community (and not the adminstrators) will spread the news through the grapevine. Otherwise it seems like a publicity stunt.

They don't just "change one build number" -- if anything, the digit(s) will be changed, as a result of a re-compile.

No, this build won't have been compiled in Feburary. That's why the f'ing build tags have date and time stamps. Obviously you don't understand that each build has different components, of which may or may not have been worked on at different times, but ultimately, with each successive build, the raw code is re-compiled in the virtual lab.

No, its not confusing. You just make it seem that way.

And for the record, I don't know why you're so happy with yourself. Thurrot speculated and told us on the 14th in his WinInfo Short Takes that 5365 was being considered. So don't be giddy about your post on the 16th that is more rambling than news. Yea, kthks.

Edited by fisherman909

well sorry ok got the info on it on the 9th so ya!

Had to get permission to post it first!!!From Microsoft! :yes:

Well anyways :angry:

I will hopefully get the screenshots soon! :cry:

Gonna play Battlefield 2 for a bit now :yes: :D

So ttyl guys just pm me with any concerns etc!

Oh and just read his article does it say monday no! And he bs's through the article as usual lol :laugh: :rofl: :yes:

"The software giant considers the May CTP build as both Beta 2 and Release Candidate 0 (RC0)." wtf :blink:

Beta 2 is well Beta 2 lmao :laugh: :sleep:

OMG!!! I dont wanna flame but ur #%^&*( :angry: me off!

The official source has requested I dont say his name since Neowin dosnt like him since this community can be very mean at times! :rolleyes:

And what Im saying about the february thing oh nvm dont wanna stir things up :no:

Edited by hypatech

Of course you had to get permission. What other excuse would you come up with? (Not to mention your lack of proof)

About the Monday bit. You weren't first with that either. Wendy confirmed Monday in a post in the NGs on Saturday.

So you know, keep talking to yourself about the little exclusivness, go plug your website at all the nice forums you can find, and in a later part of life you will realize you have erred.

[edit] Two words. Anger management:laugh:. People who are secure in their beliefs have no reason to get angry. That's why I'm laughing at you instead.

About RC0/Beta 2. Alchin told Thurrot that that will indeed be the way Microsoft will announce it. But, you know, I challenge you to convince me that you have sources in Microsoft that are higher up than Alchin. And quit calling it the "May CTP", if it was a friggin' CTP, if wouldn't be called Beta 2 either, eh? Again, further proof that you don't have an accurate understanding of Microsoft's naming conventions, and how builds are released.

Anyways, you better get back to your game. You were leaving, apparently....

Edited by fisherman909

ugghhh :no:

for your info I got the news about the new build and release date on April 6th then told close friends on the 9th then told the public yesterday!

Man I just try to be nice then everone just #$%%^& me off :angry:

Lets see my history:

1.Info on WLM 3 months before WLM comes out and offering invites to Neowinians throught the Beta Recruitment Program.People dont beleive me but all my claims come true!

2.Beta Recruitment Program 2006-Offering Vista invites gets shut down because of flaming etc and turned into a disaster.

3.And now Im just trying to offer some info to people and get the news out there about the new build and changes etc!

And Guess what happens Disaster all of them! This is the third time Im thinking of just telling Neowin Member to(you now what) and bye!

Just trying to offer what I can!

If I remember correctly, this build won't be mailed to you - it's not going to be coined a CTP build, it'll just be an interim build. Microsoft only sends out major milestones (Beta 1, and eventually Beta 2), and occasionally a CTP build they think it worthy. So for now just wait for the download.

Edited by fisherman909

hypatech: Please stop, it's one thing to express your opinion and its the other, to post info, with out having proff. I know, you are a bit up set with fisherman909, but i have to go with him, next time, if you are gona post info like this, please put proff, ( ie; screenshots, links, etc) on what you are talking about.

well sorry ok got the info on it on the 9th so ya!

Had to get permission to post it first!!!From Microsoft! :yes:

Well anyways :angry:

I will hopefully get the screenshots soon! :cry:

Gonna play Battlefield 2 for a bit now :yes: :D

So ttyl guys just pm me with any concerns etc!

Oh and just read his article does it say monday no! And he bs's through the article as usual lol :laugh: :rofl: :yes:

"The software giant considers the May CTP build as both Beta 2 and Release Candidate 0 (RC0)." wtf :blink:

Beta 2 is well Beta 2 lmao :laugh: :sleep:

OMG!!! I dont wanna flame but ur #%^&*( :angry: me off!

The official source has requested I dont say his name since Neowin dosnt like him since this community can be very mean at times! :rolleyes:

And what Im saying about the february thing oh nvm dont wanna stir things up :no:

There's no WTF here, the May CTP is indeed Beta 2 and RC0 at once. Like a normal beta, it'll be public and everything...

Off-topic:

Smiley madness for you, right? It's unreadable! :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Transmission 4.1.2 by Razvan Serea Transmission is a fast, easy-to-use bittorrent client with support for encryption, a web interface, peer exchange, magnet links, DHT, µTP, UPnP and NAT-PMP port forwarding, webseed support, watch directories, tracker editing, global and per-torrent speed limits, and more. Transmission has one of the lowest memory & resource footprints of any major BitTorrent client. Transmission's light overhead is one reason why it is so well suited for home NAS and media servers. Having been used by Western Digital, Zyxel and Belkin, Transmission gives truly impressive performance on almost any compatible hardware. Transmission is an open source, volunteer-based project. Unlike some BitTorrent clients, Transmission doesn't play games with its users to make money. Transmission doesn't bundle toolbars, pop-up ads, flash ads, twitter tools, or anything else. It doesn't hold some features back for a payware version. Its source code is available for anyone to review. Transmission doesn't track users, the website and forums have no third-party ads or analytics. Transmission 4.1.2 changelog: This is Transmission 4.1.2, a bugfix release. It fixes 20+ bugs and has a few performance improvements too. All users are encouraged to upgrade to this version. Highlights Fixed 4.1.0 bug that could cause duplicate HTTP announces to be sent to trackers. (#8639) All Platforms Reject benc data that has invalid characters. (#8577) Fixed a bug during the startup sequence where if one torrent failed to parse, subsequent torrents would also fail. (#8605) Fixed a bug that stalled some downloads at 99%. (#8654) Fixed a 4.1.0 upgrade bug that could overwrite utp_enabled and tcp_enabled settings. (#8658) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash that could happen when a peer supplied reqq value smaller than 32 in LTEP handshake. (#8713) Fixed a 4.1.0 regression that periodically wrote upload & download stats to disk even when Transmission had been idle since the last write, preventing the stats file's disk from hibernating while idle. (#8722) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that prevented TCP peer connections on some systems. (#8748) Added safeguards to HTTP responses to prevent clickjacking. (#8749) Fixed edge case that didn't preserve the order of a batch of torrents when moving their queue position up or down. (#8782) Added sanitization for UTF-8 client names provided by peers during handshake. (#8809) Stopped appending redundant zeros to blocklist files when downloaded from a remote URL. (#8819) Fixed a build failure that occurred when building with link-time optimization. (#8540) macOS Client Fixed a 4.1.0 memory leak. (#8613) Fixed navigation focus issues in the Inspector. (#8792, #8810) Improved UI code to use less CPU. (#8832, #8833, #8835, #8836, #8842, #8846, #8851) Qt Client Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when parsing some RPC responses from older Transmission servers. (#8618) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that saved both deprecated and current settings names to settings.json. (#8623) GTK Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that did not show translated logging level strings. (#8611) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when toggling alternative speed limits. (#8709) Web Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that displayed timestamps in some dropdowns as 6.75:45 instead of 6:45. (#8624) Fixed a bug that could show incorrect torrent status when reconnecting to the server after a lost connection. (#8780, #8783) transmission-remote Improved transmission-remote console output for JSON-RPC 2. (#8799, #8805) Download: Transmission 64-bit | Qt 5 Setup ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Transmission 32-bit | Qt 5 Setup Links: Transmission Homepage | Other OSes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!