Recommended Posts

You play too much. ^ lol. Wow.10.3 years for Prestiege 3?!

I've only put in 71 hours so far. Compared to previous games I've played, it's not that much. For example, I've put in over 200 hours in Black Ops.

Damn, Anaron. Thats really impressive

Dang Anaron, I thought I was doing well. I guess I do ok considering I play hardcore exclusively (hence the 7 hours played of non hardcore). We should team up and wreck some people.

http://i41.tinypic.com/2vkyfsg.jpg

Thanks guys. I'm down to team up, spedanden. I should warn you though... I only play team deathmatch. I find it's a little too easy to die in hardcore mode.

Anyway, I've added you as a friend. (Y)

I managed to bring my K/D ratio to 2.62 (up from 2.54) on the 15th. It was at 2.63 but I had a couple of bad games. I also finished the Stay Sharp spec ops mission in 21.3 seconds. It's extremely difficult to get a time below 22 seconds.

fmqgdx.png

I'm going to miss Black Ops' "Gun Game", "Sticks and Stones", "One in the Chamber" and "Sharpshooter" public modes (they're private-only in MW3 :/).

Me too. For awhile, I didn't even know 'One in the Chamber' and 'Gun Game' were private match-exclusive modes. I only discovered it when I noticed a friend of mine playing it on Xbox Live. So far, I've only played it when a lot of my friends are online. And when I'm not playing that, I'm playing Team Deathmatch.

Two new maps were released today: Liberation and Piazza. The former is more open than the other maps which is a good thing. And the latter is full of narrow pathways which makes it a run-and-gunner's dream. I like Liberation more than Piazza but I hate the way it looks. It looks like someone spilled orange paint all over the map.

  • 3 weeks later...

You can play the MP for free on PC (but only for the weekend): http://store.steampo....com/news/7346/

It starts at Thursday, Feb. 16th at 10am PST and ends on Monday, Feb. 20th.

The graphics are outdated because they're using the same game engine, as far as I am aware. Unless they come out with a new engine they won't be able to have mindblowing graphics in their games, though they chose against a new engine for Modern Warfare 3. I don't know why, but I believe the official explanation was that they were familiar with what they are using, and can make a better game that way. It is a winning formula for them though, mainly because of the Call of Duty branding. The franchise will continue to sell well as long as it is promoted as heavily as it is, rather than sales based upon the game quality. It'll probably be good enough though.

Because half the team that wrote the COD engine left with the original infinity ward team that got axed to go form respawn http://www.respawn.com ?

Only the two founders got the axe from IW, everyone else on the team quit under there own powers.

Indeed, You're correct, but the point still stands on the engine.

It will be interesting to see Respawns first game though.

Indeed, You're correct, but the point still stands on the engine.

It will be interesting to see Respawns first game though.

I guess that explains why MW3's graphics look a little different than MW2. When I first played it, I immediately noticed how different things looked and felt. The animations were noticeably different and the image quality seemed like it was barely improved. I noticed it even more in the PC version.

Anaron. Where is your new improved K/D chart? :shiftyninja:

My next goal is 2.75. :p

312tu3c.png

  • Like 1

It looks worse than MW1. :( (Played during the free weekend on Steam).

Okay, it doesn't look that bad. Call of Duty 4 had great graphics back in 2007. I remember playing it again right after the release of MW2 and the graphics were noticeably inferior.

As a disclaimer, yes, I have played the game several times and have thus formulated my own opinion on it. I'm not just pulling this out of my ass.

The graphics definitely aren't great, but the biggest thing I have an issue with is the lack of effort. Lackluster models and animations, poor textures, and most importantly terrible sounds. They're just horrible and without a doubt in my mind synthetic and/or heavily edited.

I'm not sure why they decided to do a 180 with this release. The past games despite being an arcade shooter were for the most part fairly realistic. This game is just so far out there in it's approaches to gameplay and presentation. I'm not sure it can even be called Call of Duty anymore. I actually played a few rounds of Black Ops (would have played CoD 2 or MW1 but the convenience of Steam was there) just to get a quick Call of Duty fix.

Does anyone know when the DLC maps will be released on Xbox 360 for everyone that doesn't have elite premium? As of right now, there's now been 3 maps released. Even ps3 users don't have the new maps yet. I don't want an elite premium account, and I have MS Points burning a hole in my account to get this stuff lol.

Does anyone know when the DLC maps will be released on Xbox 360 for everyone that doesn't have elite premium? As of right now, there's now been 3 maps released. Even ps3 users don't have the new maps yet. I don't want an elite premium account, and I have MS Points burning a hole in my account to get this stuff lol.

I read somewhere that Activision will make a 3-map bundle for non-subscribers in March.

Hmm yes, dual wielding lever action shotguns in MW2 was certainly very realistic!

I wasn't counting Modern Warfare 2. That game was almost as bad as this one. No recoil, dual wielding shotguns...don't even get me started.

Also, feel free to re-read where I said "most part".

I read somewhere that Activision will make a 3-map bundle for non-subscribers in March.

I see. I'm really only interested in 2 of the 3 maps, so I'm not sure, but thanks for the update. Still too long to wait. Mass Effect 3 will be out in March, so my MW3 time will be dropping drastically.

  • 4 weeks later...

Now how' your K/D doing, Anaron?

Modern Warfare 3 DLC Pack Out

Xbox 360 owners can now get their hands on the Modern Warfare 3 Content Collection #1 pack, a compilation of all the Call of Duty Elite content that has already been released.

As we outlined earlier this month, the Content Collection #1 pack contains four competitive multiplayer maps and two new Spec Ops missions, which makes it the largest DLC pack Activision has offered to date. Activision wasn't willing to name a price for the pack before today, but players will be happy to hear that the pack costs $15, the same as Modern Warfare 2 DLC packs. If you're still not sold, or want to know more about what the pack entails, check out the trailer below.

There's still no word on when the Content Collection #1 pack will be available on PS3 and PC.

Source

It's still at 2.69. It's getting harder and harder to bring it up. Anyway, I haven't tried the new spec ops maps yet but the new MP map (Black Box) is a lot of fun. It's great for sniping which is something I rarely do in MW3. I'm glad they finally made a good sniper-friendly map. The other sniper-friendly map with the orange leaves (Liberation?) isn't good at all.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Xenon
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!