Reuters: Nintendo Faces End of Era after 3DS Flop


Recommended Posts

I wouldn't say Nintendo hardware is finished at all :s

Their hand-held console, maybe so but they need to concentrate on the Wii replacement.

So far the Wii U has been less than exciting, or even interesting. I don't think it's going to do very well either, and it may make more sense for the company to follow Sega's lead and concentrate on games only. Imagine if you could play the New Super Mario Bros. on the iPad, or download their back catalog of games through iTunes, Xbox Live and other online stores the way you can with the virtual console. They would be rolling in money.

Most of the big 3DS games are coming out this holiday season, and there is going to be a big pokemon announcement here soon, which i imagine will be the announcement of a 3DS pokemon game. I think Nintendo is fine.

3DS doesn't interest me and I own a DS Lite and a DSi.

I would have bought it had the displays been larger the plastic bezel around the display smaller and the whole thing made more compact and sleek. It looks like a kids toy and not a premium device. To me the Playstation Vita looks like a premium device and I'll probably buy that.

I felt like the gaming companies abandonded nintendo which caused them not to focuse on it.... when N64 was coming out everyone was like OMG YES! then it came and 3rd parties seemed to be like eh.... Square went to the playstation basically and ruined one of their key RPG players..... thats when I felt like nintendo made a wrong turn with 3rd parties...

but then when N64 was out everyone said it was the end of nintendo, since it didn't do so great.... but their key argument then was cartridge vs CD ROM

nintendo was *******s to thier devs, that's why the devs left... plus they closed off more and more of the IDEs and SDKs to the point it's not worth it

3DS doesn't interest me and I own a DS Lite and a DSi.

I would have bought it had the displays been larger the plastic bezel around the display smaller and the whole thing made more compact and sleek. It looks like a kids toy and not a premium device. To me the Playstation Vita looks like a premium device and I'll probably buy that.

I could go for a larger display, sure, but.. looks, really, is that what you care about? More than the actual games? Plus, what you call "looks like a kids toy"... I kind of like the fact that it can handle a drop or two. If it were slim and light, like it had been designed by Apple or something, I'd be afraid of breaking it.

3DS doesn't interest me and I own a DS Lite and a DSi.

I would have bought it had the displays been larger the plastic bezel around the display smaller and the whole thing made more compact and sleek. It looks like a kids toy and not a premium device. To me the Playstation Vita looks like a premium device and I'll probably buy that.

It's not really all that different looking from the dsi/lite. In fact, it's virtually the same except for the little edge on the top panel(which is such a minor thing that it's pretty much irrelevant). As such, If you were ok with the look of the old ds models(which i would assume you were as you say you own 2 of them), then you should be fine with the look of 3ds.

I could go for a larger display, sure, but.. looks, really, is that what you care about? More than the actual games? Plus, what you call "looks like a kids toy"... I kind of like the fact that it can handle a drop or two. If it were slim and light, like it had been designed by Apple or something, I'd be afraid of breaking it.

Well the fact is ammali people do buy things based on aesthetics. It's why we choose specific wallpaper in our homes and specific fireplaces and gates it's why we choose a specific colour car, or a car design.

The fact is to me the 3DS is a gimmick the 3D aspect of the console to me is meh so if the design isn't going to be better than the DSi (and to me it isn't) then there is no reason for me to buy it at all. The Sony Vita not only looks awesome and like a professional adult gaming device but it has the features to back it up.

It's not really all that different looking from the dsi/lite. In fact, it's virtually the same except for the little edge on the top panel(which is such a minor thing that it's pretty much irrelevant). As such, If you were ok with the look of the old ds models(which i would assume you were as you say you own 2 of them), then you should be fine with the look of 3ds.

If it looks the same why am I buying it? The 3D aspect of the console is a dud. It's just a bigger DSi with 3D and I already have the DSi. Also the reason I have two is because my first DS Lite was busted so I got a DSi for free as a replacement but the seller didn't want the DS Lite back so I got to keep both. DS Lite still broken though so I don't know why I still have it even.

Nintendo, Nikia, BlackBerry and to a certain degree Microsoft are examples of companies that failed to anticipate and react effectively to shifts in the market(s) they operate in. That does't necessarily have to mean everything is suddenly over for said companies. Look at Apple: They were almost done for, look where they are now.

Shipped, not sold.

hard to say which - everything ive read says 'sold' like this

however, the DS sales wiki says 'shipped' (see here)

3DS doesn't interest me and I own a DS Lite and a DSi.

I would have bought it had the displays been larger the plastic bezel around the display smaller and the whole thing made more compact and sleek. It looks like a kids toy and not a premium device. To me the Playstation Vita looks like a premium device and I'll probably buy that.

the top display is larger on the 3DS and has higher resolution. the processors are much faster too.

the 3DS is a whole new beast. Here's a comparison of the 3DS and the DSi

the top display is larger on the 3DS and has higher resolution. the processors are much faster too.

the 3DS is a whole new beast.

I know the display is larger and it's higher resolution and it has faster processors. But that doesn't change my view on it. The 3D is its main selling point and to me that aspect of the console is a gimmick that does not interest me at all. And although it has a larger screen and faster processors I don't feel games are arriving that make good use of those features beyond what the DSi is already capable of.

So I stick by my view that it's a bigger DSi with 3D and the hardware required to support that 3D aspect of the console.

I just also want to add that if I was buying a new handheld from scratch the 3DS would be an attractive purchase. I concede that. But I'm not a new buyer I already have a DSi and I don't feel there are enough compelling reasons to upgrade to a 3DS from my DSi. And I think a lot of people see it that way as the DS sold like hotcakes and the 3DS isn't so the people who bought the DS are passing on the 3DS.

I think the main reason that the 3DS has not been successful is the branding in my opinion. Many people still see it as a DS console, to the extent that supermarkets are mixing the 3DS games within the DS section. This means that many are not buying because they 'already have' a DS, not thinking that it's the next generation device, a-la PS2 to PS3 etc.

If it were named something separate from the DS branding, then maybe it would have had more of an initial sales surge, but not at the moment. Also take note that the DS' original success didn't come immediately after launch, in fact it came with the DS Lite a while after, around the time both it and Nintendogs/Brain Training came out, this is what caused the huge success.

I think it's best to bide our time. If Nintendo were to make a 3DS Lite and price it aggresively like the original DS Lite was (?99 was the DS Lite's launch price) and have the games to back it up, it'll be a roaring success just like its predecessor.

Yeah this is a good point as I see a lot of people say well I already have a DS lite/I/XL so why should I get the 3DS. There are a ton of upgrades to it and I am happy to have it. Sales will pick up with 4 major Nintendo titles out by chistrmas Zelda/Star Fox both of which I have and are great. And then Super Mario in November and Mario Kart in early December. Not to mention the Zelda cover story in GI that I just read had me with a thought I never thought I would have - I want to play Skyward Sword more then Skyrim(so many great RPG type changes). And I'm getting ready to plunk $150 down on the CE for Skyrim. Nintendo is far from finished and the 3DS is in no way a flop. The PSP came back strong as the PS3, it just needs titles which it is getting over the next few months.

I know the display is larger and it's higher resolution and it has faster processors. But that doesn't change my view on it. The 3D is its main selling point and to me that aspect of the console is a gimmick that does not interest me at all. And although it has a larger screen and faster processors I don't feel games are arriving that make good use of those features beyond what the DSi is already capable of.

So I stick by my view that it's a bigger DSi with 3D and the hardware required to support that 3D aspect of the console.

I just also want to add that if I was buying a new handheld from scratch the 3DS would be an attractive purchase. I concede that. But I'm not a new buyer I already have a DSi and I don't feel there are enough compelling reasons to upgrade to a 3DS from my DSi. And I think a lot of people see it that way as the DS sold like hotcakes and the 3DS isn't so the people who bought the DS are passing on the 3DS.

well i hope you change your mind next year when more games are out (Y)

well i hope you change your mind next year when more games are out (Y)

Doubt it.

In my opinion many of the DS games are pretty rubbish and I would put that down to most of them fitting inside 128MB of memory. I mean most games don't have characters that actually talk it's all text. I'm not saying having text in a game is bad. But this is 2011 and I expect my portable game experience to have the cinematic characteristics of say .. The Playstation 2. Which came out 10 years ago. The PSP has always delivered on this due to its 1.8GB UMD format. The Nintendo DS.. not so much..

It just feels like to me that the Nintendo handheld consoles don't really progress that much. Back in 1998 there handhelds were text heavy with very little good sound usually games lacked any kind of character speech and today we are in the same situation. This is just disappointing to me that they focus on 3D but not on the most basic parts of the console like the storage medium.

It amazes me actually that I can buy a 2GB MicroSD for ?2.50 in the UK but Nintendo DS games are still predominantly 64 and 128MB in size. They can't spare ?2.50 for some more flash memory? really? Just ridiculous.

And my other complaint with the 3DS is the battery life. Now I commend Nintendo for shipping it with a cradle for charging but come on.. this is going head to head with the DSi and smart phones both of which have a longer battery life. This should have been on the top of Nintendo's agenda. Make it powerful but keep the battery life the same as the DSi or better. They failed to deliver. I'm sure they will come out with a NDS Lite or NDSi within 12 months though that addresses the battery life problem and early adopters will just be expected to upgrade I suppose. rolleyes.gif

The main reason I bought my DSi was for Pokemon as I really loved those games in my youth I had Pokemon Blue :p and I thought hey those were great games that I enjoyed I should try the DS version and I really enjoyed it I thought it was good but at the same time didn't really add much over the original I mean sure the graphics were better but well beyond that it was the same game. No characters ever talk, very basic sounds and effects and resources are reused thousands of times to keep the memory use on the game card low. And it will just be the same on the 3DS.. but now it's in 3D...

Yeah I'll stick with my Phone for gaming and see how the Playstation Vita turns out.

Nintendo screwed up with the 3DS but I really hope their hardware days live on. Some of the best memories I have of playing games was on their systems.

Super Mario World on SNES, best game of all time :p

You mean you wouldn't want to play Zelda, Pokemon, Kirby, Mario, Super Smash Brothers, etc, on a Sony/MS console?

Not a snowball chance you'll see any of those games on those consoles, if Nintendo dies all their games die along with them.

Nintendo has reached the point where it's... 3rd party or die.

it's neither Nintendo will be fine..

You got to love the nut jobs in this thread, Nintendo is not even close on being Sega. nor will Nintendo go 3rd party. if Nintendo dies so will their games, and for those

hoping Nintendo games ends up on MS/Sony console fat ball's chance of that happening.

Doubt it.

In my opinion many of the DS games are pretty rubbish and I would put that down to most of them fitting inside 128MB of memory. I mean most games don't have characters that actually talk it's all text. I'm not saying having text in a game is bad. But this is 2011 and I expect my portable game experience to have the cinematic characteristics of say .. The Playstation 2. Which came out 10 years ago. The PSP has always delivered on this due to its 1.8GB UMD format. The Nintendo DS.. not so much..

It just feels like to me that the Nintendo handheld consoles don't really progress that much. Back in 1998 there handhelds were text heavy with very little good sound usually games lacked any kind of character speech and today we are in the same situation. This is just disappointing to me that they focus on 3D but not on the most basic parts of the console like the storage medium.

It amazes me actually that I can buy a 2GB MicroSD for ?2.50 in the UK but Nintendo DS games are still predominantly 64 and 128MB in size. They can't spare ?2.50 for some more flash memory? really? Just ridiculous.

And my other complaint with the 3DS is the battery life. Now I commend Nintendo for shipping it with a cradle for charging but come on.. this is going head to head with the DSi and smart phones both of which have a longer battery life. This should have been on the top of Nintendo's agenda. Make it powerful but keep the battery life the same as the DSi or better. They failed to deliver. I'm sure they will come out with a NDS Lite or NDSi within 12 months though that addresses the battery life problem and early adopters will just be expected to upgrade I suppose. rolleyes.gif

The main reason I bought my DSi was for Pokemon as I really loved those games in my youth I had Pokemon Blue :p and I thought hey those were great games that I enjoyed I should try the DS version and I really enjoyed it I thought it was good but at the same time didn't really add much over the original I mean sure the graphics were better but well beyond that it was the same game. No characters ever talk, very basic sounds and effects and resources are reused thousands of times to keep the memory use on the game card low. And it will just be the same on the 3DS.. but now it's in 3D...

Yeah I'll stick with my Phone for gaming and see how the Playstation Vita turns out.

well... you have to remember that when the original DS specs were finalized, flash memory was still horridly expensive. they needed to keep the cost down so they had to limit it to 128MB or whatever.

fast-forward to 2010 when the 3DS's specs were finalized... 3DS carts are 2GB now. that's a huge leap.

"Nintendo 3DS cartridges will be able to store up to 2 GB of data at launch, and larger sizes are likely to follow throughout the system?s lifetime. The first generation of DS cartridges only went up to 64 MB, but over time, Nintendo introduced sizes all the way up to 512 MB." source

i'm currently playing OOT and the game still has text instead of voice, but they were just recreating/porting the original from N64. before OOT, i played Splinter Cell 3D which is also a port, but all the dialog was voice. all of it.

as for battery life - yeah, it's not good by 2011 standards; however, you get considerably longer life when the wifi is disabled. you certainly dont need wifi enabled when youre playing a single player game like OOT or Splinter Cell. also, if youre playing a DS game you wont be using the 3D, which saves battery life as well. in my case, i dont travel w/ my 3DS that much, save for a few flights, so battery life isnt that important. 95% of the time spent playing is at home.

Too bad....

Now this may be end for Nintendo hardware, it may still live on. There are unconfirmed reports of Nintendo putting their unique gaming line-up on iOS App Store.

Or even if they are not, this is an option still open for them.

LOL

Where did you come up with that ridiculousness1?!?!? It'll be a frosty day in hell before Nintendo puts their stuff on the App Store.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

LOL

Where did you come up with that ridiculousness1?!?!? It'll be a frosty day in hell before Nintendo puts their stuff on the App Store.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

It has been going around that the investors that jumped on during the Wii want to oust Iwata and Miyamoto and move to iOS.

As someone who grew up with the NES, I think its time for Nintendo to consider falling in line with Sega and become a software-only company. Money is in software not hardware. Honestly, cranking out hardware for the sake of having a specialized controller that won't appeal to everyone doesn't make a lot of sense. I'd have no problem playing a Mario or Zelda game on a Microsoft console. The experience is in the game not the box it runs on. As for portable gaming, I think Nintendo is justified in continuing to make handheld systems. You're not going to get a good Nintendo style game on an iPhone, primarily due to the control interface. Nintendo could make some games exclusively for phones, but you will never have a true Mario, Starfox, Zelda without some real controls.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you have entire racks of servers and that minor module cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to, your access layer switches. This should be a 10g switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports and should be a fully managed switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. if your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!