School Punishes Boy for Opposing Homosexuality


Recommended Posts

Yes, Shirley MacLaine is open minded enough to believe in astrology, ghosts, new age spirituality and occultism.

Well various forms of ghosts, do exist.

Stay at haunted places and see for yourself.

And New Age spirituality is really very old.

;)

Change it to "I think womens rights are wrong" or "I think giving jobs to blacks is wrong" and suddenly everyone will care.

He's a kid, but this sort of homophobia is what breeds the violent nature of society in the future. If he's not punished now for having such bigoted views, he'll think it's fine to hate people just because their lives are different to his own.

"Love thy neighbour" my ass.

Get real. His "opinion" is worthless and based on hate and ignorance. It has no value and doesn't deserve to be acknowledged. There's nothing good or redeeming about bigotry.

Homosexuality is a sin, and it is a disease. Homosexuals should be punished severely if they don't change their ways. Anyone who opposes to homosexuals should be awarded. Atheists are ignorant, and religious people are right.

-- See I can do this too.

I see nothing wrong with being punished voicing such an unfounded opinion.

Unfounded according to you, but not according to billions of religious people around the world.

That's why the solution is COMPLETE freedom of speech. EVERYONE should be allowed to say ANYTHING -- as long as they don't physically harm others. So, anti-homophobic, anti-religious, racist, Nazi -- every kind of OPINION should be allowed. NOBODY should FORCE others believe their own versions of what is wrong and what is right.

Now, the way that the boy stated about homosexuals is everything for me.

Had he said to his friend "I think homosexuality is wrong" I feel this would be acceptable, everyone should be entitled to an opinion. As an opinion cannot be true or false, it is just an opinion.

But as he apparently said "Homosexuality is wrong" that is stating his opinion as a fact, and essentially forcing it on others as a misguided false "truth"

Unfounded according to you, but not according to billions of religious people around the world.

That's why the solution is COMPLETE freedom of speech. EVERYONE should be allowed to say ANYTHING -- as long as they don't physically harm others. So, anti-homophobic, anti-religious, racist, Nazi -- every kind of OPINION should be allowed. NOBODY should FORCE others believe their own versions of what is wrong and what is right.

What nonsense. For starters, all opinions aren't equal or deserving of respect. Secondly, discrimination can harm people in many ways other than just physical harm.

Your "belief" in an unproven supernatural being doesn't give you the right to undermine another persons rights or treat them as a second class citizen.

What nonsense. For starters, all opinions aren't equal or deserving of respect.

You dont' want to respect my opinion, no problem. Just I like have every right not to respect your opinion.

Secondly, discrimination can harm people in many ways other than just physical harm.

And being punished for opposing Homosexuality can harm people in many ways too.

Your "belief" in an unproven supernatural being doesn't give you the right to undermine another persons rights or treat them as a second class citizen.

Similarly I could say:

Your "non-belief" in a proven (according to me) supernatural being doesn't give you the right to undermine another person's belief.

Your "belief" in an unproven supernatural being doesn't give you the right to undermine another persons rights or treat them as a second class citizen.

And you not believing in a Christians beliefs doesn't give you the right to undermine a Christians rights or treat them as a second class citizen. The kid did nothing wrong. He has an opinion which he has the right to do. It doesn't matter if its right or wrong. Nobody has the right to tell anyone what they have to believe. If he believes being homosexual is wrong, that's his right, just as it is your right to believe he is a bigot.

And you not believing in a Christians beliefs doesn't give you the right to undermine a Christians rights or treat them as a second class citizen. The kid did nothing wrong. He has an opinion which he has the right to do. It doesn't matter if its right or wrong. Nobody has the right to tell anyone what they have to believe. If he believes being homosexual is wrong, that's his right, just as it is your right to believe he is a bigot.

+1

And being punished for opposing Homosexuality can harm people in many ways too.

As it should. Homosexuals aren't doing you any harm so there's no good reason to "oppose" them. Your opposition is just discrimination and doesn't deserve protection.

...a proven (according to me) supernatural being...

Perhaps you'd like to share this proof with the rest of us? Somehow I doubt you will.

I don't get this. Government wants people to bear more and more babies, and because government wants even more people than women want to deliver they import millions of immigrants. On the other side they spend billions encouraging homosexuality. What's the point? Look at Germany - they have overwhelming levels of homosexuality and that's why Germans have basically no children at all, Turks now make children for them. Is it what the government really wants?

Yeah, and I don't like anyone that lectures me who should I like or not like.

The words have not yet been invented to describe just how harrowingly stupid this post is, my God, are you for real! How old are you? 10? Also your grasp of the English language is shocking, did you go to school at all?

As it should. Homosexuals aren't doing you any harm so there's no good reason to "oppose" them. Your opposition is just discrimination and doesn't deserve protection.

Well, if the Homosexuals feel mentally harmed when someone calls them sinful, they deserve that too. There's no good reason to be homosexual (according to me and others).

See we can go on and on like this forever.

Perhaps you'd like to share this proof with the rest of us? Somehow I doubt you will.

I'm sure my proof won't be acceptable to you. Just like your "proof" of things like evolution is not acceptable to me.

And you not believing in a Christians beliefs doesn't give you the right to undermine a Christians rights or treat them as a second class citizen. The kid did nothing wrong. He has an opinion which he has the right to do. It doesn't matter if its right or wrong. Nobody has the right to tell anyone what they have to believe. If he believes being homosexual is wrong, that's his right, just as it is your right to believe he is a bigot.

Of course I have the right to question spurious and ridiculous beliefs. People, including the teacher in the classroom, also have the right to stand up to bigotry and hatred. Religion isn't a get out of gaol free card that can be used to justify hatred and discrimination.

I doubt you'd be so quick to jump to the child's defence if he was spouting racism rather than homophobia ;)

Well, if the Homosexuals feel mentally harmed when someone calls them sinful, they deserve that too. There's no good reason to be homosexual (according to me and others).

You may think you have a reason for your bigotry but it's not a good reason.

I'm sure my proof won't be acceptable to you. Just like your "proof" of things like evolution is not acceptable to me.

How unsurprising :rolleyes:

Well would this be such a hot issue had the subject not been about gays? I agree that this should not have been discussed in a school setting and the teen should not have been subjected to punishment because he exercised his right to free speech, but I suspect that he knew that a comment such as that would provoke the teacher and or whom ever he was speaking with, and that was the reason for his statement.

You're most likely right about him trying to antagonize... Kids will be kids. lol

But on the topic of discussing things like this in school, I think that schools should be preaching tolerance. Whether it be the geeky kid or a homosexual. Too often kids grow up in intolerant homes and wind up being intolerant adults who have intolerant children... The cycle really needs to stop.

I wish you could understand how stupid that post was but you probably never will. How do you even turn on your computer?

LMAO Best post I've read in ages.

Of course I have the right to question spurious and ridiculous beliefs. People, including the teacher in the classroom, also have the right to stand up to bigotry and hatred. ......

Isn't the teacher a bigot for not letting the student have his own beliefs? Bigotry works both ways in this situation.

You're most likely right about him trying to antagonize... Kids will be kids. lol

But on the topic of discussing things like this in school, I think that schools should be preaching tolerance. Whether it be the geeky kid or a homosexual. Too often kids grow up in intolerant homes and wind up being intolerant adults who have intolerant children... The cycle really needs to stop.

LMAO Best post I've read in ages.

it's not the job of schools or the government to socially engineer children. That is parents responsiblity. if parents raise their children to hate gays.. that's their own business.

The words have not yet been invented to describe just how harrowingly stupid this post is, my God, are you for real! How old are you? 10? Also your grasp of the English language is shocking, did you go to school at all?

while the birthrate of people in first and second world nations is appauling, especially white people, that doesn't make it the gays fault. I blame feminism.

it's not the job of schools or the government to socially engineer children. That is parents responsiblity. if parents raise their children to hate gays.. that's their own business.

Well, I'd say it *kinda* is the business of the people he hates... LOL

It's not socially acceptable to hate other groups, so this should be no different. And honestly, given the choice, it's the last group I'd hate...

while the birthrate of people in first and second world nations is appauling, especially white people, that doesn't make it the gays fault. I blame feminism.

Appalling: ap?pall?ing/??p?liNG/ Adjective: Awful; terrible

I am presuming that you have quoted my post because .... you agree with me?

As far as I know, socioeconomics refers broadly to the "use of economics in the study of society" and what it shows is that if societies are better educated and wealthy they tend to have far less children than those from poor, uneducated ones! I sincerely doubt that feminism has anything to do with it! Correct me if I am wrong!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!