School Punishes Boy for Opposing Homosexuality


Recommended Posts

Yes, Shirley MacLaine is open minded enough to believe in astrology, ghosts, new age spirituality and occultism.

Well various forms of ghosts, do exist.

Stay at haunted places and see for yourself.

And New Age spirituality is really very old.

;)

Change it to "I think womens rights are wrong" or "I think giving jobs to blacks is wrong" and suddenly everyone will care.

He's a kid, but this sort of homophobia is what breeds the violent nature of society in the future. If he's not punished now for having such bigoted views, he'll think it's fine to hate people just because their lives are different to his own.

"Love thy neighbour" my ass.

Get real. His "opinion" is worthless and based on hate and ignorance. It has no value and doesn't deserve to be acknowledged. There's nothing good or redeeming about bigotry.

Homosexuality is a sin, and it is a disease. Homosexuals should be punished severely if they don't change their ways. Anyone who opposes to homosexuals should be awarded. Atheists are ignorant, and religious people are right.

-- See I can do this too.

I see nothing wrong with being punished voicing such an unfounded opinion.

Unfounded according to you, but not according to billions of religious people around the world.

That's why the solution is COMPLETE freedom of speech. EVERYONE should be allowed to say ANYTHING -- as long as they don't physically harm others. So, anti-homophobic, anti-religious, racist, Nazi -- every kind of OPINION should be allowed. NOBODY should FORCE others believe their own versions of what is wrong and what is right.

Now, the way that the boy stated about homosexuals is everything for me.

Had he said to his friend "I think homosexuality is wrong" I feel this would be acceptable, everyone should be entitled to an opinion. As an opinion cannot be true or false, it is just an opinion.

But as he apparently said "Homosexuality is wrong" that is stating his opinion as a fact, and essentially forcing it on others as a misguided false "truth"

Unfounded according to you, but not according to billions of religious people around the world.

That's why the solution is COMPLETE freedom of speech. EVERYONE should be allowed to say ANYTHING -- as long as they don't physically harm others. So, anti-homophobic, anti-religious, racist, Nazi -- every kind of OPINION should be allowed. NOBODY should FORCE others believe their own versions of what is wrong and what is right.

What nonsense. For starters, all opinions aren't equal or deserving of respect. Secondly, discrimination can harm people in many ways other than just physical harm.

Your "belief" in an unproven supernatural being doesn't give you the right to undermine another persons rights or treat them as a second class citizen.

What nonsense. For starters, all opinions aren't equal or deserving of respect.

You dont' want to respect my opinion, no problem. Just I like have every right not to respect your opinion.

Secondly, discrimination can harm people in many ways other than just physical harm.

And being punished for opposing Homosexuality can harm people in many ways too.

Your "belief" in an unproven supernatural being doesn't give you the right to undermine another persons rights or treat them as a second class citizen.

Similarly I could say:

Your "non-belief" in a proven (according to me) supernatural being doesn't give you the right to undermine another person's belief.

Your "belief" in an unproven supernatural being doesn't give you the right to undermine another persons rights or treat them as a second class citizen.

And you not believing in a Christians beliefs doesn't give you the right to undermine a Christians rights or treat them as a second class citizen. The kid did nothing wrong. He has an opinion which he has the right to do. It doesn't matter if its right or wrong. Nobody has the right to tell anyone what they have to believe. If he believes being homosexual is wrong, that's his right, just as it is your right to believe he is a bigot.

And you not believing in a Christians beliefs doesn't give you the right to undermine a Christians rights or treat them as a second class citizen. The kid did nothing wrong. He has an opinion which he has the right to do. It doesn't matter if its right or wrong. Nobody has the right to tell anyone what they have to believe. If he believes being homosexual is wrong, that's his right, just as it is your right to believe he is a bigot.

+1

And being punished for opposing Homosexuality can harm people in many ways too.

As it should. Homosexuals aren't doing you any harm so there's no good reason to "oppose" them. Your opposition is just discrimination and doesn't deserve protection.

...a proven (according to me) supernatural being...

Perhaps you'd like to share this proof with the rest of us? Somehow I doubt you will.

I don't get this. Government wants people to bear more and more babies, and because government wants even more people than women want to deliver they import millions of immigrants. On the other side they spend billions encouraging homosexuality. What's the point? Look at Germany - they have overwhelming levels of homosexuality and that's why Germans have basically no children at all, Turks now make children for them. Is it what the government really wants?

Yeah, and I don't like anyone that lectures me who should I like or not like.

The words have not yet been invented to describe just how harrowingly stupid this post is, my God, are you for real! How old are you? 10? Also your grasp of the English language is shocking, did you go to school at all?

As it should. Homosexuals aren't doing you any harm so there's no good reason to "oppose" them. Your opposition is just discrimination and doesn't deserve protection.

Well, if the Homosexuals feel mentally harmed when someone calls them sinful, they deserve that too. There's no good reason to be homosexual (according to me and others).

See we can go on and on like this forever.

Perhaps you'd like to share this proof with the rest of us? Somehow I doubt you will.

I'm sure my proof won't be acceptable to you. Just like your "proof" of things like evolution is not acceptable to me.

And you not believing in a Christians beliefs doesn't give you the right to undermine a Christians rights or treat them as a second class citizen. The kid did nothing wrong. He has an opinion which he has the right to do. It doesn't matter if its right or wrong. Nobody has the right to tell anyone what they have to believe. If he believes being homosexual is wrong, that's his right, just as it is your right to believe he is a bigot.

Of course I have the right to question spurious and ridiculous beliefs. People, including the teacher in the classroom, also have the right to stand up to bigotry and hatred. Religion isn't a get out of gaol free card that can be used to justify hatred and discrimination.

I doubt you'd be so quick to jump to the child's defence if he was spouting racism rather than homophobia ;)

Well, if the Homosexuals feel mentally harmed when someone calls them sinful, they deserve that too. There's no good reason to be homosexual (according to me and others).

You may think you have a reason for your bigotry but it's not a good reason.

I'm sure my proof won't be acceptable to you. Just like your "proof" of things like evolution is not acceptable to me.

How unsurprising :rolleyes:

Well would this be such a hot issue had the subject not been about gays? I agree that this should not have been discussed in a school setting and the teen should not have been subjected to punishment because he exercised his right to free speech, but I suspect that he knew that a comment such as that would provoke the teacher and or whom ever he was speaking with, and that was the reason for his statement.

You're most likely right about him trying to antagonize... Kids will be kids. lol

But on the topic of discussing things like this in school, I think that schools should be preaching tolerance. Whether it be the geeky kid or a homosexual. Too often kids grow up in intolerant homes and wind up being intolerant adults who have intolerant children... The cycle really needs to stop.

I wish you could understand how stupid that post was but you probably never will. How do you even turn on your computer?

LMAO Best post I've read in ages.

Of course I have the right to question spurious and ridiculous beliefs. People, including the teacher in the classroom, also have the right to stand up to bigotry and hatred. ......

Isn't the teacher a bigot for not letting the student have his own beliefs? Bigotry works both ways in this situation.

You're most likely right about him trying to antagonize... Kids will be kids. lol

But on the topic of discussing things like this in school, I think that schools should be preaching tolerance. Whether it be the geeky kid or a homosexual. Too often kids grow up in intolerant homes and wind up being intolerant adults who have intolerant children... The cycle really needs to stop.

LMAO Best post I've read in ages.

it's not the job of schools or the government to socially engineer children. That is parents responsiblity. if parents raise their children to hate gays.. that's their own business.

The words have not yet been invented to describe just how harrowingly stupid this post is, my God, are you for real! How old are you? 10? Also your grasp of the English language is shocking, did you go to school at all?

while the birthrate of people in first and second world nations is appauling, especially white people, that doesn't make it the gays fault. I blame feminism.

it's not the job of schools or the government to socially engineer children. That is parents responsiblity. if parents raise their children to hate gays.. that's their own business.

Well, I'd say it *kinda* is the business of the people he hates... LOL

It's not socially acceptable to hate other groups, so this should be no different. And honestly, given the choice, it's the last group I'd hate...

while the birthrate of people in first and second world nations is appauling, especially white people, that doesn't make it the gays fault. I blame feminism.

Appalling: ap?pall?ing/??p?liNG/ Adjective: Awful; terrible

I am presuming that you have quoted my post because .... you agree with me?

As far as I know, socioeconomics refers broadly to the "use of economics in the study of society" and what it shows is that if societies are better educated and wealthy they tend to have far less children than those from poor, uneducated ones! I sincerely doubt that feminism has anything to do with it! Correct me if I am wrong!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!