Recommended Posts

American Banks that DID NOT AND DO NOT require bailouts of any kinds:

TD Bank. RBC. BMO Harris. Scotiabank. Put your money in a Canadian owned American bank, and it'll be safe.

Not so fast...TD Bank requires a $15 fee if you don't maintain a certain balance ($100) so I got rid of them and TD Bank has receivied bailout money thru the banks they bought out

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TD_Bank,_N.A.

I've been a BoA customer for years and years and always had great experiences with them, customer service was excellent, etc. I'm really disappointed at the prospect of having to start over somewhere else, but I will definitely be doing so--and I'll tell them exactly why I'm leaving as well.

Not the same fee. The US also has ATM usage fees that can be levied by your bank or the bank/owner of the ATM or both. The new fees are directly tied to using your debit card at places other than an ATM. So, buying that cup of Joe at Starbucks (or Tim Hortons for you) would throw you into the $5 fee camp (for Bank of America, the fee may vary for other banks).

That is a whole different class of fees that has people upset because both this used to be free and they don't see the need for the bank to levy the fee (the bank profits off the retailer when you use the card to pay). In essence the bank is double dipping (they want to charge on both legs of the transaction) and people aren't happy with that notion.

Currently, Credit Unions don't charge this fee and it may be a major competitive advantage for them to keep it that way. I am a Credit Union member and have been for a number of years after getting fed up with the massive amount of crap that you get from the banks fee wise. I haven't been upset by my Credit Union and I have no desire to return to a bank for my savings needs.

I'm fine with banks only for my credit cards where they seem to offer better terms and features compared to my Credit Union. This may be the trend that many consumers take.

Ah ha ... I see what you mean. When I buy a bag of chips at the SMALL store down the road, I'm charged $0.25 "fee". When I have Domino's deliver pizza, I'm charged a $1.50 "Usage Fee" if I use my ATM card. So again, it's not NEW for Canadian's to pay extra fees just to use our bank cards.

If I bank with Bank A, and go to pull money from Bank B, I get charged by BOTH banks for 'convenience' ... sometimes up to $2/time.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Xbox Insiders get Xbox 360 achievements and Gamertag character upgrades by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft is continuing its fast-paced update schedule for Xbox Insiders. Today, the company announced a new slate of features it is rolling out to Xbox Insiders in the Alpha Skip-Ahead ring, which includes an expansion to the gamertag system, Xbox 360 achievements, and more. The unique Gamertag that Xbox users can choose for their profile is getting more characters. Instead of the 12-character limit, Insiders will now be able to get a Gamertag that's 15 characters long. The 12-character limit will still apply to Gamertags that are not unique or contain any non-Latin characters. Meanwhile, Microsoft is adding Xbox 360 game support to its Game Hubs. Selecting an installed Xbox 360 game on a modern Xbox console will now show achievement progress, captures, and other information. Achievement pop-ups are back for these classics too, which should be good news for achievement hunters. The next change is for Xbox players who can't wait to jump into their games when an update is required. "If a game requires an update and is available to stream through your Game Pass membership, you can start playing immediately with cloud gaming while the update downloads in the background," explains Microsoft. The final change of this Insider update is once again to the game cards. Insiders will find that all games, both released and upcoming, will now have a simple button to add to their profile's wishlist, making the process much easier from a single place. This Xbox update is rolling out today to Insiders in the Alpha Skip-Ahead ring. As usual, Microsoft aims to bring it to more Insiders over time before they reach all Xbox owners. Head here to find out how to join the Xbox Insider Program to get a chance to test these features and upcoming ones on both consoles and PC.
    • In the boot options in the UEFI is set to legacy or CMS? It needs to be set to UEFI if it's not already.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      467
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!