Recommended Posts

Is this really surprising? iOS is built for one device - the iPhone. Therefore the iPhone can be optimized to take advantage of the hardware more efficiently than Android. Android is an OS built for hundreds of devices to run on. It is not optimized for a single CPU or GPU.

It's built for one device? Really?

Wow... Nobody read the actual article. AnandTech did NOT run these tests! They compiled them from other sources on the web. Read folks...

it could be that anandtech are using stock roms and not modded ones like the ones others are using?

My Galaxy S2 scored 3096ms on Sunspider javascript benchmark.. latest stock firmware available for my phone (Android 2.3.4), dolphin browser HD. Not rooted/overclocked/etc.

Not really.

If the iPhone is stuck on stock, that is a limitation of the platform. If Android can be made to perform better, why is that an unfair thing?

a lot of things can be made to perform better when they are never meant to be. You think it's fair if we compare a stripped down android device that only has a browser and a couple of other services running compared to a stock iOS device.

Why would anyone want to compare an modified ROM that next to no one uses in comparison to a stock rom to iOS. that doesn't make sense... you would want to compare real world usage and what the the majority of people use, not what 1 percent (if that) of android users who eff around with their ROMs.

Well running any Android phone on AOSP builds shouldn't be counted as cheating or whatever. Google can make something great then you slap on more crap on it then of-course that will make it slower than before.

Not saying my SGS2 should be faster than anything else, I look at this like Core i5 vs Core I5 (Sandy Bridge) even at the same Ghz. Sandy Bridge version would kick pants off version 1. The A5 in the iPhone i'm sure is not the same the iPad 2 that was designed since like last summer. I'm sure they did some tweaks to the design so it's not the same CPU even though it's an A5. If that was the case then the iPad 2 would have scored the same as the iPhone 4s.

Since I have a pretty good start with rhetorical comments in this thread… How do you explain that Safari 5.1 on my 27" iMac is so much faster than the one on my 13" MacBook Pro ? Only down to the browsers themselves, sure, sure… :laugh:

At this point, it isn’t even necessary to add that a lot of the mobile browsers out there rely on Apple’s Webkit engine… If Google modifies it to get a worse score, it’s not Apple’s problem, nor the benchmarks maker here.

Of course if you use a faster device that it can perform faster, but Browser performance is still largely down to itself and the engine behind it. If you even look at the first graph, you'll clearly see that the new safari for the iOS performs faster than the previous version because it shows the previous benchmarks. For example, I could now, go and download Firefox version 1 and compare it to the nightly build (version 10) and you will see a drastic different in Sunspider tests and every single other browser performance test. This is down to how Javascript is used, how the browser translates code to actual use in the quickest possible way without breaking standards.

If you are going to compare a system, you compare it directly with performance benchmarks like hardware, because the software changes all the time. Drivers change all the time.

You also go on to say in your point that mobile browsers out there rely on the Webkit engine. Webkit is open source, that's the reason Google use it and they've contributed largely towards it. Google haven't modified it so they can get worse scores, you are just comparing an old webkit engine to a newer one which obviously performs better. Also, how can you explain how the Honeycomb version of the browser which uses Webkit actually is in a tie with the iOS 5 version of the Safari browser?

I do have a valid argument when it comes to software benchmarks because even Anandtech even said so. This is something ICS is meant to address with mobile phones.

The one benchmark I do agree with is the actual GPU scores. This is something Apple will slap Android users with and even WP7 if it was benchmarked. This is because the hardware behind it is clearly there. As for the CPU benchmarks, this is down to the Android system being inefficient. This is something I think WP7 would score the highest on because of how well it performs as an OS.

I think we've forgotten that Android was built in the age to compete with Windows Mobile 6 and BB. Off loading the graphics to the GPU completely would give the system a big enough boost to catch up.

My Galaxy S2 scored 3096ms on Sunspider javascript benchmark.. latest stock firmware available for my phone (Android 2.3.4), dolphin browser HD. Not rooted/overclocked/etc.

that's pretty good. i like that my phone will get a nice speed upgrade once i upgrade to iOS 5 (waiting for the untethered jailbreak though...). how is it with the stock browser? (as i am presuming this test was running on safari, not dolphin for iOS)

Well, even stock ROM's are coming with far better scores than the graph shows. I think that in other tests, the 4S will not be at the top and the Galaxy S2 will not be below the iPhone 4.

well according to what i quoted, it is faster then the 4S... but using a dif browser. And for your other statement, we will have to wait and see. I hope ICS is a fast and everyone thinks it'll be.

  • Like 1

If the iPhone is stuck on stock, that is a limitation of the platform. If Android can be made to perform better, why is that an unfair thing?

It would be like hacking Windows’ registry on one device and then benchmark it against another. They both need the same tweaks, or if it’s not possible, the same stock installation of Windows.

Is this really surprising? iOS is built for one device - the iPhone. Therefore the iPhone can be optimized to take advantage of the hardware more efficiently than Android. Android is an OS built for hundreds of devices to run on. It is not optimized for a single CPU or GPU.

I think that's what is demonstrated here. I don't think Mango would perform as well either, simply for the fact that the OS has to cater to a variety of platforms and form factors, and so can only optimize for the lowest common demoninator, whereas iOS 5 has what, four or five possible hardware setups? I'm not saying this is a bad thing, it obviously works, but it would explain why it outperforms everyone else.

Honestly the biggest surprise there for me is the Galaxy S2. I hadn't realised how far ahead in the non-iPhone smartphone race they really were, and how far behind HTC are falling :o

It would be like hacking Windows’ registry on one device and then benchmark it against another. They both need the same tweaks, or if it’s not possible, the same stock installation of Windows.

It isn't though.

Android is not iOS, so your analogy doesn't work here.

WP Mango doesn't do too well on the browsermark benchmark, My HD7 gets slower speeds than the iphone3gs (about 20,000)

Does it really matter tho? TBH when it comes to specs, they mean ######, its how responsive a device feels that matters. Can have the fastest phone in the world, but if it still lags when swiping homescreens, or takes 5 seconds to open a browser. Means ######.

  • Like 1

It's built for one device? Really?

Wow... Nobody read the actual article. AnandTech did NOT run these tests! They compiled them from other sources on the web. Read folks...

Yeah iOS was designed to run on iPhone (yes there are iTouch, and iPad, but you get the point - scope of optimization Apple has to do is limited to just a handful of products). It doesn't matter where the numbers come from, benchmark are benchmarks.

So, they are comparing the 4s against other phones without/no full hardware acceleration?

ICS will...and is supposed to...offer FULL hardware acceleration when GB didnt have full hardware acceleration.

So not surprised the 4s out outperforms whats currently out there for droids with similar specs. Will be interesting to see what ICS brings to the table.

And for those of you stating the android devices compared were old....I believe the Droid Bionic was just released not that long ago.

that's a big IF. that's IF ICS is actually well optimized and hardware acceleration is properly done, because in honeycomb, it was not.

Hopefully they get it right with ICS as I know a lot of users are getting kinda tired of the Android OS being slow to evolve.

So what was that about hardware that was in already existing Android phones?

What about it? Hardware is the same if not better in some Android phones. I for one never said Android phones would perform better (specially when there is little to no hardware acceleration). I just said that Apple is catching up hardware wise. Thats all.

Nice graphs.

I'm neither a Apple nor a Android fanboy, but I do hate on Android fanboys as I find them to be most obnoxious...

Every time Apple comes out with something, they never have anything nice to say. Here's some common and little bit exaggerated examples.

Apple - Android

3.5inch screen - I have 4.5inch screen that sticks out of my pockets.

Retina Display - My friend with a Samsung galaxy s II has AMOLED DISPLAY that can blow it away (but my HTC and Droid can't).

Siri - I have that like 10 years ago with vLingo.

Dual Core - My dual core overclocked 2.0Ghz can blow it away.

Notification List - My 20 year old android had that, time to play catch up Apple.

Sometimes is not all about specs and more about how well it works. Not all iPhone users use iPhones for fashion.....People buy it because it works and it works for them. If an Android works better for you, great! No need to to bash the other phone. How about congratulating them for increasing the competition?

Nice graphs.

I'm neither a Apple nor a Android fanboy, but I do hate on Android fanboys as I find them to be most obnoxious...

Every time Apple comes out with something, they never have anything nice to say. Here's some common and little bit exaggerated examples.

Apple - Android

3.5inch screen - I have 4.5inch screen that sticks out of my pockets.

Retina Display - My friend with a Samsung galaxy s II has AMOLED DISPLAY that can blow it away (but my HTC and Droid can't).

Siri - I have that like 10 years ago with vLingo.

Dual Core - My dual core overclocked 2.0Ghz can blow it away.

Notification List - My 20 year old android had that, time to play catch up Apple.

Sometimes is not all about specs and more about how well it works. Not all iPhone users use iPhones for fashion.....People buy it because it works and it works for them. If an Android works better for you, great! No need to to bash the other phone. How about congratulating them for increasing the competition?

Same things can be said about any device someone is passionate about and prefers. Its only when the conversation turns ugly that its a problem. I have seen Apple and MS users make similar comments.

3213.5ms using the stock browser.

You just bought a 4S? Congrats on the purchase :D

With the WiFi or with the cellular network? It still takes a few milliseconds to load theses huge scripts.

I believe they all use the WiFi to put the phones on their same basis - not all of them go up to 14.4 Mbps I guess in the list.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!