Recommended Posts

post-285248-0-86753700-1323927899_thumb.

Wow, that is friggin awesome! I wish that was the Windows 8 theme - flat, minimalist, and basic - no frills or unneeded ornamentation.

For me the problem with Metro is the lack of consistency through the whole operating system - go with a look and feel then implement it top to bottom, through every facet of the operating system so that there are no strange out of place icons/common controls like there was with Windows Vista and that hideous font add/remove dialogue.

Wow, that is friggin awesome! I wish that was the Windows 8 theme - flat, minimalist, and basic - no frills or unneeded ornamentation.

For me the problem with Metro is the lack of consistency through the whole operating system - go with a look and feel then implement it top to bottom, through every facet of the operating system so that there are no strange out of place icons/common controls like there was with Windows Vista and that hideous font add/remove dialogue.

That *lack of consistency* is due to it supporting not just Metro apps but legacy applications - it's a superset of the Windows UI as we have known it.

It's better implemented than GNOME Shell or Unity, to be honest. (The criticism of Metro is more because the trend has been to mimic, or clone, what Apple does.)

Newsflash (from Neowin's own Apple News section) - following Apple's iDevice strategem may, in fact, be the smartest thing Microsoft didn't do, as no less than Apple CEO Tim Cook admits that iPad2 sales are cannibalizing sales of mainstream Macs (everything from Mac Pros to MacBooks). The question that therefore has to be asked of Apple is *does it care*?

  • 4 weeks later...

The main objective of the ribbon is to what it was originally designed to do in Office, which is to make frequently used and hidden useful features easily visible for home users. People get overwhelmed when they have to dig through long menus and then end up asking how to do even the most simplest tasks. For most pro users who use keyboard shortcuts, the ribbon interface is useless and will be turned off.

As for IE ribbon, I am positive they will never add it simply due to the fact that the minimalism in the browser wins as people simply want to maximum screen viewing space.

After getting used to the ribbon, especially in Office 2010, it is perfect for me, I instinctively know where everything will be, when I have to go back and use Office 2003, I get lost with all the menus, and most of the functions placement makes no sense to me anymore. And I even had to sit through an agonisingly tedious Office 2003 Course that lasted 2 weeks, in the final exam you failed if you clicked in the wrong place once when being asked to find a function.

I can pretty much guarantee that Windows 8 will be Windows Vista R2. Most of the people just NOW are upgrading from XP TO Windows 7. They are not going to upgrade again.

IT professionals are not going to waste their time turning off metro and tweaking their installs to work with older apps they use.

Honestly, I have to say this is the worst decision that Microsoft ever made. IMO this beats Windows ME and Vista bar far. As an IT professional myself, I do not want to deal with the Windows 8 usage issues. People still cannot use Windows XP correctly!

Don't get me wrong, this interface works WONDERFUL for phones and tablets......but Microsoft should have kept it there.

This is a real shame. Having Metro enabled with three LARGE monitors accomplishes what exactly? They pretty much destroyed the screen estate with this version.

Also, what large company will develop metro applications? As far as I know, Windows XP still has between 45% to 50% market share. No large company will develop a completely functional metro application.

My development - I will still be focusing on Windows XP, Vista, and 7

I can pretty much guarantee that Windows 8 will be Windows Vista R2. Most of the people just NOW are upgrading from XP TO Windows 7. They are not going to upgrade again.

IT professionals are not going to waste their time turning off metro and tweaking their installs to work with older apps they use.

Honestly, I have to say this is the worst decision that Microsoft ever made. IMO this beats Windows ME and Vista bar far. As an IT professional myself, I do not want to deal with the Windows 8 usage issues. People still cannot use Windows XP correctly!

Don't get me wrong, this interface works WONDERFUL for phones and tablets......but Microsoft should have kept it there.

This is a real shame. Having Metro enabled with three LARGE monitors accomplishes what exactly? They pretty much destroyed the screen estate with this version.

Also, what large company will develop metro applications? As far as I know, Windows XP still has between 45% to 50% market share. No large company will develop a completely functional metro application.

My development - I will still be focusing on Windows XP, Vista, and 7

+1

Come on people if you just quite your whining and wait for the Beta you just might be surprised. Another thing if you don't want to see the start menu just hit the "Windows Key" and it is gone. If you want use the start menu to launch an app then hit the "Windows Key" again. If all you want is the task bar showing with all your icons on it then place them there then forget using the windows key. Is it really that hard for you.

Hell you would think that some of you just think Microsoft is doing this to pi** you off.

Well, I've installed the Developer Demo and I think it's the UGLIEST interface I've seen for ANY system (and I've been around since Fortran was popular). WHy does MS think a PC should look like a phone? If people want a tablet interface, that's fine on a tablet, but a PC is either a work-tool or a media center or a game-system. ANd often it's used for all of these. The old interface WORKS!

Well, I've installed the Developer Demo and I think it's the UGLIEST interface I've seen for ANY system (and I've been around since Fortran was popular). WHy does MS think a PC should look like a phone? If people want a tablet interface, that's fine on a tablet, but a PC is either a work-tool or a media center or a game-system. ANd often it's used for all of these. The old interface WORKS!

Well after Playing with Android tablet device.... I can possitively say its a piece of ****. Windows 8 is a much better tablet the Android is. If the proper hardware is built for windows 8 It will be good otherwise its just awkward. I can see Windows 8 tablets outpacing Android.

I can pretty much guarantee that Windows 8 will be Windows Vista R2. Most of the people just NOW are upgrading from XP TO Windows 7. They are not going to upgrade again.

No, but those that haven't upgraded by the end of this year will.

IT professionals are not going to waste their time turning off metro and tweaking their installs to work with older apps they use.

You can't disable Metro has far as I'm aware, also you don't have to "tweak" Windows to work with older apps. Not sure where that's coming from.

Honestly, I have to say this is the worst decision that Microsoft ever made. IMO this beats Windows ME and Vista bar far. As an IT professional myself, I do not want to deal with the Windows 8 usage issues. People still cannot use Windows XP correctly!

Microsoft isn't targeting those people here. Honestly, if you can't use Windows XP by this point, then there is no changing that. What people forget to mention is all the younger users that do know how to use a computer. I sit and watch people at school all day involved in a wide variety of computing activities. Many of whom seem more than intimate with how their machines work.

Also, what large company will develop metro applications? As far as I know, Windows XP still has between 45% to 50% market share. No large company will develop a completely functional metro application.

Mozilla for one. I think Evernote is on board with another app.

You sound very much angry for some reason. I know many do not like change, but change is front and center in computing. Is best not to fight it too often when using commercial systems.

Well, I've installed the Developer Demo and I think it's the UGLIEST interface I've seen for ANY system (and I've been around since Fortran was popular). WHy does MS think a PC should look like a phone? If people want a tablet interface, that's fine on a tablet, but a PC is either a work-tool or a media center or a game-system. ANd often it's used for all of these. The old interface WORKS!

The old interface is also becoming dated. Computing is moving in a different direction than it was 10 years ago, and as a result some things need to change. THe CLI worked too, but do we still use that anymore? Nope.

Everyone thinks the PC should look like a phone. We're going to see the smart phone / tablet / PC market merge in terms of UI and hardware in the next decade or so, so start getting used to it.

Exactly, and Microsoft isn't the only one looking at doing this either. No one is complaining that iOS is slowly invading the Mac, so why are they cussing up a storm over Metro invading Windows?

I agree some with brando's statements, however I mostly complain about the babied down interface with huge huge HUGE icons and text that is not very desktop friendly, but centered around tablets only.... that's what we bitch about...

They're live tiles, not just huge icons. They'll be able to display information without actually opening the app.

I know that but it could be helpful without being HUGE!!! LOL... would you rather have a big fat momma waitress serve you dinner or a slim hot sexy one??? LOL...

(damn I think of food too much LOL)

I think Microsoft has purposefully held some information regarding Windows 8, such as multi-tasking in Metro. The are getting all this free marketing.

If you remember with Windows 7, their was no interface change revealed till the public beta. So I think we are going to see a lot of surprises when it's beta is released.

Indeed very clever observation ;) Let's hope that is actually their idea and not a naive action without knowing what to do with it lol.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Surprise! We still can't get it right. With the current state of AI, the crappy software, the huge mega-corporations that back all of these idiot things, I think we are a very long way away from SAE Level 5. I, for one, will never get in one.
    • Nice. September/October GA?! I'll keep following it, but won't install any preview or beta versions.
    • Wow, that could have been dangerous, certainly not ready for these things. They have to be 100% or pretty well close to it. Not that I will see one i doubt, never mind ride in one, they may have them in London, but I doubt they will come to where I live.
    • Nothing kills CMF Phone 2 Pro's successor due to rising memory prices by Hamid Ganji Storage and RAM prices have been rising over the past year, leading to a significant increase in the cost of electronics for customers around the world. Many companies are now revising their plans for upcoming devices due to higher component costs and overall production expenses. CMF is the latest company to cancel the successor to one of its best-selling phones due to rising memory prices. CMF is a sub-brand of Nothing and focuses on making budget smartphones for growing markets. The brand launched the CMF Phone 2 Pro last year with some eye-catching specifications and an affordable price. While many customers may have been waiting for a successor this year, one of the company’s executives has announced that CMF will not release a new smartphone this year. And AI is to blame. As Nothing co-founder Akis Evangelidis announced on X, the company has been working on a successor to the CMF Phone 2 Pro, but with current memory prices, it cannot “build a phone that feels like a genuine step forward at a price that makes sense for CMF.” So, no new CMF phone will be launched this year. Meanwhile, Evangelidis said the company still has several new products in the pipeline, including some in entirely new categories. He added that the Nothing brand will also continue launching new products through 2026. Budget smartphones are among the first victims of the surge in RAM and memory prices, as they have become more expensive to build. The sharp increase in memory costs could also reshape the traditional price ranges associated with budget phones. Apple CEO Tim Cook also recently said that price increases for some of the company’s products are unavoidable because RAM and memory have become significantly more expensive this year. Analysts estimate that the base price of the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro could rise to $1,399 due to current market shortages.
    • Nudge me when they bring back hardware audio acceleration so I can get my EAX 5 back. We've evolved graphics to real-time path tracing, but regressed audio some 15 years back in time with this stupid software audio stack.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      541
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!