Recommended Posts

Samsung: no ICS upgrade for Galaxy S and Galaxy Tab because of TouchWiz

Samsung has just distributed the worst news of this Ice Cream Sandwich upgrade cycle: the popular Galaxy S smartphone that sold 10 million units last year and the 7-inch Galaxy Tab tablet won't be upgraded to Android 4.0. The company's argument is that they lack sufficient RAM and ROM to run the new OS alongside TouchWiz and other "experience-enhancing" software. This will come as a massive blow to the great many users of the Galaxy S, who would have rightly expected the 1GHz Hummingbird processor and accompanying memory to be able to handle ICS ? it's the same hardware as you'll find inside the Nexus S, and that phone is receiving Android 4.0 over the air right now.

Samsung addresses that inconsistency by again pointing to the differing software provision; the Nexus S only has to run the basic Android OS, whereas the Galaxy S has to deliver TouchWiz, carrier services, video calling software, and, in some markets, mobile TV.

HTC had this exact same issue when upgrading the Desire to Gingerbread a few months back, and after some equivocation, it was forced to disable some functions of its own Android skin, Sense, in order to make the upgrade fit. So Samsung isn't alone in making its users suffer for buying a skinned Android device.

Source: The Verge

chanting

Kill Android skins, kill Android skins.... What do we want, ICS, how do we want it, NO SKINS!

/chanting

Hey Samsung, how about this. Make the update available for the device with ONLY stock Android but in a custom ZIP format. The normal user wont know how to find it or what to do with it if they do find it. For those users that know what it is know they'll also be missing that "Enhanced Experience" but they'll continue to buy your latest and greatest expensive devices without second guessing the purchase. The HTC G1 wasn't a "great" device by any stretch of the word, it's all the geeks that bought it up because of all the cool stuff that it could be forced to do. This is why you are in the position of power now, if that G1 failed, Android wouldn't be where it is now and it only flurished because of all the geeks out there that just had to have one to hack to death!

I prefer stock android as well. As a side note some of the "enhanced experiences" such as Vlingo that comes with the SGS2 (maybe the SGS1 as well I don't know) is absolutely horribly! It's a reminder that voice recognition has a long way to go!

The original GS was announces in March 2010 and released the following June. By the time Samsung would of gotten around to even putting ICS on the GS, it would be 2 years.

But again, I am betting that more phones from here on out will be able to support the new OS. Google says that is one of the reasons they are working with manufacturers to be able to provide updates faster and more phones will get the latest. They just have to get everyone on the new version from here on out.

Just MO

CM9 btw

CM8 => Android 3.0

CM is getting sloppy lately. They are to big and dont handle issues as well IMO. They were great when I had my original MyTouch 3g. I find myself using other's ROMs over CM and they are smoother.

Kinda off topic, I know. :)

That's great. I expect hTC will come and say the same thing about the ICS on the Desire HD (although it has 256MB RAM more than the galaxy S).

Well, nevermind, long-live CyanogenMOd! I hate Sense/Touchwiz/Motoblur/etc, and any of those will ruin the ICS experience anyway.

Besides CM8 and other ROM's will get ICS on your Galaxy S devices :)

CM9. CM8 will be skipped. :laugh:

CM is getting sloppy lately. They are to big and dont handle issues as well IMO. They were great when I had my original MyTouch 3g. I find myself using other's ROMs over CM and they are smoother.

Kinda off topic, I know. :)

while i settled with CM , barely had SGS2 for month and half ,killed Touchwiz with fire!!

UI much better now , while hay it work for me :)

I already knew the SGS will not be supported. Its an elitist behavior coming from Samsung. CM9 is one of the alternatives SGS owners can look upto when it is released in January.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      459
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      212
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!