Recommended Posts

the fact is you almost can never get rid of those things, no mater how much you spend there will always be a region that is poorer and less able to cope with climate, conditions, and just other factors... we could throw all our money at places like africa and never see a change, due to how the region just works

and helping support a growing population that cant feed themselves now.

If we have the technology to terraform Mars, I don't think we really need to be able to "fix" earth. By the time we ruin Mars, we probably be able to travel to other star systems.

Not saying it is the right thing to do being parasites. Sort of remind me of the antagonist race in Mass Effect.

What if Mars is lifeless? Even if no life otherwise exists there, that pristine and unique alien environment, so far barely scratched by humans, needs to be preserved as is as much as possible. We?ve already done too much damage here on our own planet.

This is a stupid attitude. Mars is rock and sand. Romanticizing about rock and sand is stupid. Though obviously if there are beautiful areas on Mars people will want to preserve them.

focusing on somehow "colonizing" more of our own planet instead of other worlds is foolhardy. first, it won't grow our economy as much. second, it will continue to further destabalize this world, and since we won't have any other worlds to escape to, that's dangerous. we need more baskets, to quote the cliche. and the least of the problems we have on Mars is gravity, 0.4g is quite enough for Earth life forms to be comfortable. the biggest problem is the toxic air. i don't think solar radiation is that big a deal on Mars given proper clothing and minimal shielding on structures (i assume initial settlers will live in underground bunkers anyway). reactivating Mars' dynamo to have magnetism is too risky and expensive, thickening the atmosphere will work much better for reducing levels of radiation. we can easily terraform Mars with current tech, but it will be crude and take at least a century before we see any results. i say terraforming can wait, focus on utlization first.

and Obama didn't kill any mission to the moon. NASA have dozens of plans, they are always slow to act on them. if anything, it's during Obama's watch that the 2010 NASA authorization act passed.

People who belive in religion don't like Space.

Always leave it to some troll to throw in a religion argument in something completely unrelated. Good job! :rolleyes:

re?li?gion

a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.

I wish we had more Stephen Hawkings but thoughts geared towards FTL travel and long term space flights, but also the funding. It is not economically feasible though to try multi billion dollar space experements when the economy all over the world is pretty much bad. But of course, if we started mining asteroids, etc, it god be a great source of income [and tax] for space related expeditions!

I don't know about the technological feasibility of this, but I don't see a problem with terraforming Mars, if we could benefit from it. There's a good chance that Mars is just a barren rock, but even if it is not, the life that could exist there is probably on the microbial level. A microbe shouldn't stand in the way of (potential) advancement.

Let's fix this planet first before we destroy another one.

The money that would be spent on achieving this could get rid of poverty, famine, homeless, etc.

One does not influence the other. With one centralised world government, and proper resource management everything is achievable ;)

to move past the issue of if terraforming should be done, more along lines of who will go. will it be a select few that have money,would it be it be a planet of the rich , a planet of the geniusor a prison like USA Georgia / Australia used to be during colonization.

its just about garenteed that governments will try and claim as much of it as their own, leading to Martian Wars that will somewhat mirror what humans already do on earth, with exception fo being on their own ( est 5 year travel time ). also because of the distance, will Martian population break off and consider earth population of dregsdregs, or earth consider martian a population of dregs.

humanity needs to get over problems and learn to live in peace with each other before go about colonizing and bringing our problems to other parts of our solar system. untill then humanity should leave other plants the hell alone. as in a planetary scale, Humans are nothing more then a virus / disease, destroying all we touch

hey Hell, whatever you're smoking, i want it NOW!!! it doesn't take five years to get to Mars dude, unless you're flying a 747. the big colony ships will likely use something like a 500MW VASIMR, so expect travel times in the couple of weeks a side - we will have our beloved torch ships by the time Mars terraforming is something to actually vote on!

Tholman said it, Mars is not a life-bearing planet, so the moral issue is not as significant. of course there's something to consider, like what gives us the right? i think that's where faith and religion do come in. someone has picked humanity to have the gift of intelligence, and wants us to do this. i really believe that. i also believe the only way to fix our supposedly ailing global economy is by going to space - endless growth potential!

How will you get Mars to generate a protective magnetic field .... ?

Most papers say once an atmosphere is established it would deteriorate very slowly - it's taken billions of years to get to where it is so constant low-level replenishment should suffice.

As for protective artificial magnetospheres, they can be built into transport vehicles. UK and US labs have been working on those for years.

we don't need a magnetosphere. we don't need an atmosphere, for that matter. like i said, focus on making the most of Mars as-is. by the time terraforming is desirable we'll have access to several other worlds, the technology to modify humans to live better on Mars un-assisted, and vastly improved life support systems that will be very good at staying out of the way.

hey Hell, whatever you're smoking, i want it NOW!!! it doesn't take five years to get to Mars dude, unless you're flying a 747. the big colony ships will likely use something like a 500MW VASIMR, so expect travel times in the couple of weeks a side - we will have our beloved torch ships by the time Mars terraforming is something to actually vote on!

Ah cool, I thought it was 5 years.

I think the biggest obstacle will always be a public who is happy with the status quo and commercial interests having to be the backbone of any sort of colonisation/terraforming. It is a situation where by one could achieve it today if there was the political will and humanity put aside pursuit of wealth in favour of reaching a common interest but I doubt it'll happen in my life time.

i meant on Mars dude! on Mars! clearly on the ideal level we need all those, and to live unassisted obviously we need them...but we're not going to live on Mars unassisted, it's going to be 100% technology and science. just like the pressurized cabin we will be sharing on the trip out there.

Nom Nom, you should read The Man Who Conquered Mars if you're interested in the commercial aspects of Mars exploration. It's more digestible than the Mars Trilogy by Kim Stanley...you don't have to commit to three books. lots of info dumping but quite a realistic scenario where governments basically don't want to pay for Mars settlements so it's the transnational corps that do it.

Mars is smaller, and arguably whats the point of terraforming a planet that has a dead core? With no magnetic field any substantial amosphere would just be blown off by solar winds... Further more terraforming a planet would take at least 50+ years, by all current realistic methods laid out anyways.

We would be better off trying to terraform one of gas giant moons, even then we'd have to constantly worry about the giant gravitational pull of the giant itself pulling constant barrages of meteors and asterioids.

Remember that the solar wind is much weaker at Mars than Earth. It took billions of years for Marts atmosphere to be deteriorated to this poiunt, and most studies indicate a terraformed atmospherte wouldn't seriously degrade for a very, very long time - long enouygh that a minimal amount of supplementation would do nicely.

Terraforming a moon like Titan would be tougher due to the minimal amount of solar energy getting there (remember the inverse square law) and the intense radiation environments around Jupiter and Saturn.

Remember that the solar wind is much weaker at Mars than Earth. It took billions of years for Marts atmosphere to be deteriorated to this poiunt, and most studies indicate a terraformed atmospherte wouldn't seriously degrade for a very, very long time - long enouygh that a minimal amount of supplementation would do nicely.

Terraforming a moon like Titan would be tougher due to the minimal amount of solar energy getting there (remember the inverse square law) and the intense radiation environments around Jupiter and Saturn.

Thats true, I didn't even consider the amount of radiation coming off Jupiter.

Could you imagine waking up to the sky filled with Jupiter though? I wish.

Still, I think we could be better off placing our eggs in another basket. Mars is by no means a long term solution, theres even no assurance after it is "terraformed" we still wouldn't have to walk around with some sort of protection, like light space suites.

Also, " Even if some internal heat source warmed the planet up enough for ice to melt, it wouldn't yield liquid water. The Martian atmosphere is so thin that even if the temperature rose above freezing the ice would change directly to water vapor. "

Who is to say the water vapor wouldn't just bleed out of the thin atmosphere and out into space?

http://science.nasa....001/ast05jan_1/

Depends on how you warm Mars. The atmosphere is mostly CO2, and with trillions of tons of frozen CO2 at both poles & it being a greenhouse gas....

Once you have a denser CO2 atmosphere spike it with methane and other supergreenhouse gases then plants can do most of the rest.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!