iPad Survives 100,000+ Foot Fall From Space Near Area 51 (High-Res)


Recommended Posts

Yet you're here, and commented.

So? I have as much of a right to comment as anyone else does. If I said something like, "Wow, Apple makes the most awesomest products that are more durable than anything else" or, Wow this is amazing!" I doubt you would have singled me out. I'm sorry that it's a crime for me to wonder why I see these durability tests done mostly with Apple products and not anything else as I would like to see a comparison as a consumer to base my choice of purchases off of.

Use the market leading product to get more interest in your PR. Wow, that simple...

I don't see how an Android tablet couldn't accomplish the same result, both are tablets especially now with Android catching on and becoming more popular. Using an Android tablet would just as well shown off the durability of this company's cases if that was their goal. I don't hold any faith in a company that needs to use famous labels or celebrities to advertise their products because that usually means the product itself isn't so great to hold it's own without some label or celebrity backing it.

Damnit, is it wrong of me to want to see if the top Android tablets holds up or shatters to pieces? :o

So you care.

And, as an owner of an Android tablet and Android cellphone (And Apple computer), yes, I would single you out.

Not in the way you are implying. I don't see you singling out anyone else in a hostile tone making assumptions. It's not just this but other videos where they only test the iPad, iPhone, iWhatever and neglect top devices of other brands. Shouldn't consumers see comparisons of different brands to make educated purchasing decisions? Where is the Android tablet being thrown in red hot steamy magma or that thrilling drop from way up or the sweet titillating tension of an Android tablet being pounded by the wheel of an SUV? :p

Not in the way you are implying. I don't see you singling out anyone else in a hostile tone making assumptions. It's not just this but other videos where they only test the iPad, iPhone, iWhatever and neglect top devices of other brands. Shouldn't consumers see comparisons of different brands to make educated purchasing decisions? Where is the Android tablet being thrown in red hot steamy magma or that thrilling drop from way up or the sweet titillating tension of an Android tablet being pounded by the wheel of an SUV? :p

Tell me you're not into marketing, please.

Might be worth sending a few of these over here : http://www.bbc.co.uk...nology-16354093

Oh, that's taking things too far! :laugh:

Will they be making apps next?

Wann impress me? Build a suit out that stuff and drop a guy... ;)

...parachute kit? :p

According to my very rough calculations (unsure of the exact drag coefficient of an iPad) it looks like it's terminal velocity is about 30 miles per hour.

Not quite; terminal velocity is around 122 mph (54 m/s).

Not quite; terminal velocity is around 122 mph (54 m/s).

That's for a skydiver - using a human body shape, with typical human weight, with their arms spread out (maximum air resistance). And iPad 2 is much lighter than a person and has a much smaller surface area - so probably has a much lower terminal velocity.

  • Like 1

I wonder if half the arguments here about it being a iPad could of been stopped if they had said the word tablet? So they dropped a tablet from a height approaching space, post some decent video of it and still people aren't happy (sheessshhh)

The whole can't call an iPad an iPad but you have to call it a tablet thing has gone way to far IMO. The Gadget Show on the uk did just that. They were demonstrating a product clearly designed and marketed with the iPad in mind yet referred to the iPad as a tablet despite testing an iPad case with a bowling ball being dropped onto it.

So, let me get this straight, they dropped a steel bar from space, having no clue where it was going to fall, to demonstrate that they could protect an iPad? That doesn't seem completely reckless to anyone?

Well they appear to be in the middle of nowhere for starters, with probably miles all around them with nobody about.

I for one have no idea how long it took the baloon to reach that height. They obviously had tracking on it so if it started getting blown away miles and miles by the wind (what wind is there in the desert?!) they could have popped the baloon sooner to make sure it didn't land anywhere unsafe.

So to me, no it doesn't seem reckless

That's for a skydiver - using a human body shape, with typical human weight, with their arms spread out (maximum air resistance). And iPad 2 is much lighter than a person and has a much smaller surface area - so probably has a much lower terminal velocity.

Fair enough; but it ain't 30 mph!

Not in the way you are implying. I don't see you singling out anyone else in a hostile tone making assumptions. It's not just this but other videos where they only test the iPad, iPhone, iWhatever and neglect top devices of other brands. Shouldn't consumers see comparisons of different brands to make educated purchasing decisions? Where is the Android tablet being thrown in red hot steamy magma or that thrilling drop from way up or the sweet titillating tension of an Android tablet being pounded by the wheel of an SUV? :p

The iPad has the largest market share by far, so they can obviously make the most money if they make products for it and advertise. It's simple marketing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It won't perform hugely better than the 3080 unless you're VRAM limited in games. Have you tried putting new thermal pads on them 3080 and giving it a good clean to see if you can regain your temps and overclock?
    • Windows 95 offered the ability to add and edit the right click menus, on a per file type basis. This feature seems to be missing in the new file explorer. Are they bringing it back as a "new" feature?
    • It's nearly time to replace my aging Founders Edition 3080, it doesn't OC as nicely as it used to and it's running around 10c warmer than it did when I first bought it.  I don't have budget for much more than what I spent on the 3080 and locally, that means the best GPU I can manage is a 9070XT. On this basis I have a few questions: 1. At present I don't use ray tracing, if this was to change, would this GPU be an issue? 2. How does it compare on a performance basis? 3. Are the drivers worse or better than those for nVidia? 4. Linux support, is it there? 5. Anything else I should be aware of if I were to make this change? 6. Is it a good idea or shall I try and keep the 3080 a little longer.
    • What OS is that? It looks a bit like Mac OS but the command line suggests it isn't, either way I like it!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      73
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!