"Rocks Fell from Mars" - Confirmed by Scientists


Recommended Posts

WASHINGTON - Scientists are confirming that 15 pounds of rock collected recently in Morocco fell to Earth from Mars during a meteorite shower last July.

This is only the fifth time in history scientists have chemically confirmed Martian meteorites that people witnessed falling. The fireball was spotted in the sky six months ago, but the rocks weren't discovered on the ground in North Africa until the end of December.

This is an important and unique opportunity for scientists trying to learn about Mars' potential for life. So far, no NASA or Russian spacecraft has returned bits of Mars, so the only samples scientists can examine are those that come here in a meteorite shower.

Scientists and collectors are ecstatic, and already the rocks are fetching big bucks because they are among the rarest things on Earth -- rarer even than gold. The biggest rock weighs over 2 pounds.

A special committee Tuesday of meteorite experts, including some NASA scientists, confirmed test results that showed the rocks came from Mars, based on their age and chemical signature.

Astronomers think millions of years ago something big smashed into Mars and sent rocks hurtling through the solar system. After a long journey through space, one of those rocks plunged through Earth's atmosphere, breaking into smaller pieces.

Most other Martian meteorite samples sat around on Earth for millions of years -- or at the very least, decades -- before they were discovered, which makes them tainted with Earth materials and life. These new rocks, while still probably contaminated because they have been on Earth for months, are purer.

more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I could get my grubby paws on a few of those rocks! Cha-ching! :alien:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're scientists, not webmasters. The main NASS info office doesn't do these pages.

Well maybe they should. These web pages do not give the impression of an organisation at the forefront of science and technology, the opposite in fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, but then NASA PAO isn't that great either from the content side. They have fancy pages that are outdated, and a lot of up to date stuff of great public interest is never posted, and a lot of their tech updates, are not coordinated with the content. NASA TV is a joke except on launch days. One of their major PR failures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well maybe they should. These web pages do not give the impression of an organisation at the forefront of science and technology, the opposite in fact.

Ah, so to present yourself as an organisation at the forefront of science and technology, you need jquery, CSS, and DHTML? Gotcha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of how it looks, it's an awesome site! Loads of info that's easy to get to/not confusing, so it gets a (Y) from me. Thanks for posting that, DocM! That kind of stuff really interests me. :cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.