Superman: Man of Steel (2013)


Recommended Posts

The only real problem with Man of Steel is the editing. By that, I mean the "style" used to put it together. A lot of scenes feel like you're walking into the scene a couple of minutes late.

Imagine you walked out to get some popcorn and walked back in while a scene was taking place. It wouldn't take you long to catch up with what's going on, but you still feel like you missed the set-up to the scene.

I think they were trying to cut out most of the "obvious" background and get directly to the point. While I think it worked, I can understand why people would be put off by the style in this age of "filming for the lowest common denominator". People are used to being shown everything- the guy walks to the car, opens the door, and gets in... As opposed to just being shown in the car.

Just saw the film, wow loving it. Very dark, less comic feel to it. But i can agree to your first sentence that a few scenes was like you saw it late. Or just walked into. Other then that a top film, Hope it get's the monies worth that it deserves. 9/10

http://deadline.com/2013/06/man-of-steel-beginning-worldwide-release-record-opening-day-in-the-philippines/

SATURDAY, 5TH UPDATE: Finally, some official numbers. Warner Bros? and Legendary Pictures? Man Of Steel (4,207 theaters with 3D in 3,357 venues) grossed $44M in North America on Friday (including the $9M from midnights). ?A fantastic start to Father?s Day weekend,? gushed Warner Bros Pictures President, Domestic Distribution, Dan Fellman. It?s now the largest Friday June opening ever. ?Our CinemaScore of ?A-? with the youngest (under 18) and the oldest (over 50) age categories both rating the film an ?A? should certainly generate strong word of mouth as we continue our run in the heart of the lucrative summer play time.? The 3D screens generated 42% of Man Of Steel?s box office revenue and 32% of all admissions for 6.250M for Friday. The 331 IMAX theatres grossed $5.5M on Friday averaging $16,616 per location and ranking #5 of all time behind The Avengers? $5.9M. The Man Of Steel results helped total moviegoing this Friday increase +78% over last year?s box office. Unofficially, projections for the Superman reboot?s 3-day weekend are $105M-$115M with a 4-day cume of $115M-$125M including Thursday?s $12M worth of Wal-Mart sold tickets for the 7 PM show. Even with a longish running time of two hours and 23 minutes, the Chris Nolan-Zack Snyder-David S. Goyer-Henry Cavill PG-13 tentpole is packing a strong punch because of the 3D premium and immense wannasee sparked by masterful marketing. It took Nolan?s involvement to make Superman cool again (finally).

Internationally, Warner Bros says Man Of Steel is ranking #1 everywhere with a gross of $17.6M from 9,710 screens in the 24 overseas markets in release. The running cume from abroad is now $25.9M. Key markets that opened this weekend were the UK, Korea, and Mexico. The UK pulled in ?3.3M ($5.2M) from 574 situations, dominating the market with a 70% share and ranking as the biggest opening day in 2013 ? +11% bigger even than Iron Man 3. Mexico grossed an estimated Ps. 35.7M ($2.8M) from 2,600 screens, and, like the UK, garnered a 70% share of the market. Its Friday opening ranks as the 3rd biggest opening for a WB film. Korea continues to rank #1 with a 50% share of the Top 5 films nationwide and KRW 1.8M ($1.6M) from 990 screens, bringing the two-day tally to KRW 3.2M ($2.8M). Other notable cumes are The Philippines $2.9M (had biggest all-time industry opening day), Taiwan $1.5M (had biggest WB opening day ever), UAE $1.3M, Malaysia $1.3M.

>

great movie and cant wait for the next, specially given the hints at whats whos to come.

Spoiler

The Wayne Enterprises logo is on a satellite that Zod destroys.

Zack Snyder was asked if he would like to see Batman and Superman team-up in Man of Steel 2. Here?s what he had to say:

?I don?t know. Everything is interesting at this point. And don?t forget that Lex is out there, doing who knows what??

man-of-steel-box-office-02.jpg

Well guys I went to see it Friday night. All I have to say about this movie is this:

AWESOME

That dude nailed it as Superman. The visual effects were amazing. They really make you believe a man can fly. Outstanding film. Go check it out if you have a chance. Michael Shannon deserves an award for his role as General Zod. He was outstanding.

I really loved the film.

Huge hit at the BO for this film, that is for sure.

Can the sequel be here already?! :D We all know what it is going to be about :

A big Lex Corp truck was destroy near the end. There was no mention of Lex. None at all. Until that truck.

List of Easter Eggs in Man of Steel, some foreshadowing future films? Could well be....

WARNING - potential spoilers!!

http://comicbook.com/blog/2013/06/10/all-man-of-steel-easter-eggs-confirmed-so-far/

Simplified list - more analysis at link

LexCorp Tower (Lex Luthor)

>

Wayne Enterprises satellite (Bruce Wayne / Batman, and possibly a hint at Maxwell Lord (baddie), Checkmate, the sat being Brother MK 1, and the OMAC virus)

>

Blaze Comics sign (used by Booster Gold to self-promote)

>

Utopia Casino (Tony Gallo - finds Kryptonite & brings it to Metropolis)

>

Weisinger Elementary School (Clark's school)

>

Sullivan?s Truck & Tractor Repair (owned by Chloe Sullivan's family)

>

Ezra?s Mail Depot (owned by Smallville founder Ezra Small, ancestor of Lana Lang)

>

Toomey Waste Disposal (shout out to DC writer Bob Toomey)

Also -

A green flash during the battle with Zod - a hint at a Green Lantern noticing the battle, but which one? Hal Jordan, John Stewart or ??

>

The military gal who thinks Kal-El is "kinda hot"? Name: Carrie Farris, a mod of Carol Ferris, eventually aka Star Sapphire, the love interest of Hal Jordan / Green Lantern.

half the people i talk to say it was crap the others think it was one of the best movies all year. Either way i REALLY want to see this movie. Originally I was going to go see it today for Father's Day however, My wife got called into work to cover some shifts because people quit so she had to work from 4 this afternoon till 8 tomorrow morning.

'Man of Steel' sets box office record

 

After three decades, Warner Bros. has successfully resurrected its Superman franchise with Zack Snyder's darker, more violent take on the marquee superhero.

Man of Steel, directed by Snyder and produced by Christopher Nolan, debuted to $125.1 million at the Father's Day box office to score the top opening of all time for June. That figure includes $12 million grossed Thursday night from special Walmart screenings, putting the actual three-day figure at $113.1 million.

Either way, Man of Steel eclipsed previous June record-holder Toy Story 3, which debuted to $110.3 million in June 2010.

Man of Steel is a notable win for WB and Legendary Pictures, which co-financed the $225 million tentpole. In 2006, WB and Legendary's Superman Returns did okay business at the box office, but not enough to mark a new chapter for the franchise.

Man of Steel opens exactly 30 years after Superman III, the third entry in the wildly popular Christopher Reeve franchise. There was one more title in that series, Superman IV: The Quest for Peace, although it fell flat at the box office in summer 1987.

source

Saw it last night and really liked it. :-)

Henry cavill nailed it, he is perfect as the Superman and even as Clark Kent.

I enjoyed the build up and only part that bothered me was the extended action near the end. Few more buildings and they would've flattened the Metropolic :laugh:

Overall 9/10

Russell Crowe AI felt weird at times

I generally dislike the look of the modern superhero movies. It's very techy & "hollywood". The shots from this superman movie look really desaturated.

If I were writing a Batman or Superman movie I'd set it in the late 1930s, when the comics were first written.

 

And even though Nolan's Batman was the best, I still prefer the Animated Series to any of the movies. Serious is good, but there's such a thing as taking the material too seriously, imo.

Great movie. I really enjoyed the special effects and cinematography. I have a feeling it'll come close to Iron Man 3 in the box office. If you're a fan of Superman, then you should see this movie for what it tries to be. It's not the old Superman you're used to. This time around, he's darker and representative of what Superman would be like in our world today. If you see it with that in mind, then you'll most likely enjoy it.

 

It was nice seeing the Wayne Industries logo on the satellite that was destroyed during the fight between Superman and General Zod. The first half of the movie was superb and the way they showed the origin story (flashbacks) was great. It meant they could use more time for Superman and the rest of the movie. As for the second half, it was great but not as good as the first. It felt kinda rushed but I don't blame them. They needed to show a lot of action because of the nature of their Kryptonian powers. And they needed to conclude the story.

 

I'm really happy that they're going forward with a sequel. The fact that Superman killed General Zod sets the tone for the kind of character he should be. After all, this is a realistic Superman and not one that sits on a moral high horse 100% of the time. I hope we see Lex Luthor and a cameo appearance of a Justice League member.

I quite enjoyed it, but I was somewhat disappointed that it seemed a bit disjointed and jumped so from scene to scene so. In that regard I think I see what twotone was referring to, as Synder has done better character work, despite the good performances by Crowe et all.

The special effects were amazing, absolutely epic. Leona was a complete badass (love the Snyder 'shutter' work on her)

well superman + zod is more powerful then all the aliens and avengers combined. lol!

Only the Man of Steel can make the Avengers tiny.

I thought I was watching Star Wars, at first.

 

My mind kept wondering off.

 

Was like watching the first Christopher Reeve Superman movie.

 

The has-been actors didn't add to the appeal.

 

I suppose it was entertaining, and that's what people paid for.

A directors cut could go a long way to filling in those gaps in character development; still I enjoyed it and thought it was good. Great acting from Cavill in particular who definitely fit the role, Costner, Crowe, Shannon and A Adams were also excellent but Antje Traue was sublime as Faora, shame we didnt see more of her, just the actual script let the movie down for me. However the action is simply on another level to anything in previous CBM's and makes The Avengers characters look positively puny in comparison. This is the sort of action I expected from the Avengers but all they did was make a few holes in the road. MOS 2 and Justice League should be something special.

I don't know why I keep calling her Leona, Faora! damnit! :)

 

I think fixing the production/character issue is doable with a director's cut (seems to be a production issue, the teasers did a better job of selling certain points than the movie did - the footage was fine, the editing not so much.)  Plus its ripe territory for the sequal w/Lex etc, now that they've established why he's called Superman.

 

I just wonder how this one will translate when I see it on the small screen.  It was so visceral I can only thank IMAX for such a seat pounding experience.  You literally felt every blow.  (And the low note they were hitting during the gravity drill scene, zomgz whomp)

Yea, the plot holes were easily overlooked because the move rocked

so much. But that editing job... on a second viewing, the "thrown into a scene"

feeling was more pronounced. 

 

I think the overall effect gave the movie a "documentary" feeling, where it's like

multiple people narrating from different points in the same story.

Interesting point, I can see how that could be seen as a somewhat documentary style.

 

Plot quibbles for me regarding the Kryptonians:

1) Can anyone clarify how/when Kryptonian 'atmosphere' (whatever that is) can take their powers away? Is it no longer simply recent exposure to a yellow sun?

2) How it is it their suits 'protected' them from the painful effects of our sun/atmosphere...yet they still had some super powers while in them? Zod didn't get his heat vision till he took off the suit, right? Or, like flying, had he simply not learned to do it yet?

3) Does the blood they got from Cal carry a portion (or even complete record, hologram style) of the codex?  I still don't quite get what that was or meant.

Edited by cooky560
Fixed spoiler tag as per request
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!