Superman: Man of Steel (2013)


Recommended Posts

Finally got around to seeing this last night. 

 

I was a little unsure what to expect - the hype machine, and the trailers were making it out to be amazing but then a lot of distinctly luke-warm reviews came in and I started to think it was going to suck. I adjusted my expectations and went into the cinema with some apprehension.

 

In the end I didn't need to worry - it was a great movie. I will accept that there are problems with the film, with a number of plot holes and contrivances but clearly I was so immersed in the film I didn't even think about those until after the movie when they were pointed out to me by friends I'd seen the film with. 

 

I loved the way it looked. I loved the scope and scale of the film. The score was very good of course. Most of the cast turned in a pretty decent performance. I thought the action sequences were so fierce and unrelenting that they really made you feel like you were there - quite a few times I had a chuckle to myself as yet more destruction was happening as I was so impressed with how well done it all was. And I thought the quieter, more poignant moments (such as the parts with Clark as a kid) were really good.

 

Overall it's a must watch for me and will be picked up on blu-ray when it comes out! 9/10.  

I'm not much of a Superman fan to begin with, but my friends were going anyway and I thought that a reboot with a team such as they had might change my mind and renew my interest. It didn't. I found myself counting down the minutes until the break and I started nodding off in the second half. :(

I just came back from it, I say it was pretty good. Although the pacing was a bit off, and Lois Lane was just.. there. lol. I don't know, I just didn't see chemistry between Cavill and Adams. She was not bad to look at though lol. 

I just came back from it, I say it was pretty good. Although the pacing was a bit off, and Lois Lane was just.. there. lol. I don't know, I just didn't see chemistry between Cavill and Adams. She was not bad to look at though lol. 

Frankly, in a 'real life' situation, I'd think a Lois Lane would be scared to death of Superman's powers. :laugh:

Frankly, in a 'real life' situation, I'd think a Lois Lane would be scared to death of Superman's powers. :laugh:

 

I think she gave in a bit too easily, she had such a strong personality when she was revealed, and then suddenly, she trusts him. like.. wtf? 

Henry Cavill makes Christopher Reeves and Brandon Routh look like pu...ies. He nailed it as Superman. I really loved this guy. He looked awesome and he did the role very well. Michael Shannon deserves an award for his performance as General Zod. He was absolutely awesome as well.

 

Oh and this chic was hot too. What a sexy woman

 

414932.1.jpg

Excellent performances, beautiful visuals, strong story, crazy action, and outstanding soundtrack.

 

Like others mentioned my expectations were drastically lowered by the mixed reviews but it seemed to me any minor flaws were greatly exaggerated by some critics or even non-existent.  You could nitpick at certain aspects in the dialog and pacing but I really enjoyed the non-linear storytelling and flashbacks that some seemed to have a problem with.  My only criticism would be that shaky cam was a little much at times. Overall a great movie. 

I'm surprised you say that.  How could you see a movie this visceral anywhere else but IMAX 3D?  I don't know a single person that felt squeamish, include those that had @ Avatar.

I wanted to see it in IMAX but not IMAX 3D and apparently, movie theatres don't do regular IMAX anymore. I don't like 3D because I wear glasses and having to wear the 3D glasses on top hurts my nose. Also, everything is darker in 3D and that bothers me a lot. It makes it hard to notice details in dark scenes.

Sure you aren't comparing to Real3D?  IMAX is noticeably brighter (and uses bigger glasses - maybe you need a custom pair :)).  They ran both the standard IMAX and 3D near me.  The sound is the important part though, turn that **** up to 11.  Gotta feel those super-punches, Wham!  

So I guess I'm the only one(including my friends) who thought the movie was cr*p(watched it in 2D)? The actors did a good job, but it was too animated(3D effects don't look good in 2D :p )  and the storyline wasn't that great either. For gods sake, they used 30+ minutes to show every inch of Krypton, the planet you're never ever ever going to see again. I almost fell asleep waiting for the main plot to begin. :S

  • 3 weeks later...

Seen it 5 times now.

 

Love it!

 

They need another Man of Steel, then reboot Batman, bring in the rest of the JLA and do the Justice League film. It's no secret who he should fight in the JL film...Doomsday. Perfect villain and Kal will have some support. End it with the death of Superman and then in Man of Steel 3, have the reign of the supermen and his return. It doesn't need to be like the comics, but inspired by it for sure.

 

Can't think of a bigger threat in the comics for the JLA than Doomsday.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!