Recommended Posts

I have to agree with the op, if they're pushing the metro interface, they'd be better off fully embracing it with the classic environment, it'd gel a lot better.

Or separate it completely for the desktop, then they could go all-the-way on their tablet only version(s) ARM and other. But then they would have to come up with something that is much better than Windows 7 in some way. :/

I think the problem is Microsoft has taken the styling of the Metro concept and tried to apply it to Windows 7 quickly and cheaply.

I can't find the site at the moment, but there was an excellent article I read a few months ago, going over the full original Metro design concept - not just this tile rubbish that everyone has come to associate with the Metro name. The full concept was about task-specific UI design and layout, with fluid interaction (inspired by web design, and as seen on Windows Phone, Xbox, etc). Not just a graphic style as they seem to be trying to apply it to Windows 8. The ribbon is a good example of Microsoft's own confusion - it shouldn't be anywhere near Metro as they are competing concepts. I fear we are going to end up with (yet another) inconsistent mix of the last few operating systems while Microsoft tries to figure out just what they are doing.

EDIT: Found it. The concepts here are what I want from Metro. Not Windows 7 with a touch-screen start menu. If that means they have to ditch backwards compatibility and call it something other than Windows, so be it.

  • Like 2

I agree with the OP.

I've actually mentioned the same in a few comments on Win8 treads

they don't even need to do to much, just take a little chrome away, change the font and make the icons a bet more metro style

just so if feels like a smooth transition when you go from the beautiful start screen into the desktop.

Then again for all we know they are working on that and it will just be merged at the end or just before the RC.

Anyway I'm pretty excited for the CP, just to look at all the little improvements over the DP

I usually think dude is crazy but on this I think the dude has a point. It would be like... double the effort for Microsoft.

But look at how most folks react to the thought of ANY change in Windows - even a small one. A full-tilt change would be seen as heresy (in the religious sense).

I'm a guy that likes Immersive as a UI, and is using it in the WDP unchanged - and I'm on a traditional desktop. However, that is a far-from-majority view.

I think the problem is Microsoft has taken the styling of the Metro concept and tried to apply it to Windows 7 quickly and cheaply.

I can't find the site at the moment, but there was an excellent article I read a few months ago, going over the full original Metro design concept - not just this tile rubbish that everyone has come to associate with the Metro name. The full concept was about task-specific UI design and layout, with fluid interaction (inspired by web design, and as seen on Windows Phone, Xbox, etc). Not just a graphic style as they seem to be trying to apply it to Windows 8. The ribbon is a good example of Microsoft's own confusion - it shouldn't be anywhere near Metro as they are competing concepts. I fear we are going to end up with (yet another) inconsistent mix of the last few operating systems while Microsoft tries to figure out just what they are doing.

EDIT: Found it. The concepts here are what I want from Metro. Not Windows 7 with a touch-screen start menu. If that means they have to ditch backwards compatibility and call it something other than Windows, so be it.

And if Microsoft's developers did that, there would be a developer barbecue on the Redmond campus.

Developers are among the most vocal of the anti-Metro critics - and it's not because it's any harder to write applications to work in Metro.

However, all too many developers hate ANY change in how they do things - including writing applications.

So what happens if Windows 8 sale fails like Windows Vista? Are they going to still push Metro or completely scratch idea cause i know that Windows 8 sale is going to be terrible.

Here you are again....

Win8 will sell great, it's coming pre installed on every new pc sold from December on probably, so they will sell heaps

And hopefully people will like the tablets so it will sell on those as well

And great staying on topic for a change

So what happens if Windows 8 sale fails like Windows Vista? Are they going to still push Metro or completely scratch idea cause i know that Windows 8 sale is going to be terrible.

i don't think it will be as bad as Vista but it's clear it won't reach windows 7 sales....unless they make Metro optional for desktops which is very unlikely

I think metro on the desktop will happen more in Win9 actually. For now they can't change the desktop UI too much or all the old apps will really look out of place. Don't forget the users who need to get used to things as well. Heck, MS has always made big changes over time instead of in one go. If/when we see WinRT support the "desktop" then you'll know that the change is coming for sure.

Hell, once we get a true WinRT version of Office then we'll know.

i don't think it will be as bad as Vista but it's clear it won't reach windows 7 sales....unless they make Metro optional for desktops which is very unlikely

I don't think that will be the case at all. Any loss on the desktop side for Win8 will be offset and even gained on the mobile/tablet side of the market in the end. ARM and x86 tablet sales will be solid IMO thanks to the new UI only adding to sales even while business might not use it (though tablet sales for business should be good as well).

I think metro on the desktop will happen more in Win9 actually. For now they can't change the desktop UI too much or all the old apps will really look out of place. Don't forget the users who need to get used to things as well. Heck, MS has always made big changes over time instead of in one go. If/when we see WinRT support the "desktop" then you'll know that the change is coming for sure.

Hell, once we get a true WinRT version of Office then we'll know.

I don't think that will be the case at all. Any loss on the desktop side for Win8 will be offset and even gained on the mobile/tablet side of the market in the end. ARM and x86 tablet sales will be solid IMO thanks to the new UI only adding to sales even while business might not use it (though tablet sales for business should be good as well).

Why do you think that people will buy Windows 8 Tablet over iPad2 or Android which works well for them?

Here you are again....

Win8 will sell great, it's coming pre installed on every new pc sold from December on probably, so they will sell heaps

And hopefully people will like the tablets so it will sell on those as well

And great staying on topic for a change

That is very interesting thing you said. How many PCs actually Dell, HP and others sell nowdays? The numbers are rather shady. I see lot of more custom built PCs. Do you think that OEM will offer Windows 7 too like they did with Windows XP?

Windows 8 UI is rather radical change what people got used to. I always thought MS would take easy approach and that means, have only Ribbon interface as new change with Windows 8. In any case it looks like half work because with Metro UI elements so much inconsistency is created and duplication of lot of things. Eventually, MS will have to decide about whole Desktop future if they decide to stick with Metro which is more likely meaning Desktop and Metro cannot coexist in the current form. They are contradicting each other visually and at some other levels.

I am afraid that MS might take Apple approach somewhat by killing Desktop and locking user at Metro level who will be able to interact with folders and files only through appropriate application itself. Losing that freedom will make lot of people to look at alternative called Linux.

I agree that Windows 8 is not Metro enough. This is true of both the Windows 8 deskop, and the "Metro" start screen. Microsoft has lost the original vision and intent of metro. Metro was never about killing off gradients and shadows and making everything big, flat, blocky and "touch-first." It was never about tiles, and it was never about blocks of random color.

Windows Media Center, the Zune software, the Zune HD, and the future videos from Microsoft Research are the best examples of what metro can be. None of these look anything like Windows 8's "Metro-style" shell. Where these are beautiful, functional, and elegant, Windows 8 looks like programmer art. It's as if they said, "hey, WP7 is Metro, and it's touch, and it has tiles. That means tiles are Metro, so let's make everything in Windows 8 a tile and call it Metro!!!"

I will probably end up using Windows 8, and eventually learn to like (most of) it. It's just so far short of what it could (or really, should) have been...

  • Like 2

Why do you think that people will buy Windows 8 Tablet over iPad2 or Android which works well for them?

I wonder why people always claim only ipads and androids are legitimate options for consumers. And who says ipad and android users are the only target, there are millions of other people who have still not bought a tablet and could buy a Windows 8 tablet.

I am afraid that MS might take Apple approach somewhat by killing Desktop and locking user at Metro level who will be able to interact with folders and files only through appropriate application itself. Losing that freedom will make lot of people to look at alternative called Linux.

Wasnt aware that apple had killed their desktop and that Microsoft had stated they were doing the same. Either way, computing is evolving, the desktop will eventually be unnecessary but even then the notion that Microsoft will kill the desktop is unlikely and they will likely keep it around for legacy purposes.

We don't really know how will metro work with non touch screen but if it's anything like Zune it will be terrible. If you have let's say have 100 music album and you want to browse them in Zune it is terrible.

How? All your artists are listed down the side, all your albums right there in the middle. You can literally just start tpying to search, or even switch over to album view :p I have over 300 albums in Zune and browsing is a complete breeze. Not that it matters because Zune doesn't follow the Win8 user experience guidelines.

I wonder why people always claim only ipads and androids are legitimate options for consumers. And who says ipad and android users are the only target, there are millions of other people who have still not bought a tablet and could buy a Windows 8 tablet.

Wasnt aware that apple had killed their desktop and that Microsoft had stated they were doing the same. Either way, computing is evolving, the desktop will eventually be unnecessary but even then the notion that Microsoft will kill the desktop is unlikely and they will likely keep it around for legacy purposes.

I meant Apple didn't kill desktop but locked their users to do anything. Looks like MS is about to do the same by killing Desktop. I can bet you that in their stupid heads idea of killing Desktop is ON.

How? All your artists are listed down the side, all your albums right there in the middle. You can literally just start tpying to search, or even switch over to album view :p I have over 300 albums in Zune and browsing is a complete breeze. Not that it matters because Zune doesn't follow the Win8 user experience guidelines.

Yes, on left side is your selection and on right side marketplace but UI is so fugly and cluttered that is makes my eyes pop out. In order to use this interface i need to maximize it to my whole screen otherwise i am looking in similar unusable junk found in my Windows Phone.

OP's concepts look very bland and poor. They look old / MAC-ish and probably would be painful to use in the long run.

In the long run, getting rid of glass and having the classic desktop be more-so merged with METRO is a good idea (if it works ergonomically - Windows is not Ubuntu - Windows must make RATIONAL GUI choices which benefit people). Lets wait for Windows 9 for that.

Windows 8 signifies the transition of the GUI IMO.

If you get rid of the classic aero desktop, you will end up having alienated a bunch of users who are used to it. Besides the Classic Desktop in Windows 8 look more Windows 8-ish and generally BETTER.

I don't understand how a large corporation can get away with releasing an operating system with two conflicting interfaces for the desktop PC.

it is for backwards compatibility.

And so thatdweebs would stop screaming that they hate the new interface.

Yes, on left side is your selection and on right side marketplace but UI is so fugly and cluttered that is makes my eyes pop out. In order to use this interface i need to maximize it to my whole screen otherwise i am looking in similar unusable junk found in my Windows Phone.

You're doing it wrong...

Don't type anything in the search box. Just start typing when browsing your music and watch the magic happen. :p

its a middle ground between full metro and non metro to satisfy everyone taste i for one love it this way but i like the metro style more than the desktop style and to people just complain i suggest you use windows 8 consumer preview then judge it

Until someone can convince me there is something to be gained by going from 7 to 8 - its 7 FTW

Improved security, improved file transfer, better management of updates, will be supported for longer than 7, native USB 3 support, support for UEFI (Secure Boot), if you have a pendrive over 16GB you can carry your entire PC around with you and simply plug it into someone elses.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This AMD RX 9070 16GB GPU that performs close to Nvidia 5070 is under $600 by Sayan Sen With the memory shortage that's prevalent nowadays, discounts are super-hard to get. As such we post good deals whenever they pop up. Recently, we covered a few great discounts on SSDs wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup NVMe PCIe Gen4 drive for just $400 thanks to a special coupon. If you want a faster product but don't need all that capacity, you can also opt for Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB that is on sale for its lowest price in over three months. Let's say though that you are on the hunt for a 1440p gaming card. In that case AMD's RX 9070 non-XT can help, and with its 16GB VRAM, you can also run AI models locally without worrying about bottlenecking (check out our recent 9070 GRE reviews for gaming and productivity to get an idea). The PowerColor Reaper variant of the RX 9070 is currently on sale for just $580 which is a very good price in the current state of affairs (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Reaper cooler on this 9070 uses a triple‑fan design with ring‑blade fans, paired with premium dual ball bearings to extend lifespan and reduce friction. "Intelligent" fan control allows the fans to remain idle at lower temperatures, only spinning up when the GPU is under load. A nickel‑plated copper base makes direct contact with both the GPU and memory modules, helping to spread heat evenly. PowerColor also applies Honeywell PTM7950 phase‑change thermal interface material (TIM), which fills microscopic gaps between the die and heatsink for more efficient thermal transfer. The fan shroud is shorter in height as the firm has made it such that it can be used in certain SFF (small form factor) cases. The technical specifications of the Reaper RX 9070 are given in the table below: Specification Value Stream Processors 3584 Units Video Memory 16GB GDDR6 Memory Speed 20.0 Gbps Memory Interface 256-bit Engine Clock Game Clock: up to 2070 MHz Boost Clock: up to 2520 MHz Bus Standard PCI Express 5.0 x16 Display Connectors 1 x HDMI 2.1b, 3 x DisplayPort 2.1a Maximum Resolution DisplayPort: 7680 × 4320 HDMI: 7680 × 4320 Board Dimensions 289mm × 111mm × 41mm 304mm × 127mm × 42mm (with bracket) Slot 2 Minimum System Power Requirement 600W Power Connectors Two 8-pin PCI Express Get the PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 at the links below (you get only a 90-day warranty on Woot): PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $579.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $700) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $559.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!