Recommended Posts

So your argument is that, apple is going to claim they created the digital camera because they did, along with Kodak..... Umm ok...

LOL.. no.. Apple CLAIMED they did. There is no proof they did, actually quite the opposite. Since it has past 20+ years and Apple didn't have an issue with this and now they do is very telling that their involvement if there was any was most likely minimal.

  • Like 1

And again, no.. Kodak invented digital camera as we know it today and owns the patents. It's not one specific model they just happened to be working on with Apple. That's the difference.

Apple claims that it invented A digital camera along with Kodak and thus created a digital camera technology.

You don't seem to get the concept that no one company owns ALL of the patents that apply to digital cameras. Yes, Kodak owns a lot of them, but since Apple produced the QuickTake 100 (in cooperation with Kodak), it is quite likely that they do in fact own some patents related to it as well. Kodak started this by suing Apple over some patents that they claim Apple violated with the iPhone. Apple is suing Kodak over patents that they claim that Kodak violated.

Why is it always so hard for you to comprehend that Apple does actually own some valid patents, and is well within their rights to sue other companies when those are violated?

Reading comprehension.

This sentence means they CREATED the digital camera along with Kodak meaning simply that they claim they created a digital camera.

Creating a digital camera and inventing digital cameras are two entirely different things. Reading comprehension, indeed.

  • Like 2

Apple is not claiming they invented the digital camera.

Apple and Kodak collaborated on the first consumer digital camera. Apple did a whole bunch of lab work, and some of those ideas went into the camera. Kodak then quietly patented some of those ideas that Apple cooked up in their labs.

THAT is what this is about. Apple contributed ideas, and Kodak claimed them as their own. Kodak lauched a lawsuit against Apple last month, as a desperation move to find a new revenue stream (when you can't actually run a business, sue!), and Apple today countered and said to them "Hey, remember that time that you patented our ideas behind our back...?"

But hey, don't let the actual issue at hand get in the way of blind hatred.

snip

...and from another source to help the ones who are having trouble comprehending.

Apple previously claimed it is the true owner of the image- preview patent that is the subject of infringement claims lodged against Apple and Research in Motion Ltd. The Cupertino, California-based company contends that it developed a digital camera in the early 1990s that it shared with Kodak, and that Kodak then sought the patent on the technology. Kodak has denied the allegations.

http://www.bloomberg...fringement.html

Again, for like the millionth time, Apple isn't claiming that they, "invented digital camera."

para espanol presione 2

Do you have proof that it's true what they Apple is claiming?

The Apple QuickTake (codenamed Venus, Mars, Neptune) was one of the first consumer digital camera lines.[1] It was launched in 1994 by Apple Computer and was marketed for three years before being discontinued in 1997. Three models of the product were built including the 100 and 150, both built by Kodak

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_QuickTake

From that it sounds like Apple definitely did partner with Kodak on some early digital cameras.

I'm still not sure what you're claiming. Do you claim that Apple is being dishonest about their involvement in early digital cameras with Kodak? You seem outraged that Apple seems to be claiming that they were involved in the creation of digital cameras with Kodak in the 90s.

Do you have any sources that say that Apple wasn't really involved to the extent that they claim?

Apple is not claiming they invented the digital camera.

Apple and Kodak collaborated on the first consumer digital camera. Apple did a whole bunch of lab work, and some of those ideas went into the camera. Kodak then quietly patented some of those ideas that Apple cooked up in their labs.

THAT is what this is about. Apple contributed ideas, and Kodak claimed them as their own. Kodak lauched a lawsuit against Apple last month, as a desperation move to find a new revenue stream (when you can't actually run a business, sue!), and Apple today countered and said to them "Hey, remember that time that you patented our ideas behind our back...?"

But hey, don't let the actual issue at hand get in the way of blind hatred.

Steven Sasson as an engineer at Eastman Kodak invented and built the first digital camera using a charge-coupled device image sensor in 1975.[2][3] He received the National Medal in Technology and Innovation for this invention in 2009.[4]

The simple fact remains-- (since Apple has played this card before and fair is fair)

Kodak's patent was registered first....

(there is the case of the slide to unlock) that Apple claims-- yes there was prior products using it , but we (Apple) patented it first. (along with other cases like this)

Though, If I am not mistaken-- if Kodak wanted to raise a thorn... there is a patent on color correction for visual display systems (which could translate to meaning this in worst case).... think about it-- Your next Ipad may have to be a black and white one... if Kodak wanted to be... mischievous. And I don't mean the one about the Ipod either... I mean the original patent on color correction... the one that people assume means film.. it says ... Visual Display medium... ( medium= a monitor)

and then there is always the 1962 Patent that says -- The use of a computer to correct the color displayed on a visual device.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Good think I still have SDRAM and FP RAM sitting around.
    • Fitbit Charge 6 fitness tracker with Google apps is now at its lowest price with 47% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Fitbit Charge 6 fitness tracker at its all-time low price with a 47% discount. The device features an AMOLED touchscreen display protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3 that should offer improved scratch resistance and durability. The Charge 6 is equipped with a range of sensors including an optical heart rate sensor, a 3-axis accelerometer, built-in GPS with GLONASS support, red and infrared sensors for SpO2 monitoring, a skin temperature sensor, an ambient light sensor, a vibration motor, NFC, and multipurpose electrical sensors compatible with the ECG and EDA Scan apps. Heart rate is recorded every second during exercise tracking and every five seconds during normal daily use. The device requires the Google Health app for setup and synchronisation. Furthermore, Bluetooth provides wireless connectivity for syncing and communication with devices running Apple iOS 16.4 or later and Android 11.0 or later. The tracker stores up to 7 days of minute-by-minute activity data and retains daily activity totals for the previous 30 days. In terms of water resistance, the Fitbit Charge 6 has a 5 ATM rating that should make it suitable for swimming and water activities. The tracker operates in temperatures ranging from 14°F to 113°F and at altitudes of up to 28,000 feet. Moreover, the included Infinity band is made from a flexible silicone material and features a loop-and-peg fastening. The small band fits wrists measuring 5.1 to 6.7 inches, while the large band fits wrists measuring 6.7 to 8.3 inches. Both small and large bands are included in the box. When it comes to battery performance, the Fitbit Charge 6 should deliver up to 7 days of battery life under typical usage conditions. Features such as the Always-On Display, built-in GPS, and SpO2 monitoring increase power consumption and may require more frequent charging. The rechargeable lithium-polymer battery should take approximately two hours to charge from empty to full. Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker with Google Apps: $85.45 (Amazon US) - 47% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • google, meta, microsoft, true cancers of modern society
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 changelog: Fixed a bug where Overwrite behaved as Overwrite All during same-drive move operations. AdvancedInstaller fixed the installer’s security vulnerability: EXE Bootstrapper resolved the %appdata% location incorrectly for the System account. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 | 14.6 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!