Windows 8 Consumer Preview Discussion

By Roger H.
in The Fast Ring (Insider Previews)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

PGHammer

Posted
Posted

Am I wrong or Defrag disappeared?

Replaced by Disk Optimizer (from Diskeeper Corporation - the same folks that wrote Disk Defragmenter and the commercial Diskeeper and Undelete) I pointed out in the old WDP thread that Disk Optimizer not does everything Disk Defragmenter does, it includes an option that Diskeeper Pro Premier actually lacks - multi-pass defragmentation - from the GUI - sans rebooting. I've been a Diskeeper user since I moved from 98SE to Windows 2000 Professional - this will be the first Windows OS I've never run Diskeeper on since 1999.

Grand Master

NEVER85

Posted
Posted

I don't know if anybody here uses Speccy (small system info program by Piriform, company who develops CCleaner), but when I tried running that in the Consumer Preview, the entire OS completely froze up.

Neowinian

Jack@l

Posted
Posted

Totally useless for work, or for everyday use in desktop. I have no idea who want to force people to use their 24+ inch monitors like an 4" wp7 phone. Totally brainless, and failure, it will be bigger downfall than the first vista.

  • d4rk5ky, doodoo28s and M V E
  • Like 3
Neowinian

SreejithKM

Posted
Posted

Converting it into a DVD sounds like a plan.

Thats what I did.

Sounds gud to me too, but i was thinking of not installing it until this becomes stable. I could see VHD as a gud option to test it...suggestions????

Grand Master

Muhammad Farrukh

Posted
Posted

Well, I have never tried VHD, but from what I can tell, and I've been using it for about 8 hours, its pretty stable so far.

No crashes as of yet.

I will advice to not remove your current OS, and install Consumer Preview on another partition, if you have one

Grand Master

Mazhar

Posted
Posted

Overall, Windows 8 has been good so far. Microsoft has worked hard in getting Windows 8 to work in almost all the devices out there whether touch or traditional hardware. But there is one thing...

I know that Microsoft has a point-of-view of "No compromise" regarding Windows 8 and thus users still have the traditional desktop experience along with the new Tiles Start Screen. It is good, it is fine but the problem is that these two interfaces are actually dividing Windows 8, I mean we are not getting just ONE interface, but TWO. This is the "confusion" in windows 8 that we are getting TWO experiences, one modern (Metro interface) and one old style (Desktop) and because of this, now every product is divided into two. I mean will it not be hard for a company say Mozilla, to develop Firefox browser for the TWO interfaces?

I hope I have made my point, there is still time for Microsoft to think in which direction they are going. As a Windows user I love Windows 8 and will upgrade when it comes but I am also forced to use the two interfaces even though I only want one, the Metro one (or it may be vice versa). The number of apps that I use in my daily life will also make me in trouble as now I know these apps will also available in metro version in the future, so I am kind of divided as which app environment I want to work in!

Grand Master

Muhammad Farrukh

Posted
Posted

I know that Microsoft has a point-of-view of "No compromise" regarding Windows 8 and thus users still have the traditional desktop experience along with the new Tiles Start Screen. It is good, it is fine but the problem is that these two interfaces are actually dividing Windows 8, I mean we are not getting just ONE interface, but TWO. This is the "confusion" in windows 8 that we are getting TWO experiences, one modern (Metro interface) and one old style (Desktop) and because of this, now every product is divided into two. I mean will it not be hard for a company say Mozilla, to develop Firefox browser for the TWO interfaces?

Well put.

That is one of my main concerns at the moment. Some files can only be viewed on Metro Start Screen, so if I am using Legacy desktop now, and open a file, it takes me to Metro screen, and then I have to come back, which requires a few extra clicks. Not necessarily a deal breaker but still, something that should be looked into

Grand Master

neo1911

Posted
Posted

After using it for 3-4 hrs, I can say that I felt confused and clueless while using the OS. Simple daily tasks seem unnecessarily complicated. Two interfaces for accessing apps are really not needed. Some settings I found in metro control panel are missing in desktop control panel and vice versa. There is no uniformity.

Microsoft needs to work really really hard to unite these two interfaces and make them homogenous. Big task ahead.

With that being said, I am utterly disappointed with this stop-gap of an operating system (in its current form). The worst part is I cannot think of improvements either.

Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

I suppose you could set which apps open which files (like always), right now it defaults to metro apps because that's what they want people to get used to and also devs to code etc. If you want a desktop app to open a specific format just set it to if it doesn't take over when you install it etc.

I also don't get why it's so hard to just use the desktop like you always do? I pin apps I use everyday to the taskbar and only use the start menu very very little now. This hasn't changed, and anyways, hitting the winkey and just typing the name of an app still works the same. What MS might do, with enough pressure from business users etc, is make a mini start-screen mode. Where if set when you hit the winkey it only takes up the left side of the screen (like the new metro task switcher does) and not the whole screen. I figure that'd be enough to quiet the majority of people moaning about the start screen "taking up the whole screen"

Hell, maybe toss in a auto snap for metro apps as well so when they do open they open snapped to the right or left of the desktop as well.

Veteran

bogas04

Posted
Posted

Nice its fluid and snappy to me

But i have few problems :

  • i live in india , so i can't use audio metro app? / How to add music to this app , as in playlist or so?
  • same for weather app? it was working in WDP
  • how to remove hotmail from mail?

Grand Master

TheLegendOfMart

Posted
Posted

I am willing to at least give it a chance but I am currently watching the MWC12 W8 keynote and I'm 40 minutes in and all I've seen is metro this and metro that, how a mouse works instead of using touch and it doesn't look very intuitive, all they've done is grafted a touch experience onto a mouse control.

Windows desktops don't need fullscreen apps end of story, all they've shown might be impressive on a tablet but not a desktop PC.

Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

not just u :(

also .. same with the maps aap.

It's a good thing MS said that updates will be coming to apps AND the OS over time then. Also, about the UI, there's still things they haven't done, the way they worded it, so I expect more changes by the RC, maybe more on the desktop side now.

Grand Master

George P Global Moderator

Posted
  • Global Moderator
Posted

I am willing to at least give it a chance but I am currently watching the MWC12 W8 keynote and I'm 40 minutes in and all I've seen is metro this and metro that, how a mouse works instead of using touch and it doesn't look very intuitive, all they've done is grafted a touch experience onto a mouse control.

Windows desktops don't need fullscreen apps end of story, all they've shown might be impressive on a tablet but not a desktop PC.

Because desktop apps still look and work like they always have, why show desktop apps when they're not new? Besides, who says you have to use or even install metro apps? If you don't like them then don't use them. The start screen is just a way to start apps while allowing for more info (with tiles, for apps that use them) and better touch interaction. Still, the desktop is the desktop, anyone who's a power user should have a number of their daily apps pinned to the taskbar and use that as the area of the UI to start and switch between them (or alt+tab which still works the same last I checked).

I mean, come on, how is it not possible to use the desktop like you have been? I personally almost never have the need to use the start menu in Win7. The few times per week I do I just do winkey and type the name of the app and hit enter. It's all the same in Win8, so I don't see an issue. Once you also get all the new kb shortcuts down you don't even really need to use the mouse in the UI at all.

  • Muhammad Farrukh
  • Like 1
Neowinian

SreejithKM

Posted
Posted

Well, I have never tried VHD, but from what I can tell, and I've been using it for about 8 hours, its pretty stable so far.

No crashes as of yet.

I will advice to not remove your current OS, and install Consumer Preview on another partition, if you have one

Thanks to Julio Franco, I will surely give this a try

https://www.neowin.net/news/techspot-configuring-a-windows-8-virtual-machine :)

Experienced

9UnknownMen

Posted
Posted

I mean, come on, how is it not possible to use the desktop like you have been? I personally almost never have the need to use the start menu in Win7. The few times per week I do I just do winkey and type the name of the app and hit enter. It's all the same in Win8, so I don't see an issue. Once you also get all the new kb shortcuts down you don't even really need to use the mouse in the UI at all.

But why remove it? There are obviously so many that use the Start Orb extensively whether out of habit or perceived convenience. Just cause one can 'train' themselves not to over time isn't a reason enough. If it ain't broke dont Fix it.

The obvious answer I see is that they didnt want the meme that Windows 8 = Windows 7 with Metro slapped on top.Removing the start orb is a big UI counterpoint to that argument.

Btw, anyone here messed with Server 8 yet? Is it the same thing on that side as well?

Grand Master

TheLegendOfMart

Posted
Posted

Because desktop apps still look and work like they always have, why show desktop apps when they're not new? Besides, who says you have to use or even install metro apps? If you don't like them then don't use them. The start screen is just a way to start apps while allowing for more info (with tiles, for apps that use them) and better touch interaction. Still, the desktop is the desktop, anyone who's a power user should have a number of their daily apps pinned to the taskbar and use that as the area of the UI to start and switch between them (or alt+tab which still works the same last I checked).

I mean, come on, how is it not possible to use the desktop like you have been? I personally almost never have the need to use the start menu in Win7. The few times per week I do I just do winkey and type the name of the app and hit enter. It's all the same in Win8, so I don't see an issue. Once you also get all the new kb shortcuts down you don't even really need to use the mouse in the UI at all.

The desktop may not be new but they've done nothing to assure the power user that they haven't been forgotten other than "Oh wow look you can use a mouse to emulate the finger" nonsense.

Even if I remove all the Metro Apps from the Start Screen I'm still going to have to use Metro to navigate my way around the OS, I can't turn the Start Screen off, I can't disable the 4 corners of the screen Metro nonsense, I can't disable Metro snap because they consider the Desktop an App now and that says it all to me.

Unless they offer an Enterprise version that doesn't have any Metro whatsoever I don't see myself buying Windows 8.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Microsoft released new Defender update for Windows 11, 10, Server ISO installations

      By skinnyJM · Posted

      Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4

      By Copernic · Posted

      Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • AMD 9070XT

      By Steven P. · Posted

      NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • AMD 9070XT

      By cooky560 · Posted

      TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!