Recommended Posts

You know the menu that pops up when you go to the bottom left corner and right click? Or Win-X? That's going to be revamped and a Shut Down option will make it there too by RC. Right now it's just a crude context list.

Personally, I am fine with Win+I > Shut down.

Just as someone posted before, that if you move the cursor in a rhythmic manner around the bottom right corner, you can get charms bar, same goes for the multi-tasking tab on the upper right (Y)

yes true but realy sucks having 3 screens :-) you know how hard it is for me to get those things lol, wish i could place those things to top of screen and bottom of the screen :rolleyes:

Edit: Just found a way to get those windows on left way without actually going with mouse is just doing windows key+tab

Well, just got done playing with Windows 8 and Windows 8 Server for several hours, and this is my contribution to the subject.

Tip: Microsoft really screwed the pooch on this one from an administrative side. Avoid the OS like it was vista all over again.

Trick: I won't fall for it this time either Microsoft. You got me on Windows ME. You didn't get me on Vista, and you won't get me on this one either. I refuse to support any person that buys this hunk of junk unless it's to format the machine and go back to Windows 7 with the downgrade rights that will be built into the licensing for this.

You know the menu that pops up when you go to the bottom left corner and right click? Or Win-X? That's going to be revamped and a Shut Down option will make it there too by RC. Right now it's just a crude context list.

Personally, I am fine with Win+I > Shut down.

That sounds good to be but where did you hear that from? I think it's a good idea really, that right click menu is more for power users than anything else anyways and the only people tossing a fit over shutdown are the "power users" on here.

Well, just got done playing with Windows 8 and Windows 8 Server for several hours, and this is my contribution to the subject.

Tip: Microsoft really screwed the pooch on this one from an administrative side. Avoid the OS like it was vista all over again.

Trick: I won't fall for it this time either Microsoft. You got me on Windows ME. You didn't get me on Vista, and you won't get me on this one either. I refuse to support any person that buys this hunk of junk unless it's to format the machine and go back to Windows 7 with the downgrade rights that will be built into the licensing for this.

troll-6.jpg

They're not "workarounds", they're shortcuts. The other way of shutting down (using mouse gesture to bring up the charms bar) is perfectly fine, but there are keyboard shortcuts which power users can use to expedite the process.

Technically true. But I think the point of all these posts related to shutting down is that it has become cumbersome to do it in the way that the majority of users are used to. I still want to be able to click Start -> Shutdown - quick, 2-click access to a very commonly used command. I'm not resistant to change if it's an improvement; but clearly this is not.

In order to decrease the title bar height and adjust the fonts for Windows 8 Aero, export the following Registry key from a Windows 7 installation with the settings you want:

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Desktop\WindowMetrics

Then import the .reg file into Windows 8. Works like a charm. Caveat: Changing the theme will reset this tweak.

Not sure if this has been mentioned.

I removed a hard drive from one PC to another. Totally different hardware. Windows 8 Discovered this and cleverly rebuilt itself quickly and booted me into windows as if nothing had changed. Nice job MS !!!

I believe Microsoft has, in Win 8, a way of automatically rebuilding the registry and sytems files incase of..tampering, changes, viruses, crashes.

Technically true. But I think the point of all these posts related to shutting down is that it has become cumbersome to do it in the way that the majority of users are used to. I still want to be able to click Start -> Shutdown - quick, 2-click access to a very commonly used command. I'm not resistant to change if it's an improvement; but clearly this is not.

Move your mouse to the lower right corner of the screen, click Settings - Power - Shutdown. It's not that big of a deal. Most people I know don't even shut their PCs down anymore. They just let them sleep.

Move your mouse to the lower right corner of the screen, click Settings - Power - Shutdown. It's not that big of a deal. Most people I know don't even shut their PCs down anymore. They just let them sleep.

Funny how you edited that. Before the edit you said, "It's still two clicks. Move your..." Guess you tried it out for yourself and realized it's now more clicks than before. See what i mean?

I agree that it's not that big of a deal. But it is still a step backwards. And I'm not sure if "most people I know" is a statistically significant population sample. I'm simply pointing out why one common gripe about the CP is valid. It's not like I'm railing the entire build or calling it useless. I like it overall... but the change in how you have to shutdown / restart / switch users is bad.

So, like everyone else this thing is kicking my ass and taking a while to get my head around.

But once you get used to it, its actually quite pleasant.

When I use it, I get the feeling that this is the future. This is how the past was meant to be, but in the past it was done wrong, and now its hard to change old habits.

And this thing will hopefully mean every PC from now on will be touch, and I hope MS makes it mandatory for new PCs to have a touch screen for Windows 8 Certification.

And the iPad is 'todays' way of dealing with a touch screen. Windows 8 is 'the proper' way of dealing with a touch screen.

My new favourite thing to do is to have the Vimeo app running on the sideview with music videos, whilst reading people bitch about Windows 8.

It is so easy that I have trouble imagining this was no possible previously (with aero snap, yes, but that was a 50/50 split, this is much better)

Things I have found;

- that tip for doing the rhythmic action to get to metro apps + charms is invaluable - cheers for that

- when you keep you mouse over the bottom right corner, the aero peek desktop still works

- something I do all the time is drag files from windows explorer to desktop... in Win7 you could do this by holding the files over the show desktop button, then after desktop peak, dropping it on the desktop; this is still possible (much to my relief) by holding the files on the bottom right corner and waiting for desktop peek

- not sure if this has been mentioned (or maybe so obvious that it doesn't need mentioning) but the ESCAPE button is your friend. if you hit the win key, ESC takes you back wherever you were

- if you are in the search view, ESC once closes the side panel, so ESC twice to get back to where you were

- the closest thing to the old "All Programs' menu in Windows 8 is to go to the charms button and NOT click the windows button, but instead click the Search button... this is the equivalent of the All Apps view.

- if you are in a full screen metro app, and you move it to the side, the main area gets left blank. If you click on it, it takes you to the start screen, so you can pick a new app (or, like me just go directly into desktop)

I made a quick search and believe it was not mentioned:

how to name the groups on the metro start page:

1. move mouse down until the scroll bar shows

2. click on the "magnifier" on right of scroll bar

image_279.jpg

3. the start page zoom view appears, right click on the group, the rest is straight-forward.....

image_278.jpg

For those who want easier way to shutdown:

1) Create a shortcut (new->shortcut) on a classic desktop.

2) Direct it to shutdown.exe -s -t 0

3) Put a nice icon on it

4) Pin it on start screen

Here you go, easy shutdown button :)

Or just press the power-button on your computer case. It starts the shutdown process :)

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!