Recommended Posts

Thanks but I ended up with this. :(

Is there a way to get back? :wacko:

If You still like to get rid of watermark take look here: http://www.askvg.com/how-to-remove-watermark-build-number-info-from-desktop-in-windows-8-consumer-preview-public-beta/

I removed the watermark completely by THIS method. This method uses modded files, so the watermark not reappear when you change your wallpaper.

Note: When you complete the tutorial, change your wallpaper to the watermark disappear.

I removed the watermark completely by THIS method. This method uses modded files, so the watermark not reappear when you change your wallpaper.

Note: When you complete the tutorial, change your wallpaper to the watermark disappear.

The file needed to use this method has been taken down so it's unusable.

So MSE is now built into the OS in the form of Windows Defender. Is there a way to scan a file(s) for viruses or is it unnecessary as it will be picked up automatically by Windows Defender?

I think it scans files in real time as they're moved to or downloaded onto the FS. In fact I'm sure it scans when you download files.

So MSE is now built into the OS in the form of Windows Defender. Is there a way to scan a file(s) for viruses or is it unnecessary as it will be picked up automatically by Windows Defender?

It's probably unnecessary, but you can do a search/run of "defender" and initiate a scan manually still.

there's probably a registry tweak still to turn the context menu scan option back on

I remember I had to use that tweak for the first few beta builds of MSE 2.0 as it was accidentally disabled by default

I'd test it but I can't for the life of me remember where i got the registry file right now

When using the Metro style apps switcher (on the left edge) or the charms bar (on the right edge) with the mouse, instead of doing it in two discrete motions (move to top/bottom corner, then move down/up), try just swinging your mouse pointer around the corner in one fluid motion. With a bit of practice it becomes a lot faster and actually kinda fun and addictive (or maybe I'm a weirdo). I wish the animation for the charms bar appearing was a little faster though.

You should be able to click on the Charms bar while it's still animating in: does that work for you?

So MSE is now built into the OS in the form of Windows Defender. Is there a way to scan a file(s) for viruses or is it unnecessary as it will be picked up automatically by Windows Defender?

It is still incomplete and not fully functional as you are not supposed to use Windows 8 as your primary OS rather just for testing, hence no need to scan files.

Something that's annoying me. I have a group of ten folders pinned to the start screen. They are currently organised like layout 1 (below) but I would much rather they be laid out like option 2 or 3, is it possible?

Layout 1

X X X X

X X

X X

X X

Layout 2

X X X

X X X

X X

X X

Layout 3

X X X X

X X X X

X X

Guys, you can simply remove the watermark in 30 seconds, without any software. Why would you download additional software and mod the files ? Here we go: http://pricop.info/2012/03/remove-windows-8-consumer-preview-watermark/

Something that's annoying me. I have a group of ten folders pinned to the start screen. They are currently organised like layout 1 (below) but I would much rather they be laid out like option 2 or 3, is it possible?

Layout 1

X X X X

X X

X X

X X

Layout 2

X X X

X X X

X X

X X

Layout 3

X X X X

X X X X

X X

Unfortunately, I don't think that's possible. I have sent MS a feedback on the Layout 2 and 3. Layout 1 feels like reading an incomplete sentence.

Guys, you can simply remove the watermark in 30 seconds, without any software. Why would you download additional software and mod the files ? Here we go: http://pricop.info/2...view-watermark/

That method just hides it behind the taskbar and if you have full transparency enabled it interferes, albeit slightly, with the date and time.

Unfortunately, I don't think that's possible. I have sent MS a feedback on the Layout 2 and 3. Layout 1 feels like reading an incomplete sentence.

OK, thanks.

im not sure if this one already mentioned

you can Edit your power user task menu " The menu when you right on bottom left corner or win + x"

How to Edit your Power User task menu

http://www.winsupers...sks-menu-142525

hope it helped someone :)

im not sure if this one already mentioned you can Edit your power user task menu " The menu when you right on bottom left corner or win + x" How to Edit your Power User task menu http://www.winsupers...sks-menu-142525 hope it helped someone :)

Now that it's possible to edit that menu, who the hell needs a Start Menu anymore - just edit that with your most commonly accessed items and voila, the Power User Menu takes the place.

Now we just need someone to create a tool or utility that will make it easier - it wouldn't surprise me if Stardock gets to work on this and merges this type of edit functionality right into their Start8 button utility.

Seems like a win-win to me...

Now that it's possible to edit that menu, who the hell needs a Start Menu anymore - just edit that with your most commonly accessed items and voila, the Power User Menu takes the place.

Now we just need someone to create a tool or utility that will make it easier - it wouldn't surprise me if Stardock gets to work on this and merges this type of edit functionality right into their Start8 button utility.

Seems like a win-win to me...

So far you can't just drop any shortcut into one of the Group folders and have it work it seems. I dunno why, guess those might be specific links that the menu will work with while it skips anything else you drop in there. I'm sure once people find out how to make the right type of shortcuts needed then that'll be what people will start using if they really really need to. I bet the first thing you'll see is someone add Shutdown to it, probably a link to a simple shutdown.bat file, heh.

im not sure if this one already mentioned

you can Edit your power user task menu " The menu when you right on bottom left corner or win + x"

How to Edit your Power User task menu

http://www.winsupers...sks-menu-142525

hope it helped someone :)

I'm the one who emailed him this tip >> I'm Javier Arroyo :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      580
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!