Recommended Posts

Joshua Thompson loves the movies.

But he hates the prices theaters charge for concessions like pop and candy.

This week, the 20-something security technician from Livonia decided to do something about it: He filed a class action in Wayne County Circuit Court against his local AMC theater in hopes of forcing theaters statewide to dial down snack prices.

"He got tired of being taken advantage of," said Thompson's lawyer, Kerry Morgan of Wyandotte. "It's hard to justify prices that are three- and four-times higher than anywhere else."

American Multi Cinema, which operates the AMC theater in Livonia, wouldn't comment on the suit. A staffer at the National Association of Theatre Owners in Washington, D.C., angrily hung up the phone when asked about industry snack pricing practices.

Although consumer experts predicted that the case will be dismissed, it struck a chord Friday with area moviegoers, who said they're tired of being soaked on movie munchies.

"The prices are ridiculous," Rebecca Motley, 55, a self-employed Southfield physician, said while leaving the AMC Star Southfield 20.

Motley said she and her office manager spent $5 each for morning movie tickets and $11 each for soft drinks and popcorn.

"When I was a kid, $1 could get you into the movies and buy you a pop and popcorn. But not anymore," Motley said. "I don't know how kids can go on their own to a movie anymore."

Timothy Fells, 29, part owner of a Redford Township gym, agreed with Motley.

"Movie concession prices are extremely high, and that's why I don't stop at the snack bar very often," he said while leaving the AMC theater in Southfield.

Thompson didn't want to be interviewed because he doesn't want any notoriety, Morgan said. But Thompson said in his lawsuit that he used to take his own pop and candy to the AMC in Livonia until the theater posted a sign banning the practice.

On Dec. 26, he paid $8 for a Coke and a package of Goobers chocolate-covered peanuts at the Livonia theater -- nearly three times the $2.73 he paid for the same items at a nearby fast-food restaurant and drug store, the suit said.

The suit accused AMC theaters of violating the Michigan Consumer Protection Act by charging grossly excessive prices for snacks.

The suit seeks refunds for customers who were overcharged, a civil penalty against the theater chain and any other relief Judge Kathleen Macdonald might grant.

Two consumer lawyers predicted that Macdonald will dismiss the suit.

"It's a loser," said Gary Victor, an Eastern Michigan University business law professor. He said state Supreme Court decisions in 1999 and 2007 exempted most regulated businesses from the Michigan Consumer Protection Act.

Added Ian Lyngklip, a nationally known consumer lawyer in Southfield: "Movie theaters are regulated, so the lawsuit won't go anywhere"

Victor, an avid moviegoer, agreed that snack prices are excessive at theaters. That's why he shuns the concession counter unless he's with a date.

Griping about excessive prices at the theater concession is a time-honored tradition, says Paul Dergarabedian, an analyst for www.hollywood.com , a movie industry website.

"But like high airline prices, it's just one of those things that we've become accustomed to because we don't have any control over it," he added.

Although movie ticket sales are down -- 1.2 billion tickets were sold last year compared with 1.6 billion in 2002 -- he said a difficult economy mainly is to blame, not snack prices.

To cope with the issue, some consumers eat before or after they go to the movies, or resort to smuggling.

Fells said he sometimes smuggles Gummi Bears into the theater to save money.

Kristy Belanger, 20, a real estate secretary from Redford Township who showed up at the AMC in Livonia on Friday to see a movie with her boyfriend, concealed two bottles of Pepsi in her purse.

"I did it to save money, and I feel like I did," she said, adding that what she saved on Pepsi enabled her to buy a $4.74 serving of nachos to share with her beau.

source

I've said this for a long time. If you aren't allowed to bring anything in, and they have a captive audience, they simply should not be permitted to rape you on the cost of a box of skittles... It's outrageous. If they priced things more reasonably, I'd bet they'd sell much more and make up the difference anyway.

And it's interesting to note that he is comparing the cost to that of a drug store, which is generally high too...

Who buys candy at a theater anymore? I shamelessly bring whatever I want with me. **** em if they think they are going to rip me off like that.

Agreed.

Who buys candy at a theater anymore? I shamelessly bring whatever I want with me. **** em if they think they are going to rip me off like that.

I've done that a few times as well. :p Before you know it, they'll place a security guard at the entrance to inspect your belongings and confiscate any outside snacks and drinks, just like they do that the theme parks.

There's actually another funny thing about the article...

"But like high airline prices, it's just one of those things that we've become accustomed to because we don't have any control over it," he added.

High airline prices? Ticket prices have been dropping over the past few years, while their costs have been increasing massively (especially fuel). I can book a return ticket from Orlando to LAX for like $400. Think you can do that cheaper or faster by car?

And you technically do have control, don't buy anything from the concession booths. Buy it somewhere else, stick it in your bag and save yourself the money.

I've done that a few times as well. :p Before you know it, they'll place a security guard at the entrance to inspect your belongings and confiscate any outside snacks and drinks, just like they do that the theme parks.

get a jacket with lots of pockets. Me and my friend made a game out of it. Who can get more stuff in. She got a can of arizona tea in 0_0

Movie Theaters pretty much make all their revenue from concessions. They don't really get anything from the ticket price. If they lowered the price of food, ticket prices would have to go up to compensate. Right now you have the option of buying food, if you don't like it don't buy anything. If the ticket prices were raised, everyone would be forced to pay more.

Movie Theaters pretty much make all their revenue from concessions. They don't really get anything from the ticket price. If they lowered the price of food, ticket prices would have to go up to compensate. Right now you have the option of buying food, if you don't like it don't buy anything. If the ticket prices were raised, everyone would be forced to pay more.

I went to a theater in a smaller town... ticket prices where about $1 cheaper, and food and snacks where all WAY cheaper. a large drink was only $4, compared to $6 or $7 it is normally

The last time I went to the movies, I took my daughter, and bought tickets and concessions came out to be around $15-$20, the only reason I bought the popcorn was because I had a gift card for the theater, and wanted to use it. Otherwise I really do not recall the last time I went to the movies, not just because the tickets are high, but the transportation to and from adds up too!

I was on holiday in Brazil 2 years ago, and we went to one of the big movie theaters in a mall, and overthere it's absolutely normal to brig your own snacks.

You can walk in with a pizza or whatever you bought at McDonalds in the mall, anything was fine. Pretty sweet if you ask me

I have never been stopped for bringing in a burger and drink to my local theatre. It's not something I always do though but it beats paying extra for food. I wonder what the repercussions would be if they won their case. Either the companies will counter it somehow or other theatres may be targeted for aggressive concession pricing.

I can't stand the prices either but this is where they make their money - the theater that is. I don't go to the stands..cause of the high prices and its rare I see any that do unless they have a kid screaming for popcorn. My biggest complaint with theaters is they haven't banned cell phone use at all - PERIOD!!! I get tired of even seeing the things light up and IMO they should police the theaters while the movies are running to ensure no phone is even opened as the lights on these suckers can light up half the theater! I say they should ban them as soon as you hit the door from being on and even have jammers up... you can yell and scream "Ohh my rights of my phone is violated, what if I have an emergency!!" Well you know what...we got along just fine without them for a very long time when we went to the theaters and you can just as well tell someone which movie you are going to so they can call the theater if its really serious. Only thing is nothing is serious - OMG gotta tweat this or post on facebook where i'm at..blah blah.. BAN THEM!! I go to watch the movie not be blinded by a phone light or have someone annoying person talking a few rows from me.

I can't begin to count how many times I've complained to management after a movie is over each time it happens in hopes they do something about it. I've even gotten to the point to say something to the person taking the tickets before going in to watch over.

  • Like 1

*snipped*

And you technically do have control, don't buy anything from the concession booths. Buy it somewhere else, stick it in your bag and save yourself the money.

...And you'd be actively working against the theatres' viability.

I thought we've been over this... theatres' main source of revenue is from those very same concession foods. Those and advertisements shown prior to showtimes anyway. :pinch:

You see, I've previously worked for a local theatre in my area some several years ago, and I know for a fact that they make no where near the exploitative windfalls (most) filmgoers think they do. In fact, many smaller & more removed establishments have near-constant difficulty keeping the doors open.

This is (almost completely) due to how the movie studio-to-film theatre relationship works -- the production/distribution studio(s) of a certain film essentially lease the rights to show a film at a particular venue, including restrictive conditions stipulating everything from length of the "lease" (how long theatres can legally offer showings of a film), to visual marketing methods (posters, banners, video trailers, etc.,). And theatre franchises have to take this, or else they getz no moar filmz n da theatarz. :boo:

Only theatre I go to now is Alamo Drafthouse. Serves beer, wine, pizza, burgers, fried pickles, and a lot of other foods that they have chef's for... but the biggest plus is No Kids. Of course, doesn't help that a night out to there still cost around $60 bucks after food and tickets and drinks :p

I tend to believe that theatres are on the way out -- just too expensive.

That, and generally, they're a crappy movie experience. The seats aren't comfy, the audience are often annoying and loud, the food is often terrible AND expensive, the drink is so watered down it might as well just be water, and the price is ridiculous.

Watch it at home.... You can pause it for a pee, have decent food, no noisy morons, comfier seating and usually cheaper too.

...And you'd be actively working against the theatres' viability.

I thought we've been over this... theatres' main source of revenue is from those very same concession foods. Those and advertisements shown prior to showtimes anyway. :pinch:

You see, I've previously worked for a local theatre in my area some several years ago, and I know for a fact that they make no where near the exploitative windfalls (most) filmgoers think they do. In fact, many smaller & more removed establishments have near-constant difficulty keeping the doors open.

This is (almost completely) due to how the movie studio-to-film theatre relationship works -- the production/distribution studio(s) of a certain film essentially lease the rights to show a film at a particular venue, including restrictive conditions stipulating everything from length of the "lease" (how long theatres can legally offer showings of a film), to visual marketing methods (posters, banners, video trailers, etc.,). And theatre franchises have to take this, or else they getz no moar filmz n da theatarz. :boo:

And I'm supposed to care about this, why? It's not my concern if a whole bunch of theaters go out of business. Maybe Hollywood should stop vastly overcharging for their movies and stop being stuck in some last century distribution model.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
    • It's listed #399.99 on Amazon, per your link. It's not $299.99.
    • Wonder how much of this it related to them using something like Mythos. It seems everybody is releasing large numbers of updates in the last few weeks.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      535
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      263
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      59
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!