Why do people constantly complain about Metro when it IS easier to use?


Recommended Posts

Some people like to believe they are more elite than other users, and even refer to themselves as "power users." Some of these people don't like it when things are made simpler and easy to use. I'm not entirely sure why, but maybe it's because they feel they no longer have that level of "elitism."

Some people like to believe they are more elite than other users, and even refer to themselves as "power users." Some of these people don't like it when things are made simpler and easy to use. I'm not entirely sure why, but maybe it's because they feel they no longer have that level of "elitism."

I suppose you can look at it that way. I don't call myself a Power-User though I probably am. I've never taken it as that from anyone here. I've always felt they are indicating they take advantage of many features that common users may not even know exist. Not that many users change Start Menu settings to display top level folders as Menus instead of Links. I can guarantee anyone who thinks they can compute on a desktop in Metro-only and that is is more efficient than Windows 7 without Metro, more often than not would not be aware this setting exists.

I actually think anyone who could spend significant amounts of time being productive with Metro and full screen only apps does not need a PC and should stick with a tablet or smartphone. There are millions of people like that, just as Apple and Android whose tablets do quite well among this demographic.

I think people still haven't learned to take full advantage of search functionality - in most operating systems (OS X and Linux included). Real power users, of course, manage giant lists of shortcuts, and might organize them in folders. Only n00bs search for stuff, right?

Here's a question that I'm wondering and it's just to gauge the overall mindset in relation to Microsoft and their recent UI changes.

For the people that are now confortable using Metro, are you equally confortable using the ribbon as well?

Like I mentioned, I only want to gague the mindset since the ribbon had similar discussions when it was introduced.

I recall the first time I saw the ribbon. I think it was in the web version of word. I never used Office 2007. But, it threw me for a bit and I had to sift through it for a moment to get my bearings. But, now... it's just there. I don't mind it one way or the other. It works well, however. Once you actually understand why it's there, it is a bit faster than trying to remember where what is under which menu.

For the people that claim Windows 8 is easier to use, and especially the original poster who claims that it is "easier to use and understand than any previous Windows Interface" how would you actually explain the concept of settings to someone who's never used the system before. Just conceptually. As far as I can see, the user actually has to deal with four different categories of settings:

- Application specific settings for Desktop apps: Not entirely predictable how these can be accessed, but at least the same way as on W7 . So this shouldn't be entirely problematic for users of earlier versions of Windows

- Application specific settings for Metro apps, with the Desktop itself and the Start screen each counting as Metro applications: These are presented in a predictable way, yet the user needs to learn that a globally available "first-level" settings icon actually provides settings for the current app (which might be a problem on the Start screen especially, with the header only saying 'Start'), excluding apps on the Desktop, where instead the Desktop itself counts as an app.

- "More PC setting" (i.e. system-wide Metro settings): Can be reached using the same mechanism as Metro-app-specific settings

- Even more PC settings (i.e. 'Control Panel', which is also listed as an application specific setting for the Desktop, yet actually includes system-wide settings and not just settings for the desktop 'app'): It is not listed under the system-wide settings icon unless the Desktop is the currently active 'Metro app'.

I'd honestly appreciate it if someone gave a more concise yet comprehensive explanation of the different categories of settings in Windows 8. Or if someone could explain why this is altogether easier than Windows 7 (not to speak of OS X).

From a user's POV:

OK, so I want to change the default font size in Word. Oh look, I do it the exact same way I've been doing it for x years.

OK, so I want to change something about Windows 8 itself. I'm gonna launch the Settings app.

OK, I wanna change the settings in this Metro game, I'm gonna bring up the application-side-bar-thingy (Charms) and click "Settings"

Really, that's all most consumers ever need. They don't really need the full control panel, and the people that do can simply run -> "control"

my 2 cents

Here's a question that I'm wondering and it's just to gauge the overall mindset in relation to Microsoft and their recent UI changes.

For the people that are now confortable using Metro, are you equally confortable using the ribbon as well?

Like I mentioned, I only want to gague the mindset since the ribbon had similar discussions when it was introduced.

You said comfortable with Metro which I am (I just don't like it on the desktop). I was actually not a fan of the Ribbon but it is actually, IMO, more efficient in a lot of areas. As a simple menu, no, but as a functional menu, yes. Especially with formatting elements in Word and Excel. The ability to hover and preview is quite effective. Some advance formatting is much more discoverable.

The only two areas in which regular menus are clearly more efficient IMO, printing and file operations. The File tab of all ribbons has a lot of info, probably too much, slows down the basic function too much but not necessarily disruptively so.

Edit: There was also no major retraining issue believe it or not. MS went to great lengths to create online tutorials and make it easy to find commands they were used to and this was accessible by numerous means. This was quite an impressive transition for them. I actually think tutorials won't help the Hybrid/UI nor are they needed. What's needed is for Metro to not be on the corporate desktop. If there's already a GPO setting for that, there's half the battle.

You said comfortable with Metro which I am (I just don't like it on the desktop). I was actually not a fan of the Ribbon but it is actually, IMO, more efficient in a lot of areas. As a simple menu, no, but as a functional menu, yes. Especially with formatting elements in Word and Excel. The ability to hover and preview is quite effective. Some advance formatting is much more discoverable.

The only two areas in which regular menus are clearly more efficient IMO, printing and file operations. The File tab of all ribbons has a lot of info, probably too much, slows down the basic function too much but not necessarily disruptively so.

I used comfortable exactly for the reason you responsed. I know there are some that may dislike either or both the ribbon and Metro but they are now at a point where they can still perform most tasks hassle free. It's more to see whether users are adapting their usage behavior to the new UI.

Here's a question that I'm wondering and it's just to gauge the overall mindset in relation to Microsoft and their recent UI changes.

For the people that are now confortable using Metro, are you equally confortable using the ribbon as well?

Like I mentioned, I only want to gague the mindset since the ribbon had similar discussions when it was introduced.

I picked up the ribbon pretty quickly, and I prefer it to the older menus in the Office suite. I haven't used the ribbon in the new Explorer UI - mostly because the vast majority of my file operations are done with keyboard shortcuts or drag and drop actions.

I used comfortable exactly for the reason you responsed. I know there are some that may dislike either or both the ribbon and Metro but they are now at a point where they can still perform most tasks hassle free. It's more to see whether users are adapting their usage behavior to the new UI.

Have to give MS a big win on that. Not only do I, but many novices attempt much more advanced formatting, in Office, than any of us would have. For me, the discoverability of these features is way up. I don't have a lot of time (except multitasking with Neowin as of late) and the Ribbon save a whole lot of that. With the Ribbon Hover Preview, I rarely have to undo anything except grammatical stuff.

Because like most Microsoft products, we've spent the past couple years teaching people who are not geeks how to use a computer to perform their daily tasks, and now the way they interact with the computer is totally changing. The grandmas and parents of today don't know what "Jump lists" or "Metro" are, nor do they care. All they know is that the thing they spent so much time learning how to use is about to change, again.

That is why I am against drastic changes like this.

Yea its easier to use if you're 4

People don't want easy, they want productive

If you mean people in general you're wrong, people want to be able to use their computers easily. If you mean people who use computers regularly and know their way around them then you are right, they want productivity.

Because I can't go Start -> Shutdown.

WTF.

Use Windows Key + I then click shutdown perhaps or even move your mouse to the bottom right corner and drag up to get the charm bar and shutdown. It's different, not any harder or less efficient.

Because like most Microsoft products, we've spent the past couple years teaching people who are not geeks how to use a computer to perform their daily tasks, and now the way they interact with the computer is totally changing. The grandmas and parents of today don't know what "Jump lists" or "Metro" are, nor do they care. All they know is that the thing they spent so much time learning how to use is about to change, again.

That is why I am against drastic changes like this.

I'm not sure if you've worked much with Windows 8, but I haven't found much of anything that I couldn't grasp how to use instantly. I think almost anyone could use Windows 8.

Some people like to believe they are more elite than other users, and even refer to themselves as "power users." Some of these people don't like it when things are made simpler and easy to use. I'm not entirely sure why, but maybe it's because they feel they no longer have that level of "elitism."

Agreed.

If you mean people in general you're wrong, people want to be able to use their computers easily. If you mean people who use computers regularly and know their way around them then you are right, they want productivity.

People in general do want productivity, they wouldn't have bought a computer otherwise. This UI has never been on a PC before so yes, people in general want productivity not easy.

But picking at the word "easy" what it so difficult about Windows UI as it is today ?

Nothing.

While Windows 7 destroyed the Mac Guy vs. PC Guy marketing campaign, I can see Metro on the Desktop reviving it, with PC guy on the losing end this time.

  • Like 2

Some people like to believe they are more elite than other users, and even refer to themselves as "power users." Some of these people don't like it when things are made simpler and easy to use. I'm not entirely sure why, but maybe it's because they feel they no longer have that level of "elitism."

This is oh so precious coming from a tart who actually said that the affluent need "airplane mode' on their desktops in their private Gulfstreams. I still can't get enough of that.

Never mind....please continue. It gets quite entertaining hearing from vapid farts like you on these forums.

Yes, switching back and forth is annoying and inconsistent, but the problem is with the switching not with Metro. Metro by itself is easier to use than legacy by itself.

How do I open two apps at once in Metro and have them side by side? Or two instances of the same app?

Because like most Microsoft products, we've spent the past couple years teaching people who are not geeks how to use a computer to perform their daily tasks, and now the way they interact with the computer is totally changing. The grandmas and parents of today don't know what "Jump lists" or "Metro" are, nor do they care. All they know is that the thing they spent so much time learning how to use is about to change, again.

That is why I am against drastic changes like this.

And that's why this is going to be a flop in enterprise environment. No it team in the the world is gonna wanna teach hundreds/thousands of people a new ui/os. We are busy enough as is.

  • Like 2

How do I open two apps at once in Metro and have them side by side? Or two instances of the same app?

You cannot open two instances of the same app. However, to open two apps side by side, open one, then go to the preview pane on the left, find the apps you want, grab it and pull it out slightly to the right. Wait for the snap border to appear and drop it.

You cannot open two instances of the same app. However, to open two apps side by side, open one, then go to the preview pane on the left, find the apps you want, grab it and pull it out slightly to the right. Wait for the snap border to appear and drop it.

Thanks for that. I found one way to do it, but that will be useful. Sucks about not having two instances of the same app, though. I use that quite a bit.

You cannot open two instances of the same app. However, to open two apps side by side, open one, then go to the preview pane on the left, find the apps you want, grab it and pull it out slightly to the right. Wait for the snap border to appear and drop it.

That actually works pretty well although I think the previous app bar looks cheap. Charm bar nice. I hope RTM makes the previous app bar less sensitive and just look better somehow, the start thumbnail looks cheap and slapped on too.

If MS believes beginners only need 2 windows, fine, I'm not sure why they force a 2 app limit. Free those who need more.

This is oh so precious coming from a tart who actually said that the affluent need "airplane mode' on their desktops in their private Gulfstreams. I still can't get enough of that.

Never mind....please continue. It gets quite entertaining hearing from vapid farts like you on these forums.

I didn't say that about airplane mode. You should go back and actually read my posts, or learn to read (as it's clear you may not be able to), instead of making things up (hint: I haven't ever said they need it. Someone asked why Microsoft would include it for desktop users, and so I reasonably suggested a rare example of its use) and trying to insult me. Good one on the insult, though, you classy, classy man (Y)

not going to bash it, I just don't find it as comfortable with the mouse and keyboard... I feel it would be better with tech such as kinect and surface, just my opinion

My thoughts as well. It will be a great tablet OS.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      475
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      65
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      56
    5. 5
      monterxz
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!